Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qualitia Automation Studio vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qualitia Automation Studio is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 22.5%, up from 18.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user189918 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 4, 2015
Good Tool for Non Technical Users.
I think Qualitia's scriptless test automation tool is best used on teams that have Manual QA Testers who are looking to start to automate regression tests but are not very technical in nature. I think recognizing the overall strategy of implementing a test automation solution is extremely important when choosing a tool. If the tests are just going to be run from a local machine, then maybe a full solution like this is not what you need. But if you want to run tests on different servers and have them included in your build process, then a solution like Qualitia would help your team out. Just remember that Qualitia's technical support team is really something that will set their product apart from other similar solutions. They really do care about their customers success.
Antonio Oteri - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 3, 2024
Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation
From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The solution has plenty of features compared to other solutions."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Tosca can go through platforms to make end-to-end testing across CRM, billing, provisioning, order management flow, and databases to check for errors."
"It offers many features, such as risk-based testing and scenario creation using Kafka."
"The low code is the best feature."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the ease of use, you do not need to program if you do not want to."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
 

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"There should be ease of data manipulation within automation test cases."
"I would say the reporting part of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies."
"The solution is expensive."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"Product quality has declined as it grows, and its updates aren't without fault. The process of resolving problems has slowed, and as it expands into other areas like NeoLoad and other testing tools, the product becomes more complicated. It used to be a small firm with a clear goal, but as it grows, the quality has been affected."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."
"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."
"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."
"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."
"I am satisfied with the cost."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."
"​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."
"Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Transportation Company
9%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Qualitia Automation Studio?
The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualitia Automation Studio?
Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution.
What needs improvement with Qualitia Automation Studio?
The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack.
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.