Qualitia Automation Studio vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Qualitia Software and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qualitia Software is ranked #33, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Qualitia Software holds a 0.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to Tricentis’s 22.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qualitia Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Qualitia Automation Studio

Read 5 Qualitia Automation Studio reviews

203 Views
88 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 109 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,109 Views
10,050 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qualitia Automation Studio

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and Qualitia Automation Studio are products in the automation testing category. Tricentis Tosca holds an advantage with its extensive features and integration capabilities, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is noted for its simplicity and user-friendliness.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers scriptless automation, robust test management, and excellent integration with a wide range of technologies. It supports risk-based testing and integrates well with DevOps tools. Qualitia Automation Studio provides a visual approach to test case development, making it accessible to users without strong programming skills. It offers straightforward integration, although the range is less extensive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca features a powerful yet complex deployment model with strong customer support, including comprehensive training and documentation. Qualitia Automation Studio provides an easier deployment process beneficial for smaller teams, along with responsive customer service, though with fewer training resources.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca comes with a higher setup cost but offers a strong ROI for large enterprises due to its extensive features. Qualitia Automation Studio has a lower setup cost, appealing to smaller teams with its quicker returns, though the ROI scope might be narrower.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,004 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qualitia Automation Studio is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 22.9%, up from 19.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

it_user189918

QA Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Good Tool for Non Technical Users.

I think Qualitia's scriptless test automation tool is best used on teams that have Manual QA Testers who are looking to start to automate regression tests but are not very technical in nature. I think recognizing the overall strategy of implementing a test automation solution is extremely important when choosing a tool. If the tests are just going to be run from a local machine, then maybe a full solution like this is not what you need. But if you want to run tests on different servers and have them included in your build process, then a solution like Qualitia would help your team out. Just remember that Qualitia's technical support team is really something that will set their product apart from other similar solutions. They really do care about their customers success.

Read full review

Antonio Oteri

IT Telecom Quality Senior Tester at TIM

Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation

From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."

"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."

"Tosca can go through platforms to make end-to-end testing across CRM, billing, provisioning, order management flow, and databases to check for errors."

"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."

"Object Identification Wizard."

"The scalability is a valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca."

"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."

"Software testing tool that has multiple features. It's good to use for SAP testing, and it helps reduce test execution time."

"With one click, it will scan all the elements on the screen, so that the user can select the required elements for automation tests."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."

"I would like a better user interface."

"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."

"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."

"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."

"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"In terms of the licensing costs for Tricentis Tosca, we are spending more or less $70,000 per year. We have a very complex mechanism because there are some business users and some BI users, so the licensing structure is not simple, but support is included."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"Tricentis Tosca should improve its pricing. It is expensive."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Qualitia Automation Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More Qualitia Automation Studio Competitors

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

February 2025

Download Qualitia Automation Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

February 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Overview

Qualitia gives you simple step wise approach to quickly build your test automation and handle complexities easily with its unique scriptless approach. Qualitia gives you smart alerts and analysis to adopt changes effectively, making it agile friendly.

Qualitia Software

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2025

Free Report: Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualitia Automation Studio vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.