Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Rapid7 InsightVM vs UpGuard Vendor Risk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightVM
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (4th)
UpGuard Vendor Risk
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Rapid7 InsightVM is designed for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 18.8%, up 13.6% compared to last year.
UpGuard Vendor Risk, on the other hand, focuses on IT Vendor Risk Management, holds 3.5% mindshare, down 4.1% since last year.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

Shakeel Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 8, 2022
Brilliant audit report and scorecard but scans often get blocked by firewalls
Our company uses the Nexpose automation tools for validity, deactivation, assessment, and penetration testing. We can easily see if something has been exposed and manually focus on or follow main vulnerabilities.  We have 28 users and a JV license key for using the solution in our offline systems…
Use UpGuard Vendor Risk?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable because we pay according to asset usage. We can define our assets and sites according to our preference."
"I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution."
"The licensing is asset-based and very straightforward."
"InsightVM is an expensive product, especially compared to its competitors, at around a million NOK per year."
"In some cases, we procure the licenses. In some cases, the customers directly buy the license from Rapid7."
"Its pricing depends on the number of users per month."
"A full license for the solution is expensive because it is at the organizational level and not by individual users."
"This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

InsightVM, NeXpose
ScriptRock
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
ADP, E Trade, Cisco, Trek, GSA, Backcountry, Mimeo.com, Citrix, RackSpace, Modern Woodhouse, CFA Institute, Allianz
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.