Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Tenable Security Center vs UpGuard Vendor Risk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Tenable Security Center
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (1st)
UpGuard Vendor Risk
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Tenable Security Center is designed for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 31.4%, down 38.9% compared to last year.
UpGuard Vendor Risk, on the other hand, focuses on IT Vendor Risk Management, holds 3.5% mindshare, down 4.1% since last year.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 23, 2024
A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans
Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers. For example, suppose I manually conducted CIS hardening or compliance scoring in a separate data centre. These scores should also be reflected in the Tenable Security Center dashboard. Since the scanner is connected to the Tenable Security Center, the dashboard should display the direct scan results from the general security centre and the connected scanners. There could be unusual activities or attacks with the rising AI-related issues or threats that the Tenable Security Center could track in the future.
Use UpGuard Vendor Risk?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Tenable.sc is more expensive than its competitors."
"This solution's price is quite high."
"For 500 users the licensing fee is roughly $100,000."
"The pricing is more than Nexpose."
"Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."
"It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."
"The price of Tenable SC is expensive, we pay approximately €70,000 for the license annually. We have to pay for each IP test. The cost of other solutions is far less, such as Nessus Professional, which is €3,000 annually."
"I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, where ten is expensive. It is the most expensive tool my company is using."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
20%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Tenable SC?
The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?
For enterprise customers, it's acceptable. However, for smaller enterprises or businesses, the budget may be too restrictive to consider such extensive solutions. When proposing to small-scale indu...
What needs improvement with Tenable SC?
They are not currently handling call flows properly. Some call flows are being deleted from the registry but still show as active. Support is also lacking in onboarding properly in this area. This ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter
ScriptRock
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific
ADP, E Trade, Cisco, Trek, GSA, Backcountry, Mimeo.com, Citrix, RackSpace, Modern Woodhouse, CFA Institute, Allianz
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.