Red Hat Fuse vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus comparison

"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."

"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."

"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."

"The features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse are the OSB framework, containerization, and the integration of Apache technologies such as the NQ channel, CXF, etc. These are the features that are very prominent in the solution. Red Hat Fuse also offers flexibility, so it's another valuable characteristic of the solution."

"The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."

"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."

"Red Hat Fuse's best features are that it's very easy to set up and maintain."

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. We are an enterprise business."

"The stability of this solution is excellent."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."

"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."

"The solution is very stable."

"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."

"It might help if, in the documentation, there were a comments section or some kind of community input. I might read a page of documentation and not fully understand everything, or it might not quite answer the question I had. If there were a section associated with it where people could discuss the same topic, that might be helpful because somebody else might have already asked the question that I had."

"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."

"The monitoring experience should be better."

"As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced."

"The web tools need to be updated."

"Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."

"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."

"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."

"I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors."

"The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines are quite high even for high-priority incidents. Its price should be lower. Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"Issues with the support, the fees, and the termination of the professional services are reasons we are looking for other solutions."

"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."

"The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X."

"Our version does not have cloud capabilities."

"Red Hat Fuse is an expensive tool, though I cannot answer how much it costs as that's confidential."

"My company pays for the license of Red Hat Fuse yearly. At the end of the day, it's a low-cost solution, and its support licenses are still very decently priced versus bigger operators such as IBM, etc. Red Hat Fuse is much more affordable than other solutions. On a scale of one to five, with one being cheap and five being extremely expensive, I'm rating its pricing a one."

"We found other solutions were more costly."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"Pricing has been something that we have been working with Red Hat on, year over year. We have preferred pricing with the university because we are involved in education and research."

"This is an expensive product. It costs a lot and although it's worth the money, the explanations that we need to give to our top executives are highly complicated."

"We are paying around $24 million across five years."

"Our license for Red Hat Fuse is around $27,000 per year, which is very expensive."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."