Red Hat Fuse vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus comparison

"Red Hat Fuse's best features are that it's very easy to set up and maintain."

"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."

"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."

"The solution has more tooling and options."

"The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable."

"What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive."

"We use it because it is easy to integrate with any other application...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution nine out of ten."

"The stability has been good."

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."

"The GUI and IDE features of this solution are easy to work with and to develop. We find application management easy using this solution. It is a stable product"

"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."

"The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."

"The technology is really easy to learn."

"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."

"It's very stable and reliable."

"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."

"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."

"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."

"Currently, the main point of concern for us is how flexible it is to cater to different requirements. It should be more flexible."

"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."

"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower."

"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."

"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."

"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."

"Issues with the support, the fees, and the termination of the professional services are reasons we are looking for other solutions."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."

"We'd like to see improvements in product support."

"Our version does not have cloud capabilities."

"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."

"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."

"This is an expensive product. It costs a lot and although it's worth the money, the explanations that we need to give to our top executives are highly complicated."

"The solution doesn't have independent licensing."

"Red Hat Fuse is an expensive tool, though I cannot answer how much it costs as that's confidential."

"Pricing has been something that we have been working with Red Hat on, year over year. We have preferred pricing with the university because we are involved in education and research."

"We are paying around $24 million across five years."

"After doing some Googling and comparisons, the main standouts were MuleSoft and Red Hat Fuse. One of the big factors in our decision to go with Fuse was the licensing cost. It was cheaper to go with Fuse."

"We use the standard license, but you need the container platform in order to run it."

"We found other solutions were more costly."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."