Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RSA Adaptive Authentication vs RSA Authentication Manager comparison

RSA Adaptive Authentication and RSA Authentication Manager are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked #26, while RSA Authentication Manager is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.5. RSA Adaptive Authentication holds a 0.7% mindshare in AS, compared to RSA Authentication Manager’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of RSA Adaptive Authentication users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of RSA Authentication Manager users who would recommend it.
RSA Adaptive Authentication
Read 6 RSA Adaptive Authentication reviews
  • 254 Views
  • 216 Comparison Views
71% willing to recommend
RSA Authentication Manager
Read 12 RSA Authentication Manager reviews
  • 960 Views
  • 907 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

RSA Authentication Manager and RSA Adaptive Authentication compete in identity and access management. RSA Adaptive Authentication leads in advanced features, while RSA Authentication Manager excels in support and pricing.

What features are offered by RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

RSA Authentication Manager is recognized for its robust multi-factor authentication, centralized user management, and cost-effectiveness. RSA Adaptive Authentication offers advanced risk-based authentication, machine learning algorithms, and adaptive intelligence, providing dynamic protection.

What areas of improvement can be found in RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

RSA Authentication Manager could improve its integration with modern cloud services, offer more intuitive configuration options, and enhance documentation. RSA Adaptive Authentication would benefit from a simplified setup process, reduced complexity in configuration, and more extensive documentation.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

RSA Authentication Manager has a straightforward deployment process with mixed support reviews. RSA Adaptive Authentication has a steeper learning curve but is noted for comprehensive customer support. Deployment ease favors RSA Authentication Manager, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication excels in customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to RSA Adaptive Authentication?

RSA Authentication Manager is cost-effective with a straightforward pricing model, offering good ROI. RSA Adaptive Authentication, while more expensive, justifies the cost with advanced features, leading to a potentially higher ROI for organizations requiring adaptive security measures.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. RSA Authentication Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. RSA Authentication Manager
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

RSA Adaptive Authentication
Ranking in Authentication Systems
26th
Average Rating
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RSA Authentication Manager
Ranking in Authentication Systems
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of RSA Adaptive Authentication is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Authentication Manager is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

AR
It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs
RSA Adaptive Authentication is one of the most used tools for stopping fraud in the world. The tool is very good variable to take into account when deciding what product to choose. I think RSA is best options in this field since the tool is a really good piece of engineering.
Read full review
Akinwale Sekiteri - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly effective and versatile solution that excels in terms of security, integration, scalability, and customer support
I highly recommend it because when you compare RSA with other products, it has consistently stood out. In the past, one area where people encountered challenges was in terms of price flexibility, but it significantly improved. You can now negotiate, discuss terms, and work with it to achieve a pricing arrangement that suits your needs, and if they recognize you as a loyal customer, they are more than willing to accommodate your requirements and reach mutually agreeable terms. Overall, I would rate it around nine out of ten when considering factors like durability, data performance, scalability, integration, and security, and excels in these areas.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"The single sign-on feature is the most important."
"RSA Authentication Manager is the best available solution."
"The most valuable feature is the provision part. The mapping and the logging is also very good. In addition, the troubleshooting, from a console point of view, is easy for administration and on the provisioning and logging part."
"I have found RSA Authentication Manager to be scalable."
"Easy setup, deployment, and integration in different infrastructures, including virtual ones."
"It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-maintained product with reliable performance."
"It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"It is a good solution for token identification."
More RSA Authentication Manager pros
 

Cons

"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"It has taken years to implement."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"RSA Authentication Manager is perfect. We do not see current missing products or enhancements yet emphasize the importance of a continuous development roadmap."
"We found technical support was not very responsive to our requests for assistance."
"We have encountered issue when trying to expand this particular solution for a large set of users across the country."
"We are not planning on using the solution in the future."
"There is room for improvement in the RSA support."
"The product's capabilities to protect cloud environments need improvement."
"Enhancing the user interface and expanding their marketing efforts in regions like Nigeria and West Africa could be beneficial."
"Perhaps parts of the the user interface should become more intuitive."
More RSA Authentication Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
"You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
"Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
"The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
"The solution is costly."
"The pricing is a little bit complicated because sometimes resellers are able to make prices that are too low. Our price, with a discount, is typically not as high as some of our competitors."
"As a new customer, the minimum cost would be four dollars, but you have room for negotiation, potentially bringing it down to as low as three dollars."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
52%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Insurance Company
3%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RSA Authentication Manager?
It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with RSA Authentication Manager?
RSA Authentication Manager is perfect. We do not see current missing products or enhancements yet emphasize the importance of a continuous development roadmap.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for RSA Authentication Manager?
We use RSA Authentication Manager for web applications and internal applications. We have a number of applications connected to it, serving over thirty thousand clients. It is integrated into every...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
ThreatMetrix vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 43% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Adaptive Authentication
Compared 32% of the time
More RSA Adaptive Authentication Competitors
Cisco Duo vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Cisco Duo vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 30% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 19% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 11% of the time
Thales Authenticators vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Thales Authenticators vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 8% of the time
Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA Authentication Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiToken vs RSA Authentication Manager
Compared 5% of the time
More RSA Authentication Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
January 2025
RSA Adaptive Authentication reportDownload RSA Adaptive Authentication product report
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
January 2025
RSA Authentication Manager reportDownload RSA Authentication Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
ACE/Server
 

Learn More

RSA
RSA
 

Overview

RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
RSA Authentication Manager is the platform behind RSA SecurID that allows for centralized management of the RSA SecurID environment including authentication methods, users, applications, and agents across multiple physical sites. It verifies authentication requests and centrally administers authentication policies for organizations' end users.
 

Sample Customers

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Tiera, Fred Loya, BRE Leasing, ADP, BlueFort Security, New Hanover County
Buyer's Guide
RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. RSA Authentication Manager
January 2025
Free Report: RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. RSA Authentication Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. RSA Authentication Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our RSA Adaptive Authentication vs. RSA Authentication Manager report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.