Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024
RSA Authentication Manager and Microsoft Entra ID are both prominent in the authentication management domain. Users generally prefer the scalability and advanced integrations of Microsoft Entra ID, though RSA Authentication Manager is praised for its robust security features.
What features are offered by RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?
RSA Authentication Manager offers comprehensive security features, detailed reporting capabilities, and strong authentication methods. Microsoft Entra ID provides seamless integration with Microsoft tools, a cloud-based infrastructure, and scalability suited for large enterprises.
What areas of improvement can be found in RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?
RSA Authentication Manager could benefit from better user management, more intuitive controls, and a more modern interface. Microsoft Entra ID users suggest improvements in the initial setup process, more extensive documentation, and enhanced user support during deployment.
How is the ease of deployment and customer service of RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?
RSA Authentication Manager has a straightforward deployment process but can be complex to maintain. Its customer service is positively rated. Microsoft Entra ID’s cloud-centric deployment model simplifies the setup for modern environments, although customer service experiences are variable among users.
What setup costs and ROI can be seen with RSA Authentication Manager in comparison to Microsoft Entra ID?
RSA Authentication Manager users find its high upfront setup costs justified by strong security and long-term ROI. Microsoft Entra ID’s subscription model is cost-effective for organizations using Microsoft services and provides quick ROI through its integrations.
To learn more, read our detailed
Microsoft Entra ID vs. RSA Authentication Manager Report (Updated: October 2024).
