Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Master Data Governance vs Stibo STEP MDM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Master Data Governance
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (1st)
Stibo STEP MDM
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. SAP Master Data Governance is designed for Master Data Management (MDM) Software and holds a mindshare of 22.2%, down 23.0% compared to last year.
Stibo STEP MDM, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions, holds 13.3% mindshare, up 10.6% since last year.
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions
 

Featured Reviews

Abhijit Misra - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates with other third-party solutions, but Bill of materials (BOM) creation needs to be enhanced
We are trying to get the cloud solution of SAP Master Data Governance for multiple clients, which requires more improvement. Bill of materials (BOM) creation in manufacturing needs to be enhanced in SAP Master Data Governance. Clients have also suggested improvements in managing a hierarchy and ensuring that you maintain and work on the hierarchy side.
RahulSoni - PeerSpot reviewer
Modular design, product-based MDM and easy to setup
Stibo is a great product if you want to utilize it in product-based MDM. Customer-base, they are still growing, but product-base is fine because every single time you have to create hierarchies in the product and not care about all the other stuff. But the major thing is the hierarchy, at which particular type that product is and what that product does, how it looks, what is the catalog, what are the relationships with other stuff. So, from that note, Stibo is great. Around 20 to 25 people were there when I was on a particular project. I knew around 20 to 25 people who knew Stibo MDM and were part of it.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution."
"SAP is a closed tool. Integrating with it requires a lot of effort and money. It is also very expensive and not flexible."
"The most valuable thing is what it does: data management."
"SAP Master Data Governance integrates well."
"This is an all-around good product."
"The ability to identify and manage duplicate data is valuable. The solution automatically checks for duplication possibilities based on criteria like name matching."
"We've found the solution to be quite flexible."
"We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems."
"Data profiling allows us to recognize values from our upstream applications. It helps us place limits on the creation of new data domains to organize the ecosystem. The golden record, crucial for downstream applications, ensures data integrity and consistency."
"It's very user friendly, and we can do everything in one place."
"The match engine is very good and the BPM solution is very good as well."
"It's powerful and it's stable."
"The second feature I love is its modular design, where you can create a certain number of entities and create hierarchical entities."
 

Cons

"The solution lacks some flexibility."
"The implementation could be easier."
"Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it."
"Bill of materials (BOM) creation in manufacturing needs to be enhanced in SAP Master Data Governance."
"The user experience can be improved."
"The technical support should be improved."
"The documentation provided for the MDG extensions by Utopia could be improved."
"The platform's pricing needs improvement."
"The customer service and support were a little adamant about giving workarounds rather than accepting that something was not working correctly."
"There is scope for improvement with regard to the UI."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The search feature for searching internal records could be improved."
"The analytics module can be improved. It is a self-service solution for creating new reports and submitting visions to bring more data to the CEO table."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive solution."
"The cost of the product is not ideal."
"The product is too expensive."
"SAP Master Data Governance is an expensive product."
"The cloud solution is subscription-based, it is paid monthly or quarterly. If the solution is on-premises, it is a one-time fee. As far as I am aware there are no additional costs."
"We have an enterprise license. The whole SAP landscape pricing model is based on the number of users, and the number of transactions. The price could be better, there is always room for improvement in the price."
"SAP Master Data Governance is a licensed product. While there might be no upfront cost for the MDG component itself, you still need to pay for user authorizations."
"The licensing cost is reasonable."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Retailer
11%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Master Data Governance?
We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems.
What needs improvement with SAP Master Data Governance?
We are trying to get the cloud solution of SAP Master Data Governance for multiple clients, which requires more improvement. Bill of materials (BOM) creation in manufacturing needs to be enhanced i...
What needs improvement with Stibo STEP MDM?
Stibo needs to make it way much more efficient in the integration of the data. When you insert data, if you're not utilizing StepXML, the data load will take a lot of time. They can utilize direct ...
What is your primary use case for Stibo STEP MDM?
Our use case is based on the master data profile for customers and certain regulatory instances specific to Brazil. We used Stibo STEP MDM to create and manage the records for these datasets.
 

Also Known As

SAP MDG
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Convergent IS, CHIO Aachen, Dell, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), City of Boston, Mozzart, Mitsui Knowledge Industry (MKI), AOK Bundesverband, eBay
Sears Canada, Best Buy, Oriental Trading
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Master Data Governance vs. Stibo STEP MDM and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.