SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect comparison

SAP and Sparx Systems are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Sparx Systems is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. SAP holds a 8.4% mindshare in BPD, compared to Sparx Systems’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Sparx Systems users who would recommend it.

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 62 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

10,990 Views
4,726 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Read 99 Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect reviews

7,841 Views
4,940 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competitors in the process and architecture management space. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect has an edge in cost-effectiveness and broad support for various frameworks, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is preferred for its features and integration capabilities.

Features: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect supports extensive modeling languages and frameworks like UML, Archimate, and TOGAF. It facilitates project documentation and architectural management, offers reverse engineering, and supports teamwork through a centralized RDBMS. SAP Signavio Process Manager emphasizes intuitive collaboration tools and accessible process modeling. It provides integration with various ecosystems, appealing to business stakeholders with user-friendly interfaces.

Room for Improvement: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect could become more user-friendly by enhancing its UI and collaboration features. Its steep learning curve is a challenge for some users. SAP Signavio Process Manager could benefit from better integration with other systems and advanced analytics, along with more flexible license models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is mainly an on-premises solution, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager offers both on-premises and robust cloud deployments. Sparx Systems provides satisfactory customer support, but technical assistance could improve. Signavio is noted for responsive service and strong cloud deployment options but could enhance detailed support.

Pricing and ROI: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is praised for its affordable licensing model, offering substantial ROI through comprehensive features at a low cost. SAP Signavio Process Manager is seen as more expensive, justified by its enhanced collaboration and industry-integrated features, bringing significant value and effective ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (6th)

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 8.4%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is 8.0%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	8.4%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect	8.0%
Other	83.6%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Eury Reyes P

Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reveals real bottlenecks, but pricing and usability need work still require improvement.

SAP Signavio Process Manager could be improved in several areas to make it more competitive and accessible. From my experience, the strongest opportunity lies in enhancing its process mining capabilities. While Signavio offers solid functionality, other tools like Celonis provide deeper insights and more seamless integrations, especially when working with large datasets or complex execution paths. Strengthening the integration layer and expanding native process mining features would significantly elevate the platform. Another area for improvement is pricing. The solution tends to be positioned at a premium level, which can limit adoption compared to other tools that offer similar or stronger capabilities at a more accessible cost. A more flexible or tiered pricing model would make the product more appealing to a broader range of organizations. Regarding usability, while the platform is powerful, it can feel advanced for users who do not have a process engineering background. Improving the user interface and offering more intuitive guidance for non-technical stakeholders would help increase engagement and ease of use across teams. In terms of support, the setup experience is manageable, especially with technical assistance, but there is room for SAP to provide more consistent and accessible support to ensure a smoother learning curve for new users. Overall, enhancements in process mining depth, integration capabilities, pricing flexibility, and user-friendliness would make SAP Signavio Process Manager a more compelling and widely adoptable solution.

Read full review

Milan Sterba

Senior Enterprise Architect at Deepview S.r.o.

Efficient documentation generation through organized model structure with a good price-performance ratio

Whenever I begin a new project with Sparx, I have to spend time training people on how to use it since it is not straightforward. Although it's a powerful product with plenty of features, it's not easy for even experienced users to find their way without guidance. This is not the most user-friendly solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."

"The Collaboration Hub is especially useful for collaborative tasks and ensuring transparency across teams."

"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."

"The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond."

"We can use workflow manager to create forms."

"The most valuable feature is the glossary. It is really nice because all of the information is centralized, and that is a big help to the company."

"The modeling tool of Signavio was particularly nice because it has suggestions of where the best areas of improvement are and analyzes your data to show you where the areas of change for improvement are."

"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

"Using Sparx Enterprise Architect allowed my customer to detail and make the company's IT strategy visible and accessible to all. The system provided clear roadmaps for IT development and helped to keep up-to-date documentation of systems and processes."

"The features I find most valuable is the ability to create a document and then put it into a OneCare artifact."

"We could capture the process models around 24 countries with all their local variations."

"The solution saved a lot of time, about 30%."

"Its traversability is most valuable. I can use ArchiMate, and I can create a UML model. ArchiMate is for logical enterprise architecture, UML is for software engineering, and BPMN is for business processes. I can build it to have multiple models, and they are also traversable, which is not something that every tool allows. If there is a huge organization, you can segment it and have separate models for business technology or internal resource management system. You don't need to keep them in one model, and you can decide to segregate them."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Scalable solution for modeling, project sharing, and collaboration. Support for it is good."

"The TOGAF ADM model is most valuable. It is also very cheap as compared to other options in the market."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pros

Cons

"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."

"I would like to see more predictive analytics. The tool already has all the process maps, but it could offer a more proactive improvement offering. For example, they could put a little bit more machine learning behind it."

"The tool's navigation could be improved."

"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."

"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."

"From what I have experienced when I worked with a process team, we would like to work with dummy process diagrams. Right now, I don't know if I would set up a process as a dummy, since it very often gets mixed up with diagrams in production. There are many process diagrams linked to the production environment. I would like to have some kind of sandbox to work with. That would be very good. I don't even know if they already have it, but I would certainly like that."

"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The licensing model could be better."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

"There used to be that feature in ArchiMate Modeling of Enterprise Architect called inherited relationships. Now it's gone."

"It would be great if we could decrease the use of different parts of the Toolbox."

"The database management area was not usable."

"I have found the solution is lacking options. The general usability needs improvement and more compliance to CML definitions."

"The presentation graphics need to be improved in future builds."

"This solution should have better ease of use for the uninitiated."

"The integration could be improved."

"It really did not work for logical modeling. The look is very old-fashioned. You can't make the diagrams easy on the eye, so we ended up drawing them again in Visio anyhow."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

"I found the pricing of the solution to be moderate compared to other choices."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"We are using the free trial version."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"We have an annual license, and it's very affordable."

"The license for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is paid yearly, but I don't handle that area. It's good for its price, so I'm rating it a five out of five, but I'm not using it much. I also don't have information regarding additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees."

"There is a license for this solution. When comparing this solution to others it is priced well."

"This product has a paid license, with a yearly subscription option."

"It is cheap."

"It's affordable. The only additional cost that we haven't yet figured out is the floating license. If you buy a floating license, you have to have a license management server, which comes at an additional cost that's not discussed. So, we haven't yet used the floating license. That’s because I haven't had a chance to figure that out."

"Licenses are pretty low cost compared to, for example, ARIS."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

The stability has been good and satisfactory. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

One of the reasons many public sector institutions in the Czech Republic use it is that it provides a very good price-performance ratio. While it might be cumbersome to learn, it still delivers exc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

See all answers

Comparisons

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 34% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Visual Paradigm vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 12% of the time

No Magic MagicDraw vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 8% of the time

Lucidchart vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 2% of the time

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

January 2026

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report

Download Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect product report

Also Known As

Signavio Process Editor

No data available

Overview

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is an enterprise solution that helps streamline, accelerate, and integrate software, system, and business development. With this intuitive modeling and design solution, enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, enable collaboration, support their teams and colleagues, and manage complex projects. Software architects, business analysts, project managers, developers, support staff, and testers can unite under a single repository. Through numerous view points and potential sub-systems, users are offered a unified view in a complex environment.

With Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, users are also offered a shared model option which can be accessed quickly and securely by in-office and remote team members through the Enterprise Architect’s Pro Cloud Server. Building a coherent, verifiable model can be done by connecting and integrating a variety of behavioral and structural information in visual form. As a result, Enterprise Architect offers high performance, flexibility, and the ability to model, manage, and trace every stage of the business development and modeling process.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Features

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect assists in creating a unified and accessible vision in business development by offering a flexible platform with a unique set of rich features. These features include:

Test and debug - Streamline software development and visualize software with the simulation process. Users can test and confirm correct behavior, set and oversee test points, and debug and examine software.

Track tasks - Track, prioritize, and assign individual and group tasks to assist in the model’s development. Users can visually monitor their progress through the Gantt chart.

Open standards - Users can visualize and analyze running software with integrated custom tools. They can also run advanced simulations, team-based repositories, testing tools, and version control. In addition, the solution supports enterprise architecture frameworks such as UPDM and TOGAF.

Simulation - Create and debug embedded solutions by simulating behaviors and state models. Users can specify events, triggers, constraints, and more. Users can also specify extensive and complex structural systems and create custom domain-specific solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect merges high-end tools, online availability, a dedication to open standards, and accessible pricing so enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, whether remote or in-office. Users particularly like the architectural frameworks and the scalability.

Marc L., a principal architecture enterprise solution adviser at Cronomagic Canada, notes, "The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks."

An enterprise architect at a manufacturing company writes, "Scalable solution for modeling, project sharing, and collaboration. Support for it is good."

Sparx Systems

Sample Customers

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

OmniLink

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

December 2025

Free Report: SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.