SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect comparison

SAP and Sparx Systems are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Sparx Systems is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. SAP holds a 8.2% mindshare in BPD, compared to Sparx Systems’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Sparx Systems users who would recommend it.

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 62 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

11,174 Views
4,693 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Read 99 Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect reviews

7,890 Views
4,971 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competitors in the process and architecture management space. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect has an edge in cost-effectiveness and broad support for various frameworks, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is preferred for its features and integration capabilities.

Features: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect supports extensive modeling languages and frameworks like UML, Archimate, and TOGAF. It facilitates project documentation and architectural management, offers reverse engineering, and supports teamwork through a centralized RDBMS. SAP Signavio Process Manager emphasizes intuitive collaboration tools and accessible process modeling. It provides integration with various ecosystems, appealing to business stakeholders with user-friendly interfaces.

Room for Improvement: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect could become more user-friendly by enhancing its UI and collaboration features. Its steep learning curve is a challenge for some users. SAP Signavio Process Manager could benefit from better integration with other systems and advanced analytics, along with more flexible license models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is mainly an on-premises solution, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager offers both on-premises and robust cloud deployments. Sparx Systems provides satisfactory customer support, but technical assistance could improve. Signavio is noted for responsive service and strong cloud deployment options but could enhance detailed support.

Pricing and ROI: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is praised for its affordable licensing model, offering substantial ROI through comprehensive features at a low cost. SAP Signavio Process Manager is seen as more expensive, justified by its enhanced collaboration and industry-integrated features, bringing significant value and effective ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,479 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (7th)

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 8.2%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is 7.4%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	8.2%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect	7.4%
Other	84.4%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Eury Reyes P

Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reveals real bottlenecks, but pricing and usability need work still require improvement.

SAP Signavio Process Manager could be improved in several areas to make it more competitive and accessible. From my experience, the strongest opportunity lies in enhancing its process mining capabilities. While Signavio offers solid functionality, other tools like Celonis provide deeper insights and more seamless integrations, especially when working with large datasets or complex execution paths. Strengthening the integration layer and expanding native process mining features would significantly elevate the platform. Another area for improvement is pricing. The solution tends to be positioned at a premium level, which can limit adoption compared to other tools that offer similar or stronger capabilities at a more accessible cost. A more flexible or tiered pricing model would make the product more appealing to a broader range of organizations. Regarding usability, while the platform is powerful, it can feel advanced for users who do not have a process engineering background. Improving the user interface and offering more intuitive guidance for non-technical stakeholders would help increase engagement and ease of use across teams. In terms of support, the setup experience is manageable, especially with technical assistance, but there is room for SAP to provide more consistent and accessible support to ensure a smoother learning curve for new users. Overall, enhancements in process mining depth, integration capabilities, pricing flexibility, and user-friendliness would make SAP Signavio Process Manager a more compelling and widely adoptable solution.

Read full review

Milan Sterba

Senior Enterprise Architect at Deepview S.r.o.

Efficient documentation generation through organized model structure with a good price-performance ratio

Whenever I begin a new project with Sparx, I have to spend time training people on how to use it since it is not straightforward. Although it's a powerful product with plenty of features, it's not easy for even experienced users to find their way without guidance. This is not the most user-friendly solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art."

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."

"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."

"The modeling tool of Signavio was particularly nice because it has suggestions of where the best areas of improvement are and analyzes your data to show you where the areas of change for improvement are."

"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."

"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."

"This is one of the best solutions and it is easy to implement."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

"It provides good utilization and it's a convenient tool for building exact architectural work."

"I have found the Meta Model tuning feature useful as it provides me with an overview of all my work needs."

"Artifact templates are most valuable."

"It's a stable and scalable solution. I like that it's similar to Rational Rose."

"Simplified our task at maintaining architecture information and traceability with requirements."

"It is a very rich tool in terms of the functionality, and the types of diagrams, that you can create in this tool."

"It is a handy tool for visual modeling that provides opportunities for analysis, design, and support of models using ArchiMate, UML."

"This is a useful tool for IT people who need to design their solution architecture."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pros

Cons

"The solution is complex."

"The user management functionality in Process Manager is not as user friendly as the one in the Collaboration Hub."

"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."

"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."

"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."

"The price can be made cheaper."

"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."

"If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

"This solution is quite complex to use. It would be nice if the learning curve wasn't so steep."

"The database management area was not usable."

"One room for improvement in Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is that it's not very friendly. Another room for improvement in the tool is that it doesn't enable you to import the metadata from a database very easily, so reverse engineering of a database was very difficult. Its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement."

"The Business Process Modeling or BPM feature can be improved to make it more interactive and user friendly because it is a tool for technical people. My current use is only for business process modeling notation and putting in the icons etc. You need to take them in as a class, which makes things very complex. Because of this complexity, it is not an easy-to-handle solution. Enterprise Architect is not very good for mockups. We cannot create user screens and other similar kinds of stuff, which is bad. For these things, we prefer to use Axure RP and other similar solutions. They should either remove this feature from this product or provide some kind of connectivity with Axure RP so that people can do better mockups of screens and import them. They need to augment and strengthen the BPM feature, which is the main feature. They need to put in some elements like artificial intelligence and augmented reality. They should look into such features because these things are coming up."

"I would like the system to more "intellectually" build a scheme, place icons, and connect lines on the schemes."

"The user interface is not so good. It's not easy for someone to use it at first. The product takes some getting used to."

"This solution has some limitations from a business perspective."

"From a practical point of view, we need speed and reliability for creating a model and doing some really meaningful tasks such as application landscape, refactoring, etc. These are two primary criteria. Sometimes, when you import something, it creates the object duplicates, or it allows you to do something that you're not supposed to do. For example, validation is missing. This could be frustrating because when you work at a high speed, you need to come back and start fixing things that the tool allowed you to go with, which is not quite good. So, there should probably be some internal mechanisms to advise you about what you're doing and what is probably not the best idea."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"The product is expensive."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

"The Corporate Edition, or one of the bundles, is the way to go."

"Licenses are pretty low cost compared to, for example, ARIS."

"The pricing for ultimate version is steeply high."

"There is a license for this solution. When comparing this solution to others it is priced well."

"The licensing is not as expensive as some of the other data modeling tools such as Erwin."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"We had a yearly license."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

The stability has been good and satisfactory. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

One of the reasons many public sector institutions in the Czech Republic use it is that it provides a very good price-performance ratio. While it might be cumbersome to learn, it still delivers exc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

See all answers

Comparisons

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 33% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Visual Paradigm vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 12% of the time

No Magic MagicDraw vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Lucidchart vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Visio vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 2% of the time

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

January 2026

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report

Download Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect product report

Also Known As

Signavio Process Editor

No data available

Overview

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is an enterprise solution that helps streamline, accelerate, and integrate software, system, and business development. With this intuitive modeling and design solution, enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, enable collaboration, support their teams and colleagues, and manage complex projects. Software architects, business analysts, project managers, developers, support staff, and testers can unite under a single repository. Through numerous view points and potential sub-systems, users are offered a unified view in a complex environment.

With Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, users are also offered a shared model option which can be accessed quickly and securely by in-office and remote team members through the Enterprise Architect’s Pro Cloud Server. Building a coherent, verifiable model can be done by connecting and integrating a variety of behavioral and structural information in visual form. As a result, Enterprise Architect offers high performance, flexibility, and the ability to model, manage, and trace every stage of the business development and modeling process.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Features

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect assists in creating a unified and accessible vision in business development by offering a flexible platform with a unique set of rich features. These features include:

Test and debug - Streamline software development and visualize software with the simulation process. Users can test and confirm correct behavior, set and oversee test points, and debug and examine software.

Track tasks - Track, prioritize, and assign individual and group tasks to assist in the model’s development. Users can visually monitor their progress through the Gantt chart.

Open standards - Users can visualize and analyze running software with integrated custom tools. They can also run advanced simulations, team-based repositories, testing tools, and version control. In addition, the solution supports enterprise architecture frameworks such as UPDM and TOGAF.

Simulation - Create and debug embedded solutions by simulating behaviors and state models. Users can specify events, triggers, constraints, and more. Users can also specify extensive and complex structural systems and create custom domain-specific solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect merges high-end tools, online availability, a dedication to open standards, and accessible pricing so enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, whether remote or in-office. Users particularly like the architectural frameworks and the scalability.

Marc L., a principal architecture enterprise solution adviser at Cronomagic Canada, notes, "The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks."

An enterprise architect at a manufacturing company writes, "Scalable solution for modeling, project sharing, and collaboration. Support for it is good."

Sparx Systems

Sample Customers

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

OmniLink

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

February 2026

Free Report: SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.