SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect comparison

SAP and Sparx Systems are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while Sparx Systems is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. SAP holds a 8.2% mindshare in BPD, compared to Sparx Systems’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Sparx Systems users who would recommend it.

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 62 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

11,174 Views
4,693 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Read 99 Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect reviews

7,890 Views
4,971 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager are competitors in the process and architecture management space. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect has an edge in cost-effectiveness and broad support for various frameworks, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is preferred for its features and integration capabilities.

Features: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect supports extensive modeling languages and frameworks like UML, Archimate, and TOGAF. It facilitates project documentation and architectural management, offers reverse engineering, and supports teamwork through a centralized RDBMS. SAP Signavio Process Manager emphasizes intuitive collaboration tools and accessible process modeling. It provides integration with various ecosystems, appealing to business stakeholders with user-friendly interfaces.

Room for Improvement: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect could become more user-friendly by enhancing its UI and collaboration features. Its steep learning curve is a challenge for some users. SAP Signavio Process Manager could benefit from better integration with other systems and advanced analytics, along with more flexible license models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is mainly an on-premises solution, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager offers both on-premises and robust cloud deployments. Sparx Systems provides satisfactory customer support, but technical assistance could improve. Signavio is noted for responsive service and strong cloud deployment options but could enhance detailed support.

Pricing and ROI: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is praised for its affordable licensing model, offering substantial ROI through comprehensive features at a low cost. SAP Signavio Process Manager is seen as more expensive, justified by its enhanced collaboration and industry-integrated features, bringing significant value and effective ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,961 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (7th)

Sparx Systems Enterprise Ar...

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 8.2%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is 7.4%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	8.2%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect	7.4%
Other	84.4%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Eury Reyes P

Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reveals real bottlenecks, but pricing and usability need work still require improvement.

SAP Signavio Process Manager could be improved in several areas to make it more competitive and accessible. From my experience, the strongest opportunity lies in enhancing its process mining capabilities. While Signavio offers solid functionality, other tools like Celonis provide deeper insights and more seamless integrations, especially when working with large datasets or complex execution paths. Strengthening the integration layer and expanding native process mining features would significantly elevate the platform. Another area for improvement is pricing. The solution tends to be positioned at a premium level, which can limit adoption compared to other tools that offer similar or stronger capabilities at a more accessible cost. A more flexible or tiered pricing model would make the product more appealing to a broader range of organizations. Regarding usability, while the platform is powerful, it can feel advanced for users who do not have a process engineering background. Improving the user interface and offering more intuitive guidance for non-technical stakeholders would help increase engagement and ease of use across teams. In terms of support, the setup experience is manageable, especially with technical assistance, but there is room for SAP to provide more consistent and accessible support to ensure a smoother learning curve for new users. Overall, enhancements in process mining depth, integration capabilities, pricing flexibility, and user-friendliness would make SAP Signavio Process Manager a more compelling and widely adoptable solution.

Read full review

Milan Sterba

Senior Enterprise Architect at Deepview S.r.o.

Efficient documentation generation through organized model structure with a good price-performance ratio

Whenever I begin a new project with Sparx, I have to spend time training people on how to use it since it is not straightforward. Although it's a powerful product with plenty of features, it's not easy for even experienced users to find their way without guidance. This is not the most user-friendly solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When comparing my experience with Celonis and Signavio, I can discern the distinctions between these two platforms. However, I'm unable to differentiate between ARAs and add-ons, as that falls outside my scope of familiarity. Regarding Celonis, it comes with its set of advantages and disadvantages. Notably, it boasts robust features like action flows, task mining, and seamless integration with AML programming. Conversely, Signavio lacks action flows and instead relies on action segments and tasks for interaction. This discrepancy is a significant factor setting Selenium and SecureView apart. In the context of Signavio, it offers a combination of BPMN and process discovery, a feature absent in Celonis. This tandem of BPMN and process insight contributes to Signavio’S potency. Meanwhile, Celonis primarily features the process miner tool, setting it apart from Signavio. These variations collectively outline the numerous differences existing between Celonis and Signavio."

"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."

"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."

"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."

"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."

"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."

"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

"The solution is easy to use, supports SysML and UML, and is able to connect to MATLAB. This is very important for us."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated data model, so if I change the name of an item, all models using that object are automatically updated."

"I like that there is support for software patterns."

"The company has become more efficient and reduced its budget."

"The TOGAF ADM model is most valuable. It is also very cheap as compared to other options in the market."

"The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks."

"The solution saved a lot of time, about 30%."

"The features I find most valuable is the ability to create a document and then put it into a OneCare artifact."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pros

Cons

"The tool's navigation could be improved."

"After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford."

"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."

"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."

"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."

"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

"They should make the Save button easier to find. A simplified user interface for a lighter user would probably be useful. I am not sure if such an interface is already there."

"No way to implement data integrity and referential integrity constraints."

"In general, we now have a problem with Sparx Enterprise Architect because many analysts think it's too complicated to use in a giant environment."

"I have found the solution is lacking options. The general usability needs improvement and more compliance to CML definitions."

"I struggled with most of the features for this tool, as did the rest of our architecture team."

"Even if there are web-based tools in the Enterprise Architecture tool ecosystem (like Prolaborate), the main modeling application is still a fat client application."

"The initial setup of the Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect It's very complicated. It's very difficult to start with the right templates because there are many possibilities. The deployment took approximately two days."

"In a future release, they should improve portfolio planning."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

"There is no license required for this solution."

"Its price is very good for the value that you get with it."

"I use my own license. So, I just bought the professional version, which costs $800 or something like that. In the company where I am working, we have floating licenses. They are probably more expensive. Its licensing is affordable, but we are talking about a large organization, and there could be modelers or viewers of the models. We don't know how much that would cost us."

"It is very economical and low cost. You have to pay for a one-time license, and it is active forever."

"We paid 1200 euros as a once-off cost. All add ons and integrations come at an additional cost."

"Pricing and licensing are suitable even for small companies."

"I think our license costs roughly $1,000 a year, but I could be wrong."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

The stability has been good and satisfactory. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

One of the reasons many public sector institutions in the Czech Republic use it is that it provides a very good price-performance ratio. While it might be cumbersome to learn, it still delivers exc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect?

See all answers

Comparisons

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 33% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Visual Paradigm vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 12% of the time

No Magic MagicDraw vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Visio vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Lucidchart vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Compared 2% of the time

More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

January 2026

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report

Download Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect product report

Also Known As

Signavio Process Editor

No data available

Overview

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is an enterprise solution that helps streamline, accelerate, and integrate software, system, and business development. With this intuitive modeling and design solution, enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, enable collaboration, support their teams and colleagues, and manage complex projects. Software architects, business analysts, project managers, developers, support staff, and testers can unite under a single repository. Through numerous view points and potential sub-systems, users are offered a unified view in a complex environment.

With Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, users are also offered a shared model option which can be accessed quickly and securely by in-office and remote team members through the Enterprise Architect’s Pro Cloud Server. Building a coherent, verifiable model can be done by connecting and integrating a variety of behavioral and structural information in visual form. As a result, Enterprise Architect offers high performance, flexibility, and the ability to model, manage, and trace every stage of the business development and modeling process.

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Features

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect assists in creating a unified and accessible vision in business development by offering a flexible platform with a unique set of rich features. These features include:

Test and debug - Streamline software development and visualize software with the simulation process. Users can test and confirm correct behavior, set and oversee test points, and debug and examine software.

Track tasks - Track, prioritize, and assign individual and group tasks to assist in the model’s development. Users can visually monitor their progress through the Gantt chart.

Open standards - Users can visualize and analyze running software with integrated custom tools. They can also run advanced simulations, team-based repositories, testing tools, and version control. In addition, the solution supports enterprise architecture frameworks such as UPDM and TOGAF.

Simulation - Create and debug embedded solutions by simulating behaviors and state models. Users can specify events, triggers, constraints, and more. Users can also specify extensive and complex structural systems and create custom domain-specific solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect merges high-end tools, online availability, a dedication to open standards, and accessible pricing so enterprises can stay in control of their workplaces, whether remote or in-office. Users particularly like the architectural frameworks and the scalability.

Marc L., a principal architecture enterprise solution adviser at Cronomagic Canada, notes, "The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks."

An enterprise architect at a manufacturing company writes, "Scalable solution for modeling, project sharing, and collaboration. Support for it is good."

Sparx Systems

Sample Customers

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

OmniLink

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

February 2026

Free Report: SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.