Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SCOM vs Savision Live Maps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Savision Live Maps
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (81st)
SCOM
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Savision Live Maps and SCOM aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Savision Live Maps is designed for Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability and holds a mindshare of 0.1%, down 0.1% compared to last year.
SCOM, on the other hand, focuses on Event Monitoring, holds 7.2% mindshare, down 10.3% since last year.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

MO
Jul 18, 2019
Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components
Savision helps to add the 'missing' layer in monitoring as well as consolidating various events and alerts sent. This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM. The dashboards and views available are easy to manage and share, and provide all of the…
MarcMermuys - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
Has efficient monitoring with robust integration capabilities
We use SCOM to configure different monitors using several management packs. It integrates systems like Active Directory and correlates them, and it is used for monitoring and managing systems SCOM allows integration of several systems, providing correlation between different systems such as…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM."
"They have great integration with the active directory."
"Being able to make and customize management packs and send out notifications is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring."
"It works better than other products I’ve used – namely SolarWinds, which is cumbersome and error prone for web app monitoring. SCOM is not."
"SCOM's most valuable features are the network path feature, reporting, and integration with business intelligence."
"The stability has been great."
"We have found the scalability capabilities to be okay."
 

Cons

"Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion."
"SCOM is not as straightforward in terms of user interface or general experience, which could be improved."
"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."
"Third-party tools have had to be created to make SCOM management pack creation more efficient and effective. However, this weighs down the application as it just adds a resource requirement, which is ballooning the size of the necessary storage and all that for essentially substandard components."
"The management of the servers could be better."
"Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial."
"There are some negative points about this product. Sometimes, the capabilities of the software don't appear, and you can't directly see the results. You have to wait for a long period to refresh the policy to push it to the software or other patches."
"The GI is difficult to work with and the reporting servers are also difficult."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it."
"SCOM's pricing is average."
"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."
"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."
"SCOM is very cheap because it's included in the license for the System Center suite, which is around $8,400 per CAL."
"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."
"The pricing is good, and it's part of their system center suite."
"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SCOM?
The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?
The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support.
What needs improvement with SCOM?
Might be the APM (Application Performance Monitoring) solutions, which it lacks compared to other tools. I don't know what other tools are in the market, so I don't know what SCOM lacks. I need to ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Live Maps
System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Municipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives
Dialog Telekom
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.