Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SECDO Platform vs Trellix Active Response comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #69, while Trellix is ranked #50 with an average rating of 8.0. Palo Alto Networks holds a 0.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 33% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
SECDO Platform
Read 3 SECDO Platform reviews
  • 369 Views
  • 72 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
Trellix Active Response
Read 4 Trellix Active Response reviews
  • 365 Views
  • 252 Comparison Views
33% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SECDO Platform and Trellix Active Response both compete in the cyber-security solutions category. Trellix Active Response appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, while SECDO Platform is more valued for its pricing and support.

Features: SECDO Platform is valued for its automated incident response, strong analytical capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Trellix Active Response stands out with its comprehensive detection, wide integration capabilities, and feature richness.

Room for Improvement: SECDO Platform needs enhancements in scalability, reporting functionalities, and configuration processes. Trellix Active Response requires simplification in its configuration process, more user-friendly customization options, and better customer support responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SECDO Platform is noted for its straightforward deployment, responsive customer service, and quick implementation. Trellix Active Response is easy to deploy but receives mixed reviews on customer support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: SECDO Platform is praised for its cost-effectiveness and quick return on investment. Trellix Active Response, despite being pricier, is seen as worth the investment due to its extensive features and superior return on investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Active Response Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Active Response
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,476 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.0
The SECDO Platform enhanced incident response, threat detection, and operational efficiency, providing significant cost savings and improved security posture.
Sentiment score
6.5
Trellix Active Response improved threat detection, reduced incident response times, increased efficiency, and enhanced productivity with an intuitive interface.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SECDO Platform report
While we haven't yet quantified the financial benefits, we recognize that there has been a return on investment, particularly with operational efficiencies provided by the alerts.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Active Response report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
SECDO Platform's customer service is responsive, knowledgeable, fast, effective, and appreciated for technical expertise and courteous support across various channels.
Sentiment score
8.5
Trellix Active Response's technical support is praised, though customer interactions have decreased and users see room for improvement.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
SECDO Platform scales efficiently, handling increased loads and varying data volumes, suitable for small businesses and large enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.2
Trellix Active Response is scalable, integrates easily, handles large data seamlessly, and maintains performance and security with minimal latency.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SECDO Platform report
The scalability of Active Response is satisfactory.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Active Response report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
SECDO Platform is reliable, integrates well, detects threats effectively, enhances efficiency, and maintains stability without frequent downtime.
Sentiment score
8.3
Trellix Active Response is praised for reliability, efficient data handling, quick threat detection, adaptability, and stability with minimal downtime.
 

Room For Improvement

SECDO Platform requires improved integration, simpler setup, seamless reporting, enhanced customer support, and better scalability for optimal user experience.
Trellix Active Response requires enhanced resource management, advanced features like AI, better support, and optimization for improved performance.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SECDO Platform report
We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems similarly to how it is deployed for normal endpoints.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Active Response report
 

Valuable Features

Users praise SECDO Platform for automated investigations, seamless integration, advanced forensics, and user-friendly design aiding efficient security event handling.
Trellix Active Response is praised for robust threat detection, real-time incident response, easy integration, and comprehensive reporting features.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SECDO Platform report
They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the endpoints, allowing us to deploy a response quickly.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Active Response report
 

Categories and Ranking

SECDO Platform
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
69th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (10th)
Trellix Active Response
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
50th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of SECDO Platform is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Active Response is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1643085 - PeerSpot reviewer
Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth
The initial setup can be complex. I would advise users to leverage all of the access with Palo Alto, in terms of setting up with the technical account management teams. They need to ensure that what they have in mind for the product is actually going to be what happens. I have not run into any problems with deploying the product. Any of their security products are well-documented, either with open source intelligence or the documentation from Palo Alto. We had a client with less than a thousand users that received a dedicated engineer and a technical account manager that was able to walk them through the first 90 days of ownership. The support is certainly there.
Read full review
ED
Operational efficiencies increase with immediate threat alerts for endpoints
We use Trellix Active Response primarily for our endpoints, including desktop computers. It monitors all the tools that our users use for their day-to-day work The alerts provided by Trellix Active Response are its most valuable feature. They notify us immediately of any vulnerabilities on the…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Government
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Active Response?
Based on our evaluations, Trellix Active Response's pricing was the most feasible from a cost perspective. I rate the pricing between a six and an eight. It is justified.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Active Response?
The only area for improvement is regarding operational technology devices, specifically the engineering automation systems. We would like Trellix to optimize the technology for these systems simila...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for McAfee Active Response?
We use Trellix Active Response primarily for our endpoints, including desktop computers. It monitors all the tools that our users use for their day-to-day work.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs SECDO Platform Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs SECDO Platform
Compared 58% of the time
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs SECDO Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs SECDO Platform
Compared 42% of the time
More SECDO Platform Competitors
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Active Response Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Active Response
Compared 59% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Active Response Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Active Response
Compared 41% of the time
More Trellix Active Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Incident Response
April 2025
SECDO Platform reportDownload SECDO Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
January 2025
Trellix Active Response reportDownload Trellix Active Response product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Active Response
 

Overview

SECDO enables security teams to identify and remediate incidents fast. Using thread-level endpoint monitoring and causality analytics, SECDO provides visibility into every endpoint along with the context necessary for understanding whether a suspicious activity is a genuine threat. Unique deception techniques force threats like ransomware out into the open early, and trigger automated containment and remediation.

SECDO provides the most intuitive investigation experience available so you can quickly unravel complex incidents across the organization.  You can investigate incidents detected by SECDO as well as alerts from the SIEM. SECDO visualizes the attack chain so you immediately understand the “who, what, where, when and how” behind the incident. Then, based on an analysis of exactly how endpoints were compromised, SECDO surgically remediates the incident with minimum user impact.

Palo Alto Networks

Continuous Visibility into Your Endpoints:
Capture and monitor events, files, host flows, process objects, context, and system state changes that may be indicators of attack or dormant attack components.

Identify and Remediate Breaches Faster:
Access tools you need to quickly correct security issues. Send intelligence to analytics, operations, and forensic teams.

Target Critical Threats:
Get preconfigured and customizable actions when triggered, so you can target and eliminate threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Valley National Bank, IDT Corporation
Liquor Control Board of Ontario
Buyer's Guide
SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Active Response
April 2025
Free Report: SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Active Response
Find out what your peers are saying about SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Active Response and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Active Response report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.