We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Identity and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."All the features within the XDR are valuable as a whole for our organization."
"The threat detection capability is the most valuable feature."
"The AI-based detection, scanning, prevention and mitigation features are the most valuable features."
"The protection provided by SentinelOne Singularity Identity is the most valuable feature."
"The XDR capabilities are very good."
"They have different levels of support. We have the highest level where they are constantly checking all the endpoints. If at any certain point, they identify that a computer has been triggered by a virus, a link, or something else, they would automatically tell us that within 15 seconds. If they notice something, they automatically send us an email saying that they noticed something in the computer, and they are going to block it."
"I like the detection and protection features. We don't need to do anything, and it will alert us when the mitigation is not successful. We only need to target those endpoints. Otherwise, we don't have to do anything about that."
"One of the top things we're interested in is cloud protection."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"The resolution turnaround from SentinelOne Singularity Identity's support should be improved."
"Sometimes I get kicked out of the console. I don't know why."
"The solution's query resolution time could be reduced further, and a faster resolution could be provided."
"Our company has different locations, such as Sunbury, Oklahoma, and Alabama. I have my devices by location, and I have not found a way to choose all the endpoints and then push the update automatically. I have been doing it one by one."
"The first-level support has room for improvement."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 14 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 26th in Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Cortex XSIAM, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach and Picus Security. See our SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs. XM Cyber report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.