ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs VMware Carbon Black App Control comparison

ThreatLocker and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Control category. ThreatLocker is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.2, while Broadcom is ranked #4. ThreatLocker holds a 20.2% mindshare in AC, compared to Broadcom’s 12.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of ThreatLocker users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Read 40 ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform reviews

3,528 Views
423 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

VMware Carbon Black App Con...

Read 8 VMware Carbon Black App Control reviews

703 Views
612 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

VMware Carbon Black App Con...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

VMware Carbon Black App Control and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are competing products in the endpoint security category. ThreatLocker appears to be the preferred choice due to its robust features and comprehensive security measures, outweighing VMware's pricing and support advantages.

Features: VMware Carbon Black App Control offers application whitelisting, lockdown capabilities, and open API integration, providing strong control over applications. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection includes a zero-trust model, application control, and elevation control, offering versatile options for security management, enhanced by ring-fencing and granular visibility.

Room for Improvement: VMware Carbon Black App Control could enhance granularity in threat visibility and improve integration speed with other security tools. Simplifying reporting and extending support for more platforms could also be beneficial. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection would benefit from simplifying its complex deployment process and reducing the learning curve. Additionally, its reporting tools and granular control settings could be expanded for better user-friendliness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Carbon Black App Control is known for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, suitable for businesses prioritizing ease of setup. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection, although offering more features, involves a more complex deployment, supported by dedicated customer service to address implementation challenges.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Carbon Black App Control is recognized for competitive pricing and strong ROI, especially for companies needing basic endpoint security. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection might involve higher initial costs but promises significant long-term benefits due to its advanced feature set and security model, making it a strategic investment for organizations aiming for comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...

Ranking in Application Control

1st

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (4th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (6th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), ZTNA (4th), Ransomware Protection (1st)

VMware Carbon Black App Con...

Ranking in Application Control

4th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 20.2%, up from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Carbon Black App Control is 12.3%, down from 26.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform	20.2%
VMware Carbon Black App Control	12.3%
Other	67.5%

Application Control

Featured Reviews

Charles Loveland

Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

World-class support and highly effective for application control and elevation

Their product is solid. I have a hard time complaining much about it because when we do find little things, they are usually interface-related or related to things that would be nice to have. Their idea portal, unlike so many other vendors we deal with, shows movement. At least four to eight features of ThreatLocker exist because I made a request in the last five years, and it became a feature of the actual product. When it comes to improvements, we moved the product as customers, and we got to move the product by making suggestions. They seem to be very reactive to it, so there is not a whole lot that they actively need to change right now. It is one of those situations where when we run into something that would be nice to have, it happens. They make it work.

Read full review

Abul Atti M Salem

Cybersecurity Consultant at KAFD DMC

We can isolate problem machines and limit their access

We use App Control to scan the network for virtual machines that have unauthorized applications. We can isolate the problem VMs and control application access. More than two years. I rate Carbon Black App Control 10 out of 10 for stability. I rate App Control six out of 10 for scalability.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The deployment is very easy."

"I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"Overall, everything is excellent, and everything is well-prepared, from the laptops provided to the overall setup."

"Being able to protect and trust nothing by default, known as zero trust, is the most important feature to me."

"The application control is highly valued by me."

"The most valuable feature is probably the ability to block programs from running. ThreatLocker has some built-in features that make it super easy. You can also contact their support within the program. If you're having issues, you can click on that button and connect with someone in five to 10 seconds."

"The application control is a key feature of ThreatLocker."

"The biggest one that we focus on is the application control with ringfencing. That combination is very beneficial."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pros

"The visibility is valuable."

"If any malicious activity, like VAT viruses, anything RNE, ZOD malware, or something similar, comes in we know that unless we approve it, it's going to be blocked."

"I use the console to check for threats and I find it to be very user-friendly."

"All the functions within VMware Carbon Black App Control are valuable."

"The effectiveness of application whitelisting is very good."

"We use App Control to scan the network for virtual machines that have unauthorized applications. We can isolate the problem VMs and control application access."

"The visibility, reporting, and the ability to stop or prevent malicious or undesired applications from being installed are the most valuable features."

"The API integration is good."

Cons

"A valuable addition to ThreatLocker would be a column in the audit page displaying a VirusTotal score for each file."

"There could be options for handling a bulk amount of machines simultaneously."

"It would be beneficial to have a tighter integration into PSA systems so that approvals can be done directly without having to leave the PSA."

"Better visualizations of what exactly is happening in our logs would be helpful. There can be more visuals on what has been elevated. Presenting this in a more refined manner would be beneficial."

"ThreatLocker would benefit from incorporating an antivirus feature or comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring, a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users."

"The user experience could be improved."

"Initially, the learning curve was slightly high for me, however, that has been resolved now."

"ThreatLocker University offers many good training modules, but more in-depth training for advanced platforms would be beneficial."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform cons

"I rate App Control six out of 10 for scalability."

"The reporting is not good and needs to be improved."

"Carbon Black does not use the database for identifying the file, the fields, or malware."

"Another issue is that even sometimes if you approve, for example, Adobe as a publisher, you say any product or anything that's from Adobe has to run. It generally runs, but especially in a large environment and with a lot of users, sometimes, due to some certification validation issues or some other issue, it might stop the process from running. Genuine processes like Adobe and Chrome can get blocked. so that needs to be improved."

"The initial setup is somewhat complex."

"Its setup is very complex, and it requires guidance from the support team, but it is well worth the effort."

"I would like to see the addition of some more features that are in other, similar solutions."

"The solution should have overhead in keeping lists of applications that you want don't want to run."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe ThreatLocker's pricing model is fair and flexible, allowing account managers to offer customized deals based on our specific needs."

"Considering what this product does, ThreatLocker is very well-priced, if not too nicely priced for the customer."

"The pricing works fine for me. It's very reasonably priced."

"I do not deal with pricing, but I assume it is cost-effective for us. We choose a solution based on functionality and affordability."

"We have encountered a few challenges regarding pricing, contract renewals, and additions. As we explored adding features like Cyber Hero, it proved to be an increased expense for our clients. This was primarily a mistake on our part due to how we initially priced it to clients."

"The pricing is fair and there is no hard sell."

"I can't complain. Cheaper would always be nice, but I think it's reasonable compared to other software in the cybersecurity market."

"Although the pricing seems good, there have been inconsistencies in contract negotiations."

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

"Its price is reasonable and what is expected for these types of products."

"The pricing for this product is competitive and our customers who told us that often, Carbon Back is the cheaper solution."

"We pay a fee for support, which is renewed annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Pricing, setup costs, and licensing have been pretty accessible and manageable. It was not too expensive to get started, especially at a small scale for a smaller MSP. It is very accessible, easy t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?

Going with the theme of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform being a one-stop shop where they have just about everything, and they have a really good product stack as is. However, t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Airlock Digital Application Control vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 4% of the time

BigFix vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Airlock Digital Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 30% of the time

McAfee Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 17% of the time

Ivanti Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 13% of the time

Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 10% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs VMware Carbon Black App Control

Compared 10% of the time

More VMware Carbon Black App Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform

December 2025

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform report

Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Carbon Black App Control

December 2025

Download VMware Carbon Black App Control product report

Also Known As

Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing

CB Protection, Carbon Black CB Protection

Overview

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.

ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.

What are the most important features?

Application Control: Ensures only approved applications can be executed, minimizing security risks.
Selective Elevation: Provides granular control over application permissions without compromising security.
Ring-Fencing: Isolates applications to limit possible damage from compromised software.
Comprehensive Blocking: Blocks unauthorized applications, supporting zero-trust strategies.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing security tools efficiently.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies complex security processes, making them manageable for non-expert users.
Reduced Operational Costs: Minimizes resource expenditure through effective security management.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access and malicious scripts.
Responsive Support: Offers quick and effective assistance to minimize downtime and issues.

Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.

ThreatLocker

Carbon Black is a leading provider of next-generation endpoint security. Carbon Black serves more than 3,700 customers globally, including 33 of the Fortune 100. As a cybersecurity innovator, Carbon Black has a strong heritage of innovative technology leadership in multiple endpoint security categories, including application control, endpoint detection and response (EDR), and next-generation antivirus (NGAV). Leveraging its big data and analytics cloud platform - the Cb Predictive Security Cloud - Carbon Black solutions enable customers to defend against the most advanced cyber threats, including malware, ransomware, and non-malware attacks. Deployed via the cloud, on premise, or as a managed service, customers use Carbon Black solutions to lock down critical systems, hunt threats, and replace legacy antivirus.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Kaas Tailored, Core-Mark, Indeed, Hologic, Landmark Credit Union, Project Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control

December 2025

Free Report: ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control

Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control report.

See our list of best Application Control vendors.

We monitor all Application Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.