Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

UKG vs We360.ai comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

UKG
Ranking in HR Analytics Software
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
124
Ranking in other categories
Benefits Administration (5th), Talent Management (5th), Employee Scheduling Software (1st), Cloud HCM (5th), Employee Time Tracking Software (3rd), Talent Acquisition (5th)
We360.ai
Ranking in HR Analytics Software
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the HR Analytics Software category, the mindshare of UKG is 14.0%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of We360.ai is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
HR Analytics Software
 

Featured Reviews

PN
Apr 4, 2023
User-friendly, good support, and stable
We use UKG to monitor staff time management, specifically their clock-ins, and clock-outs We utilize UKG to track the time when an employee clocks in, takes breaks, and clocks out. This allows us to monitor the productive hours worked by the employee and how long they have been present. The…
Use We360.ai?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing part. I'm a user, and I believe it is based on the user count. One thing that is nice about Ultimate is that you can learn how to use the system without additional fees. The learning aspect is the life of a product, and the training was a huge reason why we went with Ultimate. We did have some integration costs. They were a part of the implementation because of the integrations to other systems that we included in our implementation."
"The platform is not affordable but also not the most expensive."
"UKG's pricing and licensing model involves ongoing expenses based on the number of employees paid. The initial implementation cost is low when UKG implements it directly. However, when partners handle the implementation, it becomes more expensive since partners don't receive the monthly recurring fees."
"If you're going for the full suite, it can be fairly pricey."
"While I am unsure of the licensing cost itself, the total cost of implementation and licensing for a company with over 5000 employees would be around 6,00,000. So, there are additional costs beyond licensing."
"The pricing depends on the number of licenses we buy."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HR Analytics Software solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
88%
Computer Software Company
2%
Healthcare Company
1%
Financial Services Firm
1%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with UKG?
Our company is testing the UKG Ready Mobile App, but there are some glitches. I feel that in the system when you log on to Kronos, UKG Dimensions, and UKG Workforce Central, we have different modul...
What is your primary use case for UKG?
I worked with UKG globally, assisting with its implementation in 59 countries. In my company, we use it for the timekeeping aspect offered, payroll purposes, and other stuff like that. It is used f...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about UKG, Oracle, ADP and others in HR Analytics Software. Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.