VMware Live Recovery vs Veritas System Recovery comparison

Veritas and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Veritas is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Veritas holds a 1.3% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 70% of Veritas users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Veritas System Recovery

Read 8 Veritas System Recovery reviews

912 Views
465 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

5,329 Views
4,476 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Veritas System Recovery

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Veritas System Recovery and VMware Live Recovery compete in data recovery solutions. VMware Live Recovery is perceived to have an upper hand due to its advanced features enhancing data availability.

Features: Veritas System Recovery provides robust data restoration, automated system backup, and flexible storage options. VMware Live Recovery offers real-time data recovery, minimized downtime, and advanced recovery options enhancing data availability.

Room for Improvement: Veritas System Recovery could improve its real-time features, deployment agility, and user interface. VMware Live Recovery could enhance cost-effectiveness, simplify configuration for non-technical users, and expand its integration with less common storage solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Live Recovery is recognized for a streamlined deployment process and strong customer support. Veritas System Recovery, while user-friendly, follows a traditional deployment approach with satisfactory support.

Pricing and ROI: Veritas System Recovery is known for being cost-effective for basic features with a good ROI. VMware Live Recovery, though initially more expensive, offers a faster ROI due to its advanced capabilities and performance, delivering greater value for investment.

To learn more, read our detailed VMware Live Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Veritas System Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

28th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Veritas System Recovery is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 7.3%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.3%
Veritas System Recovery	1.3%
Other	91.4%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Sareesh V

Sr.System Administrator at Suwaidi

The solution can be used for DR testing and allows running an infinite number of full backups

When we consider the backup model of other products like Veeam, their incremental backup just adds to their first full backup. With Veritas System Recovery, we have the option to run an infinite number of full backups according to our requirements. With my cloud version of Veritas System Recovery, I can have a full backup every month, which is not possible with any other vendors. Other vendors will claim that the original copy is strong enough, but the customers have to ensure that bugs won't cause any problems in the future. However, with Veritas System Recovery, you can run a full backup this month and again run a full backup on the first or thirtieth day of the next month.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has helped reduce my company's cost by around 50 to 60 percent."

"With Veritas System Recovery, we have the option to run an infinite number of full backups according to our requirements."

"Offers good recovery quickly."

"The solution captures the system state, so when we restore the system, it will be restored to the state it was in at the time of the backup."

"You can back up the whole image."

"The installation was straightforward."

"The tool helps automate system recovery. The solution is most useful in scenarios involving restoration to a different environment. For instance, when migrating from a physical server to a virtual one, the tool facilitates conversion."

"It has a user-friendly interface."

"The solution offers a rich set of features, well adapted in the market."

"VMware SRM is very effective between two sites with identical twin storage, you can have synchronization between the two sites."

"VMware SRM replicates the VM from one site to another, and it helps us orchestrate the powering of VMs and DR when the DC goes down."

"The stability of SRM has been excellent. It gets a nine-out-of-ten."

"It is easy to implement for my clients."

"The solution is very flexible."

"The initial setup is easy depending on the environment you are working with."

"The UI is very user-friendly and testing is easy."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"Veritas System Recovery’s pricing and local support need some improvement."

"The tool's deployment could be easier. The deployment itself isn't the issue; rather, the problem lies in configuring policies and testing everything before it's ready. We invest a significant amount of time in preparing for various scenarios. However, we often encounter situations where changes have occurred since our initial preparations. This can render the automation less valuable."

"The pricing could be cheaper."

"Veritas System Recovery Manager offers some manager solutions, but there is room for improvement."

"Lacks the ability to protect the database snapshot."

"The reliability is sometimes lacking."

"We faced issues with recovery and restoration."

"It needs an easier interface."

More Veritas System Recovery cons

"Currently, there is a limitation of consolidating only 15 sites per SRM."

"In my view, if VMware comes up with an appliance-based solution like vCenter Server (which was also Windows-based), it will be much easier for deployment. I"

"We have had an issue when some customers have traditional designs and sites. For example, on one another site, they are using hyper-converged, using VMware, or Nutanix. We have a problem with the synchronization between the storage for site to site. This is the main issue. We are adding some other tools to support the synchronization to allow the movement of the workload from site to site easily."

"The configuration process could be improved."

"In general, the drawbacks of VMware SRM, where improvements can be made, stem from the fact that it is an expensive and complex product."

"If you have a failover case, you need to work on it manually. It would be helpful if this could be automated. It would simplify things."

"I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring."

"We've had configuration issues on occasion. We start to fail over, and then we have to call it off because the configuration is not right, or the data stores aren't configured correctly in the secondary data center. Oftentimes, it is just the experience level of the team, and we have to bring in the vendor to help and validate our configuration."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There is no need to pay any additional fees apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution."

"Licensing costs explode after 75 VMs."

"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."

"VMware SRM is an expensive solution, and users need to pay extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It is an expensive platform. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"SRM is reasonably priced for the functionality it provides."

"The software is expensive. There is a one-time cost involved in purchasing the license."

"The licensing costs for the product are perpetual in nature. A person needs to buy the license only once there is a need to buy support on a yearly basis. The licensing cost for VMware SRM is expensive."

"VMware SRM is quite expensive."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Veritas System Recovery?

The tool helps automate system recovery. The solution is most useful in scenarios involving restoration to a different environment. For instance, when migrating from a physical server to a virtual ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas System Recovery?

The tool's deployment could be easier. The deployment itself isn't the issue; rather, the problem lies in configuring policies and testing everything before it's ready. We invest a significant amou...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Veritas System Recovery?

The tool is a last resort. We primarily focus on preventing situations where its use becomes necessary. While we sell and test this tool, our customers don't frequently need to use it because it pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Veritas System Recovery

Compared 21% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Veritas System Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Veritas System Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Veritas System Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Veritas System Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

More Veritas System Recovery Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 29% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 24% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Global-active device vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 1% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

December 2025

Download Veritas System Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

January 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

Veritas System Recovery 18, System Recovery 18, System Recovery

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

Veritas System Recovery 18 delivers superior backup and disaster recovery for servers, desktops, and laptops with a single unified solution that enables businesses to recover from downtime or disasters in minutes. With patented Restore Anyware technology, IT administrators can rapidly restore exactly what they need, when and where they need it - including entire physical and virtual machines to bare metal or dissimilar hardware as well as files, folders, and granular application objects. Unlike other technologies, Veritas System Recovery also provides cross-platform Physical to-Virtual (P2V), Virtual-to-Virtual (V2V), and Virtual to-Physical (V2P) recoveries, making it the perfect complement to physical and virtual environments.

Veritas

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Mother's Nutritional Center, Occidental Technical Group

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery

December 2025

Free Report: VMware Live Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware Live Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our VMware Live Recovery vs. Veritas System Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.