Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Reviews

It is used as a device that can detect any issues and changes when people are not at work. In one case, we use it when someone is not at work or has already used their allotted time off. This helps us understand any issues that may arise when someone is not at work, which could lead to changes in the way we work.

There are many areas that could use improvement. One thing that is important to keep in mind is that times change, and we need to be adaptable to what happens. Ultimately, we want to see positive results and improvements.

In the next release, I would add dashboards that allow everyone to see what's happening, not just the security team. Users can view the data and see what's happening. Also, I think the Data Lake from Cortex XDR should be public, not private.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The initial setup was easy.

The pricing is cheap.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for its ability to detect based on behavior rather than simple virus scan to prevent malicious activities. We also use it to go in and white list things that are okay. This way, they won't get blocked.

The behavior-based detection feature is valuable. 

It'll help if customization was easier. It would be better than how it's now if it came out of the box using their stock set up to get it up-and-running. Then you go in, and you add more restrictive things to make it better.

I have been using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for a little over a year.

Technical support has been fine.

The initial setup isn't straightforward or complex. It's somewhere in the middle. Like 90% of the features are there out of the box. When you start doing more complex things, it becomes more complicated. For example, if we wanted to limit someone's ability to plug in and access a USB stick, we have to create a profile to do that, and that's an advanced functionality.

We did most of the deployment in-house.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine.

Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution.

I would like the Panorama module included. It's another solution that is provided by Palo Alto and we are interested in that.

I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included.

I have been working with Cortex XDR for a year and a half.

Technical support is okay.

I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price.

I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a ten out of ten.

We use this solution to protect our computer system against threats, such as exploits and malware.

The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward.

In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by proving hard disk encryption. If it could support this it would be a complete solution.

I have been using this solution for approximately two months.

The solution is stable, we have not had any issues.

We have over 5,000 employees and they are being managed through this solution. It is scalable.

We have our own IT support teams.

We were previously using McAfee and we switched to this solution because they failed to provide us proper protection.

We have an IT support team in our organization and they are managing everything remotely, such as laptops.

Our internal team did the implementation of the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks an eight out of ten.

We're primarily a Palo Alto shop, and we integrate solutions in the Palo Alto ecosystem. But for firewalls and threat hunting, it's all through Cortex XDR. We also compliment the Cortex XDR product with other endpoint protection solutions, like Windows Defender, or whatever the customer is using,

Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very easy to work with, and we're quite happy with them.

It would be good to have a better way to search for a file within the UI. Like in SentinelOne, you can search for an arbitrary file, and in Cortex XDR, you can't. You can do it with an addendum license, but I think we could all benefit from getting it with the standard license. Because if you want to do threat hunting with this product, you have to search for files now and not wait to get a license.

I've been using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for about two years.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a stable solution.

We used to talk to Palo Alto support extensively, and we always had a pleasant experience and never had a problem with them.

Cortex XDR is quite easy to install. The time it takes to deploy depends on the infrastructure. We have had cases that lasted a few days and other cases where it took two to four months for a proof of concept.

Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider. It's quite expensive, and they can't sell it for less than 200 euros a license. It's the lowest license price we can get from them.

I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine.

We had firewalls set up and it integrated but didn't meet with our regulations.

We were using this solution for endpoint protection.

It's a perfect solution. 

It integrates well into the environment.

I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response. Also, if they could make an on-premises version we would definitely go with Cortes. At this time, they are not offering an on-premises solution.

We had it in our environment for two days.

It's a stable solution.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is scalable.

The technical support was good.

We evaluated Fideles and are currently using it, as it meets the regulations and is on-premises.

We had to move away from working with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks due to the regulations. They state that the logs have to be kept in Saudi Arabia. Also, the log is in the cloud, which is against the regulations. 

We chose Fidelis. They meet the regulations and they are on-premises.

We had no issues with Cortex. We were satisfied but it didn't meet with the regional regulations.

I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks an eight out of ten.

I'm testing the product right now. I use the solution for endpoint security.

Everything is fine. 

It'll not slow down your system when compared to others.

The initial setup is easy.

I'd like the solution to provide URL filtering and web-based prevention. We'd like to block web pages at a high level.

We would also like to have advanced tech protection and email scanning.

I've been using the solution for a year.

The product is very stable and the performance is good. It doesn't slow down the systems it runs on. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution can scale well.

More than 100 people are using the solution right now. 

We've never needed the assistance of technical support just yet.

I've also used McAfee MVISION Endpoint. 

I'm testing them both and finding the advantages and disadvantages between them.

The solution is very easy to set up.

You do have to pay for a license in order to use a solution. It's expensive.

We're a reseller.

We are using the latest, most up-to-date version, of the product.

I would recommend using it with another protection layer. Cortex should provide an additional layer of security apart from this. You might have to integrate with other vendors also.

If you are looking to deploy a security solution as a whole, this is a good option.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. If we had more advanced security features, I'd rate it higher.

I have deployed some customized playbooks and modified ones which are out-of-the-box with more integration with SIEM solutions such as ArcSight, QRadar, ADRs and Trend Micro.

The solution should offer more dashboards and they should be better customized. The case number of items should be addressed. 

I have found the interface of Azure to be more simple and customizable than that of the solution. 

I have worked on Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks with my customers for a number of weeks. 

The stability is good. 

The scalability is fine. 

We have plans to increase the usage. 

The initial setup was simple. 

The deployment took no more than two hours. 

So far, I have made use of the free license which is offered. Once it ended, I was able to buy a license based on the number of users or divisions. The license varies with the number of users or applications involved. 

If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them. 

The interface of Azure is more simple and customizable than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.

I have found the solution to be very easy in respect of the integration and configurable. The integrations are out-of-the-box, as are the playbooks. 

The solution is deployed solely on-premises on a single server. 

As of now, there are six users making use of the solution. 

My advice is that the on-premises environments for the product's use should be increased. 

I rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks as an eight out of ten.