Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Reviews

We use it for malicious connections from malicious websites. There might also be some payloads that might be inside the traffic. We also use it to identify malicious processes or bugs that are running on the network and any activities that tend to lead to data infiltration.

It is easy to use.

Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms.

I have been using this solution for about a year.

We have maybe a thousand users of this solution because it is deployed on-prem.

I don't think there were issues with the installation.

It has a yearly renewal.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Cortex XDR a seven out of 10.

We had firewalls set up and it integrated but didn't meet with our regulations.

We were using this solution for endpoint protection.

It's a perfect solution. 

It integrates well into the environment.

I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response. Also, if they could make an on-premises version we would definitely go with Cortes. At this time, they are not offering an on-premises solution.

We had it in our environment for two days.

It's a stable solution.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is scalable.

The technical support was good.

We evaluated Fideles and are currently using it, as it meets the regulations and is on-premises.

We had to move away from working with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks due to the regulations. They state that the logs have to be kept in Saudi Arabia. Also, the log is in the cloud, which is against the regulations. 

We chose Fidelis. They meet the regulations and they are on-premises.

We had no issues with Cortex. We were satisfied but it didn't meet with the regional regulations.

I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks an eight out of ten.

We're primarily a Palo Alto shop, and we integrate solutions in the Palo Alto ecosystem. But for firewalls and threat hunting, it's all through Cortex XDR. We also compliment the Cortex XDR product with other endpoint protection solutions, like Windows Defender, or whatever the customer is using,

Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very easy to work with, and we're quite happy with them.

It would be good to have a better way to search for a file within the UI. Like in SentinelOne, you can search for an arbitrary file, and in Cortex XDR, you can't. You can do it with an addendum license, but I think we could all benefit from getting it with the standard license. Because if you want to do threat hunting with this product, you have to search for files now and not wait to get a license.

I've been using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for about two years.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a stable solution.

We used to talk to Palo Alto support extensively, and we always had a pleasant experience and never had a problem with them.

Cortex XDR is quite easy to install. The time it takes to deploy depends on the infrastructure. We have had cases that lasted a few days and other cases where it took two to four months for a proof of concept.

Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider. It's quite expensive, and they can't sell it for less than 200 euros a license. It's the lowest license price we can get from them.

I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine.

I'm testing the product right now. I use the solution for endpoint security.

Everything is fine. 

It'll not slow down your system when compared to others.

The initial setup is easy.

I'd like the solution to provide URL filtering and web-based prevention. We'd like to block web pages at a high level.

We would also like to have advanced tech protection and email scanning.

I've been using the solution for a year.

The product is very stable and the performance is good. It doesn't slow down the systems it runs on. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution can scale well.

More than 100 people are using the solution right now. 

We've never needed the assistance of technical support just yet.

I've also used McAfee MVISION Endpoint. 

I'm testing them both and finding the advantages and disadvantages between them.

The solution is very easy to set up.

You do have to pay for a license in order to use a solution. It's expensive.

We're a reseller.

We are using the latest, most up-to-date version, of the product.

I would recommend using it with another protection layer. Cortex should provide an additional layer of security apart from this. You might have to integrate with other vendors also.

If you are looking to deploy a security solution as a whole, this is a good option.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. If we had more advanced security features, I'd rate it higher.

I use the solution for endpoint protection.

One of the main benefits of the solution is its intelligence to correlate the events into an incident.

The solution could improve by providing better integration with their own products and others.

I have been using this solution for approximately one year.

The solution is stable.

It is one of the best in the market for scalability.

We have approximately 500 people using this solution in my organization and we plan to increase usage.

The initial installation is easy.

We did the implantation of the solution with integrators.

The price of the solution is high for the license and in general.

We evaluated CrowedStrike and Darktrace.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine out of ten.

We are a solution provider and one of the Palo Alto products that we implement for our clients is Cortex XDR (Extended Detection and Response).

It is also known as Traps, and it is mostly used for endpoint protection. For example, when remote users want to connect to their organization using a VPN, they will be protected.

The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting.

Once installed, this product is easy to manage, whether it is on-premises or the cloud-based management system.

There are a lot of logs generated and an engineer has to go through all of the events to find out exactly what the bottleneck is. We do need to collect the events but this can be time-consuming. Being able to filter the events to see those that are related to the actual alert would save time spent by the engineer.

A better pricing plan would make this product more competitive.

We have been dealing with Palo Alto, including Cortex XDR for more than three years.

This is a stable product and it is good, but we will keep evaluating other products as we continue to offer this type of solution to our customers.

Cortex XDR is a scalable solution.

The technical support team is good, and we can reach them quickly and easily. However, finding a resolution might take time.

We have used Cylance in the past, although we stopped using it about three years ago.

We are currently using K7 Endpoint Protection. Unfortunately, it is not catching anything, whether it is malware or a virus.

When we first implemented this product, it was called Traps. However, I don't see any difference, other than the name. For new customers, it might be a bit difficult to install and set up. It takes perhaps eight hours to install.

I deployed this product, and I was also involved with the initial POC.

Only one admin is needed for deployment and a second person should be available to work with the users.

This is an expensive solution.

We are currently trying to evaluate ELK.

Overall, this is a good product and I can recommend it to others.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are using it for a banking client.

Its interface and pricing are most valuable. It is better than other vendors in terms of security.

It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint.

I have been using this solution for two years.

It is very stable. I wouldn't recommend the latest version. Being a new version, it would have bugs, which is similar to the new versions of other products.

In Peru, we have approximately 20,000 users. The banking client doesn't have any plans to expand the usage. We might increase its usage by 200 to 500 with new clients.

Technical support of Palo Alto is the best.

It is very easy to deploy. The deployment is quick. The deployment of the management console takes just two hours, but the deployment of the agent takes approximately a month.

We have five to eight engineers for deployment and maintenance.

I would rate Cortex XDR a nine out of 10.

In terms of what could be improved in Cortex XDR, definitely the host insights module. The ability to kind of take a look at what applications are running on the endpoint is a new feature, but there is a lot of room for improvement there in terms of versioning and so forth.

Additionally, the dashboard could use some significant improvement, just making it more useful with more information. It has a limited amount of information right now. It is customizable, but I'd love to see a better out-of-box dashboard.

I have been working with Cortex XDR over the last year, at least.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks an eight.