Top 10 Couchbase Enterprise Alternatives

Name: Couchbase Enterprise
Brand: Couchbase
Rating: 4.1 (18 reviews)

Vendor: Couchbase

4.1 out of 5

18 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Couchbase Enterprise Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Couchbase Enterprise based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Redis, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, and MongoDB Enterprise Advanced. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Couchbase Enterprise surpasses its competitors by offering unmatched scalability with its memory-first architecture, advanced query capabilities using N1QL, seamless offline-first mobile integration, and robust multi-cloud support, ensuring superior performance and flexibility for modern data applications.

Couchbase Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Couchbase, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Redis

4.4 out of 5

Redis

4.4 out of 5

Couchbase Enterprise offers versatility with document and key-value storage, robust analytics, and strong indexing, appealing for comprehensive needs. In comparison, Redis excels in speed for caching and real-time data, providing cost-effectiveness but lacking extensive flexibility beyond caching.

Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. Redis Report

Pricing

Couchbase Enterprise setup cost is generally higher due to its comprehensive feature set, while Redis offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on in-memory data structures. Both solutions cater to different organizational needs and budget priorities.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Couchbase Enterprise appeals for its XDCR replication and multi-database paradigms. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB attracts with global distribution and integration with Azure AI services. Couchbase Enterprise suits complex operations, while Azure Cosmos DB excels in cloud adaptability with flexible APIs.

Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Couchbase Enterprise presents a competitive setup cost that appeals to businesses seeking scalability, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers a streamlined setup process with cloud integration advantages.

View comparison

Pricing

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is preferred for its scalability, JSON flexibility, and sharding capabilities. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise excels in document indexing and advanced analytics. MongoDB attracts developers with its open-source nature, while Couchbase is favored for mobile applications and easy querying.

Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Report

Pricing

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced involves notable setup costs, while Couchbase Enterprise provides a more cost-effective initial setup. Their pricing structures differ significantly, influencing enterprise considerations for database deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

InfluxDB

4.1 out of 5

InfluxDB

4.1 out of 5

InfluxDB is optimal for time-series data management with ease of deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise excels in handling complex document-based workloads with extensive features and robust support, appealing to businesses requiring advanced capabilities despite higher upfront costs.

Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. InfluxDB Report

Pricing

InfluxDB typically involves a lower setup cost compared to Couchbase Enterprise, which tends to have a higher initial expense reflecting its robust feature set and enterprise-focused capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

InfluxDB typically involves a lower setup cost compared to Couchbase Enterprise, which tends to have a higher initial expense reflecting its robust feature set and enterprise-focused capabilities.

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Cassandra excels in high scalability and data distribution efficiency. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise offers advanced features like comprehensive analytics and robust memory management. Tech buyers might choose Cassandra for scalability and cost-effectiveness, whereas Couchbase Enterprise appeals with streamlined deployment and extensive support.

Download Cassandra vs. Couchbase Enterprise Report

Pricing

Cassandra offers a low upfront setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Couchbase Enterprise has higher initial expenses, yet provides robust enterprise features and support.

View comparison

Pricing

Cassandra offers a low upfront setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Couchbase Enterprise has higher initial expenses, yet provides robust enterprise features and support.

ScyllaDB

3.9 out of 5

ScyllaDB

3.9 out of 5

Couchbase Enterprise appeals to users needing ease of scaling and versatile data management. In comparison, ScyllaDB attracts those prioritizing speed and efficient data handling. Each solution targets distinct needs, offering measurable benefits in cost reduction and enhanced performance.

Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. ScyllaDB Report

Pricing

Couchbase Enterprise offers a straightforward setup with associated costs that align with its enterprise-level features, whereas ScyllaDB provides a more cost-efficient setup, appealing to businesses seeking scalability without incurring high initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop provides a complete Hadoop ecosystem with enterprise security and ease of integration, ideal for comprehensive data management. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise offers robust indexing and multi-database support, appealing to those seeking high performance and complex querying capabilities.

Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. Couchbase Enterprise Report

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop involves a higher setup cost compared to Couchbase Enterprise, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop involves a higher setup cost compared to Couchbase Enterprise, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

Apache HBase

3.6 out of 5

Apache HBase

3.6 out of 5

Apache HBase excels in scalability and Hadoop integration, appealing to big data needs. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise focuses on performance and flexibility for web and mobile applications, offering high availability and easy deployment, making it ideal for real-time application requirements.

Download Apache HBase vs. Couchbase Enterprise Report

Pricing

Apache HBase offers lower setup costs compared to Couchbase Enterprise, making it a cost-effective option. Meanwhile, Couchbase Enterprise provides advanced features with a higher setup cost, catering to businesses seeking robust functionality.

View comparison

Pricing

Aerospike Database 7

4.0 out of 5

Aerospike Database 7

4.0 out of 5

Aerospike Database 7 attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective pricing and high performance. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise appeals through its extensive features and long-term ROI. Aerospike emphasizes efficiency and speed, while Couchbase focuses on rich capabilities and adaptability.

Pricing

Aerospike Database 7 offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Couchbase Enterprise, which can involve higher initial expenses but provides advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Aerospike Database 7 offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Couchbase Enterprise, which can involve higher initial expenses but provides advanced features.

Oracle NoSQL

4.0 out of 5

Oracle NoSQL

4.0 out of 5

Oracle NoSQL's competitive pricing and focus on transactional capabilities attract those seeking cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise offers superior functionality with its feature-rich platform, catering to those valuing performance, scalability, and enhanced data handling through cache and search features.

Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. Oracle NoSQL Report

Pricing

Oracle NoSQL often has a lower initial setup cost, appealing to small-scale applications, while Couchbase Enterprise typically involves higher setup expenses, suited for complex, large-scale deployments. The pricing reflects differing target market focuses.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 2 more products

Related categories

NoSQL Databases

Managed NoSQL Databases

In-Memory Data Store Services