Top 10 Couchbase Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

18 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Couchbase Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Couchbase based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Redis, MongoDB, and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Couchbase surpasses its competitors by offering a flexible, high-performance NoSQL database with built-in caching, scalability, and advanced querying capabilities, ensuring real-time data access and seamless integration for modern applications.

Couchbase Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Couchbase, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Redis

4.4 out of 5

Redis

4.4 out of 5

Couchbase supports complex queries and analytics ideal for comprehensive features. In comparison, Redis excels in high-speed data processing suited for real-time performance. Couchbase offers a versatile deployment model, while Redis provides seamless cloud scalability. Couchbase's high upfront cost contrasts with Redis's cost-efficient speed.

Download Couchbase vs. Redis Report

Pricing

Couchbase setup costs may be higher compared to Redis, which offers a more budget-friendly initial implementation. Redis provides a cost-effective choice for users prioritizing economical deployment, distinguishing it from Couchbase's potentially higher setup investment.

View comparison

Pricing

MongoDB

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB

4.1 out of 5

Companies utilize MongoDB for document-based storage and development, favoring its flexibility, scalability, and ease of use across environments like cloud and on-premises. It supports data analytics, business process management, and web applications. Enhanced security, mobile access, and query optimization are needed, along with better documentation and a competitive pricing model.

Download Couchbase vs. MongoDB Report

Pricing

We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB.

It is rather expensive.

View comparison

Pricing

We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB.

It is rather expensive.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

4.1 out of 5

Couchbase supports diverse database paradigms with user-friendly analytics and ease of use. In comparison, Azure Cosmos DB excels in global distribution with strong Azure integration, offering flexibility in complex environments. Each solution caters to different scalability and performance needs, addressing varied deployment preferences.

Download Couchbase vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report

Pricing

Couchbase setup costs are generally lower and more straightforward, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB often incurs higher initial expenses and complexity. Key differences in setup costs can significantly impact the overall budget and implementation timeline.

View comparison

Pricing

InfluxDB

4.1 out of 5

InfluxDB

4.1 out of 5

InfluxDB excels in time-series data, offering ease of use with high-performance analytics, attracting those focused on monitoring applications. In comparison, Couchbase appeals to enterprises requiring a full-featured, versatile database with flexible querying, making it suitable for complex projects.

Download Couchbase vs. InfluxDB Report

Pricing

InfluxDB offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Couchbase involves a more complex setup with higher initial expenses. InfluxDB is ideal for budget-conscious users, while Couchbase is suited for enterprises seeking advanced features despite higher costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Couchbase excels with advanced querying and flexible data models, appealing to those needing rich features and seamless synchronization. In comparison, Cassandra's linear scalability and high write throughput make it ideal for handling large distributed data systems with open-source flexibility.

Download Cassandra vs. Couchbase Report

Pricing

Cassandra offers a more flexible setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking scalability, while Couchbase presents a straightforward setup process that can be beneficial for smaller teams prioritizing efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers enterprise-grade security and integration, ideal for complex ecosystems. In comparison, Couchbase provides versatility in database support and deployment, attracting those needing flexible analytics and ease of use. Both have cost considerations impacting purchasing decisions.

Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. Couchbase Report

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Couchbase, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. These cost differences highlight the variance in their initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

ScyllaDB

3.9 out of 5

ScyllaDB

3.9 out of 5

Couchbase excels with agile replication and indexing for adaptive data models, appealing to scenarios needing robust querying and mobile sync. In comparison, ScyllaDB focuses on speed and efficiency, ideal for low-latency applications, making deployment simple and cost-effective for performance-driven needs.

Download Couchbase vs. ScyllaDB Report

Pricing

Couchbase has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, offering a more complex and robust feature set, while ScyllaDB provides a cost-effective option with streamlined simplicity.

View comparison

Pricing

Couchbase has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, offering a more complex and robust feature set, while ScyllaDB provides a cost-effective option with streamlined simplicity.

Apache HBase

3.0 out of 5

Apache HBase

3.0 out of 5

Apache HBase offers scalability and seamless Hadoop integration, ideal for enterprises managing large datasets and needing high write speeds. In comparison, Couchbase excels in query performance and operational ease, providing advanced querying, mobile synchronization, and efficient deployment for faster time-to-value.

Download Apache HBase vs. Couchbase Report

Pricing

Apache HBase offers a cost-effective setup while Couchbase presents higher initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Apache HBase offers a cost-effective setup while Couchbase presents higher initial setup costs.

Aerospike Database 7

4.0 out of 5

Aerospike Database 7

4.0 out of 5

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

Pricing

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

View comparison

Pricing

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

Oracle NoSQL

4.0 out of 5

Oracle NoSQL

4.0 out of 5

Oracle NoSQL appeals to enterprises needing ACID transactions and security through its integration with Oracle Cloud. In comparison, Couchbase supports flexible multi-model capabilities, benefitting real-time analytics and rich queries. Each solution's support and pricing may influence tech buyers differently.

Download Couchbase vs. Oracle NoSQL Report

Pricing

Oracle NoSQL has lower initial setup costs, making it appealing for budget-conscious users, while Couchbase's setup costs are higher but justified by its advanced features, potentially benefiting those seeking robust solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 1 more products

Related categories

NoSQL Databases

In-Memory Data Store Services

Vector Databases