Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Couchbase comparison

Cloudera Distribution for H...

Read 14 Couchbase reviews

2,491 Views
1,624 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Couchbase compete in the big data and database sectors, with Cloudera having an edge in complex enterprise capabilities and Couchbase excelling in flexibility and ease of use. Users favor Cloudera for enterprise features, while Couchbase stands out in scenarios needing low latency.

Features: Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers Cloudera Manager for streamlined administration, Impala for fast querying, and enterprise-grade security with support for Hive and Spark, facilitating comprehensive big data integration. Couchbase provides various database paradigms, robust document indexing, and efficient querying, well-suited to cloud and edge environments, supporting diverse NoSQL solutions.

Room for Improvement: Cloudera's performance stability needs enhancement, particularly with newer versions and Spark integrations; its installation can be complex, and node-based pricing is costly. Couchbase faces integration challenges, limited Windows support, and needs better documentation and security features, along with improved multicluster support and real-time processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudera's on-premises deployment offers infrastructure control but receives mixed support reviews regarding local expertise. Couchbase is flexible across on-premises and cloud deployments, praised for versatility but needing better community engagement and technical assistance in complicated setups.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudera is considered expensive, especially as infrastructure scales, but promises substantial ROI for enterprises needing detailed data solutions. Couchbase's pricing is seen as more flexible and affordable, though extra integration costs can arise, requiring careful evaluation of long-term values and organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. Couchbase Report (Updated: January 2025).

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. Couchbase

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudera Distribution for H...

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (2nd)

Couchbase

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Couchbase is 11.3%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Rok Dolinsek

Manager, Bussines Development & Co Owner at Troia d.o.o.

Enables on-premise implementation with powerful data processing capabilities

This is the only solution that is possible to install on-premise. Cloudera provides a hybrid solution that combines compute on cloud or on-premises. It includes all machine learning algorithms in the Spark machine learning library. All functionalities needed for a big data platform and ETL are on the platform, eliminating the need for other tools. It is scalable, ready for vertical scaling, and very powerful, offering numerous functionalities and configurations for generative AI.

Read full review

Ravi_Singh

Manager at Tesco

Supports multiple data models and offers AI capabilities

With some of the operations, we used to face some challenges with scalability. Although it worked pretty well, in some scenarios, we noticed issues where the replications and the sharding were not happening correctly. In recent versions, we also faced some issues in terms of enabling advanced operations like FTS and vectors. Although it works pretty well, in some places, we do face challenges, especially on a heavy scale. I think all issues are being addressed in the latest version of Couchbase. The resources are not that good for Couchbase. The tool's documentation is pretty extensive, but if you go for any kind of courses or tutorials, there are very limited resources available. It also becomes a little bit challenging for new people to get onboard into it. MongoDB and other such open-source database tools perform really well as they're really widely adopted, and they have resources available to get you onboarded pretty quickly. I think that we do face some challenges with Couchbase, but luckily, we have the tool's enterprise version solution, so we get all the support from the product team.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Very good end-to-end security features."

"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."

"It has the best proxy, security, and support features compared to open-source products."

"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."

"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable."

"We had a data warehouse before all the data. We can process a lot more data structures."

"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized."

"Provides a viable open-source solution for enterprise implementations and reliable, intelligent data analysis."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop pros

"Investing in Couchbase has significantly lowered our operational costs and increased throughput, reducing costs by half and supporting around five times the non-peak user volume during peak hours."

"The main advantages were associated with it being a no SQL database. It helped us send out metrics or rewards to multiple players in our game at a very low latency."

"The most valuable feature of Couchbase is document indexing. It is better than MongoDB. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."

"Couchbase has not given any performance problems as of now."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Sync Gateway is a great feature that supports the mobile application."

"It is pretty stable."

"The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views."

More Couchbase pros

Cons

"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."

"The performance of some analytics engines provided by Cloudera is not that good."

"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."

"It is quite complicated to configure and install. Integrating the platform into an information system is always a challenge, especially when starting with on-premise implementation."

"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."

"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."

"The pricing needs to improve."

"Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop cons

"One thing that could improved upon is the level of concurrency. The documentation for this solution could also be improved."

"I have tried multiple libraries in a demo they provide and it works fine, but when it merges with libraries, it creates a problem."

"The main problem has been with integration with the services."

"The platform's grouping features need improvement."

"The performance could be quicker and better, especially in the querying process."

"There are some limitations to the database. The SQL database cannot handle real-time processing for critical IoT scenarios. What we have to do is store our data into the database then code it out, this wastes a lot of time."

"Couchbase could improve the design of the UI because it should be optimized for viewing statistics or a similar feature."

"The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes."

More Couchbase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better for the product."

"I haven't bought a license for this solution. I'm only using the Apache license version."

"The tool is expensive...For the SMB market or customers whose environments are not that complex and do not have multiple systems running, Cloudera might not be a good option."

"The pricing must be improved."

"The price is very high. The solution is expensive."

"The product’s price depends from project to project."

"It is an expensive product."

"Cloudera requires a license to use."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."

"It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

"I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."

"It can range between 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year depending on company requirements."

"We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."

"The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?

The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?

The price for Cloudera is average, yet it is very good compared to other solutions. It can be deployed on-premises, unlike competitors' cloud-only solutions.

What needs improvement with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop?

It is quite complicated to configure and install. Integrating the platform into an information system is always a challenge, especially when starting with on-premise implementation. Integrating wit...

What needs improvement with Couchbase?

What is your primary use case for Couchbase?

In my company, we use the enterprise version of Couchbase, and it is used across the organization for its database operations. We do only use the NoSQL database, not Couchbase Capella. The tool is ...

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase?

I suggest the tool to others as it is heavily, working a lot on improving the database framework. The tool offers support for multiple data models. We do need to maintain the tool as there is a nee...

Amazon EMR vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Comparisons

Compared 29% of the time

HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 29% of the time

Apache Spark vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 21% of the time

Cassandra vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 3% of the time

Vertica vs Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Competitors

MongoDB vs Couchbase

Compared 39% of the time

Cassandra vs Couchbase

Compared 29% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Couchbase

Compared 19% of the time

Redis vs Couchbase

Compared 4% of the time

Aerospike Database 7 vs Couchbase

Compared 3% of the time

More Couchbase Competitors

Product Reports

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

February 2025

Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop product report

Download Couchbase product report

February 2025

Overview

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is the world's most complete, tested, and popular distribution of Apache Hadoop and related projects. CDH is 100% Apache-licensed open source and is the only Hadoop solution to offer unified batch processing, interactive SQL, and interactive search, and role-based access controls. More enterprises have downloaded CDH than all other such distributions combined.

Cloudera

Couchbase is a versatile database solution for healthcare, automation, e-commerce, gaming, caching, and analytics. It supports 920 nodes and 420 clusters, making it scalable and extensible. Its valuable features include multiple database paradigms, low latency, dynamic API integration, Sync Gateway for mobile apps, and a user-friendly interface.

Couchbase has helped organizations with low latency metrics, large user updates, and cost-effective caching. Its built-in data replication and disaster recovery features make it a complete solution for various needs.

Sample Customers

37signals, Adconion,adgooroo, Aggregate Knowledge, AMD, Apollo Group, Blackberry, Box, BT, CSC

Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE