CrowdStrike Falcon Reviews

We implemented CrowdStrike because we needed to identify a new solution to address a 100% remote workforce, both because of COVID, but in general, our workforce is very distributed around the country.

The primary way that CrowdStrike has improved the way our organization functions is visibility. When we do have an issue, the ability to see what was happening before, during, and after the issue on the target laptop or server is far better than what we were used to.

Having the updates happening automatically, with a third-party defining those updates and pushing those in, also providing us visibility into the current status of all of our endpoints, is critical.

We use Falcon's endpoint and cloud workload protection, which is deployed on our Azure cloud servers. It is definitely one of the top options available to any organization. We had reviewed 10 different applications in the EDR space and Falcon was one of the top three that we had identified.

In terms of preventing breaches, so far, it's doing great. Definitely, in our testing that we do every month, it is identifying issues that arise with more certainty. Simply, the team has more confidence in what they're utilizing as a tool and it has freed them up to work on things that are a more efficient use of their time.

The Protect functionality on the laptops provides great visibility into what's occurring, and the cloud management of the platform is what we needed.

It is important to us that this cloud-native solution provides us with flexibility and always-on protection because we have a 100% distributed workforce, in place even before COVID. To manage 600 remotely-deployed laptops requires a cloud-managed solution.

The console is a little cluttered and at times, finding what you're looking for is not intuitive. Once you find it, it's great, but it's not always very intuitive as to how to find exactly what you're looking for sometimes.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for six months.

We have had no issues at all with stability, and no conflicts on any of our endpoints or servers.

It seems to be limitless from a scalability standpoint. Definitely, there would be no impact on our end, and we haven't noticed or run into any issues as we scaled from our initial 10 systems to 600. There was no difference in speed or reporting, et cetera.

So, scalability does not seem to be an issue.

Technical support is an area for improvement. If you have an actual issue, such as an identified threat, then they are very good. However, if you're struggling to figure out what might have occurred, we're still trying to figure out how to get our best support from CrowdStrike in those situations.

Prior to Falcon, we were using Webroot.

The primary improvement that we have seen is visibility. We had no visibility into what happened before, during, and after a situation with Webroot, but with CrowdStrike, we have that visibility, which allows our team to make educated decisions. In terms of detection and prevention, I believe it's all experiential so far. Falcon has been very good at both detection and remediation for any issue that has come up.

The sensor setup and deployment were extremely easy. We were able to deploy a hundred percent of our endpoints within 60 days. We found it to be very smooth.

It was a very simple deployment strategy to get the agent out to the end-users. It was so smooth that we didn't even have to notify the end-users that it was being done. It just happened automatically. 

There was no conflict between CrowdStrike and our existing EDR that we were going to get rid of. After the installation, we were able to have the old EDR totally removed within 30 days.

We had two people for deployment and we have one for maintenance. Their roles are in information security.

We have seen ROI in that our team is freed up to work on things that are more important.

We took advantage of Falcon's free trial before purchasing it, and it was very easy to get it. We were on the phone with a representative discussing our next steps and they offered the free trial, and we were set up and functional with it the next morning. Having a free trial period is something that is expected. If anybody wants our business in this space then it's necessary because we aren't going to purchase something without trying it first.

The pricing is not bad. It's on the higher end of the market, but you get what you pay for. It's a little on the confusing side because the name of the item they're selling doesn't match what you see when you log into the product.

If you buy "Protect" and you log into the product, you don't see "Protect". You see something else, like "Identify" or whatever. So, they need to do a better job of aligning product names from the sale to within the product.

There are add-on fees for different packages that you can buy, and we are looking at adding on some feature functionality as we go forward.

We evaluated 10 different solutions in the EDR space. The top three included CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black, and Microsoft's ATP.

CrowdStrike was a little better, cost-wise, than the other two. Also, I felt that the console for managing the platform was easier for my team.

My advice for anybody who is looking into implementing this product is that every organization is slightly different in its needs, and CrowdStrike may or may not be the right solution. Once you can do a trial and a bake-off of multiple options, you'll find if CrowdStrike is the right solution or not.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for endpoint security. We use the tool to ensure the endpoints are protected from abnormal activities, people don't run different scripts, and people don't compromise endpoints and use them to get into the network.

The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint.

I would like a centralized deployment where I could roll out or push it to all endpoints.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface for two years.

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very stable solution.

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very scalable solution. A lot of customers are using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface. One of our customers for the solution has 12,000 endpoints.

The solution's technical support is handled centrally by CrowdStrike, and the support was also good and knowledgeable.

I didn't deploy the solution, but I supported customers that use it. I think it took them up to six months to deploy the CrowdStrike Falcon Surface.

The solution somehow doesn't allow intrusion and minimizes fraud or cyber-attacks. Within the time we're using it, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface detected a lot of intrusion from malicious individuals. It was able to prevent a lot of insider threats where people internally will want to run some malicious scripts within the environment.

It detects those malicious attacks quickly, and we can prevent them. It minimized a lot of cyber and fraud-related activities that could have cost the bank a lot of money.

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a cloud-based solution. In light of the recent global IT outage that affected CrowdStrike, they should do proper change management.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Due to compliance requirements, our organization utilizes CrowdStrike Falcon as our Endpoint Detection and Response solution. This decision was particularly driven by the need to address a surge of ransomware attacks within our environment, experiencing between ten and 15 incidents at the time. The implementation of an EDR solution became crucial for effectively responding to these threats.

Our existing system lacked real-time monitoring and visibility, causing detection delays of even several minutes. CrowdStrike addressed this by offering near-instantaneous detection across the entire system. Furthermore, it allows for manual or automated response actions, significantly improving our overall incident response speed.

Integrating CrowdStrike Falcon with other solutions such as our SIEM was easy.

The key aspect of CrowdStrike Falcon is its behavioral detection approach. Unlike traditional signature-based platforms that rely on pre-defined patterns, Falcon analyzes an application's behavior to identify and respond to threats much faster. This makes it lightweight and minimizes impact on system performance. The sandbox feature is also valuable, while it incurs an additional cost, it can be valuable for deeper investigation.

The UI is not efficient. We are required to dig down to get more information, jumping from screen to screen.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for three and a half years.

CrowdStrike Falcon generally ran smoothly with minimal lag.

CrowdStrike Falcon meets our scaling needs. To increase usage we simply add more agents.

Frustrated by CrowdStrike's slow and inconsistent technical support, we ended up having more success researching and resolving the issue ourselves.

Neutral

Leveraging the cloud platform, the initial deployment was straightforward. We simply needed to activate and deploy the agents. While configuration for a seasoned professional only took one to two hours, the entire deployment process typically takes a couple of days.

CrowdStrike Falcon can be more expensive than some competitors, and its base price doesn't cover every feature. For instance, adding sandboxing for advanced malware analysis incurs an extra cost.

We evaluated CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. However, since we bought the CrowdStrike, we did not move forward with SentinelOne.

CrowdStrike stands out for its superior threat detection speed, lightweight agents that don't impact system performance, and its helpful recommendations for responding to threats. This combination allows us to swiftly stop even unknown threats in their tracks.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon eight out of ten.

Two engineers max are required for maintenance.

We have 5,000 CrowdStrike Falcon users within our organization.

CrowdStrike Falcon utilizes a behavioral approach to security, proactively identifying threats based on their actions rather than relying on pre-defined signatures. This allows for faster response times compared to traditional signature-based systems.

We use it for threat detection and threat hunting.

We are an MSP. We have deployed this in our customer environment, and we use it to detect threats in their environment. It is beneficial for customers to find cybersecurity-related threats on the endpoints.

The out-of-the-box configurations and threat intelligence provided by CrowdStrike are better than other vendors and competitors in this field. It improves our security strategy because we are building threat intelligence on top of CrowdStrike-provided detection.

We are building SIEM use cases on top of the data provided by CrowdStrike. There is reliability, and the response that we get from it is very fast. If any incident happens on the endpoint, it immediately detects that and sends that to our SIEM.

Endpoint security is a very crucial aspect of cybersecurity. Integrating CrowdStrike helps a lot to identify and dig deeper into the threats.

Its integration capability is valuable. It integrates easily with any OS. 

They are good at what they are doing, but they can add more use cases. They can improve their documentation. It is a very big aspect where they are lacking. They have documentation, but it is behind the wall of authentication. It is not available publicly.

In terms of features, I would like them to add detailed logging functionality in CrowdStrike. Currently, CrowdStrike detects the threats immediately based on the IOCs and the signature-based policies or many threat behaviors, but in terms of logging those threats, it is not very good. The information that they provide in the logs is very little. They can build more analytics into it. If they can add more information about an event, it will be beneficial for us and everyone else who is using CrowdStrike.

I have been using this solution for four years. I have had hands-on experience with it for about two to three years.

It is a stable product.

I have not interacted with their support team. It is not a part of my job.

I work with multiple vendors, not only CrowdStrike, in the endpoint space, and the CrowdStrike UI is better than others. The response of CrowdStrike is better than other vendors.

It is deployed on the cloud. Its deployment is of moderate complexity. It is not easy, and it is also not difficult. Overall, it is easy to deploy and manage CrowdStrike Falcon across the organization.

I would definitely recommend CrowdStrike Falcon. It is better than other solutions, such as VMware Carbon Black. CrowdStrike is doing better in this space. 

If you are using CrowdStrike Falcon for the first time, it will be easy for you. You can definitely use it.

Overall, I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon an eight out of ten. 

We rely on CrowdStrike Falcon for comprehensive threat detection, prevention, and valuable insights. This robust solution also offers identity protection features. Our dedicated team of six professionals effectively manages the platform, ensuring its effectiveness across multiple locations, including our data centers and core facility.

CrowdStrike's advanced detection and prevention capabilities offer a superior level of protection against potential threats. Its unique feature of automated rules is designed to effectively confine threats at the device level. This automatic confinement of high alerts ensures that the device is secured immediately, buying crucial time for the dedicated response team to identify and neutralize the threat. This proactive strategy not only minimizes the potential impact of threats but also guarantees a rapid and efficient response to any security incidents, thereby enhancing the overall security posture.

We appreciate Falcon's network visibility feature as it allows us to monitor the evolution of threats on PCs and within the company network. The solution's real-time incident response is notably swift. Initially, we encountered numerous false positives during the project initiation phase. However, we managed to resolve most of them independently or with assistance from CrowdStrike support. Consequently, our security levels were significantly improved, and we elevated all parameters to their maximum. Currently, we seldom encounter false positives. Most of these were low-level alerts, while the high-level alerts were automatically quarantined.

While Falcon's advanced capabilities offer robust security solutions, it's worth noting that some of these features may come at a higher cost. This could potentially make it a less economical option for small to medium-sized businesses operating on tighter budgets. It's important for such companies to weigh the benefits of Falcon's comprehensive protection against their financial constraints to make an informed decision.

We have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for nearly five years already.

Crowdstrike Falcon demonstrates exceptional stability once it has been properly configured with the appropriate settings. While there may be a period of adaptation and configuration required to ensure optimal performance, once the solution is in place, it operates with remarkable stability. Users can rely on Crowdstrike Falcon to consistently deliver reliable and secure protection without significant disruptions or instability.

I would rate Crowdstrike Falcon a nine out of 10 for scalability. It offers seamless scalability, allowing easy expansion of the sensor deployment to accommodate growing needs. However, it's worth noting that the primary limitation one may encounter is the cost associated with deploying additional sensors.

I rate CrowdStrike support nine out of 10. It's fantastic. 

Positive

We made the switch from Symantec to Falcon because we required a solution that offered greater speed, reliability, and the ability to effectively handle the wide range of advanced threats present in the wild.

The initial setup of Crowdstrike Falcon was straightforward and efficient. The cloud-based deployment process was seamless for most components, with the exception of the sensors. Deploying the sensors to PCs was automated and hassle-free, requiring just a few minutes per device. However, to ensure the highest level of protection and customization, we opted to manually install the sensors on our servers. This hands-on approach allowed us to have greater control and assurance over the server deployment, ensuring the best possible protection for our critical infrastructure.

We've seen an ROI in terms of time saved. It's probably around 5 percent. 

While Falcon's advanced capabilities offer robust security solutions, it's worth noting that some of these features may come at a higher cost. This could potentially make it a less economical option for small to medium-sized businesses operating on tighter budgets. It's important for such companies to weigh the benefits of Falcon's comprehensive protection against their financial constraints to make an informed decision.

Of course but I can't disclose this information.

I rate Crowdstrike Falcon nine out of 10. 

I mainly use CrowdStrike Falcon to prevent threats and detect indicators of attacks or compromises in the network.

In the past, we regularly got alerts about suspicious activities in the network but couldn't understand where they were coming from. Since we deployed CrowdStrike, the network has become much calmer, and we now understand the sources of infections, which helps us prevent them from spreading. We now get immediate information about infections and can react much faster.

An improvement would be to extend support to legacy and unsupported servers. In the next release, CrowdStrike should include patch and vulnerability management, which would allow us to rely on just one solution.

I've been using CrowdStrike Falcon for over a year.

Falcon is pretty stable - we haven't seen any kinds of performance issues like lagging, which we did experience with other endpoint protection solutions.

CrowdStrike's technical support is very fast and responsive.

Positive

Previously, I used Microsoft Bitdefender, but CrowdStrike was faster and better protection-wise.

The initial setup was straightforward - it was very quick (about two and a half hours) without any downtime or issues. We also extended the installation to the remote side, which took another hour. I would rate the setup process four out of five.

We used an in-house team.

In the past, we have around four to five engineers managing our endpoint - we have now reduced this to two engineers, which has cut costs. We've also been able to cut the time needed to find the threats and their root causes from up to six hours a day to just half an hour. I would rate our ROI as five out of five.

We pay between $30-50 per user for a yearly license, which is more expensive than SentinelOne or Bitdefender. However, CrowdStrike gives better value for money, so I would rate their pricing four out of five. If you want to add modules or features, these are an additional cost per user.

We evaluated SentinelOne, but it was too heavy on the machine and slowed it down. We also did a threat simulation analysis with both SentinelOne and CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne wasn't able to detect or block the threats.

CrowdStrike Falcon is the best endpoint protection solution I've used so far. I would advise anybody thinking of implementing it to go for it, as CrowdStrike will provide more visibility, depth, and context to threats and allow you to understand what's going on. I would give Falcon a rating of ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as advanced threat protection. It is used to protect all endpoints, servers, etc. 

They're very good at what they do. As far as the product is, in its current state, I don't have any complaints at all right now. They do a quarterly review with us, just so they can let us know how many viruses or how much malware they've stopped, etc. Those features are quite good. They also go through the portal step-by-step to describe whatever they improved or tightened up. They will explain everything clearly and in a way that a customer can understand.

They do also ask for feedback, which is nice. They'll ask things like "The last time we changed this, how was your experience?" or "Did you get a lot of false positives?" or "Did you get any complaints?" etc. That's pretty good. Not many companies do that.

The UI is simple and self-explanatory. Everything is easy to understand.

So far, in the past three years, they've been absolutely great. They've been more proactive than the solution we had previously was. They even introduced new products in their line and they came back and told us that they could add that product to our current solution. At first, we added them, then we decided we had sufficient resources in house to manage it ourselves and removed it. They were great about the change. 

They've caught quite a lot of viruses and malware that have been sent through improper links, which is very reassuring. 

They report any network isolation that has been done on certain endpoints if they detect a malicious file or malware on the device that couldn't be cleaned by automation. They isolate it or us. The end-user can contact the service desk and say, "Hey, I'm not able to surf the internet. I can't do anything, so can you help me?" or we're able to look at the endpoint and see "oh, your PC is infected, that's why you aren't allowed on." It's protecting us well.

Even though the users are somewhere else, even when they're not at headquarters, we are able to remediate everything before we put them on the network again. Those network isolations are great when we detect high threat malicious items. Those are valuable tools that we appreciate.

If an operating system is stopped by support by the original vendor like Microsoft, or maybe Apple, within a few weeks, CrowdStrike will also decide they no longer support it, and they kind of move on. I understand their model. However, if we still have the OS, it's hard to keep it protected. So, for example, if Microsoft decides to stop supporting or patching a solution, Crowdstrike too will stop supporting it and making updates. It's still a useable product, it's just not getting updates or patches and therefore may be vulnerable. 

The result is that we can't guarantee we're going to be able to protect that hardware or operating system. We either have to upgrade to a newer platform, which sometimes is not possible because you have a legacy application. Whatever that constraint is, sometimes we're not able to move things. We still have to rely on other products to support that. That's the only quandary I have with them. 

Basically, they don't cover legacy OS or applications. That's the only issue we're concerned about.

When a file is infected or it detects a ransomware file network, when it does remediate, it should self-heal as Sophos does. That's a good feature to have, but I don't know enough pros and cons about that to kind of recommend that because if it is a false positive, that may be a problem. If it detected a valid file and if for some reason it decides, "Oh, this looks like an infection," and maybe it's not actually infected, and if it goes in and remediates it by replacing it with an older file, that may be a problem. However, I don't know, because I've never used that feature or heard anybody say that's a problem.

I've been using the solution for about three years now.

I have two engineers that regularly watch everything. We all get alerts. We'll see if something gets isolated, or a user will tell us. We isolate the issues and work on them so nothing gets through the endpoints into the system. Within 30 minutes to an hour, an issue can be cleared.

It's therefore very stable. We're able to catch everything before it can get it. It's reliable for sure.

They're so pro-active there's very little intervention that we have to do on our end.

The solution is easily scalable. A company shouldn't have any issues with that aspect of the solution.

Technical support is great. We've never had to contact them at all. Instead, they've always been proactive and reached out to us.

Their quarterly review manager will contact us every three months. They schedule it months ahead and we actually jump on a Zoom or WebEx meeting. They actually go through the improvements, how much detections they go through, all of our features, anything new that has been added, anything they're seeing out in the world in terms of threats, and where we need to tighten up the roles.

They would improve the sensitivity level or they will decrease the sensitivity level for some false positives. For example, they might say "Hey, we detect these, but they're not really a threat because this is just a Word document that's produced in an older format. It's not something that's malicious." Then they would decrease the sensitivity in certain areas, to eliminate the issue going forward. They always ask permission before tweaking anything. They will come to us and say, "this is what we're considering doing it and why we want to do it. Is that okay?" We usually agree to that and then they go ahead and do it.

It's just a phenomenal company. If they ever stopped the way they handle their customer service, then I would probably move on to a different company. So far they've been pretty good. For the last three years, they contacted us always and told us about every aspect of the solution. I don't think I missed a quarterly meeting so far with them due to the fact that it's all been so valuable.

Originally, we had Webroot. We used to get, every so often, a slew of viruses that would get through the cracks. I don't know if Webroot's definition didn't get updated in a timely manner or if they were just delayed in something, however, whatever it was, we used to get that intrusion quite a bit. Then we would patch it and we would have to remediate everything. It wasn't ideal. 

We were looking for a product that would be more proactive than a reactive solution, and after doing a bunch of research, we decided on CrowdStrike. 

The solution's initial setup was very simple. The only thing we had an issue with is our network operation. Is a separate organization that manages it. We have a network operation that we used for 24 hour monitoring. They don't support CrowdStrike and they were not experts in it. They stood us we would have to manage it ourselves. In the beginning, we were kind of worried about it. However, after that initial stage, the simplicity of how to install it, configure it was like a breeze.

We manage the entire solution in house. For maintenance, we have me and two engineers, plus a second level of support. There are around five people altogether.

I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution. That's a detail our finance department handles.

We did research on Cylance. We looked at Norton as well. We went through a bunch of products and we decided CrowdStrike was probably the most advanced threat protection at that time, which was three years ago. 

One of the products we were looking at is Sophos. The reason we were looking at Sophos is we were purchasing a backup and disaster recovery tool. In that tool, they had a built-in Sophos pack; they integrated Sophos in to protect the backup and replication and recovery. That way, if a backup had infections, for some reason, and they weren't picked up, and it got into our backup product, then Sophos could kick in and pick it up. It has automated remediation, meaning it reverses back the infection before infection if that makes sense.

Sophos has a self-healing technology built into it, which is an AI technology that they invented. We were looking at that because we thought that may be a better product. We were doing some homework on that and trying to figure out more about it. We're still in the process of purchasing a backup and recovery tool, so we're still doing our homework.

We're just customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. The last time I checked, it was version 5.6. It is up-to-date, however. I get a report every so often saying, we've updated the sensors, or current version, etc. It's an auto-update and it does that. Whenever it's missing something or it couldn't reach an endpoint, the company will send me a report of that, saying these endpoints are not updated because we couldn't detect it on the network any longer.

The only advice I would say to others considering the solution is, if they have an unsupported operating system or legacy application, to look closely at CrowdStrike to see if the solution actually makes sense for them. This is due to the fact that they're not going to be able to support it. If they have thousands of servers and 20% of them are legacy applications, they may not want to think about CrowdStrike because the solution doesn't support legacy products. Other than that, I fully recommend CrowdStrike. The advanced threat protection they have has always been great.

I'd rate the solution a solid nine out of ten.

A popular choice for Data Loss Prevention is CrowdStrike Falcon. This is the primary function our clients leverage it for, as it offers industry-leading DLP capabilities.

CrowdStrike Falcon has helped our customers secure their confidential data.

The DLP is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon. Additionally, the scanning is good and the deployment is easy.

The console is not user-friendly or visually appealing and has room for improvement. I would like a single pane of glass dashboard.

I have been an integrator of CrowdStrike Falcon for one day. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

I have also worked with Trend Micro and Panda.

The initial deployment is straightforward. I would rate the ease of setup nine out of ten.

Two people are required for the deployment.

I need to upgrade the software occasionally but it doesn't require continuous maintenance.

While the specific deployment time varies depending on each client's individual environment, on average the process can be completed in a couple of days.

I only deploy the solution for clients, I don't calculate their ROI.

CrowdStrike Falcon's pricing is reasonable. We can customize features and that affects the pricing.

We pay 40,000 dirhams per 100 users.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon nine out of ten.

Our clientele ranges from small to enterprise-level businesses.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon as it provides all the features of an EDR.