Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ESET Inspect Logo

Top 10 ESET Inspect Alternatives

Vendor: ESET
3.8 out of 5
Post review

Top ESET Inspect Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ESET Inspect based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Fortinet FortiEDR. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ESET Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ESET, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ESET Inspect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels with its advanced threat intelligence and cloud-native architecture, catering to users valuing cutting-edge features. In comparison, ESET Inspect appeals to cost-conscious buyers, offering detailed analytics and flexible deployment, maximizing ROI with lower initial costs.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Inspect Report
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost structure, providing clear budgeting, while ESET Inspect offers a flexible setup cost, catering to varying financial needs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon features a straightforward setup cost structure, providing clear budgeting, while ESET Inspect offers a flexible setup cost, catering to varying financial needs.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels with detailed reports and tracing capabilities, appealing for its reasonable setup costs. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, though pricier, offers seamless integration and advanced analytics, justifying its higher costs with superior features and significant ROI.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which has a higher initial cost.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which has a higher initial cost.
ESET Inspect Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection, real-time response, and automation, offering straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides comprehensive endpoint visibility, proactive threat hunting, and advanced investigative tools, thus delivering better ROI and detailed investigative features. Scalability is a challenge for ESET Inspect, while FortiEDR faces integration issues.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers real-time threat detection and is praised for easy deployment and customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides advanced analytics and deeper insights, justifying its higher cost with superior features. SentinelOne appeals for cost-effectiveness, while ESET attracts advanced users.
Download ESET Inspect vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, making SentinelOne a pricier option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup cost compared to ESET Inspect, making SentinelOne a pricier option for initial deployment.
ESET Inspect Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Elastic Security
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Security is valued for its comprehensive monitoring, real-time alerts, and reasonable setup costs. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides advanced threat detection and detailed forensic capabilities, justifying its higher investment. Elastic Security offers smooth deployment, while ESET Inspect delivers effective customer service despite a more complex setup.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Elastic Security Report
Elastic Security has a moderate setup cost, providing accessible deployment, whereas ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost, offering a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security has a moderate setup cost, providing accessible deployment, whereas ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost, offering a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect features robust threat detection, while Intercept X Endpoint excels with comprehensive protection capabilities. In comparison, ESET Inspect's advanced threat hunting contrasts with Intercept X Endpoint's deep learning malware detection. ESET Inspect offers cost-effectiveness; Intercept X Endpoint provides extensive features for higher investment.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
ESET Inspect is hailed for its low setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint is often critiqued for higher upfront expenses. Intercept X's intricate configuration demands more time compared to the straightforward setup of ESET Inspect.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect is hailed for its low setup cost, while Intercept X Endpoint is often critiqued for higher upfront expenses. Intercept X's intricate configuration demands more time compared to the straightforward setup of ESET Inspect.
ESET Inspect Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in advanced threat protection and ease of deployment, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers comprehensive threat detection and integration features, justifying its higher cost with a superior ROI.
Download ESET Inspect vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security's setup cost is characterized by its competitive pricing, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is noted for being higher but potentially offering more comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security's setup cost is characterized by its competitive pricing, while ESET Inspect's setup cost is noted for being higher but potentially offering more comprehensive features.
ESET Inspect Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5

Trend Vision One offers comprehensive protection for endpoints, networks, and email with centralized visibility. It is valued for its attack surface management, real-time threat detection, integrated management, ease of deployment, and user-friendly interface.

Download ESET Inspect vs. Trend Vision One Report
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
It would be nice if it was a little bit cheaper, but I think it has a fair price. It is comparable to others in the market.
The price is reasonable. It's not exorbitant. CrowdStrike and other players are on the higher side.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect offers cost-effectiveness with advanced threat hunting and seamless integration. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR excels with proactive threat management and customer partnership, which appeals to those seeking comprehensive managed services. The choice depends on budget priorities versus advanced threat response needs.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
ESET Inspect's setup cost tends to be higher, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a notable difference in initial expense between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect's setup cost tends to be higher, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a notable difference in initial expense between the two solutions.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in threat detection and automation with smooth deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers rich forensic data and network visibility but has a challenging setup. Bitdefender provides lower costs, while ESET delivers valuable features despite higher expenses.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. ESET Inspect Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has higher setup costs, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective setup experience. ESET Inspect stands out for its affordability, contrasting sharply with the premium setup investment required for Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has higher setup costs, while ESET Inspect offers a more cost-effective setup experience. ESET Inspect stands out for its affordability, contrasting sharply with the premium setup investment required for Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is known for its comprehensive threat detection, automated response functions, cost-effectiveness, easy deployment, and responsive customer service. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides deep analysis, flexibility, customizability, high ROI, and superior feature depth but has complex deployment and integration challenges.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. ESET Inspect Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users report lower setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, highlighting a significant cost advantage for organizations prioritizing initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response users report lower setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, highlighting a significant cost advantage for organizations prioritizing initial implementation expenses.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in threat detection and detailed forensics, offering comprehensive threat hunting capabilities. In comparison, Datto EDR provides advanced threat intelligence and real-time monitoring with seamless integration. ESET Inspect is budget-friendly, while Datto EDR's higher cost is justified by its advanced features and proactive protection.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. ESET Inspect Report
ESET Inspect has a minimal setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a minimal setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) involves a higher initial investment.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert
4.1 out of 5
ESET Inspect stands out for its competitive pricing and excellent support, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers superior features and advanced threat intelligence, justifying its higher price for those seeking comprehensive functionality.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, making it a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Inspect Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5

Open EDR addresses security by providing threat detection, incident investigation, and automated responses. It enhances endpoint protection with detailed monitoring. Users appreciate its real-time threat detection, easy deployment, and community support but note issues with false positives, system performance, and complex installation. They desire better reporting features and more integrations.

View comparison
ESET Inspect Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate excels in threat detection, automation, and security integration, making it ideal for robust threat response. In comparison, ESET Inspect offers detailed forensic analysis and customizable dashboards. Tech buyers might choose Fidelis Elevate for reasonable costs or ESET Inspect for its superior features.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Fidelis Elevate Report
Fidelis Elevate has a higher initial setup cost, while ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. Fidelis Elevate's comprehensive security features may justify the higher cost compared to ESET Inspect.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate has a higher initial setup cost, while ESET Inspect offers a more budget-friendly setup. Fidelis Elevate's comprehensive security features may justify the higher cost compared to ESET Inspect.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in pricing and customer support. In comparison, WatchGuard provides advanced threat analytics and real-time response. ESET Inspect is appreciated for straightforward deployment while WatchGuard offers premium features. ESET Inspect enhances cost-effectiveness, whereas WatchGuard justifies higher costs with advanced capabilities.
Download ESET Inspect vs. WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response. WatchGuard's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Threat Detection and Response. WatchGuard's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its comprehensive features.
ESET Inspect Logo
ESET Inspect Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
ESET Inspect is appreciated for its ease of use and reliable threat detection. In comparison, Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers advanced features and integrated network security, catering to those needing comprehensive protection. Sangfor's additional capabilities come at increased complexity but provide higher value for tech buyers.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
ESET Inspect's setup cost is generally lower compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect's setup cost is generally lower compared to Sangfor Endpoint Secure, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements.
ESET Inspect Logo
N-able EDR
1 out of 5
ESET Inspect Logo
N-able EDR
1 out of 5
ESET Inspect excels in detailed reporting and advanced threat detection, making it ideal for users needing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, N-able EDR streamlines integration and real-time monitoring for those prioritizing ease of deployment and efficient customer service over extensive threat analysis.
Download ESET Inspect vs. N-able EDR Report
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Inspect has a lower setup cost compared to N-able EDR, which offers extensive features.

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)