Fortinet FortiSandbox Reviews

The primary use case of this solution is email and protection.

We use FortiMail as well, and most of our environment is protected. We don’t have internet access for our users apart from email.

This solution is deployed in the Cloud.

The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most.

The online information is very good.

The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified.

When choosing FortiSandbox, there are three different types of Licenses, but it doesn’t specify that it is for FortiSandbox, so you have a box for Sandboxing, then a separate box for hardware, and a separate one for the Cloud.

This solution is stable. I am happy with it.

This solution is scalable.

We have over two thousand users.

I have never used technical support.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The information available on-line was helpful during the configuration.

We did not implement this solution through a vendor, we did it ourselves.

The pricing is okay, but the licensing can be confusing. For example, if you purchase FortiSandbox, there are three different types of licensing. They have a separate FortiSandbox for the cloud, and for FortiGate. It can be quite confusing.

For being an existing FortiGate customer, they started by giving me one year for free, then I started renewing.

If you are an existing user of Fortinet and familiar with the interfaces of FortiGate and others then it will be easy for you.

I don’t have a business relationship with Fortinet. I am a user.

I would recommend this solution. I don’t have any complaints, so it is difficult to say what I would like to see in the next release.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

This solution is used to connect to all of our other fabric, including Fortinet solutions such as FortiGate, FortiMail, and FortiClient.

We have this solution deployed on a virtual machine.

The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails.

Sometimes, email remains in the queue, which is a problem that we have contacted support about. This is something that needs to be improved.

The response time from technical support should be improved.

This solution is stable.

We have approximately four hundred people who use this solution.

We do plan on increasing our usage.

Technical support for this solution is good, but the people can take a long time to answer you. Sometimes, by the time they answer our ticket, we have already fixed the problem.

The initial setup is easy. There are instructions to follow.

We deployed this solution on our own.

This is a solution that I strongly recommend.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution to allow us to pick up on any traffic that is suspicious.

If there is malicious traffic that is going through the web application, we can halt that action, instead of waiting for the AntiVirus to take action. It also allows us to block them. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution.

The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors.

The solution is very stable.

The solution is scalable. All of our web traffic currently goes through it.

Technical support is pretty good.

We didn't previously use a different solution.

The initial setup is straightforward.

We used a local vendor to help us with the initial implementation.

We use the on-premises deployment model of the solution.

I'd recommend the solution. All of its features are readily available.

I'd rate it nine out of ten.

We use Fortinet FortiSandbox for threat protection and threat emulation.

The solution is easy to manage.

I have been using Fortinet FortiSandbox for approximately one year.

The solution is stable.

We have over 20 customers using this solution.

The technical support is good.

The initial setup is not too complex but could be easier.

There is a license to use this solution.

I rate Fortinet FortiSandbox a ten out of ten.

We use this solution on-premises and our primary use case is for end-point protection. 

What I find most valuable, is that it is easy to use. 

Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection. 

I believe the solution is very stable. We've had a crash once or twice, but it was because they were having problems on their side. Now it works pretty well and we don't have any issues.

I believe the solution is scalable. We currently have only four people using it at our office.

The initial setup is easy and straightforward. If a person doesn't have experience with the product, they can do some searching to see exactly how to do it. But it's not difficult at all. 

The solution is not expensive at all.

I will rate this solution a seven out of ten. I would like to see an improvement in the end-point protection.