Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GoAnywhere MFT Logo

Top 10 GoAnywhere MFT Alternatives

Vendor: Fortra
4.6 out of 5
Badge Leader
456 followers
Start review

Top GoAnywhere MFT Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to GoAnywhere MFT based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, webMethods.io, and MOVEit. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. GoAnywhere MFT surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive data encryption, automated workflows, and secure managed file transfers, ensuring seamless integration with various platforms while maintaining high levels of security and compliance to streamline business operations efficiently.

Fortra Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortra, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Control-M
4.4 out of 5
Control-M offers comprehensive workflow management and automation for IT operations. In comparison, GoAnywhere focuses on secure data transfer, offering cost-effective solutions. Control-M is ideal for large environments, while GoAnywhere appeals to organizations prioritizing security and streamlined file transfers.
Download Control-M vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Control-M has a higher setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Control-M has a higher setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers automation and security in file transfers with Advanced Workflows. In comparison, webMethods.io excels in integration features and handles complex scenarios with tools like API management. Both provide unique benefits, meeting diverse enterprise needs effectively based on specific requirements.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. webMethods.io Report
GoAnywhere MFT requires lower setup costs compared to webMethods.io, offering an economical option for businesses seeking budget-efficient solutions. In contrast, webMethods.io involves higher setup expenses, suitable for organizations with a larger budget for integration tools.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT requires lower setup costs compared to webMethods.io, offering an economical option for businesses seeking budget-efficient solutions. In contrast, webMethods.io involves higher setup expenses, suitable for organizations with a larger budget for integration tools.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MOVEit
4.1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MOVEit
4.1 out of 5
MOVEit provides excellent capabilities for handling large files and flexible protocol support, ideal for extensive audit trails. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT simplifies complex workflows with powerful automation and integration options, making it suitable for diverse needs with intuitive adaptability across environments.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. MOVEit Report
MOVEit has a lower setup cost while GoAnywhere MFT offers advanced features at a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
MOVEit has a lower setup cost while GoAnywhere MFT offers advanced features at a higher initial investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway
3.9 out of 5
IBM Sterling File Gateway excels in managing large-scale file transfers with high-capacity limits and strong security. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT focuses on seamless cloud integration and simplifying workflows, appealing to those seeking extensive automation without custom scripts.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. IBM Sterling File Gateway Report
IBM Sterling File Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a cost-effective alternative for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Sterling File Gateway has a higher setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting a cost-effective alternative for deployment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite
4.2 out of 5
SEEBURGER BIS offers robust integration features, emphasizing EDI and high reliability. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT excels in secure file transfers with strong security features. SEEBURGER's flexible integration stands out, while GoAnywhere's intuitive workflow appeals to those seeking simplicity without custom scripts.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite has a high setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a budget-friendly setup charge.
View comparison
Pricing
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite has a high setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a budget-friendly setup charge.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks offers budget-friendly pricing and efficient deployment, focusing on encryption and API flexibility. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT appeals to tech buyers with extensive automation and protocol support, promising a higher long-term ROI despite initial costs.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. Kiteworks Report
Kiteworks offers competitive setup costs aimed at businesses prioritizing affordability, whereas GoAnywhere MFT provides a more comprehensive setup requirement that enhances functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiteworks offers competitive setup costs aimed at businesses prioritizing affordability, whereas GoAnywhere MFT provides a more comprehensive setup requirement that enhances functionality.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct
4.0 out of 5
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is chosen for its reliability in high-volume data transfers. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT provides a comprehensive feature set, including integration and automation. A tech buyer might choose Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct for reliability and GoAnywhere MFT for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Report
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct offers a straightforward setup process with reasonable costs, while GoAnywhere MFT provides a more comprehensive configuration with slightly higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct offers a straightforward setup process with reasonable costs, while GoAnywhere MFT provides a more comprehensive configuration with slightly higher initial expenses.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
ActiveBatch by Redwood
4.6 out of 5
ActiveBatch by Redwood offers versatile automation features, enhancing integration capabilities for various IT operations. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT emphasizes secure file transfers with strong security features. ActiveBatch users seek better cloud integration, while GoAnywhere users look for improved API handling and cloud compatibility.
Download ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a high upfront setup cost, whereas GoAnywhere MFT offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a high upfront setup cost, whereas GoAnywhere MFT offers a more affordable initial investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Aspera Managed File Transfer
3.8 out of 5
Aspera Managed File Transfer provides fast transfer speeds and scalability with FASP technology, making it ideal for large data sets. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers comprehensive security and automation features, appealing to companies needing robust compliance and efficient workflows despite higher costs.
Download Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Aspera Managed File Transfer and GoAnywhere MFT offer different setup costs, with Aspera having a higher cost reflecting its advanced capabilities, while GoAnywhere presents a more budget-friendly option, catering to businesses looking for cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Aspera Managed File Transfer and GoAnywhere MFT offer different setup costs, with Aspera having a higher cost reflecting its advanced capabilities, while GoAnywhere presents a more budget-friendly option, catering to businesses looking for cost-effective solutions.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
VisualCron
4.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
VisualCron
4.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT appeals to tech buyers seeking robust workflow automation and strong security for compliance. In comparison, VisualCron attracts those needing straightforward scheduling without programming skills. GoAnywhere provides extensive integration, while VisualCron offers user-friendly, visually intuitive task management.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. VisualCron Report
GoAnywhere MFT requires a substantial setup cost, whereas VisualCron offers a more affordable initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT requires a substantial setup cost, whereas VisualCron offers a more affordable initial financial commitment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
4.4 out of 5
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer excels in comprehensive integration and strong alerting, appealing to users needing robust encryption and complex workflow orchestration. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT emphasizes automation and security, offering economical pricing and seamless cloud integration for diverse protocol support.
Download BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly GoAnywhere MFT. The pricing distinction highlights BMC’s premium position, while GoAnywhere MFT offers cost-effective solutions suitable for different budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly GoAnywhere MFT. The pricing distinction highlights BMC’s premium position, while GoAnywhere MFT offers cost-effective solutions suitable for different budget considerations.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer
3.9 out of 5
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer stands out for its comprehensive integration capabilities, catering to complex environments. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT excels in automation and scalability, offering a simplified deployment process that appeals to cost-conscious organizations seeking immediate benefits from efficient file transfers.
Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Axway AMPLIFY MFT demands a higher setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT presents a more cost-effective setup. GoAnywhere MFT offers competitive initial pricing, whereas Axway emphasizes comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Axway AMPLIFY MFT demands a higher setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT presents a more cost-effective setup. GoAnywhere MFT offers competitive initial pricing, whereas Axway emphasizes comprehensive capabilities.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
CA XCOM Data Transport
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers user-friendly interfaces and robust security, ideal for streamlining secure operations. In comparison, CA XCOM Data Transport excels in handling extensive transfers across platforms, appealing to enterprises with complex environments, validating its value despite potential higher costs.
GoAnywhere MFT is praised for its affordable setup cost, offering value for businesses with budget constraints, while CA XCOM Data Transport is noted for a higher initial investment, which may indicate additional features or capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT is praised for its affordable setup cost, offering value for businesses with budget constraints, while CA XCOM Data Transport is noted for a higher initial investment, which may indicate additional features or capabilities.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
JSCAPE MFT impresses with scalability and cloud deployment flexibility, fitting businesses needing large file transfers and robust security. In comparison, GoAnywhere's workflow features and intuitive operations support businesses requiring efficient data management and secure file transfers. JSCAPE prioritizes hybrid deployment, while GoAnywhere enhances on-premises capabilities.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report
JSCAPE by Redwood has minimal setup costs, ensuring quick deployment, while GoAnywhere MFT involves a higher initial investment but offers extensive integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
JSCAPE by Redwood has minimal setup costs, ensuring quick deployment, while GoAnywhere MFT involves a higher initial investment but offers extensive integration capabilities.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
TIBCO Managed File Transfer
3.8 out of 5
TIBCO Managed File Transfer appeals to those seeking simplicity and cost-effectiveness with secure protocols. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT attracts users needing advanced automation and cloud integration. TIBCO's straightforward deployment benefits quick setups, while GoAnywhere's flexible approach suits varied environments.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer Report
TIBCO Managed File Transfer incurs higher setup costs, whereas GoAnywhere MFT offers a more budget-friendly setup. This price difference highlights the cost aspect that could influence user's initial investment in these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
TIBCO Managed File Transfer incurs higher setup costs, whereas GoAnywhere MFT offers a more budget-friendly setup. This price difference highlights the cost aspect that could influence user's initial investment in these solutions.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Flux
5.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Flux
5.0 out of 5
Flux might appeal to cost-conscious buyers due to its flexible scheduling and workflow management capabilities. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT attracts those prioritizing security and regulatory compliance with its robust security features, justifying a higher initial investment despite its comprehensive deployment process.
Download Flux vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Flux offers cost-effective initial setup whereas GoAnywhere MFT involves a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Flux offers cost-effective initial setup whereas GoAnywhere MFT involves a higher setup investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MessageWay
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MessageWay
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT enhances automation and compliance through integration and encryption. In comparison, MessageWay supports complex workflows with high-volume capabilities. GoAnywhere's straightforward deployment suits budget-conscious buyers, while MessageWay’s personalized assistance benefits enterprises needing advanced features despite higher costs.
GoAnywhere MFT has a lower setup cost compared to MessageWay, highlighting a cost-efficient option for users seeking a budget-friendly solution. MessageWay's higher setup cost could imply more advanced initial configurations or additional support requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT has a lower setup cost compared to MessageWay, highlighting a cost-efficient option for users seeking a budget-friendly solution. MessageWay's higher setup cost could imply more advanced initial configurations or additional support requirements.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Aspera On Demand
1 out of 5
Aspera On Demand excels in scalability and high-speed data transfer, appealing to organizations with large data needs. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers superior security and ease of integration, which is essential for companies prioritizing data protection and seamless protocol compatibility.
Aspera On Demand offers minimal setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT requires a higher investment. This cost difference highlights Aspera On Demand's affordability advantage compared to GoAnywhere MFT's more substantial financial commitment for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Aspera On Demand offers minimal setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT requires a higher investment. This cost difference highlights Aspera On Demand's affordability advantage compared to GoAnywhere MFT's more substantial financial commitment for implementation.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
3.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT excels in security and automation, making it ideal for businesses focused on data protection. In comparison, SolarWinds Serv-U offers robust FTP/SFTP support for straightforward file sharing, appealing to enterprises seeking cost-effective and simple deployment solutions.
GoAnywhere MFT reports lower setup costs compared to SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, illustrating a potentially more economical initial investment for GoAnywhere MFT users.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT reports lower setup costs compared to SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, illustrating a potentially more economical initial investment for GoAnywhere MFT users.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Oracle MFT Cloud Service
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT excels with its security features and broad integration options appealing to diverse deployment needs. In comparison, Oracle MFT Cloud Service's cloud-native integrations and scalability advantages cater to organizations prioritizing Oracle's broader suite adaptability for enhanced long-term integration within complex environments.
GoAnywhere MFT has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Oracle MFT Cloud Service tends to be higher due to its additional cloud infrastructure integration.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Oracle MFT Cloud Service tends to be higher due to its additional cloud infrastructure integration.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
OpenText BizManager
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers a cost-effective solution with strong security and automation features. In comparison, OpenText BizManager provides a comprehensive feature set with advanced integration capabilities. Tech buyers may prefer GoAnywhere MFT for affordability, while OpenText BizManager appeals with its extensive integration functionalities.
GoAnywhere MFT offers a cost-effective initial setup, whereas OpenText BizManager requires a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT offers a cost-effective initial setup, whereas OpenText BizManager requires a higher setup investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
WingFTP Managed File Transfer
1 out of 5
WingFTP Managed File Transfer offers efficient file transfers and favorable pricing, making it ideal for smaller enterprises. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT excels in security features and integration capabilities, appealing to larger companies seeking robust security and versatile integration for complex needs.
WingFTP Managed File Transfer has a lower setup cost compared to the more expensive setup of GoAnywhere MFT. Each product's pricing reflects distinct differences in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WingFTP Managed File Transfer has a lower setup cost compared to the more expensive setup of GoAnywhere MFT. Each product's pricing reflects distinct differences in initial investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers comprehensive features and flexible integration, ideal for secure, multi-protocol file transfers. In comparison, Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS excels in seamless AWS integration, offering cost efficiency and scalability with a focus on Amazon S3, perfect for AWS-centric environments.
GoAnywhere MFT features a straightforward setup cost suitable for businesses seeking comprehensive management, while Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS offers a simpler setup cost, appealing to users needing efficient cloud-based file transfers.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT features a straightforward setup cost suitable for businesses seeking comprehensive management, while Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS offers a simpler setup cost, appealing to users needing efficient cloud-based file transfers.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MetaDefender Vault
1 out of 5
MetaDefender Vault highlights its pricing and ROI by focusing on threat detection and secure data storage with strong malware detection. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT impresses with comprehensive managed file transfer capabilities and extensive support, appealing to those needing advanced features and flexible deployment.
MetaDefender Vault shows higher setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT. GoAnywhere MFT offers lower initial expenses, attracting budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
MetaDefender Vault shows higher setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT. GoAnywhere MFT offers lower initial expenses, attracting budget-conscious users.

Related categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Process Automation
Workload Automation