We primarily use the solution in our company and our client's company.
IT Consultant at Elips Elektronik
Reliable, good hardware with intelligent provisioning
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is stable and reliable."
- "I want to improve hyper-converged sites."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I trust the hardware mostly.
There are some features like intelligent provisioning, et cetera, which are quite useful.
The ILO for management is great.
It's scalable.
The solution is stable and reliable.
What needs improvement?
I want to improve hyper-converged sites. We are mostly working with the DL series, however, now we are trying to work with more hyper-converged.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for more than 20 years.
Buyer's Guide
HPE ProLiant DL Servers
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about HPE ProLiant DL Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We are really happy with HP ProLiant Servers. They are stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We find the solution to be scalable.
At this time, we have more than 100 users on the solution.
We work with clients that have companies that vary in size, from small to large.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support has been great. I have been quite satisfied with their level of assistance.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use ProLiant Servers and SimpliVity. We've also worked with Dell. The quality of HP is better here in Turkey. It's faster, and they come with spare parts. There's a shorter timeframe to replace hardware if parts are defective.
How was the initial setup?
How difficult or straightforward the implementation process is depends on the customer's location. We have lots of customers in Turkey. Some of them are complex, and some of them are simple.
We have three admins that can handle maintenance tasks.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
While the price is okay, the price of Dell is lower.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a reseller. We are HPE partners.
I'd advise users to try HP. It's a good solution. However, it depends on the customer. Some prefer working with Dell. If a company already has Dell infrastructure, we advise them to continue with Dell to have a homogenous environment.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
When you compare hyper-converged with ProLiant, hyper-converged is more available due to the clusters; you can cluster it. However, for ProLiant, you have to find a solution with VMware or something like that, for example, third-party solutions. That said, on the hardware side, ProLiant has no cluster option.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Very stable, 100% scalable, and easy to deploy
Pros and Cons
- "It is very stable. This is the feedback that I'm getting from my customers for the hardware. It is also 100% scalable. HPE is also very specialized when it comes up to the server industry. It is not only about the rack servers; it is also about the blade servers. They were the first ones to bring these to the market more than ten years ago."
- "It has something called WorldView. They should do some enhancement over WorldView to run an operating system as a code. Such a feature would be amazing for running multiple servers. They are already working on this, and they can enhance the existing versions for this. It should also be cheaper. It is currently expensive."
What is our primary use case?
It is mainly an x86 Intel server. There are some versions of AMD processors as well. You can use it for many purposes. You can use it as a web server, a backup server, a database server, or an application server. You can use it for any main purpose for which you need a server.
It is mainly on-premises, but you can also deploy it in a cloud.
What is most valuable?
It is very stable. This is the feedback that I'm getting from my customers for the hardware. It is also 100% scalable.
HPE is also very specialized when it comes up to the server industry. It is not only about the rack servers; it is also about the blade servers. They were the first ones to bring these to the market more than ten years ago.
What needs improvement?
It has something called WorldView. They should do some enhancement over WorldView to run an operating system as a code. Such a feature would be amazing for running multiple servers. They are already working on this, and they can enhance the existing versions for this.
It should also be cheaper. It is currently expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been selling this solution for almost six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is 100% scalable. We have about a hundred customers.
How are customer service and technical support?
I don't directly get in touch with them, but I haven't heard anything bad about it.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not complicated for HPE or any other server.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is expensive. Its price should be better.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution. I would rate HPE ProLiant DL Servers an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Buyer's Guide
HPE ProLiant DL Servers
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about HPE ProLiant DL Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sr IT Analyst at Bayer Pharmaceuticals
Scalability, rapidness, and computing are valuable features.
What is most valuable?
The scalability, rapidness, and computing are actually very good. It's a Gen9 server that we've been working with, so it is pretty good.
How has it helped my organization?
The benefit is that they're pretty reliable. Reliability is pretty much what we need.
What needs improvement?
There is need to improve the iLO support. There's a management part of the server that they've improved and that was a big deal.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is very stable and the support is very good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is very good. We were able to move from the servers and upgrade them very easily. It has worked very nicely and is serving generation to generation over the years, so it is pretty good.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support was very good. We have a pretty decent relationship; we have a four-hour onsite repair.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We've tried other products and have had some issues in the past. However, HPE has been the most reliable solution.
How was the initial setup?
We have different locations; in my location, I was involved in the setup. It was pretty straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have used IBM and Compaq back in the day.
For us, an important factor while selecting a vendor is that the actual company backing the product. We know that we're a company that has been around a long time in the industry.
What other advice do I have?
You would be foolish not to be looking into HPE. A lot of their products seem very interesting and they are very useful in our field.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Manager of Systems Engineering at Zayo
The server hardware is valuable and it works. Some of the drivers cause crashes.
What is most valuable?
The server hardware is valuable and it works. It's a server platform. It's comparable to everything else on the market. It works in a pretty reliable fashion.
How has it helped my organization?
As a cloud service provider, we have to provide compute to customers with reliable hardware support.
What needs improvement?
I can't think of any new features I would like to see. I'm really happy with it. I know that they're moving towards OneView.
It's a server. You plug it in and it does what it is supposed to do. It’s compliant with the HPE server line because they assemble all of the drivers that they install. The drivers have typically been extremely buggy, but we removed them from our builds. I would be nice if those drivers weren't causing critical system failures every other version, but it doesn't affect us anymore.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The platform stability is good. There are some drivers that are extremely unstable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a server platform, so it's not getting more or less scalable than anything else. It's not like Flexpod or other architectures.
How are customer service and technical support?
We've called technical support for broken programs and things like that. It really depends on who you get. There are some HPE support staff who are really, really good and there are some who are atrocious. It is really hit or miss, depending on which product you call in for. For the 360s, the support has typically been pretty good and the engineers will come on site are helpful for us.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We do a lot of server cycling, every two years or so, and we evaluate it. Our work platform allows us to standardize. It's been HPE during the time when I've been here.
How was the initial setup?
They used the DL client before I started. I've been with this company for four years. As a service provider, we install the product for our customers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We are doing another evaluation cycle right now. We will be evaluating Dell, Super Micro, and UCS.
When choosing a vendor, honestly, it’s the support that I’m looking for. Everyone gets their hardware from the same couple of places in Taiwan or wherever. What really matters is being able to get the hardware delivered on time. We've actually built relationships with the manufacturers and vendors for support. If we can't get things replaced in a timely fashion, then we have to get our heads around it and say, "I know we're a five grade data center, but we may be down for another 12 hours, or whatever, because we can't get the part in". They chose HPE before I got to the company. We've continued to work with HPE because we've had a good relationship with them. Maybe 80% of our servers, our server hardware, our storage hardware, and switches, etc. are HPE.
What other advice do I have?
It is solid hardware. I'd give them a list of the drivers to rip out before the builds. I've done that before, actually, because most of the drivers that I'm talking about cause hard crashes. The will cause a blue screen, and that impacts customers. Some versions are safe, and some versions are not safe.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior SQL Server Consultant at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The P830 controller card with the SAS expander gives us performance on 10K SAS discs.
What is most valuable?
It has 26 internal disc slots and will take 12 gig SAS discs. We needed to run a SQL server availability groups on a pair of these, and we needed to be able build a high-speed, high-performance disc array to hold our data. The DL380 Gen-9, along with the P830 controller card with the SAS expander, gives us phenomenal performance on 10K SAS discs. They outperformed our existing SAN by a factor of 8 to 10 times.
How has it helped my organization?
These replaced old Dell servers and have half the footprint, being as they're a 2U server. They also used half the power. They saved us considerable amounts of money and hosting costs with our data center. Deploying these servers actually saves us money.
What needs improvement?
I can't see how you can fit much more into a small server, to be quite honest. If I was to be really picky, it needs to not drop the memory speed when you fill all the memory slots, which is a real niggle, but other than that, they've worked so well. They've done so much for us in cutting our hosting costs over the original four way boxes that these replaced. Their performance is absolutely phenomenal.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
They've deployed for us without any issues.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Absolutely stunning. We also use the Gen8 on some of our other systems and the key systems that I support -- our ARP CRM and ticket and billing system. Our billing systems handles roughly two-and-a-half billion pounds a year. It's very critical.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
They seem to scale brilliantly, but it's difficult to tell. Our company is a constantly growing business. Our expansion is vast -- twenty percent or more last year. The systems are still holding up really well. In fairness, we specked them up and we benchmark these servers, so the particular way we had these servers built was specific to our use, but they do really well.
How are customer service and technical support?
We did with the original install, the Gen9's that we had. We had some of the first Gen9's that were released. We did have a slight pickup with a BIOS setting, but HP support sorted that one for us.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I inherited the Dell servers from a legacy. I just replaced them with the HP servers. Those are my preferred choice, always. Without being detrimental to Dell, we don't like their servers very much, and the HP ones have always been far better.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Deputy Manager IT at La Gajjar
iLO feature and technical support are very good
Pros and Cons
- "One of the most valuable features is iLO, which is very good. Another thing is the HPE support is very good."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case of HPE ProLiant DL Servers is virtualization. We also host three servers on it: our active directory, file server, and web server.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features is iLO, which is very good. Another thing is the HPE support is very good.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for two and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is stable, and we use it daily.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
HPE ProLiant is scalable.
In our organization, we have 100 users of this solution. We are using it for our entire data center.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is very good. For the initial level, they provided me very good support for the installation of the servers and all the things after that. Somehow one hard disk crashed, so we logged a call at HPE and an engineer came the next day to replace the hard drive and explain how to prevent this type of issue. So, we have been a customer of HPE for more than 10 years.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is a little bit complicated, but after that, it's very easy to deploy the server.
What about the implementation team?
We had a third-party vendor help us with deployment.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a ROI. We have improved because there is an entire platform moved on virtualization. Also, there is good support of HPE, so we have minimized our data center downtime 0.1%.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This was a one-time purchase for us because it's hardware that we purchased from HPE. There aren't any licensing costs.
What other advice do I have?
I rate this product a nine out of ten. To those considering implementation, I would advise them to calculate their commercial as well as their data load and user load. After that, you can choose a solution from HPE.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Telecommunication Department Head at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Stable with an easy initial setup and good scalability
Pros and Cons
- "The pricing of the product is fair and not too expensive."
- "The technical support is pretty good, however, they could be a bit faster and more responsive."
What is our primary use case?
The main use for the last order was for the applications and other items around an electronic fencing system.
What is most valuable?
The initial setup is very easy.
The solution scales well.
The pricing of the product is fair and not too expensive.
The product is very stable.
What needs improvement?
The solution is pretty complete, for what I have seen over the past three years. I can't recall if I've felt that any features were lacking within that time.
The technical support is pretty good, however, they could be a bit faster and more responsive.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using the solution for three years at this point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is quite stable. It's worked for two or three years with no downtime whatsoever. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's pretty reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We haven't had any issues with scaling over the time we've had the solution. If a company needs to scale, it should be able to do so relatively easily.
We have about 300 users that log into the system at any given time.
We plan to increase usage. We have to extend our electronic fencing system to our other sites, and we will likely purchase another product from ProLiant when that happens.
How are customer service and technical support?
There's another team for technical support. The technical support is very, very good and the experience in our organization has made us interested in buying more HP ProLiant. We're quite satisfied with the level of support they give to us.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
While the company hasn't used a different solution, I personally have experience with Dell. I generally prefer to use HP instead.
How was the initial setup?
The implementation is not complex at all. We find the initial setup to be quite straightforward.
The product was ordered and came complete and ready to go. It was basically plug and play, so that there really wasn't a deployment period per se. We just had to power it up and check the hardware. We put in the discs and had the spare parts on hand as well. They deliver it ready to go, so it's pretty fast.
We have five individuals that handle the implementation and maintenance. They are all engineers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't consider it an expensive product. We're quite happy with the pricing so far. It's reasonable.
What other advice do I have?
We're just customers. We don't have a business relationship with HP.
We're using the latest version of the solution. We purchased Gen 10 about a year or so ago.
I'd recommend the solution to other organizations.
Overall, I would rate the product at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Software Operations Engineer at Agfa Healthcare
Stable and runs our software
Pros and Cons
- "We'd like to see better processors, better Intel processors. That's the most important for us at this moment."
- "It's scalable but we are switching to workstation for some software because the CPU speed isn't fast enough anymore."
What is our primary use case?
Our software is working on it, so it's very useful for our company. I'm not using it myself, but we are responsible for selling it together with our software.
What needs improvement?
We'd like to see better processors, better Intel processors. That's the most important for us at this moment.
Also, the disappearance of the ML150 can be a problem. So we probably have to switch to the ML110, we don't know yet. Wa are also using the DL160, so it can be a problem. And that's why we may have to switch some of our products to a workstation.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's stable. We sometimes have problems, but globally it's working fine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable but we are switching to workstation for some software because the CPU speed isn't fast enough anymore. For some products we were already using workstations, but for some others we now need workstations for the clock speeds.
How is customer service and technical support?
We are OEM clients, so the support is very good. We have direct contact so support is good. We used to have 13 x 5, but now it's next business day.
What other advice do I have?
When we look to work with a vendor, we look for stability. That's the most important. What is very important is that the systems are delivered on time. At this moment, that's a big problem, because of the hurricane in Houston, probably.
Also the team we're working with, because we have different countries that are ordering. It's on us to follow up on the deliveries.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller

Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE ProLiant DL Servers Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Rack ServersPopular Comparisons
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers
Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers
IBM Power Systems
HPE Apollo Systems
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers
Intel Server System
Oracle SPARC Servers
Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers
HPE Moonshot
Dell XR2 Rugged Server
Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server
Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE ProLiant DL Servers Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Are there any comparisons of HPE & Cisco servers using Benchmarks?
- Enterprise SSD - increase in cost justified?
- What is the biggest difference between Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers and HPE ProLiant DL Servers?
- Which HPE server is better - Apollo 4200 Gen10 or ProLiant DL360 Gen10?
- What is the best HPE ProLiant Server to replace a Dell PowerEdge Server?
- How do Lenovo ThinkSystem rack servers compare with HPE ProLiant DL servers?
- Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
- Are there any comparisons of HPE & Cisco servers using Benchmarks?
- When evaluating Rack Servers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What's the 2018 Market Outlook for Companies Selling Rack Servers?