HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs IBM Power Systems comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 20.7% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to IBM’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Read 156 HPE ProLiant DL Servers reviews

11,874 Views
9,900 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM Power Systems

Read 69 IBM Power Systems reviews

5,783 Views
4,145 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

IBM Power Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 22, 2024

HPE ProLiant DL Servers and IBM Power Systems compete in the server market, each offering distinctive strengths. HPE takes the lead in deployment ease and customer service, while IBM excels in processing power and reliability.

Features: HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer high reliability, scalability, and manageability, appealing to environments leveraging server knowledge across types. IBM Power Systems are noted for powerful processing, virtualization features, and stability, ideal for intensive workloads.

Room for Improvement: HPE ProLiant DL Servers could enhance management capabilities, pricing, and global support. IBM Power Systems need improvements in memory database, graphical dashboards, and integration with modern applications for more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are straightforward to deploy and supported by comprehensive customer service despite occasional slow responses. IBM Power Systems offer robust deployment for hybrid environments but have complex setups and slower support responses compared to HPE.

Pricing and ROI: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are cost-effective, offering quick ROI thanks to reliability and lifecycle. IBM Power Systems are expensive but justify costs with long-term performance, posing a pricing challenge for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

156

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Power Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of HPE ProLiant DL Servers is 20.7%, down from 22.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Power Systems is 9.1%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Elorza

Expert IT Solution Architect at Nestle

Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable

I give the solution an eight out of ten. We have been having issues with HPE's road maps, which tend to be very aggressive. For example, if we have a server and then HPE announces and releases the NexGen, the previous server only has one more gear before the end of use. This can be problematic for clusters that are configured to only have the same model, as after a year we would have to do diagnostics or buy a new cluster. This is something we do not like about HPE, although other vendors may also be aggressive, HPE is really bad. It is important for new users to keep this in mind.

Read full review

Omobolaji Olaloku

Senior Enterprise System Engineer at Zenith-bank

Extremely stable, good ROI, and scalable

The most valuable feature of our machines is their ability to replace faulty parts without causing any downtime. Our servers are equipped with advanced technology, making it possible to replace defective parts without having to bring down the servers. This is crucial, as any disruption to our services would result in inconvenience to our customers. Therefore, being able to service the machines and replace parts without causing any downtime is highly beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the value and the scalability."

"Support is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"HPE ProLiant DL Servers are a great product. We don't have many complaints."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is HPE Integrated Lights-Out (iLO)...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The hardware is reliable."

"ProLiant DL servers are the best on the market. The models support an extensive list of Intel processors."

"The technical support from HPE ProLiant DL Servers is very good. We can contact them through various means and they are responsive, they are quick."

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers pros

"Some of the most valuable features are the processing power, stability, and security."

"We found working with IBM Power Systems that LPM is the most valuable feature."

"The best features of the solution are its robustness and service level."

"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."

"We've been using it for a long time, and it's stable."

"The availability of a solution depends on the requirement of the customer. The most valuable feature is the virtualization. You can have this one system or you can use it for many. They were using almost 120 servers within that specific service."

"The virtualization and the quality you get from it is one reason we like the solution."

"We value the stability and technology capability of this solution the most. It is very stable, and the processor technology of IBM is very good. When you have a CIO and you are dealing with C-level every day, you can, without any doubt, support the core banking or critical applications with this solution."

More IBM Power Systems pros

Cons

"Most of the servers we use are okay. However, sometimes, you need to change the parts. We'd like the solution to be more robust."

"HPE ProLiant DL Servers are not scalable."

"The speed of the solution could be increased."

"The licensing fees are expensive and have room for improvement."

"They should work with Microsoft to make licensing costs better. That's because the physical servers have processors with all these cores, and Microsoft now licenses Windows virtual server desktops based on the number of cores and the serving servers. So, if you got to build 10 or 20 servers on that desktop, you got to license them all with Microsoft. They should have a partnership with Microsoft to decrease the virtual licensing of servers in partnerships so that when you purchase the servers, you also get licensing for Microsoft on top of them. That's because it gets very expensive to license virtual operating systems to run on physical servers."

"Configurations could be simplified."

"On the software side, I would like for the management of the server overall (including reviewing its health) to be a bit easier. Right now, we have something that sits on the server to make sure all hardware drivers and other thing are up to date. This is a pain to set up."

"HPE ProLiant DL Servers could improve its portfolio, it could be more diverse because there is a limited number of them available. Dell, IBM, or Lenovo, have a better product portfolio that is diverse."

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers cons

"I would like to see the scaling model improved so it's not just either tiny or huge."

"The lack of software vendors moving onto the platform, as opposed to fleeing the platform, is an issue."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The pricing is high."

"In my country, there are power supply interruptions. IBM could find ways to make the product stable through these interruptions."

"Sometimes, the availability of additional services can be a challenge. Certain IBM software takes time to deliver to the client. It can be slow."

"I think IBM needs a little more work on managing the overall environment with eliminating Systems Director."

"IBM should be more flexible with marketing or offer marketing events themselves and invite the partners to attend. That might be far more productive."

More IBM Power Systems cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"I like the price of this product and the add-on components. It is cheaper than Dell and is a one-time hardware purchase with minimal ongoing costs."

"I give the pricing a six out of ten."

"We have ILO licenses. We use this feature."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"The price of HPE ProLiant DL Servers is reasonable, but because of covid and other factors, the price could be reduced. The license is paid annually."

"The price is a little too high; it could be reduced."

"There are less expensive solutions than HPE ProLiant DL Servers. However, there is a lot of value in this solution."

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The cost model is great. There is so much built in to the technology, that if you know how to use it you can save yourself a lot of money."

"IBM Power is more expensive than other rack-mount servers, and you have to have a license for everything, including cores and memory."

"IBM Power Systems is very expensive."

"The licensing costs are okay. With IBM Power Systems, it's inclusive, so you can differentiate the price of the hardware from the software itself."

"When there is an error in the SAS drive of 10,000 RPM, my company buys support for 1,500 USD."

"Why should I be charged for that use rather than a single CPU, a single socket?"

"The additional software costs are high."

More IBM Power Systems pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do Lenovo ThinkSystem rack servers compare with HPE ProLiant DL servers?

Lenovo ThinkSystem rack servers offer flexibility and efficiency in order to meet mission-critical demands. I like that Lenovo blends outstanding performance, reliability, and manageability. The bi...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE ProLiant DL Servers?

The most valuable feature of the solution is HPE Integrated Lights-Out (iLO)...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE ProLiant DL Servers?

The product is expensive. I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price. On the needs of the customers, the product offers a lot of suppor...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Power Systems?

IBM Power Systems provides very good performance and stability compared to other brands or processors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Power Systems?

IBM should provide a platform where users can learn about the storage and security of IBM Power Systems.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Power Systems?

In my company, we use the system for the data center and our IBM Cloud Pak System.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 47% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 23% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 7% of the time

Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 2% of the time

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers Competitors

Intel Server System vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 44% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 16% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 5% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs IBM Power Systems

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Power Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

December 2024

Download HPE ProLiant DL Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Power Systems

December 2024

Download IBM Power Systems product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant DL series, HP ProLiant DL

IBM OpenPOWER LC

Learn More

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Video not available

IBM

Overview

HPE ProLiant DL Servers are utilized by organizations for tasks like virtualization, database hosting, and application hosting, deployed both on-premises and in private clouds for diverse needs.

Organizations depend on HPE ProLiant DL Servers for stability, performance, and reliability. They are essential for running active directories, enterprise applications, and handling high-performance computing. These servers are known for their easy setup, scalability, and extensive management capabilities like iLO. Offering compatibility with many components and energy efficiency, they provide reliable hardware and good performance under demanding conditions. However, there is a need for improved price, stability, scalability, airflow, and power consumption. Enhancements in controller cache, port sizes, SAN connectivity, support availability, and management interface are also required. Faster technical support, better documentation, simplified configurations, and enhanced monitoring features and security integration would benefit users.

What are the key features?

Easy Setup: Quick and straightforward deployment.
Scalability: Adaptable to growing business needs.
Extensive Management: Features like iLO for advanced control.
Energy Efficiency: Optimized for lower power consumption.
Compatibility: Works well with various components.
Reliable Hardware: Robust and dependable technology.
Redundancy: Ensures high availability and minimal downtime.

What are the benefits and ROI?

High Performance: Excellent for demanding computing tasks.
User-Friendly: Easy to maintain and operate.
Flexibility: Versatile for different applications.
Good Technical Support: Access to professional assistance.

HPE ProLiant DL Servers are implemented across industries like finance for active directories and payment solutions, education for virtual desktops, healthcare for database synchronization, and IT firms for high-performance computing and application hosting.

IBM Power Systems are built to crush the most advanced data applications - from the mission-critical workloads you run today to the next generation of AI.

Sample Customers

AmeriPride Services, iSource, Bolagsverket, BlueShore Financial, British Columbia Assessment Authority, National Stock Exchange, Cardlytics

Cipher

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems

December 2024

Free Report: HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. IBM Power Systems report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.