Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user476355 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Systems Engineer at Cardinal Glass
Vendor
I really like the way we can do the storage in cells. I would like serial number tracking to be improved.

What is most valuable?

I've been using HP for quite a few years, so my knowledge base of HP products is good. We like to standardize on them. We also have good relationships with HP vendors. That's the reason why we've been going with the HP ProLiants.

I really like the way we can do the storage in cells, for putting operating systems on them. The redundancy, as far as power supplies, hard drives, etc. Ease of use is key.

How has it helped my organization?

The business benefits - if we stick to one brand, you don't have to have as much people, as far as knowing different brands and stuff like that. 

Reliability - so we don't have to keep repairing them, we don't have downtime, which is key. Most of our plants are 24/7, so we've got to make sure that we don't have downtime. We used them in a Hyper-V environment, that adds in the uptime, as well.

What needs improvement?

Serial number tracking and trying to get that tied to my account. I have a terrible time with that with HP. I've got hundreds of servers around the country, and when I try to call in and keep the serial numbers straight and things like that. When I try to download drivers for them, the serial number doesn't come up, even though it's under extended coverage. I've not been happy with that part.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Reliability was the reason why we've had them for so many years - they've been reliable.

Buyer's Guide
HPE ProLiant DL Servers
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about HPE ProLiant DL Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

 The pricing has been good on them.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Dell was the primary competitor. We do have some plants that have Dell systems, but we probably are 90 - 95% HP, as far as company-wide. We've just been happy with the product, and there's not been a business reason to switch.

What other advice do I have?

For me, they key things are reliability, and ease of use. Then the pricing's good as well.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Technical Analyst at CAE
Vendor
It's a line that I'm comfortable with. I think it's something that HPE has put the investment into for the long-term.

Valuable Features

I think the high availability features that are built into the server as our systems require a certain amount of uptime. Having to buy less servers because of built-in redundancy, means I have to buy less pieces of iron. It's a line that I'm comfortable with. I think it's something that HPE has put the investment into for the long-term.

Improvements to My Organization

I think it's just the generations that are built on the ProLiant line of servers.

Room for Improvement

The biggest thing I don't like about ProLiant, and this will be very trivial, is the rails. Every generation, even within the same family generation, the rails are different. It's a pet peeve. It’s not a technical thing. We do rack-mounted servers. Having to deal with different rack - or rail kits - is a real pain. It's not a huge technical thing, but that's the biggest thing for me.

Use of Solution

For us it’s been a success year after year, generation after generation. I've used ProLiant for 15 -16 years.

Stability Issues

Really none. Again, that may be just familiar with the tools from its initial iterations.

Scalability Issues

Really none. Again, that may be just familiar with the tools from its initial iterations.

Customer Service and Technical Support

I've never had a problem with support, and dealing with HP is always seamless.

Initial Setup

The setup is so easy. It used to be SmartStart, but now they've changed that whole functionality. It's seamless to us. I don't really have any complaints from a "stand-it-up-and-support-it" perspective.

Other Solutions Considered

We looked at Dell versus HP. Proliant versus the R-series on the Dell side. When you look at product to product, servers are fairly closely matched. The supportability, or the management of the HP, versus bringing in Dell into my shop was a cost, from an educational perspective for my staff. Understanding the product inside and out was more important than bringing in a new partner.

Other Advice

I rate the ProLiant line very highly because you see the commitment of them building on it, and to me that's important.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
HPE ProLiant DL Servers
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about HPE ProLiant DL Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user471279 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer at a university with 10,001+ employees
Real User
It has easy manageability, and with iLO we are able to do everything remotely.

What is most valuable?

It has easy manageability, and with iLO we are able to do everything remotely.

How has it helped my organization?

It's just a computer server, so we just use them for whatever things we can't virtualize so it's nothing very special in that regard as far as what sets HPEs apart from somebody else's there.

What needs improvement?

We're looking forward to OneView management, stuff like that to keep it all in check. But there's not really anything specific. It will provide a single pane of glass for management instead of going out to 50 different servers and configuring things so you get, set up a template, or do the different things through OneView. Just kick it off and replicate and automate what you're doing.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I haven't had any issues with that at all.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I haven't had any issues with that at all.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've used other platforms in the past, but nothing specific. We wanted to have a single pane of glass for management and have consistency as much as we can so we stick with one vendor overall between blades, between rack mounts, between everything.

What other advice do I have?

Proliant, they're fine. I mean it's compute, it's pretty hard to mess it up these days.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user251847 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Officer at Poder Judicial
Vendor
Due to the fact that our software is web-enabled for both internal and external users, we needed a powerful and simple to use solution.

What is most valuable?

It’s very powerful, so we can offer good services for our network. It offers a very reliable framework for our judicial needs. Hyper-V software gave us more capacity to consistently meet our judges' needs. I think the most valuable feature, from my end, is that HP is a strong platform on which to host our services. It has good life-cycle performance and it will work continuously. In general, it’s a very good machine.

How has it helped my organization?

We’ve got 30,000 lawyers connecting every day, and we needed to serve them in an efficient manner. This is done by managing their dockets well and automating the process in a streamlined manner. By allowing our lawyers to automate the process, we are able to better serve their needs.

What needs improvement?

We honestly don’t have any problems. It’s a well-built machine, and there are no problems with the servers.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It’s pretty stable. We are using the DL-380 line, and we have 14 servers that go into three racks for two data centers.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It’s scalable, and it doesn’t take that much effort to do so. When you prioritize simplicity, it’s much easier to scale quickly and you don’t need to buy much more.

How are customer service and technical support?

It was never a big problem for us. When a part breaks, it doesn’t take long for us to replace the part. It was easy for us to switch in third-party servers temporarily while waiting for the spare part to arrive from HP, and it would work just fine.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using Compac. In the public sector, when you buy, you do it through a public process. You can’t choose, you write the specifications of your needs, and then vendors offer their products. We do our buying through our RFP process.

How was the initial setup?

Very easy. It’s always an easy thing for us to install, as our staff has good knowledge.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also looked at Dell and Lenovo. We always look at multiple vendors to compare pricing, which, for the public sector, is extremely important. With HP, the prices weren’t too different from other vendors, but for us it was the right choice when considering the total cost.

What other advice do I have?

We have a private-cloud data center, but we also host publicly for some customers. The software that we’re offering to our buyers is web-enabled for both internal and external users. So the servers needed to be powerful and simple to use.

For me, in the public sector, it was never that concerning for us to get the latest release of servers. Our users were satisfied with using older servers that served their needs just fine, and it saved us a lot of money as we didn’t have to pay the premium for the newest servers.

HP has been very good for us. I would recommend buying exactly what you need and the same line of the hardware to be consistent.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Business application analyst at CFI
Real User
Top 5
It's a robust, scalable solution
Pros and Cons
  • "I recommend HP ProLiant. It's a robust and scalable product."
  • "We have had issues with ProLiant's intelligent provisioning. Sometimes, the drivers do not come up, so we have to install them manually."

What is our primary use case?

We use ProLiant servers to host our solution. We have around 150 users. 

What needs improvement?

We have had issues with ProLiant's intelligent provisioning. Sometimes, the drivers do not come up, so we have to install them manually. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We started using ProLiant a few months ago.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

HPE ProLiant is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

HPE ProLiant is scalable. 

How was the initial setup?

The setup can be complex or straightforward, depending on the server model. One person can complete the deployment in about four days. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate HP ProLiant DL servers eight out of 10. I recommend HP ProLiant. It's a robust and scalable product. If you're having problems with the drivers, you can go to the HP forums and get some help. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Mahmoud Abdellatif - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Engineer at CORELIA
Real User
Compatible and flexible with the scaling feature a big advantage
Pros and Cons
  • "The product is compatible and flexible for small and medium businesses."
  • "The speed of the solution could be increased."

What is our primary use case?

We use the server as our hyperconversion infrastructure. When I have an HPE server and network like Aruba, we can manage all the infrastructures as software defined by the OneView dashboard to simplify day-to-day tasks. 360 and 380 are used in small to medium-size businesses. Power Server uses a high processing environment that has heavy workloads. We are partners with HPE and I'm an IT infrastructure engineer.

What is most valuable?

The product is compatible and flexible for small and medium businesses. Scaling is a big advantage of this solution. It simplifies our processes. I think HPE will have an advantage in the next phase because of their new GreenLake technology that will simplify things for small and medium businesses.

What needs improvement?

I think the speed could be improved with OneView. At the moment, OpenManage is faster and has a better interface than HPE. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have no real stability problems with the solution. For small and medium size businesses, ProLiant is a stable product.

How are customer service and support?

We haven't had any problems with support. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is relatively straightforward. The configuration is very smooth and can be done in about half an hour. Maintenance depends on the infrastructure of the client and how the solution is configured.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Compared to some of the competitors, HPE ProLiant is slightly more expensive. We have customers who have decided to take a cheaper solution. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
reviewer1063335 - PeerSpot reviewer
CS Core planning manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Multiple application support, reliable, and good performance
Pros and Cons
  • "HPE ProLiant DL Servers have good performance and they support different types of applications."
  • "The support lifecycle for the product for the Telco application should be better."

What is our primary use case?

We use HPE ProLiant DL Servers as part of our management solution and for some specific applications.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution has improved how our organization functions because it enhances the service delivery, as part of the managed solution.

What is most valuable?

HPE ProLiant DL Servers have good performance and they support different types of applications.

What needs improvement?

The support lifecycle for the product for the Telco application should be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using HPE ProLiant DL Servers for approximately one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

HPE ProLiant DL Servers have been stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In my experience, HPE ProLiant DL Servers are scalable.

We have approximately 45 users using the solution in my organization. We plan to increase usage.

What about the implementation team?

We use a system integrator for support.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate HPE ProLiant DL Servers a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer905394 - PeerSpot reviewer
Administrative Assistant at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Smooth sailing, stable, and solid service with these servers
Pros and Cons
  • "We get good performance with HPE ProLiant DL Servers. They are really stable. We run all our applications smoothly. We have no problem at all."
  • "In terms of what could be improved, if I could have faster processors with less cores, that would be good."

What is our primary use case?

We use VMware for the authorization and 3D rendering for AutoCAD for architecture projects. We run several databases on websites and so on - so normal activity.

What is most valuable?

We get good performance with HPE ProLiant DL Servers. They are really stable. We run all our applications smoothly. We have no problem at all.

What needs improvement?

In terms of what could be improved, if I could have faster processors with less cores, that would be good. I know that they have a new series with AMD processors, but I have currently no access to them. This would be nice, because we need faster processors for rendering. It is more interesting than having a lot of cores. Overall, I do not see any particular improvement needed, because I think that they are already at the edge and ahead of the competition.

In the next release, I would like to see to more power, because the next generation will always require more computing power, but I'm sure that they are already doing their best for this.

They have a management solution, HPE OneView, but I didn't implement it because at the beginning it can be a bit difficult and we only have a small set of servers. So it was too much work for not enough return. So it could be simplified with better results to have a better return with this.

For how long have I used the solution?

We are using ProLiant DL380 Gen10 and Gen9 servers.

Because I belong to a small service and we are obliged to use big contracts directly from the European Commission, these were the servers that were in that contract. At the beginning it was not my choice to use HPE, because we were working with IBM, and I was really happy with those servers. But I see that HPE servers are really nice also, and we have had a really good experience with them, so I'm happy with them, too.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

HPE ProLiant DL Servers is terribly stable. We have no down-time.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Thanks to VMware, we can always add more virtual machines and then a new server if we need to have more. Because we have big processors and a lot of memory, we have a SAN also, so it's really scalable in that way, but it's not related to HPE. Any server could be scalable in that kind of structural combination with VMware and so on. So it's not related to HPE by itself.

How are customer service and support?

We have not had any issues with HPE technical support. I had a problem with a tape backup, and they reacted immediately, and the next day it all was up and running normally. So I'm really happy with the after-sale service.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used IBM. But I have not touched IBM in years, so I don't know how they compete, and they sold their servers to Lenovo, so I don't know how it evolved. But I'm really happy with HPE now.

How was the initial setup?

At the beginning, the initial setup was a bit difficult because there was a learning curve, but now it's easy and with HPE it is really easy to update the servers. We don't have a lot of servers. We are a small service and we have only five to six servers, but a lot of virtual machines, and it is really easy to upgrade the servers. In combination with VMware you can move your machine, so you have no interruption in the service. It's really easy to do. It can all be done remotely thanks to iLO, so you have a good management. iLO processor is a bit slow. though, it could be faster.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The street price is probably really expensive, but at the Commission, we benefit from a good rebate, so we have a good price. I don't know the price of the competition because it is in a contract. I didn't compare. When I look for some parts, I see that it could be really expensive to have the same servers that we have.

What other advice do I have?

On a scale of one to ten, I would give HPE ProLiant DL Servers an eight.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE ProLiant DL Servers Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Rack Servers
Buyer's Guide
Download our free HPE ProLiant DL Servers Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.