Top 10 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

3.3 out of 5

2 reviews
50% willing to recommend

1,949 followers

Top IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, and AppDynamics. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is known for its comprehensive monitoring and diverse technology stack support. In comparison, Dynatrace offers advanced AI-driven insights and automation. IBM Tivoli’s strong customer support complements its system complexity, while Dynatrace's easy deployment and extensive customer service justify higher costs.

Download Dynatrace vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a higher initial setup cost, while Dynatrace offers a more competitive pricing structure with lower upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a higher initial setup cost, while Dynatrace offers a more competitive pricing structure with lower upfront expenses.

Azure Monitor

3.9 out of 5

Azure Monitor

3.9 out of 5

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers automatic problem detection and performance reports. In comparison, Azure Monitor excels in real-time analytics and machine learning. IBM Tivoli’s competitive pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers. Azure Monitor’s integration with Azure services and advanced features attract buyers seeking comprehensive solutions.

Download Azure Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report

Pricing

The setup cost for IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is seen as higher, while Azure Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. IBM Tivoli is typically considered premium-priced in its segment.

View comparison

Pricing

AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers comprehensive reporting and deep integration for cost-effective monitoring and good ROI. In comparison, AppDynamics excels with real-time monitoring and flexible analytics, providing a streamlined deployment process and superior customer support, ideal for those needing user-oriented features.

Download AppDynamics vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a higher setup cost compared to AppDynamics, which offers a more affordable setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a higher setup cost compared to AppDynamics, which offers a more affordable setup option.

ITRS Geneos

4.1 out of 5

ITRS Geneos

4.1 out of 5

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers reliable monitoring capabilities and sophisticated alerting, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer support. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides advanced configurability and in-depth analytics, justifying its higher price with a faster deployment process and superior value.

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. ITRS Geneos Report

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.

Catchpoint

4.2 out of 5

Catchpoint

4.2 out of 5

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is noted for its strong monitoring tools and integration capabilities. In comparison, Catchpoint excels in detailed reporting and real-time data collection. IBM's pricing and supportive customer service make it a practical choice, while Catchpoint's advanced features justify its higher costs.

Download Catchpoint vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report

Pricing

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager typically involves a higher setup cost compared to Catchpoint, which offers a more cost-effective initial implementation. This price difference can influence the overall budget allocation for IT monitoring solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText SiteScope

3.8 out of 5

OpenText SiteScope

3.8 out of 5

OpenText SiteScope is praised for real-time monitoring and customizable reporting, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager stands out with in-depth analytics and scalability. In comparison, OpenText SiteScope is noted for its straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness. IBM Tivoli offers extensive support documentation and long-term value.

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope Report

Pricing

OpenText SiteScope has a significantly lower setup cost, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager presents a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText SiteScope has a significantly lower setup cost, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager presents a higher initial investment.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Log Management

Mobile APM