Jenkins Reviews

We are using the solution for integration purposes. We have our own DevOps pipeline. Jenkins is the key tool that is being used in the entire DevOps journey. It's like an automation build tool. It's a CI/CD: continuous integration and continuous deployment

We mostly enjoy the multi-branch pipeline support. We have multiple branches regarding, for example, the production environments. In this environment, we can use Jenkins for the deployment and integration of multiple branches.

The deploying and assessing of the development of our code and our application has been really useful. 

It's getting a bit easier for us to use Jenkins, and it is really helping us.

The solution is stable.

It can scale easily.

Jenkins is pretty flexible and integrates with many products. As of now in the market, there is no vendor dependency. They are providing a lot of plugins, so it's not very difficult to integrate with others.

If they could provide some release management and integrated security like JFrog Xray and JFrog SonarQube, that would be ideal. If they could have a built-in security assessment, like a run times security assessment, or some engine within Jenkins, that would be great. We are expecting a collaborative solution. We'd prefer not to have to go through third parties. We want everything in a single place and without having to deal with extra applications and expenses.

I would want to see if they can add some security engines or security modules within the Jenkins portal so people wouldn't have to buy or go for some other outside products. As of now, security is the biggest concern. That should be the first priority after any technology.

They need to improve their documentation. When you compare it to Red Hat documentation which is very nice, you find that Jenkins does not provide much helpful documentation.

The product needs to showcase more use cases. 

I've used the solution for eight to ten years.

The stability is good. it's reliable. I'd rate the stability four out of five. 

The solution can scale quite well. 

We only have 20 to 30 users on the product right now. It's something our development team uses daily.

The other people handle support cases. I'm not quite sure how quickly they respond since we have different infra teams, so they handle all these cases.

The only competitor to Jenkins is Argo CD for Jenkins. We are not using it yet.

The approach is now changing to GitOps. People are moving towards the GitOps rather than the old DevOps model. That's where the Argo CD or Flex comes in as alternative tools that are picking up interest in the market.

It would be easier to set up the solution if they offered better documentation. With more direction, it would be easier to deploy the solution. The steps shown in the documentation are not very clear. 

It shouldn't be like a puzzle. I have to search everywhere, every time, and Google what I need. Rather than going to blogs and some open-source community blogs, it's better to have its own documentation. It should be very straightforward and clearly show the steps, the minimum requirements, and the bottlenecks. It should all be centralized as well.

I'd rate the setup process a three out of five in terms of ease of implementation.

I'm not sure of the exact pricing of the product. My understanding is that it is not very expensive. It's an open-source tool. They do also have an enterprise version, which is what we use. It's the same tool whichever you use, however, with enterprise, you get support.

We are customers of Jenkins.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We use Jenkins to build and deploy our software.

Jenkins is very easy to use. It has a lot of integrations.

I would like to see more integrations included in the next release.

I have been using Jenkins for two years.

Jenkins is a stable solution.

Currently, we have 100 users working with Jenkins. We haven't had the need to scale the solution. We are satisfied with what we have.

There hasn't been a need to contact technical support.

Prior to using Jenkins, we were using Maven. We decided to switch because of the cloud enablement and the continuous integration.

The initial setup of Jenkins is easy.

We used an outside provider to install Jenkins.

I would recommend Jenkins to anyone thinking of implementing it into their organization.

Overall, I would rate Jenkins a nine out of 10.

We're deploying our pipeline through CI/CD with both engines, most use it for CI purposes only. We are building our CAR files and deploying them in the endpoint cluster, such as Kubernetes as well as on-premise systems. We are using the management where I can write playbooks and deploy them. I call the playbook through the Jenkins Groovy script. We can do multiple instances, at a single time. 

The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its open source.

The disadvantage of Jenkins is writing Groovy scripts. There are other CI tools where you do not need to write this many scripts to manage and deploy.

I have been using Jenkins for approximately three years.

Jenkins is stable.

The scalability is easy in Jenkins because we are using a master and worker node architecture.

We have many departments using this solution in my company, such as DevOps and Automation teams. 

The technical support was never used. We followed the standard documents. I never interacted with Jenkins technical because there is a wide user base online. Jenkins has been a long time in the market, we easily find help if needed. Similarly, how Python codes are molded and a lot of companies are using it. You can easily find a solution if you're stuck.

Jenkins is easy to set up. The full deployment can take some time if there is a lot of data to be accessed. There are the data analysis files, and queries, and we need to update everything in the end systems, such as a center DB. This can take some time, approximately half an hour due to the large file size. The majority of things can be deployed within five to seven minutes.

There is a cost saving by using Jenkins because instead, we do not have to depend on the public cloud or any private cloud CI tools.

We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing.

I advise others that want to try Jenkins to first test it locally and then they can integrate it with the cloud. Whoever wants to use the continuous integration tools, should first go with Jenkins and then, later on, they can try other market available tools.

I rate Jenkins a nine out of ten.

The primary use cases include manifest generation and publishing modules.

Whenever we do releases, it goes to Jenkins to publish a version of the application and the version being released. Jenkins plays a big role in this process.

GitHub linking is pretty good. We have a deployment application where we can run our tests and add various variables to be passed as assertions to those tests. This is pretty fluid with Jenkins.

It is a stable solution and is generally scalable.

Sometimes, random errors of metadata are not there, which causes delays. These are essentially gaps in the information being passed to the job. This could be reduced and would save a lot of time.

Jenkins runs in correlation with GitHub but can only run one job at a time. Also, that job is a pre-selected job. So, if you select a particular job, then that job would run for all your pull requests. It would be amazing if for pull request one, for example, I could do build one, and for pull request two, I could do build two.

I've been working with Jenkins for two years.

It's quite stable and pretty reliable.

To a large extent, it is scalable; after that, some manual interference is required at certain points.

In our company, everybody works with Jenkins, so we have more than 10,000-20,000 users.

I am satisfied with the technical support services.

I would recommend Jenkins and would rate it at nine on a scale from one to ten.

I mainly use Jenkins to create automatic triggers for pushing code.

Jenkins' most valuable feature is Pipeline.

Jenkins takes a long time to create archive files.

Jenkins' stability is good, and we haven't had any issues with downtime.

Jenkins is scalable in the sense that we can develop as many jobs as necessary. 

Jenkins' technical support team is small but helpful.

Positive

The initial setup isn't very complex, though it may take some time to create end scripts because it lies in the backend and needs to work during free integration time.

We used a uDeploy IBM product and team.

I would rate Jenkins eight out of ten.

We use Jenkins for integrated reporting. We have different projects that require coaching, gate configuration, and clone effects. We build packages, deploy, and upload-pack eights. We start at software changes and follow the process through to final testing and eventually launching. 

Jenkins has excellent task planning features. 

We have a variety of examples in our organization.  We have security configurations that we would like to isolate across our platform. It is not always easy to control the permissions for each user. There are cases where I do not want everyone to have access to the technical aspect of a job or even that the job exists.

I have been using Jenkins now for ten years.

We have found Jenkins to be very stable.

I believe Jenkins is scalable. We have over two hundred users. We have plans to increase this number.

We have not used technical support. We just Google, from the internet. Most of the time we can solve it on our side.

The initial set-up is easy for a single-link system. For more complicated systems it is not easy. As a product, Jenkins has been in the top five for more than five years, so that is not a problem.  

We did an in-house implementation. We have an incremental process for deployment. We also have a complete patent for official patent deployment. We have two patents, one for development and one for official relief. We have an integration team that is responsible for these patents.

Jenkins has a free licensing program.

Jenkins is the most popular automation engine in the world. There are other options, but fewer users. There are some other choices in the market but Jenkins is definitely number one. I would rate Jenkins an eight out of ten.

We use Jenkins to remove human error when completing multiple deployments. 

The most valuable aspect of this solution is that there are multiple features. We can abstract certain variables and then build our deployment routine while being able to do some abstraction onto the SSH connections. 

We can access a history of the different deployments so that we know whenever we have an issue. Problems are well documented so we can actually go back into your deployment history when necessary.

This solution could be improved by removing the storage of unnecessary data such as the history of test deployments that were unsuccessful. 

In a future release, we would like to have access to more third party plugins and would like to integrate with tools like Kubernetes.

We have been using this solution since 2014. 

This is generally a stable solution. Sometimes we have experienced some issues but they have been minor. 

We have previously used an FTP server and we would copy and paste the files manually. I still prefer to use Bash scripts directly and deploy using SSH, or there are situations where we will not use an application because it would be overkill for such a simple deployment. We continue to use alternatives alongside Jenkins because sometimes it is pointless to build an entire Jenkins job just for deploying a website.

There is a learning curve at the beginning. Jenkins could have setup wizards that could help you start off instead of having to rely on someone, reading a manual or completing an online tutorial.

We've done everything in-house. 

We use the open source solution.

There might be unnecessary overheads if you're trying to use Jenkins for very simple deployments. I would say make sure that you actually need to use Jenkins for specific actions.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

We are using Jenkins to automate the compilation and check the implementation from scripts for validation and testing. It's a useful tool for any developer.

If the code works fine in the company's development environment, it doesn't mean that it will be okay for other platforms. We're using Jenkins to test the server in platforms. It's very helpful.

Jenkins has improved our organization by allowing us to use automatic testing to cover all the various levels of software, which includes software embedded into hardware. It has been very difficult to be able to run tests in embedded software in the past.

The most valuable features of Jenkins are the integration of automatic scripts for testing and the user's ability to use any script.

Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly.

I have been using Jenkins for approximately one year.

The stability of Jenkins is good.

Jenkins is scalable.

We have five people that are using this solution in my company.

I have not used the support from Jenkins.

I did not use a solution other than Jenkins.

Jenkins is complex to implement.

The implementation of the solution was done in-house. We use two or three people for the deployment.

The solution has had good value for the money we spent.

My advice to others is this is a tool that will help save time have good coverage for the validation environment and test more hardware capabilities. For example, it can handle an embedded system and it can run any type of script.

I rate Jenkins a nine out of ten.