Jenkins Reviews

We are using Jenkins to automate the compilation and check the implementation from scripts for validation and testing. It's a useful tool for any developer.

If the code works fine in the company's development environment, it doesn't mean that it will be okay for other platforms. We're using Jenkins to test the server in platforms. It's very helpful.

Jenkins has improved our organization by allowing us to use automatic testing to cover all the various levels of software, which includes software embedded into hardware. It has been very difficult to be able to run tests in embedded software in the past.

The most valuable features of Jenkins are the integration of automatic scripts for testing and the user's ability to use any script.

Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly.

I have been using Jenkins for approximately one year.

The stability of Jenkins is good.

Jenkins is scalable.

We have five people that are using this solution in my company.

I have not used the support from Jenkins.

I did not use a solution other than Jenkins.

Jenkins is complex to implement.

The implementation of the solution was done in-house. We use two or three people for the deployment.

The solution has had good value for the money we spent.

My advice to others is this is a tool that will help save time have good coverage for the validation environment and test more hardware capabilities. For example, it can handle an embedded system and it can run any type of script.

I rate Jenkins a nine out of ten.

We use Jenkins to remove human error when completing multiple deployments. 

The most valuable aspect of this solution is that there are multiple features. We can abstract certain variables and then build our deployment routine while being able to do some abstraction onto the SSH connections. 

We can access a history of the different deployments so that we know whenever we have an issue. Problems are well documented so we can actually go back into your deployment history when necessary.

This solution could be improved by removing the storage of unnecessary data such as the history of test deployments that were unsuccessful. 

In a future release, we would like to have access to more third party plugins and would like to integrate with tools like Kubernetes.

We have been using this solution since 2014. 

This is generally a stable solution. Sometimes we have experienced some issues but they have been minor. 

We have previously used an FTP server and we would copy and paste the files manually. I still prefer to use Bash scripts directly and deploy using SSH, or there are situations where we will not use an application because it would be overkill for such a simple deployment. We continue to use alternatives alongside Jenkins because sometimes it is pointless to build an entire Jenkins job just for deploying a website.

There is a learning curve at the beginning. Jenkins could have setup wizards that could help you start off instead of having to rely on someone, reading a manual or completing an online tutorial.

We've done everything in-house. 

We use the open source solution.

There might be unnecessary overheads if you're trying to use Jenkins for very simple deployments. I would say make sure that you actually need to use Jenkins for specific actions.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

We use this solution to build, test, and then deploy new software to the FTP server.

This solution has improved our organization with how much time it saves when coding.

We really appreciate that this solution is plug and play. When coding in the version control system, this product completes the build process automatically.

We would like to see the addition of mobile simulators support to this solution, as part of its open-source offering. We currently have to carry out manual testing for these platforms.

We have worked with this solution for around four years.

We have found the stability of this solution to be good.

Due to the lack of mobile simulators, we have not scaled this solution.

We have not had to contact the technical support team; the official documentation provided has resolved any issues we came across.

We found the initial setup of this solution to be okay. The setup isn't complicated, but there is some step by step documentation provided that will need to be read and followed during the process.

The deployment of the product took one or two days initially, and only took one person to action.

We carried out implementation and deployment of this product using our in-house team.

This is an open-source solution for the basic features. However, if an organization wishes to include specific functionality, outside of the basic package, there are extra costs involved.

We previously trialed an AWS-based product. However, it was complex to use and conflicted with some of our existing software.

We highly recommend this solution for web development. However, for mobile development, it may be better for organizations to consider other options.

I would rate this solution a five out of ten.

We use Jenkins for deploying with GenX and work on the pipeline too. We engage in many activities using both Jenkins and GenX. 

I love Jenkins. I like that you work on anything, and you make anything. Jenkins is very important for my team. I am satisfied with the product.

Jenkins can be improved, but it's difficult for me to explain. The initial setup could be more straightforward. If you connect Jenkins with bookings and lockouts, it can be challenging.

I have been using Jenkins for three years.

Jenkins is a stable product.

Jenkins is a scalable solution. We have ten people using this product right now.

Technical support was very good.

On a scale from one to five, I would give technical support a five.

Positive

The initial setup depends on the project and related activities.

I have implemented this solution myself, and I have also used a consultant on other occasions.

Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced.

I would recommend Jenkins to potential users. You can use Jenkins with other products and make anything you like. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Jenkins a ten.

We use this product as an open-source CI/CD. It allows integration, building pipelines, and even linking them to Azure or AWS platforms. It is an open-source tool. However, I wouldn't call it a public cloud. I would refer to it as an open-source tool for continuous integration and deployment. It can be integrated across every platform.

Our primary use case for this solution is creating pipelines for some projects we work on. Additionally, we use it to build pipelines and provide them with commands. For example, if we want to make a Docker image or send the deployments to Azure then we can integrate them into the Jenkins app service instead of Azure DevOps.

The user interface could definitely be improved, and I rate it close to zero. It isn't very good, and I am sure why it has not been worked on. The user interface could definitely be improved.

We have been using this solution for approximately a year and a half and are currently using the latest version.

The solution is stable but it is slow. It is a free service so I can't complain about the time it takes.

The solution is scalable and concurrent users have access to the platform. Currently, only a few people in our company are using this product.

I have not contacted customer service and  support.

The initial setup was difficult. It is not easy to comprehend, and I recommend having a hands-on tutor or experience for you to be able to use it effectively. Additionally, the documentation is not helpful, as it is not user-friendly. I am unsure if this is because it is an open-source product, but it can definitely be improved.

It took approximately two hours to set up from scratch. In order to create the Docker image dependencies that need to be integrated need to be checked. The required keys also need to be identified because some SSH keys might be needed.

We chose this solution because it is in line with the budget and customer preferences. 

I rate this product a four out of ten. I would advise people using this product for the first time to review the provided documentation and watch some YouTube videos on the setup process while trying to understand the platform itself. The documentation is essential as it allows for a better explanation of some features and YouTube assists with troubleshooting. The product is affordable, but the user interface needs to be improved.

We use Jenkins to build and deploy our software.

Jenkins is very easy to use. It has a lot of integrations.

I would like to see more integrations included in the next release.

I have been using Jenkins for two years.

Jenkins is a stable solution.

Currently, we have 100 users working with Jenkins. We haven't had the need to scale the solution. We are satisfied with what we have.

There hasn't been a need to contact technical support.

Prior to using Jenkins, we were using Maven. We decided to switch because of the cloud enablement and the continuous integration.

The initial setup of Jenkins is easy.

We used an outside provider to install Jenkins.

I would recommend Jenkins to anyone thinking of implementing it into their organization.

Overall, I would rate Jenkins a nine out of 10.

We're deploying our pipeline through CI/CD with both engines, most use it for CI purposes only. We are building our CAR files and deploying them in the endpoint cluster, such as Kubernetes as well as on-premise systems. We are using the management where I can write playbooks and deploy them. I call the playbook through the Jenkins Groovy script. We can do multiple instances, at a single time. 

The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its open source.

The disadvantage of Jenkins is writing Groovy scripts. There are other CI tools where you do not need to write this many scripts to manage and deploy.

I have been using Jenkins for approximately three years.

Jenkins is stable.

The scalability is easy in Jenkins because we are using a master and worker node architecture.

We have many departments using this solution in my company, such as DevOps and Automation teams. 

The technical support was never used. We followed the standard documents. I never interacted with Jenkins technical because there is a wide user base online. Jenkins has been a long time in the market, we easily find help if needed. Similarly, how Python codes are molded and a lot of companies are using it. You can easily find a solution if you're stuck.

Jenkins is easy to set up. The full deployment can take some time if there is a lot of data to be accessed. There are the data analysis files, and queries, and we need to update everything in the end systems, such as a center DB. This can take some time, approximately half an hour due to the large file size. The majority of things can be deployed within five to seven minutes.

There is a cost saving by using Jenkins because instead, we do not have to depend on the public cloud or any private cloud CI tools.

We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing.

I advise others that want to try Jenkins to first test it locally and then they can integrate it with the cloud. Whoever wants to use the continuous integration tools, should first go with Jenkins and then, later on, they can try other market available tools.

I rate Jenkins a nine out of ten.

Jenkins is basically used as a CI/CD tool, wherein you can integrate multiple tools that are part of your delivery pipeline. Jenkins is basically a controller for your delivery. For example, what happens, when it happens, and in what sequence it happens can be controlled by Jenkins.

Jenkins is a very mature product. 

It has got a lot of support as far as integrating Jenkins with other tools is concerned. 

There are a lot of plugins as well if you want to enable any feature or any automation as part of your delivery pipeline. There are a lot of plugins, actually, which are available both as part of an open-source as well as a commercial ecosystem.

It is easy to configure and easy to scale as well.

The initial setup is easy.

The enterprise version is less stable than the open-source version. 

Security is one area that is lacking a bit. You need to have that extra work done when you are adopting Jenkins. There are some features here and there, however, if security overall can be improved, that would be really great.

I've used the solution for more than ten years. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.

It is scalable. Jenkins can be implemented in a master play mode. You can have multiple masters and you can have multiple notes on which you can execute your jobs, which makes it very scalable.

We have about 500 people using Jenkins.

We've never contacted external support. We've only dealt with internal support. Internal support is very well educated in terms of supporting Jenkins and other tools of concern. I'm very satisfied.

Jenkins was the first product I used. Apart from Jenkins, there are other tools I've used, like Bamboo. Then, specific to the cloud, we have other DevOps services, and other pipelines.  I have used multiple options. Still, I'm kind of a Jenkins fan. I definitely recommend Jenkins over other tools.

The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex or difficult. You can enable a Jenkins pipeline, I would say, and a day, or less than a day.

We have about ten staff members that can handle deployment and maintenance. There are managers, developers, and DevOps teams, and then there are SYSops, admins, and DBAs. All these factors are there.

We handled the implementation ourselves, in-house. We didn't need any integrators or consultants.

One good thing about Jenkins is there are two flavors. One is open-source and the other is the commercial or the enterprise edition. The open-source version is pretty stable. For the security concern, you can add your own security-related intervention to make it that much more secure.

For the enterprise edition, you have a cloud-based which actually provides the commercial Jenkins version. Apart from security, they have come up with upgraded versions of Jenkins, for example, Jenkins Access Control and Jenkins Two-point Access Control. You can get added all kinds of features and the ease of implementing or managing your product. As I mentioned, Jenkins open-source is actually more stable and mature if you compare it to the enterprise version.

The solution can be on-premises or in the cloud. 

I'd recommend the solution to others.

I'd rate it ten out of ten.

We use Jenkins to trigger the URL and necessary files in a batch. Jenkins is integrated with Jira and Litmus. We'll put a URL into Jenkins and trigger it. We can schedule it to run overnight every day, week, month, etc. 

Multiple teams are using Jenkins, and it's integrated with multiple Jira plugins. I believe around 250 people using it.

We can schedule anything with Jenkins, which is useful for deployment or anything that requires scheduling. It also has multiple plugins we can use for Maven, JUnit, etc.

Jenkins could have better cloud functionality. Currently, we are using the existing legacy model, but we are moving toward the cloud, so it would be great if they could improve in that area. In the future, I would like more cloud features and related training materials, like a video tutorial. 

I've been using Jenkins for one year, and I know about related automation tools like Selenium, Tosca, etc.

Jenkins' main advantage over other solutions is multiple plugins and ease of setup. Open-source and secured versions are also available, so maybe that's why there are multiple processes. Other deployment tools cost more, and the setup is messy. These are some reasons management decided to use Jenkins instead of other solutions.

The Jenkins setup is easy because it's open-source, and we can get a community edition. We don't need to do anything. We only need to install it and it's ready to use. The total deployment time depends on how long you have to code. In my case, it generally takes half an hour to one hour.

I rate Jenkins eight out of 10. It's a scalable, open-source tool with multiple plugins. It's easy to use and set up. I don't rate it 10 because there is room for improvement in terms of the cloud and related capabilities. 

If somebody wants to use Jenkins, they need to first consider the scope. What is the scope, and what tech are you using? Jenkins is easy to set up, and we can integrate it with multiple technologies, whether a .NET application or anything else. We can deploy the code and can run with that. 

The simplicity of Jenkins and the evolving ecosystem of Jenkins are most valuable. Today, you do not have to write a pipeline from scratch. The library functionality of Jenkins helps you to bring all those in ready-made, and you also get the best practices for them. That is a great feature of Jenkins, and that is why it is being used significantly.

Jenkins also helps you to be agnostic to cloud providers.

I would like to have an integrated dashboard on top of it and a better UX to look at. The dashboard could be better in terms of integration with other tools. We should be able to have a single pane of glass across all the tools that we use where Jenkins is the pipeline. This can be a very good upgrade to it.

I have been using this solution for about 10 years.

It is very stable.

It is highly scalable, and it can scale into different models.

In terms of its customers, I have worked with very big enterprises to small companies with about 100 people.

Jenkins is an open-source initiative. So, the support is more community-based. The community is great. I do not remember asking for help often because it is quite stable, but for any extensibility that can be built on it, the community is great. You can find lots of resources and helpful people.

It is definitely not complex. It might not be very easy for a newcomer, but it is in the easy to medium range to get started with.

As people are using it, they should come to the community and provide their input so that the community can grow better.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.