JIRA Portfolio Reviews

We are using JIRA Portfolio life cycle management.

The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise. However, most clients choose cloud deployment. Not all of our clients have their own database.

The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is for managing teams of 10 or more. It can track the program level and portfolio. There are plenty of beneficial features, such as the hierarchy-level view, customization, and structure plugin. 

The interface JIRA Portfolio could improve.

I have used JIRA Portfolio within the last 12 months.

I have not faced any challenges with the stability of the solution.

I rate the stability of the JIRA Portfolio a six out of ten.

The scalability should improve in JIRA Portfolio.

I rate the scalability of JIRA Portfolio a seven out of ten.

Sometimes there are difficulties receiving support from the vendor. They do not answer immediately.

I rate the support from JIRA Portfolio five out of ten.

Neutral

The setup of the cloud deployment is simple. The solution has over 2,000 plugins and research is needed to determine which one is the best to use and implement.

The cloud deployment takes a few clicks from the mouse to finish. It can be done quickly.

The solution should be overall more user-friendly.

There are free plugins available, but most of them are at an additional cost. Additionally, other services are an extra cost.

This is a great tool for life cycle management.

I rate JIRA Portfolio an eight out of ten.

Everyone mentions tasks using JIRA. It is used for various everyday tasks, including dashboards, sprints, backlogs, and workloads.

It has been very efficient for internal communication and managing different data and work projects. It tracks the progress, the development, and more. 

It is one of the important tools and one can easily maintain and manage the tasks in JIRA. 

The workflow and bucket features are most helpful. We never have code changes without a linked JIRA case. Code changes are linked to JIRA, and you can see the code changes within Jira.

 The roadmap in our capacity planning features impacted the project management. We're transitioning from Bitbucket to GitLab and JIRA, which are linked to GitLab. This change is necessary due to this transition.

The focus will be on commits. The focus will be on checking the message, confirming drastic data as a prefix. If not, then the commit will be rejected.

The products are getting bigger. So, learning JIRA is not so easy. There is a learning curve. 

It is not easy to understand all the workflows. 

I have been using it for seven years. 

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. Sometimes, if you have a version change, even if you follow the process of "open," "in progress," "in review," "progress class," then "closed branch," and finally "close Jira," you might only change one line of code. But you still have to go through the internal process. It's modified coaching. It still goes over the entire process in ten minutes.

There are around 500 end users in the company. 

The customer service and support are good. 

We have a standalone team for the setup. 

It provides the most functions and is very agile, lean scrum. 

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

I would recommend JIRA. It is based on Agile only. So if you want to learn JIRA, you first learn Agile office knowledge or cloud or function, something like this. Then you can understand JIRA too.

JIRA Portfolio gets used by my company's customers for its capabilities, like portfolio management, project management, and generating high-level project reviews for their CXOs.

The most valuable features of the solution for my customers are the product's ability to generate dependency reports and provide the basic view where they evaluate the task status, like to which team it got assigned with respect to certain versions and how they are placed.

In general, the valuable features of the tool are its capabilities concerning dependency reports and task status.

The team-centric view is slightly weaker in JIRA compared to its competitors, especially considering how I can evaluate how each resource has been placed, not just in one project but across JIRA. JIRA fails to showcase particular information missing, including how resources are placed and the capacity in the coming weeks or in a particular time zone.

The product's scalability should be improved in the future. The big setback when I look at JIRA Portfolio is that though we provide multiple kinds of templates, like JWM or JSM, in place, JIRA doesn't give you an option where you can play with multiple kinds of project methodologies. If you look at the bigger picture, Atlassian gives you a box mechanism where it has an approach where it provides lean, LeSS, and waterfall as well, and that particular flavor is missing in JIRA Portfolio.

I have been using JIRA Portfolio for the last four years. My company has a partnership with Atlassian. My company is a platinum partner of Atlassian in India. I use the solution's latest version.

It is a stable solution since I haven't faced any issues. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

My customers are mostly enterprise-sized businesses. My company does serve medium segment clients as well. With respect to JIRA Portfolio, we get many queries from enterprise customers.

The delay in response from the solution's technical support causes us to beat around the bush to identify the exact issue. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the initial setup an eight or nine since it is not that difficult. We can do a little bit of customization, and configuration is pretty much straightforward.

The solution is deployed on Atlassian Cloud.

The time taken for deployment depends upon the configuration of JIRA Portfolio and what its users do with it. Depending on what the customers want from the tool, it may take a day to a week.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a six. The product is slightly on the inexpensive front considering its competitive feature at the pricing point it offers.

If an organization requires just the reporting or portfolio view at a high level and is majorly operating on the agile front, JIRA Portfolio is the right product for them. If a company has multiple project methodologies and wants something beyond just a Gantt view in BigPicture might be the right choice.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I just use JIRA Portfolio, which is available on the server.

When I develop software, there are many things and we need to check the status. Then, I use JIRA Portfolio in all areas, such as JIRA's use for tracking software issues from QAT. When we needed to check the plan of our project and manage the project status, I usually used JIRA. And if there is some field issue or customer service field issue, we gather the field issues using JIRA.

I think the solution's most important and valuable feature is its ability to track the issues. We can also check the status using JIRA, which is a good function in the solution.

Our major team does not control or manage JIRA server well since sometimes there is trouble using the solution, which is a problem. The solution's speed needs to be improved.

In the future, adding certain functions should be made easier in JIRA.

I have been using JIRA Portfolio for around ten years. I am a software developer who uses the solution. Also, I don't remember the version of the solution I am using.

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten. It is a very scalable solution. Around 2,000 people are using the solution. In my lab, 10,000 people are using the solution.

In the future, we may change to an ARM system.

I haven't contacted customer support yet. For doubts, I talk with my infrastructure team. I think JIRA's tech support is good. I rate the solution's technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

Previously, I didn't use a different system. I just opted for Jira.

The initial setup is easy. I rate it a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup, and ten is an easy setup.

I can't comment on the time taken for deployment since I don't manage JIRA server.

Maybe there are some people who manage the server using JIRA application. I guess three people are managing the solution.

A set of people were involved in the deployment of the solution.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight. There is an additional cost to be paid for some kinds of tools.

I recommend the solution to those planning to use it. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

I mainly use Portfolio for integrating systems, such as web pages for different brands. We also use it for loyalty and analytics applications.

Portfolio helps us increase the visibility of projects' status and management with remote workers who make up most of the company.

Portfolio's best features are performance and elastic memory.

An improvement would be if Portfolio were integrated with Office 365. Also, Portfolio's portfolio management is complicated because you need different components or apps to see specific portfolios. 

I've been using Portfolio for three years.

Portfolio's stability is good.

Portfolio is scalable for some things, but it's more difficult if you need to scale a whole company in other levels.

JIRA's technical support is very good - when I have a question or a problem, they give us the solution immediately.

Neutral

The initial setup was easy, and deployment took a couple of months.

We used an in-house team.

Portfolio is well-priced - a license for ten users costs $100 or $150 a month. There are no additional fees to pay.

Portfolio is user-friendly, and the escalation in the organization is faster and better. I would rate it as ten out of ten.

We use Jira to manage the software development lifecycle. We create a project in Jira and capture the requirements at various levels, including epics, features, objectives, stories, defects, etc. One hierarchy can have multiple levels that can be linked, so requirements are more traceable.

Jira's Structure, agile, and Kanban boards are helpful. I also like JQuery, which allows you to fetch the relevant set of data. We use JQuery, JQL, and the Structure board a lot. Kanban boards help us monitor daily tasks, and we review the progress using the burndown charts. 

Jira has room for improvement in terms of managing various projects and linking requirements centrally under one project. They could include some add-ons that enable you to link all the requirements and put them into a centralized place. That central place should be restricted to a limited set of users with privileges based on user groups with those rights. 

I would also like if Jira had a centralized space for accessing project-specific documents. Furthermore, they could enhance the graphs and charts to make them more presentable.

We've been using Jira for around nine years.

Jira's code is excellent. I can quite export using Jira and smoothly use any of its features or link it with other tools to build a chart. I often use Confluence to depict our team's progress on a project. 

Scalability is one of Jira's main advantages. When demand increases and an organization needs more space, Jira can support it. It provides several add-ons and connectors to link to Jira with other tools like Confluence, Excel, or various other options. We have more than 1,000 people using it.

I have never had issues using Jira, so I've never contacted support. 

Setting up Jira is straightforward. 

I believe we pay a monthly license for Jira, but I don't know the precise cost. I think it's dependent on how much space the organization uses. The vendor may offer a range of pricing options based on the organization's requirements. 

Jira is the standard across the globe. This is the market leader for maintaining or managing software development, and it has cost advantages over other available tools. 

I rate Jira Portfolio nine out of 10. Jira is the best tool in the market, but it still has room for improvement. At the same time, it's pretty easy to understand. There is a lot of documentation and videos online, so anyone can quickly learn various features.  

I recommend Jira Portfolio for big organizations that want to maintain the software requirements. Jira's cost may be too high for smaller organizations, but several cheaper options are available. 

The primary use case is project management. 

The entire features that are required for managing the product's communication between the team there are valuable. Managing product development and managing inter-team communications are also valuable features.

Maybe integration with other tools could be made easier. 

I have been using this solution for three years.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. There was no downtime, no issues.

It is a scalable solution that's suited to our requirements for small teams. I'm not sure about larger teams. So, it's limited to whatever users it has. So that's suited to our requirements.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten, as far as my experience goes with the tool, but I haven't used it on a larger scale.

I never needed any support. I'm a primary or maybe average user, so nothing extensively that I've used. So I have never needed any support.

It was absolutely easy to set up and work with Jira, so that was absolutely easy.

Jira is a SaaS solution, so there is nothing to be deployed. It's an on-cloud solution.

Currently, I use the free version for personal use.

I find it simple compared to Azure DevOps. Comparing both Azure DevOps and Jira, then Jira is simpler compared to DevOps.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It is a good tool and easy to use. It is very easy to start using the tool. It is very easy to understand and use the tool.

We use JIRA Portfolio for project management and delivery. We follow a Kanban board for new tasks, schedules, releases, bugs, and enhancements. Every new project is onboarded on JIRA Portfolio.

JIRA Portfolio is easy-to-use and has a lot of data we can track easily. The solution has good reporting and is very user-friendly. The developers can pick it up easily, and the solution's collaboration is very nice. It helps resolve a lot of collaboration issues, requirement issues, and also the metrics part. We can track the metrics straightforwardly and then see where we stand and what needs to be done.

It would be really nice if the solution provided a heads-up every time they enhance something or add new features. Recently, we had an issue because they changed the structure of using demo accounts. We didn't have any heads up and were struggling with what to do and how to go about it. We had to reach out to a lot of people, ask if they were also facing the same issue, and then we finally had to figure it out ourselves.

JIRA Portfolio is an amazing tool, but it would be much simpler if it provided a heads-up about how to go about new changes beforehand. The documentation for these changes is available online, but it's too much. If the solution comes up with a change, it should only provide information for that particular change. Otherwise, we'll have to spend a lot of time looking into a lot of documentation.

I have been working with JIRA Portfolio for four years on a continuous basis.

JIRA Portfolio is a stable solution. We've not come across bugs in the solution.

JIRA Portfolio is a scalable solution with no storage, user, or project issues. Around 18 users are using the solution in our organization.

Initially, when we had to configure the solution, we contacted its technical support team, which is well organized.

Before JIRA Portfolio, we used Microsoft Project, which was messy and painful with its Excel sheets.

The best thing about JIRO Portfolio is that its initial setup is very easy. You can start a Kanban board in a couple of minutes and then start communicating and adding users.

Our organization has seen a return on investment with JIRA Portfolio regarding the ease and the issues in managing the project or program, collaborative and documentation issues, and requirement issues. With JIRA Portfolio, there's improvement in the processes, the execution, and the delivery time.

We use a cloud version of the JIRA Portfolio.

My suggestion would be to come up with a customization plan or a business case regarding what you need for a particular project and what is possible and what is not possible with JIRA Portfolio. Then, present that business case to the technical team to avoid issues later.

I've seen scenarios where we didn't put forth a particular question and had to reconfigure and move everything to a new project. It's best to understand the project requirements and then configure accordingly to avoid such a situation.

Overall, I rate JIRA Portfolio a nine out of ten.