Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ManageEngine Applications Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
ManageEngine Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ManageEngine, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ManageEngine Applications Manager is valued for affordability and support, with benefits like user-defined thresholds and application discovery. In comparison, Dynatrace offers superior AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. ManageEngine requires customization for deployment, while Dynatrace’s automation makes complexity worth it. ManageEngine excels in support; Dynatrace in advanced features.
ManageEngine Applications Manager appeals to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and responsive support. In comparison, Datadog attracts users needing advanced cloud features, offering scalability and integration despite higher costs. Tech buyers choose based on pricing, deployment preferences, and required feature sets.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers robust monitoring with pre-configured templates for easy setup. In comparison, Zabbix provides flexible configuration and extensive customization. ManageEngine has straightforward deployment but occasional support delays, while Zabbix has a steeper learning curve but strong community support. ManageEngine's pricing suits SMBs, whereas Zabbix's cost-saving open-source model appeals to large enterprises.
ManageEngine Applications Manager involves higher setup costs, while Zabbix offers a more budget-friendly setup. Zabbix users report lower initial investment compared to ManageEngine, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
ManageEngine Applications Manager involves higher setup costs, while Zabbix offers a more budget-friendly setup. Zabbix users report lower initial investment compared to ManageEngine, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
ManageEngine is noted for its ease of deployment and affordable pricing, making it ideal for straightforward monitoring. In comparison, New Relic offers in-depth monitoring and advanced analytics, suitable for complex environments. ManageEngine could improve scalability, while New Relic might benefit from a more user-friendly setup.
ManageEngine Applications Manager is appreciated for easier setup and lower pricing. Azure Monitor outperforms in scalability and integration with Azure services. In comparison, Azure Monitor offers robust analytics and machine learning insights. ManageEngine is noted for cost-effectiveness and swift ROI, whereas Azure Monitor delivers long-term benefits in complex environments.
ManageEngine Applications Manager appeals with affordability and ease of deployment, offering essential performance monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics attracts tech buyers with extensive features and advanced analytics, despite a higher cost and complex deployment, justified by significant ROI through comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher upfront expense. Splunk AppDynamics invests more in advanced features, impacting its initial cost structure.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher upfront expense. Splunk AppDynamics invests more in advanced features, impacting its initial cost structure.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers comprehensive monitoring with built-in metrics, and is valued for easy deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Grafana excels in data visualization and plugin support. Despite its higher learning curve and cost, Grafana provides flexible integration options and long-term ROI.
ManageEngine Applications Manager features a moderate setup cost, while Grafana typically presents a lower initial investment. Grafana's pricing strategy focuses on accessible entry points, contrasting ManageEngine's approach with a more substantial initial spend.
ManageEngine Applications Manager features a moderate setup cost, while Grafana typically presents a lower initial investment. Grafana's pricing strategy focuses on accessible entry points, contrasting ManageEngine's approach with a more substantial initial spend.
ManageEngine Applications Manager is praised for its comprehensive monitoring, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels with powerful analytics, scalability, and advanced features. Each solution addresses different needs, offering unique strengths for various IT operation management requirements.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a lower setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a lower setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers affordability and ease of use, appealing to budget-conscious businesses with comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Prometheus Group provides a feature-rich, scalable solution, ideal for enterprises needing robust management with extensive integrations and real-time alerts, despite higher costs.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers robust support and competitive pricing, making it ideal for budget-conscious users. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor excels with its extensive feature set, justifying a higher price. Both solutions suit different needs, balancing cost-effectiveness and advanced capabilities.
ManageEngine Applications Manager has a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, making it a more budget-friendly choice for businesses seeking cost efficiency.
ManageEngine Applications Manager has a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, making it a more budget-friendly choice for businesses seeking cost efficiency.
ManageEngine Applications Manager is known for its straightforward setup and efficient customer support. In comparison, eG Enterprise offers a more extensive feature set, including automated root cause analysis. Both solutions have strengths in different areas, making each appealing for varied performance monitoring needs.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while eG Enterprise involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while eG Enterprise involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
OpenText SiteScope excels in extensive monitoring capabilities and ease of customization. In comparison, ManageEngine Applications Manager impresses with its comprehensive feature set, including application performance monitoring and strong reporting tools. OpenText users appreciate the flexibility, while ManageEngine users find it more versatile and robust.
OpenText SiteScope has a significantly higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Applications Manager, making it less cost-effective for budget-conscious users.
OpenText SiteScope has a significantly higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Applications Manager, making it less cost-effective for budget-conscious users.
ManageEngine Applications Manager is chosen for its pricing and support. In comparison, Avantra is selected for its advanced features and automation. ManageEngine Applications Manager benefits include easier deployment and quick ROI. In contrast, Avantra offers superior automation and SAP monitoring, justifying its higher cost.
ManageEngine Applications Manager has low setup costs, while Avantra requires a higher initial investment. ManageEngine is favored for budget-conscious users, whereas Avantra is for those prioritizing advanced features.
ManageEngine Applications Manager has low setup costs, while Avantra requires a higher initial investment. ManageEngine is favored for budget-conscious users, whereas Avantra is for those prioritizing advanced features.
