Meraki MX Reviews

• Easy to configure
• Provides site-to-site VPN's
• VLAN's
• DHCP
• multiple WANs

We are using it as a content filtering and load balancing application.

They should improve load balancing.

We had no issues with the deployment.

We have had issue with the load balancing.

We have had no issues scaling.

Meraki support is really good.

We also use Meraki MR and Aerohive devices.

Meraki setup is really easy.

Both Meraki and Aerohive are good products, and I prefer Meraki. I work with Meraki products in production. Meraki are more intuitive than Aerohive.

We deploy this solution for our customers. We do the cloud and on-premises deployments, and we have all the versions.

It is very easy to use and manage. It is also very easy to scale.

In general, the SD-WAN feature needs to be improved. The load sharing and load balancing of the traffic should be improved. I have had some problems with these features in the past.

I have been using Meraki MX since 2016.

It has very good stability.

It is very scalable. We have all kinds of customers.

They have very good technical support. Cisco Meraki's support is incredible.

The initial setup can be complex. It usually depends on the scenario. The deployment usually takes half a day, but it again depends on the scenario.

It is a good global solution in terms of the price and features, but because we sell this solution in dollars, sometimes we don't get to sell this solution in Brazil because the dollar is very expensive. 

The price of every project is different. It varies depending upon the project, scenario, and client.

I would recommend this solution based on the use case. I would rate Meraki MX an eight out of ten.

The internet traffic shaping functionality has been very valuable.

The IPS, the Intrusion Prevention System, can be improved. If they can add I think the next generation firewalls, that would be great.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

This is an edge firewall in our company. It has the powerful options of ISP, AMP, antivirus, SD-WAN, applications control, and traffic shaping. 

In a week, we can make new policy and view what all our users did.

We appreciate the ISP features: AMP, Antivirus, applications control, and traffic shaping. The dashboard is very intuitive and easy to understand. 

I think for now, it is good. However, we could have more reporting options and the ability to send alarms to the administrator. 

It has good support services.

Our organization had a traditional WAN. We had routers to connect our branches, which was a very complex solution. 

Now, with Cisco Meraki MX84, we have a SD-WAN, and we only need Internet in all our branches. Thus, we have an easy solution to connect new branches and it is very fast.

It is very fast to implement and very easy to configure.

We use it for UTM devices.

We have roughly 200 users, using this solution.

We prefer UTM solutions.

As far as what needs to be improved — nothing really comes to mind. It does what we need it to do.

I have been using Meraki MX for more than five years.

Both the scalability and the scalability are great with Meraki MX.

The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment takes less than one day.

If you're thinking about implementing Meraki MX, make sure to plan it properly. Planning takes time which gives you the ability to make sure it's scaled properly, without too much complexity.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine — nothing is perfect.

SDWAN and all types of implementations.

Simple to manage.

Real Auto VPN with load balancer without needing a public IP. It is simple and functional.

More detail needed for configuration of the VPN. No peer Meraki.