

Cisco Meraki MX and WatchGuard Firebox are competing in the network security category. Cisco Meraki MX tends to have the upper hand in ease of deployment and remote management, whereas WatchGuard Firebox fares better in affordability and advanced features.
Features: Cisco Meraki MX is noted for its cloud-based management, site-to-site VPNs, and content filtering capabilities, making it ideal for cloud environments with centralized control. WatchGuard Firebox, in contrast, provides layered security, VPN functionality, and a user-friendly interface, appealing to various business sizes.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki MX needs to enhance its SSL inspection, expand robust VPN integrations, and refine monitoring capabilities while considering competitive pricing strategies. WatchGuard Firebox could improve its reporting, simplify its interface, and enhance cloud integration for greater user satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MX stands out for its smooth deployment and reliable customer service due to its cloud-based management, considered versatile for any setup from on-premises to cloud. WatchGuard Firebox also offers flexibility in deploying various environments, with customer support praised for efficiency, though integration with other tools remains a concern.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki MX is perceived as expensive primarily due to licensing costs, but its functionalities often justify the investment through reduced downtime and administrative tasks for many users. WatchGuard Firebox, being cost-effective with competitive security features, presents itself as a preferred choice for budget-conscious buyers.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
From a security standpoint, preventing even a single major security incident or prolonged outage can represent significant cost savings.
I do not see any return on investment after WatchGuard Firebox implementation in terms of cost reductions.
Reduced incidents and easier management helped lower operational cost.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
Cisco's TAC support for Cisco Meraki MX is excellent because no other OEM provides support at this level.
Cisco is one of the best vendors in the market.
On a scale of one to 10, I would rate the technical support of the WatchGuard Firebox a 10.
When comparing WatchGuard Firebox with other vendors such as Fortinet, SonicWall, Palo Alto, and Sophos, WatchGuard Firebox performs competitively.
Most of the time, support engineers are knowledgeable and able to assist effectively with firewall configuration issues, VPN troubleshooting, firmware updates, and security-related concerns.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
Overall, WatchGuard Firebox offers strong scalability for SMBs, MSPs, branch offices, and hybrid environments while keeping deployment and management relatively straightforward.
The user interface and features compared to newer firewalls are not up to the mark, which includes functionalities such as filtering, web filtering, threat protection, user identity, and UTM features that need improvement.
You can choose different models based on throughput and features, which makes it easy to support growing environments.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
I have just one WatchGuard Firebox unit that is licensed, and I have no bugs on it, so I am happy with that.
Once properly configured, the platform handles VPN connectivity, traffic inspection, and security services constantly, even in multi-site environments with remote users.
There are issues with traffic hitting the firewall, which could indicate performance problems related to throughput.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
It gives good visibility and control over the traffic, and the UI makes it easy to manage policies and respond quickly when something comes up.
Some improvements in threat intelligence integrations and SIEM integration as an out-of-the-box context would be beneficial.
The cost for renewal after three years is 75% of the hardware cost, which is a significant problem.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
When we tried to renew the Palo Alto license, the cost was beyond any reasonable range.
Fortinet is more expensive than WatchGuard.
I find WatchGuard Firebox to be cost-effective.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
The Firebox offers valuable features such as network security, URL filtering, UTM features, intrusion prevention and detection, and authentication.
The features of WatchGuard Firebox are most valuable for maintaining network security.
Some of the best features of WatchGuard Firebox in my experience are its ease of management, strong VPN capabilities, and integrated security services.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki MX | 3.5% |
| WatchGuard Firebox | 2.1% |
| Other | 94.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 104 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 30 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud-managed security with user-friendly setup and efficient management, enhancing VPN and firewall functionalities for businesses.
Cisco Meraki MX is known for its robust cloud-based network management, featuring AutoVPN, SD-WAN, and advanced security. Its centralized control over firewall, traffic shaping, and monitoring ensures excellent connectivity and security. The interface allows easy management by non-technical staff, offering remote access and seamless network performance through real-time alerts and troubleshooting. It supports global connectivity with minimal effort, addressing needs across small to enterprise environments. Despite its strengths, users point out areas needing improvement like load balancing, VPN features, more flexible logging, and session capabilities. Pricing, integration limits, and licensing need enhancement.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?In industries like retail, finance, and education, Cisco Meraki MX provides enhanced security and connectivity. Retail chains benefit from easy VPN setups for secure multi-site networking, while educational institutions find value in its ability to manage large campuses efficiently. Financial services leverage its robust security features to protect sensitive data, ensuring compliance and trust.
WatchGuard Firebox is a high-performance firewall known for its ease of setup, offering robust security with layered protection and centralized management capabilities.
WatchGuard Firebox stands out for its intuitive management and high throughput, addressing security needs with features like VPN, web filtering, and threat detection. Its centralized control and reporting abilities, along with Active Directory integration, make it popular among varied organizations. Its user-friendly interface and ongoing updates enhance usability and reliability. However, there's a call for better cloud-based administration, scalability, and improved integration with third-party vendors.
What are the key features of WatchGuard Firebox?WatchGuard Firebox is implemented across industries to secure internet gateways and protect data in multi-site businesses. Its applications span from Unified Threat Management (UTM) and intrusion prevention to compliance support in business environments requiring secure connectivity through VPNs.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.