

Cisco Meraki MX and Sophos Firewall are two popular contenders in the firewall solutions category. Cisco Meraki MX has a competitive edge with its simplified cloud-managed approach, making it attractive for users seeking ease of use and centralized control, while Sophos Firewall excels in providing robust security features suitable for complex IT environments.
Features: Cisco Meraki MX offers a cloud-managed approach, leveraging AutoVPN, traffic shaping, and content filtering for ease of use. Sophos Firewall distinguishes itself with advanced threat protection, synchronized security, and deep packet inspection, catering to organizations needing specialized security and monitoring features.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki MX could improve by augmenting its security capabilities, particularly in SSL inspection and VPN access control. Its pricing structure is also a common critique. Sophos Firewall is known for strong security measures but is often criticized for having a complex user interface and certificate management challenges, especially with HTTPS traffic, and could enhance its load balancing and reporting features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MX is celebrated for its rapid, cloud-based deployment process and superior customer service. It supports various deployment environments from on-premises to the public cloud. Sophos Firewall, while offering hybrid deployment options and reliable support, can present initial setup challenges primarily in on-premises scenarios.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki MX pricing, notably higher due to its subscription model, is justified by users through its management simplicity and IT support reduction, despite significant initial CapEx costs. Sophos Firewall offers competitive pricing appealing to smaller businesses, characterized by a straightforward licensing model that offsets the seemingly higher costs for additional functionalities.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
The costs have increased with Sophos XGS in the last few years, with license prices going up by 30%, doubling from $2,500 to about $5,000, which is a big challenge for us.
The graphical interface of Sophos XG simplifies configurations, saving time in support and troubleshooting compared to the Linux-based solution I previously used.
We purchased endpoint security for the first time last year, and even without endpoint security, it provides comprehensive security.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
Cisco's TAC support for Cisco Meraki MX is excellent because no other OEM provides support at this level.
Cisco is one of the best vendors in the market.
Their team was quick to diagnose and resolve the problem by exchanging the equipment within two weeks.
Any issues are quickly addressed by their support team, which is not common among all OEM manufacturers.
When my customers raise a ticket, a customer representative calls them immediately to address their queries.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
You can scale up to multiple firewalls with centralized management.
You can't upgrade memory or storage on a specific model, which limits scalability.
Since it uses the underlying Kubernetes infrastructure, it can scale easily if the Kubernetes cluster is sufficiently large.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
It is rated at nine out of ten for stability and is very reliable.
Sophos XG is very stable, even when serving as a DHCP server.
Sophos XGS is stable now, and I would rate its stability as a ten out of ten.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
Tekton also has an unstable API with frequent changes, making it challenging to maintain consistency across versions.
It would be beneficial if Sophos XGS offered an end-to-end solution with competitive pricing.
The DDNS features are essential for any organization, as it is better not to have a static IP address from an ISP.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
Currently, it costs about four million shillings in Kenya.
The cost depends on the package you are in, such as full threat management or basic.
The last instance I purchased was for three years, around $3,700 for SDG 125.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
The firewall feature of Sophos XG has been the most effective for threat prevention.
It's able to detect cloud applications like Zoom or Microsoft Teams and allows traffic shaping based on the application.
By prioritizing bandwidth for our ERP hosted in Amazon Cloud and de-prioritizing non-essential sites, it has greatly improved our network management.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Sophos Firewall | 6.9% |
| Cisco Meraki MX | 3.5% |
| Other | 89.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 209 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 61 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud-managed security with user-friendly setup and efficient management, enhancing VPN and firewall functionalities for businesses.
Cisco Meraki MX is known for its robust cloud-based network management, featuring AutoVPN, SD-WAN, and advanced security. Its centralized control over firewall, traffic shaping, and monitoring ensures excellent connectivity and security. The interface allows easy management by non-technical staff, offering remote access and seamless network performance through real-time alerts and troubleshooting. It supports global connectivity with minimal effort, addressing needs across small to enterprise environments. Despite its strengths, users point out areas needing improvement like load balancing, VPN features, more flexible logging, and session capabilities. Pricing, integration limits, and licensing need enhancement.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?In industries like retail, finance, and education, Cisco Meraki MX provides enhanced security and connectivity. Retail chains benefit from easy VPN setups for secure multi-site networking, while educational institutions find value in its ability to manage large campuses efficiently. Financial services leverage its robust security features to protect sensitive data, ensuring compliance and trust.
Sophos Firewall provides comprehensive network security with web filtering, VPN capabilities, and cloud integration. Users highlight its effective threat prevention and flexibility for customizable policies, enhancing network visibility and management.
Renowned for its robust security, Sophos Firewall simplifies network protection through advanced features like intrusion prevention and endpoint protection integration. Its user-friendly interface allows seamless remote management and tailored rule creation, making it ideal for varied environments like healthcare and education. While the system excels in threat detection, areas such as interface navigation, support response times, and VPN integration face challenges. Enhanced reporting and bandwidth management are essential for improved performance.
What are the standout features of Sophos Firewall?Industries such as healthcare, education, and finance implement Sophos Firewall for secure VPNs, improved threat management, and effective traffic monitoring. Its load balancing and email security features support compliance and governance, ensuring robust protection tailored to sector-specific requirements.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.