Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Sophos XG Logo

Top 10 Sophos XG Alternatives

Vendor: Sophos
4.1 out of 5
2,807 followers
Post review

Top Sophos XG Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Sophos XG based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Sophos Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Sophos, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Sophos XG Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate excels in extensive security features and VPN performance, appealing to tech buyers seeking strong integration capabilities. In comparison, Sophos XG offers advanced threat protection and intuitive configuration, making it an attractive choice for those prioritizing detailed reporting and synchronized security.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. Sophos XG Report
Fortinet FortiGate users report moderate setup costs, while Sophos XG users mention lower initial costs. FortiGate is seen as slightly more complex to install compared to the simpler setup experience with Sophos XG.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate users report moderate setup costs, while Sophos XG users mention lower initial costs. FortiGate is seen as slightly more complex to install compared to the simpler setup experience with Sophos XG.
Sophos XG Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense excels in pricing, flexibility, extensive customization, and open-source community support. In comparison, Sophos XG stands out with its advanced security features, intuitive management, and sophisticated threat detection, making it worth the higher cost. Netgate pfSense is praised for straightforward deployment, while Sophos XG offers proactive support.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. Sophos XG Report
The setup cost for Netgate pfSense is minimal compared to Sophos XG, which involves higher initial investment. Netgate pfSense provides a lower entry cost, while Sophos XG reflects a more significant expenditure for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Netgate pfSense is minimal compared to Sophos XG, which involves higher initial investment. Netgate pfSense provides a lower entry cost, while Sophos XG reflects a more significant expenditure for setup.
Sophos XG Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG excels in ease of deployment and customer service, valued for strong security and integration. In comparison, OPNsense offers feature richness and extensive configuration at a cost-effective rate. A tech buyer might choose Sophos for streamlined setup or OPNsense for open-source flexibility and lower costs.
Download OPNsense vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas OPNsense is often noted for its lower upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG typically involves a higher initial setup cost, whereas OPNsense is often noted for its lower upfront expenses.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall is praised for its robust security and excellent integration with Cisco products. In comparison, Sophos XG stands out for its advanced threat protection and user-friendly configuration. Cisco’s solution is noted for its comprehensive security, while Sophos XG offers a straightforward, efficient setup option.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Cisco Secure Firewall has a higher setup cost than Sophos XG. The initial investment required for Cisco Secure Firewall can be significantly greater compared to the more affordable setup cost of Sophos XG.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall has a higher setup cost than Sophos XG. The initial investment required for Cisco Secure Firewall can be significantly greater compared to the more affordable setup cost of Sophos XG.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XG offers competitive pricing and versatile VPN support, appealing to those prioritizing cost-efficiency and smooth deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide superior threat detection and a comprehensive security suite, making them ideal for organizations requiring advanced features and higher security investment.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a lower initial setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which exhibits higher expenses for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a lower initial setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, which exhibits higher expenses for initial deployment.
Sophos XG Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
Sophos XG offers competitive pricing and support, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Azure Firewall provides a robust feature set and strong Azure integration. Sophos XG excels in advanced threat protection and VPN capabilities, while Azure Firewall is favored for its scalability and comprehensive security policies.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG's setup cost is straightforward and budget-friendly, whereas Azure Firewall's setup cost is higher due to its advanced integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG's setup cost is straightforward and budget-friendly, whereas Azure Firewall's setup cost is higher due to its advanced integration features.
Sophos XG Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Sophos XG offers competitive pricing and supportive customer service. In comparison, Check Point NGFW excels with its comprehensive threat prevention and granular policy controls. Sophos XG is favored for ease of deployment, while Check Point NGFW provides robust advanced security features and solid ROI.
Download Check Point NGFW vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost than Check Point NGFW, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Check Point NGFW, despite being higher in setup cost, offers advanced capabilities that might justify the investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost than Check Point NGFW, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Check Point NGFW, despite being higher in setup cost, offers advanced capabilities that might justify the investment.
Sophos XG Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XG is praised for comprehensive security features and ease of deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels in customer service and ROI. Sophos XG needs better documentation, while WatchGuard Firebox requires improved hardware performance. A tech buyer might choose Sophos XG for its reporting, or WatchGuard Firebox for superior threat detection.
Download Sophos XG vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Sophos XG setup costs are generally higher, while WatchGuard Firebox focus on a more economical approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG setup costs are generally higher, while WatchGuard Firebox focus on a more economical approach.
Sophos XG Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ entices tech buyers with its ease of use, reliability in threat blocking, and budget-friendly setup, making it a simple and effective choice. In comparison, Sophos XG attracts due to its superior threat detection, comprehensive security features, and significant long-term ROI, justifying the higher cost.
Download SonicWall TZ vs. Sophos XG Report
SonicWall TZ offers lower setup costs, while Sophos XG requires a higher initial investment. SonicWall TZ is budget-friendly for small businesses, whereas Sophos XG justifies its price with advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall TZ offers lower setup costs, while Sophos XG requires a higher initial investment. SonicWall TZ is budget-friendly for small businesses, whereas Sophos XG justifies its price with advanced features and capabilities.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX excels in pricing and support. In comparison, Sophos XG is known for its feature-rich offerings worth the investment. Juniper SRX offers cost-effectiveness and notable ROI, while Sophos XG, despite higher costs, provides high ROI due to its extensive features.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Juniper SRX Series Firewall has higher setup costs while Sophos XG offers a more cost-effective setup. The Sophos XG provides a budget-friendly alternative with robust features despite its lower initial expense compared to the Juniper SRX Series Firewall.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper SRX Series Firewall has higher setup costs while Sophos XG offers a more cost-effective setup. The Sophos XG provides a budget-friendly alternative with robust features despite its lower initial expense compared to the Juniper SRX Series Firewall.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XG excels with advanced threat protection and deep packet inspection. In comparison, Untangle NG Firewall offers ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Sophos XG requires a higher learning curve, whereas Untangle NG Firewall's straightforward deployment suits smaller budgets. Sophos XG's superior security features justify its higher cost.
Download Sophos XG vs. Untangle NG Firewall Report
Sophos XG has a moderate setup cost, while Untangle NG Firewall is more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a moderate setup cost, while Untangle NG Firewall is more budget-friendly.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XG attracts buyers with its ease of deployment and responsive customer service, plus competitive pricing and strong ROI. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate-VM impresses with advanced threat protection, seamless integration, and a feature-rich architecture, making it worth the higher cost for enhanced security and user experience.
Download Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a lower initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM entails higher setup expenses. FortiGate-VM's upfront investment could be significant compared to the more budget-friendly Sophos XG.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a lower initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate-VM entails higher setup expenses. FortiGate-VM's upfront investment could be significant compared to the more budget-friendly Sophos XG.
Sophos XG Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa users appreciate its robust threat detection and reporting, while Sophos XG stands out for its integration with other security tools. In comparison, Sophos XG offers enhanced firewall protection. SonicWall NSa is cost-effective, yet Sophos XG's comprehensive features justify its higher price.
Download SonicWall NSa vs. Sophos XG Report
SonicWall NSa has a higher initial setup cost, while Sophos XG offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa has a higher initial setup cost, while Sophos XG offers a more cost-effective setup.
Sophos XG Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG offers robust security features like deep packet inspection and comprehensive threat protection. In comparison, KerioControl is appreciated for its intuitive setup and user-friendly firewall management. Sophos XG provides extensive protection, while KerioControl excels in ease of deployment and customer service.
Download KerioControl vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has higher setup costs compared to KerioControl, making KerioControl a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Sophos XG users report more extensive setup procedures, whereas KerioControl offers a simpler and less costly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has higher setup costs compared to KerioControl, making KerioControl a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Sophos XG users report more extensive setup procedures, whereas KerioControl offers a simpler and less costly setup.
Sophos XG Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
Sophos XG is favored for its reliable pricing, support, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF is recognized for advanced features and superior threat intelligence. Sophos XG needs better analytics, while Sangfor NGAF could improve performance, with each solution offering distinct advantages.
Download Sangfor NGAF vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG users highlight a straightforward setup process with moderate initial costs, while Sangfor NGAF's setup is noted for being cost-effective yet more complex. Sophos XG is often preferred for ease of installation, unlike Sangfor NGAF which has a lower setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG users highlight a straightforward setup process with moderate initial costs, while Sangfor NGAF's setup is noted for being cost-effective yet more complex. Sophos XG is often preferred for ease of installation, unlike Sangfor NGAF which has a lower setup cost.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XG is recognized for affordability and strong customer support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is favored for its advanced features and perceived superior investment. Sophos XG emphasizes cost-effectiveness, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is valued for long-term capabilities despite higher initial costs.
Download Palo Alto Networks VM-Series vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has relatively straightforward initial setup costs, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series setup involves higher complexity and expense. Sophos XG is more accessible for smaller budgets, contrasting with the premium pricing of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has relatively straightforward initial setup costs, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series setup involves higher complexity and expense. Sophos XG is more accessible for smaller budgets, contrasting with the premium pricing of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers superior network performance and integrated VPN capabilities, making it a cost-effective option with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Sophos XG delivers advanced threat protection and intuitive configuration options, justifying its higher cost with extensive features and detailed support resources.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers a moderately priced setup cost, whereas Sophos XG features a higher initial setup fee. Barracuda's firewall provides a cost-effective starting point compared to the more expensive setup of Sophos XG.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers a moderately priced setup cost, whereas Sophos XG features a higher initial setup fee. Barracuda's firewall provides a cost-effective starting point compared to the more expensive setup of Sophos XG.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Forcepoint offers advanced threat detection and granular control at competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Sophos XG excels in comprehensive network security and integration capabilities, providing a better long-term ROI due to its robust feature set and effective security management tools.
Download Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has higher setup costs, while Sophos XG offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has higher setup costs, while Sophos XG offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Sophos XG Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
Sophos XG offers intuitive configuration and advanced threat protection. In comparison, Huawei NGFW provides comprehensive security and scalability. Sophos XG is easier to configure, while Huawei NGFW excels in feature set and scalability for large-scale operations. Sophos XG deployment is simpler with reliable support, whereas Huawei NGFW's customization comes with more complex deployment.
Download Huawei NGFW vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a higher setup cost compared to Huawei NGFW, with users noting the affordability of Huawei’s setup. Differences in pricing are significant and could influence budget-sensitive decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a higher setup cost compared to Huawei NGFW, with users noting the affordability of Huawei’s setup. Differences in pricing are significant and could influence budget-sensitive decisions.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Zscaler Cloud Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Sophos XG excels in robust threat protection and integration capabilities. In comparison, Zscaler Cloud Firewall delivers scalable, cloud-based security. Sophos XG users suggest better VPN stability, while Zscaler users seek simplified configurations. Sophos XG offers competitive pricing, whereas Zscaler provides superior long-term value with minimal maintenance.
Download Sophos XG vs. Zscaler Cloud Firewall Report
Sophos XG setup cost is considered reasonable by users, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall setup cost is perceived as higher but justified by its comprehensive features. Sophos XG is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness, whereas Zscaler focuses on offering robust capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG setup cost is considered reasonable by users, while Zscaler Cloud Firewall setup cost is perceived as higher but justified by its comprehensive features. Sophos XG is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness, whereas Zscaler focuses on offering robust capabilities.
Sophos XG Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.6 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Hillstone E-Series
4.6 out of 5
Sophos XG excels in rich network protection features and ease of management. In comparison, Hillstone E-Series offers advanced threat detection and integrated security functions. Sophos XG's intuitive approach appeals to those seeking straightforward deployment, while Hillstone E-Series justifies its premium pricing with long-term benefits.
Download Hillstone E-Series vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Hillstone E-Series is noted for potentially higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Hillstone E-Series is noted for potentially higher upfront expenses.
Sophos XG Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5

Juniper vSRX is chosen for its advanced security and high performance. In comparison, Sophos XG is preferred for intuitive management and comprehensive reporting. Juniper vSRX's configuration complexity contrasts with Sophos XG's user-friendly setup. Sophos XG is more cost-effective, while Juniper vSRX justifies higher costs with robust features.

Download Juniper vSRX vs. Sophos XG Report
Juniper vSRX offers a more competitive setup cost, while Sophos XG has a higher initial expenditure. Differences in setup costs highlight Juniper's affordability compared to Sophos.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper vSRX offers a more competitive setup cost, while Sophos XG has a higher initial expenditure. Differences in setup costs highlight Juniper's affordability compared to Sophos.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series
4.3 out of 5
Sophos XG offers competitive pricing, intuitive management, and robust customer support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels in advanced features, superior threat detection, and scalability. Sophos XG is user-friendly and budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series provides comprehensive security for a higher cost.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG entails a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series comes with a higher setup cost but offers robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG entails a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series comes with a higher setup cost but offers robust features.
Sophos XG Logo
Sophos XG Logo
GajShield Next Generation Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Sophos XG offers cost-efficient, straightforward deployment and broad integration capabilities. In comparison, GajShield provides robust data security, application filtering, and superior customer service. Sophos XG is ideal for budget-conscious organizations needing simplicity, while GajShield suits high-risk environments prioritizing advanced data protection.
Download GajShield Next Generation Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG incurs a moderate initial setup cost, while GajShield Next Generation Firewall has a relatively low setup cost. Sophos XG offers a wider range of advanced features, whereas GajShield emphasizes cost efficiency for basic needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG incurs a moderate initial setup cost, while GajShield Next Generation Firewall has a relatively low setup cost. Sophos XG offers a wider range of advanced features, whereas GajShield emphasizes cost efficiency for basic needs.
Sophos XG Logo
WiJungle
1 out of 5
Sophos XG Logo
WiJungle
1 out of 5

WiJungle is an Unified Network Security Gateway that enables organizations to manage and secure their entire network through a single window.

View comparison

Related categories

Firewalls
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
WAN Edge