Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WatchGuard Firebox Logo

Top 10 WatchGuard Firebox Alternatives

Vendor: WatchGuard
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
772 followers
Post review

Top WatchGuard Firebox Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WatchGuard Firebox based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

WatchGuard Firebox surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive cybersecurity solutions with advanced threat detection, intuitive management features, and superior scalability, providing businesses with robust protection and seamless integration to enhance network security.

WatchGuard Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WatchGuard, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate offers a comprehensive security suite with integration benefits and competitive pricing for large deployments. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox is favored for its ease of use and cost-effective features, appealing to SMBs.
Download Fortinet FortiGate vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiGate has a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox tends to have a lower upfront expense. WatchGuard’s affordability contrasts with Fortinet's more comprehensive configuration investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate has a moderate setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox tends to have a lower upfront expense. WatchGuard’s affordability contrasts with Fortinet's more comprehensive configuration investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers scalability, customizability, and an open-source nature, making it a flexible option with low setup costs. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox, known for its robust security and advanced threat insights, provides superior features and reliable performance, justifying its higher price.
Download Netgate pfSense vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Netgate pfSense setup cost is minimal, making it a cost-effective solution; WatchGuard Firebox setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features and targeted infrastructure.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense setup cost is minimal, making it a cost-effective solution; WatchGuard Firebox setup cost is higher, reflecting its advanced features and targeted infrastructure.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
OPNsense offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness with open-source features like a powerful firewall and extensive plugins. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels with enterprise-grade security, advanced threat detection, and scalability. OPNsense is praised for community support, while WatchGuard Firebox features robust customer service.
Download OPNsense vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
OPNsense has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses. WatchGuard Firebox, however, justifies its higher cost with advanced security features and robust performance suitable for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense has a lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses. WatchGuard Firebox, however, justifies its higher cost with advanced security features and robust performance suitable for larger enterprises.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall provides competitive pricing and scalability, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking integration flexibility. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers comprehensive security features with advanced malware protection, attracting organizations prioritizing robust functionality over cost, despite its potentially higher price point.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Cisco Secure Firewall typically incurs higher setup costs compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which is noted for its more budget-friendly initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall typically incurs higher setup costs compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which is noted for its more budget-friendly initial setup expenses.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG impresses with granular controls and detailed reporting, ideal for complex networks. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers intuitive interfaces and easy VPN setups, making it suitable for small to medium businesses seeking straightforward management and strong security within budget constraints.
Download Sophos XG vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Sophos XG has a simpler setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which may have a more intricate pricing structure, appealing to users seeking a streamlined budgeting process.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a simpler setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, which may have a more intricate pricing structure, appealing to users seeking a streamlined budgeting process.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox appeals with its simple setup and strong support, making it ideal for smaller businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer advanced security features like application control, making them attractive for businesses prioritizing comprehensive security despite a higher price.
Download Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers a lower setup cost, providing budget-friendly security solutions, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls require a higher initial investment, aiming for enhanced features and performance.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers a lower setup cost, providing budget-friendly security solutions, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls require a higher initial investment, aiming for enhanced features and performance.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Azure Firewall
3.7 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox attracts tech buyers with cost-effective pricing and ease of integration. In comparison, Azure Firewall is chosen for cloud-native security and scalability. WatchGuard Firebox's straightforward deployment contrasts with Azure Firewall's superior support infrastructure. Azure Firewall's higher pricing is justified by its advanced capabilities.
Download Azure Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox incurs a higher setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox incurs a higher setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox excels in ease of setup and cost-effectiveness, offering user-friendly interfaces and strong ROI. In comparison, Check Point NGFW delivers robust security and extensive application control but could improve performance stability and simplify its complex licensing and upgrade processes.
Download Check Point NGFW vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Check Point NGFW, despite a higher initial investment, provides robust security features.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox offers a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Check Point NGFW, despite a higher initial investment, provides robust security features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall TZ
4.1 out of 5
SonicWall TZ offers robust configuration and competitive high-availability features, appealing for its security and integration at a reduced cost. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides superior integration with layering security and intuitive reporting, making it attractive for managing flexible traffic and high throughput.
Download SonicWall TZ vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
The SonicWall TZ typically involves higher setup costs than the WatchGuard Firebox, which is known for its economical installation.
View comparison
Pricing
The SonicWall TZ typically involves higher setup costs than the WatchGuard Firebox, which is known for its economical installation.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX Series Firewall attracts buyers for its pricing and customer service, addressing needs with robust security features and versatile connectivity. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers advanced threat detection, user-friendly setup, and comprehensive reporting, making it attractive despite a higher price point.
Download Juniper SRX Series Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall has higher upfront setup costs, while the WatchGuard Firebox offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. The differences in pricing highlight their varying target markets and feature sets.
View comparison
Pricing
The Juniper SRX Series Firewall has higher upfront setup costs, while the WatchGuard Firebox offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. The differences in pricing highlight their varying target markets and feature sets.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall offers intuitive policy management, cost-effective pricing, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides advanced threat detection and comprehensive security services, though it has a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Tech buyers will appreciate Untangle's affordability and ease, or WatchGuard's superior features.
Download Untangle NG Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Untangle NG Firewall has lower initial setup costs, making it budget-friendly for smaller deployments, whereas WatchGuard Firebox incurs higher setup expenses, which may be justified for its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall has lower initial setup costs, making it budget-friendly for smaller deployments, whereas WatchGuard Firebox incurs higher setup expenses, which may be justified for its advanced security features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
SonicWall NSa
3.9 out of 5
SonicWall NSa's threat detection and granular security policies make it a popular choice for those focused on robust network protection. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox excels with its comprehensive security suite and high-performance throughput, appealing to those seeking extensive features and higher value despite the cost.
Download SonicWall NSa vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
SonicWall NSa often incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas WatchGuard Firebox is generally noted for being more affordable and quicker to implement.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall NSa often incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas WatchGuard Firebox is generally noted for being more affordable and quicker to implement.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sophos XGS
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is noted for affordability and support, while Sophos XGS justifies its higher cost through advanced features. WatchGuard excels in VPN capabilities, whereas Sophos offers superior threat protection. WatchGuard's reporting needs improvement, and Sophos needs better management. WatchGuard has better customer service.
Download Sophos XGS vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower setup cost, while Sophos XGS incurs a higher initial investment, providing advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower setup cost, while Sophos XGS incurs a higher initial investment, providing advanced features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiOS excels in security and performance. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox stands out for features and user satisfaction. Fortinet FortiOS could improve management tools. WatchGuard Firebox offers intuitive configurations. Fortinet FortiOS has a higher cost, while WatchGuard Firebox provides better ROI.
Download Fortinet FortiOS vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiOS setup cost is noted for being higher, while WatchGuard Firebox offers a more budget-friendly setup price, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiOS setup cost is noted for being higher, while WatchGuard Firebox offers a more budget-friendly setup price, highlighting a significant cost difference.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
KerioControl offers comprehensive VPN options and bandwidth management. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox impresses with advanced threat detection and customizable security policies. KerioControl is praised for straightforward deployment, while WatchGuard Firebox provides better ROI due to its extensive features.
Download KerioControl vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
KerioControl setup cost is lower, making it more accessible, while WatchGuard Firebox has a higher setup cost, offering more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioControl setup cost is lower, making it more accessible, while WatchGuard Firebox has a higher setup cost, offering more advanced features.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Sangfor NGAF
4.0 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox excels with its ease of setup, integration capabilities, and extensive features, appealing to those seeking robust security. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF is favored for its affordability and simplicity, ideal for small to mid-sized enterprises needing cost-effective security solutions.
Download Sangfor NGAF vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower initial setup cost compared to Sangfor NGAF, highlighting affordability differences. Sangfor NGAF, while more expensive, may offer additional features that justify the higher investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower initial setup cost compared to Sangfor NGAF, highlighting affordability differences. Sangfor NGAF, while more expensive, may offer additional features that justify the higher investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is praised for its customer support and affordability. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers comprehensive features and perceived value. Barracuda is known for its advanced threat protection, while WatchGuard excels in high-level threat detection, making either suitable for different security needs.
Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a significantly lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox. WatchGuard Firebox, on the other hand, provides more extensive initial implementation options at a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall has a significantly lower setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox. WatchGuard Firebox, on the other hand, provides more extensive initial implementation options at a higher setup cost.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers advanced threat protection, cloud access control, and deep packet inspection. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides multi-factor authentication, network visibility, and a security platform with integration options. Tech buyers may value Forcepoint for straightforward deployment, while others might prefer WatchGuard for its comprehensive features.
Download Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
The setup cost for Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall may be higher initially, while WatchGuard Firebox often presents a more budget-friendly option upfront. WatchGuard Firebox typically offers lower setup costs compared to Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall may be higher initially, while WatchGuard Firebox often presents a more budget-friendly option upfront. WatchGuard Firebox typically offers lower setup costs compared to Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Huawei NGFW
3.6 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is recognized for its reliable security, user-friendliness, and strong network protection. In comparison, Huawei NGFW offers advanced threat detection, high performance, and superior integration. WatchGuard Firebox appeals for its cost-efficiency and support, whereas Huawei NGFW attracts with advanced features and long-term value.
Download Huawei NGFW vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox setup costs are affordable and straightforward, while Huawei NGFW's setup costs are higher and more complex.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox setup costs are affordable and straightforward, while Huawei NGFW's setup costs are higher and more complex.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security shines for complex, large-scale environments with extensive integrations and threat prevention. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox is optimal for smaller enterprises, emphasizing affordability and performance. Check Point requires advanced configuration, whereas WatchGuard offers simplicity and faster deployment.
Download Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox. Despite the differences in setup costs, each solution caters respectively to differing budget requirements and network security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox. Despite the differences in setup costs, each solution caters respectively to differing budget requirements and network security needs.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Juniper vSRX offers robust performance and advanced security features, appealing to those needing reliable VPN and threat intelligence. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox’s balanced functionality and ease of use attract users seeking comprehensive security and intuitive deployment with cost-effective pricing and lower operational costs.
Download Juniper vSRX vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
The setup cost for Juniper vSRX is known to be higher compared to the more affordable setup cost for WatchGuard Firebox, making the latter a cost-effective choice.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Juniper vSRX is known to be higher compared to the more affordable setup cost for WatchGuard Firebox, making the latter a cost-effective choice.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Palo Alto Networks PA-Series
4.3 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is appreciated for its comprehensive security measures and easy management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series excels with advanced threat detection and integration capabilities. WatchGuard Firebox offers cost-effective, straightforward deployment, while Palo Alto Networks PA-Series justifies higher costs with sophisticated features and long-term benefits.
Download Palo Alto Networks PA-Series vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, making it more suitable for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox has a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, making it more suitable for budget-conscious organizations.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Hillstone T-Series
3.7 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Hillstone T-Series
3.7 out of 5
Hillstone T-Series offers advanced threat protection, high performance, and easy integration. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox is noted for its rich features, including advanced security services and flexible configuration. While Hillstone is cost-effective with strong support, Firebox provides extensive capabilities at a higher price.
Download Hillstone T-Series vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Hillstone T-Series setup cost is lower compared to the higher setup cost of WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting affordability versus premium pricing. WatchGuard Firebox also delivers extensive features and security, balancing its investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Hillstone T-Series setup cost is lower compared to the higher setup cost of WatchGuard Firebox, highlighting affordability versus premium pricing. WatchGuard Firebox also delivers extensive features and security, balancing its investment.
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
WatchGuard Firebox Logo
Smoothwall Firewall
4.5 out of 5

Smoothwall Firewall is used in educational institutions for web filtering and network security. Users praise its effective content filtering, robust reporting, and strong technical support. They appreciate its user-friendly deployment but desire more frequent updates, detailed analytics, and better documentation. Some have experienced stability issues and challenging initial setup, yet find it practical for schools.

View comparison

Related categories

Firewalls
Unified Threat Management (UTM)
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions