Microsoft Azure DevOps Reviews

Currently, we are using it for the continuous integration and continuous deployment of the CI/CD pipeline available for our projects.

The solution is very useful.

It's very easy to use and easy to navigate. It's a simple product to navigate.

The product is very stable; it's being used by quite a few organizations. We find it quite reliable.

The scalability, for now, is good for what we need. 

The installation is very straightforward.

We haven't had too much time to really play with the solution and therefore it's difficult to really know if there's anything missing in terms of features. We need more time with it.

The price could be lowered. It would be nice if it was cheaper.

I started using the solution a few months ago. It's been about a year or so. We have not used the product for that long just yet.

The product is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's quite reliable in terms of performance. 

The solution is scalable, at least for our purposes. We haven't run into any issues.

We have about 1,000 users on the solution currently.

The forums that are available to users are quite helpful and have a lot of information. It helps us troubleshoot very well. We don't usually call anyone directly.

We did not use a different solution before using this product.

The product is very straightforward to set up. 

The deployment is fast as well. It only took us about 10 to 15 minutes to have everything up and running. 

I handled the installation myself. I did not need the assistance of a consultant or integrator. It was handled in-house.

It would be nice if the licensing was a bit cheaper.

Our IT team looks after that aspect. I don't deal with tasks such as licensing and payments directly.

We did not evaluate other solutions before deciding on this product.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. So far, we've been very pleased with its capabilities.

We use DevOps for backlogs and work items. We divide our releases into many sprints to keep our development on time, and we use DevOps to manage tasks for development or business teams.

DevOps is easy to use because we can arrange each task in a project and follow up with the testing, development, and business teams. We manage everything through this.

I want DevOps to have more automated reminders about tasks that don't need management. We don't have reminders, so a project manager must track the tasks. It's not automatic.

We've been using Azure DevOps for three years. 

DevOps is stable. 

DevOps is scalable. About 70 people use the solution on average. 

Another team handles the implementation, so I wasn't involved. I'm on the business team. Two engineers are responsible for deploying and managing DevOps. 

We pay for a yearly license. 

I rate Azure DevOps eight out of 10. I prefer Jira, but both solutions are very nice. 

We use Azure DevOps for managing our workflow, as well as the CI/CD.

We use the CD/CD for all of our deployment lifecycles.

The CI/CD portal is very user-friendly.

The platform is very easy to manage. It is easy to manage repositories between the business users and corporate users.

Fields can be customized and the reporting is good. The APIs that are exposed can generate management reports.

The most valuable feature is the test manager. 

Integration is easy to do. The single-sign-on facility is there in every aspect including Azure DevOps, Active Directory, our portals, and all of our development sites.

Proper Gantt charting should be a feature that is included because as it is now, we have to create it ourselves.

We would like to have an indicator of the percentage of occupancy. Suppose a person is working on two different domains, and we have 70% on one project with 30% on the other, it should be able to report that. As it is now, we have to manually enter that data. If this functionality were provided then it would make it easier for users.

We have been using Azure DevOps for the past two to two and a half years.

We have had issues, usually related to the APIs, but the support team has always helped us to resolve them.

The Microsoft support team is prompt to respond and very good.

The price is cheaper than Jira and some of the other competing tools.

Overall, this is a good product and if the Gantt chart and occupancy reporting features are added then it will be the most powerful one in this space.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten

Some of the valuable features are the interface and the workflows are easy to learn and to manage. It has all the features that are required on each account.

There are some areas that need improvement such as tracking. There is not anything major that needs to be improved in the future, just minor adjustments are needed. The solution works well.

I have been using the solution for a few years.

The solution is stable.

I have found the solution to be scalable, we have approximately 30 people using it.

I have not used the support. However, you receive all the documentation with the solution needed.

I would recommend this solution, it is a good tool to use.

I rate Microsoft Azure DevOps an eight out of ten.

We implement this solution to those wanting to improve their processes to make their business function better.

Some of the valuable features are the functionality and the wide range of capabilities.

Not all companies use the same methodology which could limit the use of this solution.

I have been using the solution for approximately two years.

The stability of the solution is great.

I have found the scalability good. We have approximately four specialists and ten testers using the solution in our organization.

I would recommend this solution to others if they have tools with Microsoft and the proper infrastructure because not all customers work with this methodology in the development team.

I rate Microsoft Azure DevOps a nine out of ten.

I have many microservices, and I am using Azure DevOps to deploy my microservices and build a global platform for payments.

Azure Pipeline and Azure Release are most valuable. I use Azure DevOps through pipeline and release.

It should have security features for scanning the code and checking it for vulnerability and security. Currently, I am using other tools for this. It should also have integration with other tools to improve security.

I have been using this solution for two years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. Currently, we have 400 users, and they are DevOps engineers and developers.

They have helped me with the problems. They are very good.

I have only used Azure DevOps.

It is very simple to install. Its deployment takes a very short time.

I would recommend this solution. I like Azure DevOps.

I would rate Microsoft Azure DevOps a nine out of ten.

We are a software development company and we use DevOps practices to manage our application development lifecycle. This is our primary use case. We don't have a production environment for the applications that we develop. Rather, they are given to our customers when they are production-ready.

The management includes service requests, incidents, issues, etc.

The most valuable feature is that it brings order to our projects, and we know the status of each one at every moment.

This product would be improved if the helpdesk were included.

We are a small company and have not had any problems with scalability.

Technical support is good and we haven't had any problems with them.

We don't have any complaints about the pricing.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I like the management features and the user interface is very friendly.

It is not clear what features have been added or enhanced since the last version. My customer used a previous version and it did not meet their expectations, so clarification with respect to the new version is needed on their website or other venues.

I would like to see more customization available to the administrator. You need to change the workflow of the end result.

I did not load the application heavily, but it was stable.

I only tested this solution with a single user. I think that it is scalable, as long as you increase the resources as you move to a larger scale.

I have not been in touch with technical support yet.

The initial setup is very simple.

I performed the setup myself, on my laptop.

I would advise someone considering this solution to use Microsoft because it is very user-friendly, it can run on small levels of applications, can be calibrated to the application, it can be scaled to a larger scale, from small scale to larger scale. It's very stable, you just need to increase the receptors if you need to scale to a larger scale. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.