IBM FlashSystemIBM FlashSystem generally receives favorable reviews for its pricing and support, while the NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is often praised for its comprehensive feature set, which many users believe justifies the higher cost. IBM FlashSystem stands out for its scalability, high performance, and data reduction capabilities. Users appreciate its ease of integration and broad functionality. Conversely, NetApp NVMe AFF A800 excels in providing advanced data protection, high throughput, and efficient storage management. It features strong data management tools and superior performance under diverse workloads. Users of IBM FlashSystem suggest improvements in its documentation and system compatibility enhancements. Some report encountering issues with firmware updates. For NetApp NVMe AFF A800, users recommend more intuitive management tools and enhanced technical support for complex setups. IBM FlashSystem is praised for its straightforward deployment and the effectiveness of its customer service, which many find responsive and helpful. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 also offers a smooth deployment experience though some users note a steeper learning curve. The customer service for NetApp is mostly positive, though occasionally cited as needing improvement for intricate issues. IBM FlashSystem is typically seen as providing good value for a lower initial setup cost and strong ROI due mainly to its efficient data reduction and reliability. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 has higher initial costs but is often considered worth the investment due to its comprehensive feature set and long-term performance benefits, potentially leading to solid ROI over time.
IBM FlashSystem setup cost is generally lower and more straightforward, while NetApp NVMe AFF A800 presents a higher initial investment with more complex integration.