Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Opsview based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and New Relic.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
ITRS Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ITRS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Opsview offers affordability and ease of deployment with strong customer support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Datadog, with its advanced feature set and real-time analytics, justifies a higher cost, providing tech buyers substantial value and promising returns on investment.
Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring, flexibility, and strong community support, making it cost-effective for smaller enterprises. In comparison, Opsview delivers advanced features like customizable dashboards and hybrid cloud monitoring, providing high ROI for larger organizations. Opsview's ease of deployment contrasts with Zabbix's steeper learning curve.
Zabbix has a lower setup cost compared to Opsview, which might make it more appealing for budget-conscious users. Opsview, however, offers more advanced features that justify its higher setup cost.
Zabbix has a lower setup cost compared to Opsview, which might make it more appealing for budget-conscious users. Opsview, however, offers more advanced features that justify its higher setup cost.
Opsview excels with customizable dashboards and broad device monitoring for diverse IT environments. In comparison, New Relic offers robust analytics and application performance monitoring. Opsview appeals with cost-effectiveness, while New Relic attracts those valuing comprehensive features and application-level insights in cloud-native deployment.
Opsview involves moderate setup costs making it an affordable choice, whereas New Relic presents higher setup expenses appealing to businesses with larger budgets.
Opsview involves moderate setup costs making it an affordable choice, whereas New Relic presents higher setup expenses appealing to businesses with larger budgets.
Opsview offers robust integrations and custom alerts, beneficial for diverse monitoring needs. In comparison, Elastic Observability's scalability and log analysis suit large-scale data demands, appealing for enterprises needing advanced search and log management. Elastic's extensive features may justify higher costs for comprehensive observability.
Opsview has a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Observability may involve more complex setup expenses, highlighting notable differences in initial investment.
Opsview has a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Observability may involve more complex setup expenses, highlighting notable differences in initial investment.
SolarWinds NPM excels in ease of deployment and customer service, making it ideal for quick integration and support. In comparison, Opsview, with its comprehensive monitoring and scalability, suits organizations needing robust features and scalable solutions despite a higher initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor offers real-time data analysis with simple deployment, benefiting smaller setups. In comparison, Opsview's comprehensive features and scalable architecture cater to larger enterprises. PRTG provides cost-effective solutions, while Opsview justifies higher costs with advanced capabilities and extensive integrations.
PRTG Network Monitor has minimal setup costs, which contrasts with Opsview's higher setup expenses. This difference in setup costs highlights the varying approaches these solutions take toward initial implementation.
PRTG Network Monitor has minimal setup costs, which contrasts with Opsview's higher setup expenses. This difference in setup costs highlights the varying approaches these solutions take toward initial implementation.
Nagios XI offers extensive flexibility and customization, making it ideal for complex network environments. In comparison, Opsview appeals to users with modern integrations and user-friendly features. Nagios XI suits those needing a strong plugin ecosystem, while Opsview excels in intuitive dashboards and advanced reporting tools.
SCOM excels in Microsoft integration, ideal for enterprises heavily utilizing Microsoft tools. In comparison, Opsview's flexibility supports diverse systems, appealing to those needing customization. SCOM's Microsoft focus offers substantial ROI, while Opsview's competitive pricing benefits those valuing adaptability and multi-environment support.
SCOM has a higher setup cost compared to Opsview, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation. The lower initial investment in Opsview highlights its affordability, whereas SCOM's investment offers a robust feature set in exchange for higher setup costs.
SCOM has a higher setup cost compared to Opsview, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation. The lower initial investment in Opsview highlights its affordability, whereas SCOM's investment offers a robust feature set in exchange for higher setup costs.
Opsview offers comprehensive monitoring with robust performance tracking, appealing to users needing broad-spectrum analytics. In comparison, Auvik's intuitive interface and automation, with features like automated network topology mapping, attract those prioritizing efficient deployment and real-time visibility in managing complex networks.
Opsview involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Auvik Network Management (ANM), which offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment required for deploying these network management solutions.
Opsview involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Auvik Network Management (ANM), which offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment required for deploying these network management solutions.
Opsview offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities and flexible alerting, making it a strong choice for its competitive pricing and support. In comparison, Checkmk stands out with customizable dashboards and efficient performance, valued for its cost-effectiveness and higher ROI, especially in large-scale deployments.
Opsview's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting a more extensive feature set, while Checkmk offers a lower setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious users.
Opsview's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting a more extensive feature set, while Checkmk offers a lower setup cost, making it appealing for budget-conscious users.
Opsview offers comprehensive integration and flexible configurations for complex tasks, appealing to enterprises seeking customization. In comparison, LogicMonitor emphasizes automated cloud-based features, providing scalability and efficiency. Tech buyers might choose Opsview for integration or LogicMonitor for real-time analytics and ease of deployment.
Opsview appeals to enterprises with its competitive pricing and efficient support. In comparison, Centreon's robust customization options and scalability attract businesses with complex needs. Opsview benefits smaller enterprises with its cost-effectiveness, whereas Centreon suits larger organizations with intricate monitoring requirements.
Opsview has a higher setup cost, making it less budget-friendly compared to Centreon, which offers a more economical setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in affordability between the two solutions.
Opsview has a higher setup cost, making it less budget-friendly compared to Centreon, which offers a more economical setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in affordability between the two solutions.
Opsview tends to shine in support and service, while Icinga excels in feature richness and user satisfaction, making it worth the investment despite a potentially higher cost. In comparison, Icinga users value its flexibility and ease of integration with other tools.
ScienceLogic is known for comprehensive features and strong customer support, providing powerful automation and integration capabilities. In comparison, Opsview offers an intuitive approach with straightforward monitoring and customizable dashboards. Ideal for robust feature sets, ScienceLogic suits those seeking advanced capabilities, while Opsview appeals to budget-conscious buyers desiring simplicity.
ScienceLogic offers a lower setup cost compared to Opsview, making it a more cost-effective initial investment. Opsview's setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive onboarding services.
ScienceLogic offers a lower setup cost compared to Opsview, making it a more cost-effective initial investment. Opsview's setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive onboarding services.
WhatsUp Gold is appreciated for its straightforward pricing and responsive support. In comparison, Opsview offers more comprehensive features, making it a worthy investment. WhatsUp Gold excels in simplicity and ease of use, while Opsview provides extensive monitoring capabilities and customization options.
WhatsUp Gold has a lower setup cost compared to Opsview, making it the more budget-friendly option. Opsview, however, offers additional features that may justify its higher initial expense for some users.
WhatsUp Gold has a lower setup cost compared to Opsview, making it the more budget-friendly option. Opsview, however, offers additional features that may justify its higher initial expense for some users.
Opsview is favored for budget-friendly pricing and strong support, catering to hybrid IT needs with versatility. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager appeals to enterprises requiring deep hardware integration and robust features, justifying its cost through comprehensive control over resources.
Opsview has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager tends to incur higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in the cost-effectiveness of Opsview compared to the more expensive setup process of Cisco UCS Manager.
Opsview has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco UCS Manager tends to incur higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in the cost-effectiveness of Opsview compared to the more expensive setup process of Cisco UCS Manager.
AppNeta excels in real-time network diagnostics with quick deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Opsview offers flexibility, extensive integrations, and adaptability for diverse environments. AppNeta's low upfront cost contrasts with Opsview's higher investment, providing scalable solutions with substantial long-term ROI.
AppNeta by Broadcom has a straightforward setup cost, while Opsview presents more complexity in its pricing structure. Users may find AppNeta simpler to implement initially, contrasting with Opsview's multifaceted approach.
AppNeta by Broadcom has a straightforward setup cost, while Opsview presents more complexity in its pricing structure. Users may find AppNeta simpler to implement initially, contrasting with Opsview's multifaceted approach.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is favored for its ease of deployment and responsive customer service, offering comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities. In comparison, Opsview excels with its extensive plugins and flexibility, making it ideal for those needing advanced features and customization options.
Opsview offers robust monitoring capabilities and flexible deployment with strong customer support, attracting budget-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Instana Infrastructure Monitoring delivers real-time data collection and automated insights for dynamic environments, appealing to organizations with larger budgets seeking advanced features.
Opsview is favored for intuitive monitoring and flexible deployments. In comparison, IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor excels in advanced reporting and scalability. Opsview offers cost-effective solutions, while IDERA Uptime, despite higher costs, provides holistic features and superior support for long-term benefits.
Opsview offers a competitive setup cost making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses, while IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides a higher initial cost reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Opsview offers a competitive setup cost making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses, while IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides a higher initial cost reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
