Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Reviews

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is a comprehensive cloud security platform that encompasses vulnerability management, container management, Kubernetes management, and serverless management. It utilizes modules, such as Cloud Workload Protection, to provide comprehensive cloud security. Before deploying any applications, Prisma Cloud performs cloud scans to identify and address vulnerabilities, minimizing potential threats. The solution provides visibility into our cloud environment, enabling us to effectively manage and monitor our infrastructure. This capability is particularly valuable in the financial industry, where hybrid multi-cloud environments are prevalent.

We use all the modules Prisma Cloud offers.

Prisma Cloud offers security scanning for multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments. This is crucial because managing multiple cloud accounts, such as AWS, GCP, and Azure, typically necessitates accessing each account individually to view the inventories of assets and services. Prisma Cloud eliminates this inconvenience by consolidating all of this information into a single unified interface, providing a comprehensive overview.

The comprehensiveness enhances threat protection by providing integrated and out-of-the-box policies, along with all the necessary components, to effectively secure cloud environments and achieve comprehensive visibility through Prisma's capabilities.

The security automation capabilities of Prisma Cloud are effective. We can automatically remediate some of the alerts using predefined policies. We utilize Defender to detect vulnerabilities in our containers, AKS, and GKE environments.

Prisma Cloud has benefited our organization in so many ways that we can't count them all on our fingers. The Cloud Security Posture Management module of Prisma provides a wide range of capabilities, including visibility, governance, compliance, auto-remediation, integration with hybrid cloud environments, vulnerability reporting, and blocking capabilities. It also offers compliance reports, integration with third-party tools for vulnerability and alert notifications, and Cloud Workload Protection capabilities for blocking, alerting, and specifying affected containers or servers. Additionally, it provides visibility into code security by monitoring the Infrastructure as a Code environment for unauthorized users.

It enables a proactive approach to cloud security, allowing us to prevent vulnerabilities, threats, and complications arising in cloud or hybrid cloud environments. We can easily investigate and obtain comprehensive reports.

We spent the first five months after implementing Prisma Cloud familiarizing ourselves with the solution and completing the training sessions provided by Palo Alto. During this time, we began to see the benefits that Prisma Cloud offered our organization.

Prisma Cloud works with the CIB. Therefore, when we build and deploy something, we can incorporate a Prisma scan, which assists us in scanning the images and gaining insights into the state of our environment. It provides us with comprehensive visibility and raises alerts or triggers notifications to inform us of any missing elements or potential issues. This is how Prisma can contribute to the build and deploy phases.

It provides deep visibility and control regardless of how complex our cloud environment becomes.

Prisma Cloud enables us to integrate security into our CI/CD pipeline and it provides us with a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources.

Prisma Cloud provides run-time risk clarity throughout the entire pipeline, revealing issues as they arise. This enables us to effectively block vulnerabilities and rectify identified problems.

We have reduced run-time alerts. The run-time protection has helped many of our clients protect their environments.

Prisma Cloud has significantly reduced our investigation time. The clear visibility it provides into our environment and the process flow has streamlined our investigations. Additionally, using Prisma to investigate issues rather than directly accessing our cloud accounts saves valuable time.

The most valuable features of Prisma Cloud are its cloud security posture management and cloud workload protection capabilities. Integrating Prisma Cloud with our cloud service providers provides a comprehensive view of our multiple cloud environments through a single dashboard. This enhanced visibility improves vulnerability management and compliance. With CWP, we can gain complete visibility into all workloads within our environment.

We are encountering issues with the new permissions required for AWS integration with Prisma. Specifically, we need a mechanism to automatically identify and integrate the missing configuration permissions that are introduced on a biweekly or monthly basis. We have requested the Palo Alto team to develop this automation, and we are eagerly awaiting its implementation. We appreciate the efforts of the engineering team for their contributions.

I have been using Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for two years.

Prisma Cloud is a stable platform. The only downtime we experience is scheduled, and Palo Alto notifies us in advance of the scheduled outage and its duration.

I would rate the scalability of Prisma Cloud a nine out of ten. I have received positive feedback from our clients indicating that Prisma Cloud is an excellent fit for their environment.

We have repeatedly contacted technical support to address issues encountered by both ourselves and our clients. The support is helpful.

Positive

We previously used AWS GuardDuty for vulnerability management and compliance visibility, but it was not user-friendly due to the requirement to log into separate accounts to access reports.

When I first started using Prisma, I found it to be very easy to learn. Several of our engineers were already familiar with Prisma Cloud and were able to help me understand how it worked, including the UI, navigation, and integration with other tools. They also showed me how to make API calls and integrate Prisma with third-party tools. Additionally, the Prisma team was incredibly helpful whenever I contacted them for assistance. They were always willing to answer my questions and help me troubleshoot any issues I was having.

I completed the implementation myself after completing the training sessions with the Palo Alto team and attending a lab session for the Prisma Cloud deployment.

I don't have direct access to financial information, so I'm not fully aware of the overall costs. However, I do work with clients and solution teams to provide relevant solutions. I also collaborate with the research team to explain Prisma's capabilities and its comprehensive range of features. When I see the credits and other similar programs may make Prisma's licensing costs appear lower than those of competing tools, it's important to consider the overall cost when evaluating cloud security solutions. For example, when implementing cloud security measures for CSPs or CWPs, other tools may be required, potentially leading to higher overall costs than Prisma Cloud's comprehensive solution.

I would rate Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks nine out of ten.

Prisma Cloud necessitates maintenance for both weekly and monthly updates.

My advice to new users and researchers is to delve into Prisma Cloud's capabilities and potential. Understanding the full scope of what it can do is crucial for new users. It's not just about visibility or the GUI; it's about the underlying work that engineers do, such as runtime protection, virus detection, and code security. New users should have a clear understanding of these capabilities. They should participate in sessions, practices, and labs to gain hands-on experience.

I work for a monetary provider and handle around five customers. We mostly use Prisma Cloud for CSPN, but we have a banking customer using CWPP. 

Apart from those two use cases, the other customers are not interested in Prisma Cloud's other functionalities because they're green and already have other solutions with partners that they say are more mature. We have not implemented them in the customers' production environment, but we have toyed around with proofs of concept.

My organization is not primarily a customer. We don't use it a lot because we're a security company that mainly provides customers with solutions using this. That said, visibility is the most significant benefit for our clients because some are so large that they're unaware of what they have. 

They don't have adequate governance over expenses, security, and the parts of the network that are communicating. Prisma Cloud gives them reports that will provide instant insight into what's there. A new feature creates a visual map of networks and communications in the discovery part. It's excellent because you can instantly visualize everything. That's one feature that all the customers appreciate.

It performs well in complicated cloud environments. You only need to add your cloud account credentials. Most of the time, Palo Alto recommends using a full admin account for a service account accessing the tool. The tool works just as well, regardless of the company size. That's one of Prisma's biggest strengths. No matter how big you are, the tool can see everything.

Prisma Cloud can scan any cloud provider. We currently use Prisma on GCP, Amazon, Azure, and Alibaba. We also have Oracle, but I haven't used it for Oracle yet. This is crucial because some customers aren't proficient in managing multiple cloud environments. They only need to go to Prisma Cloud and see what they have because the team managing security is not the same one developing the solutions. 

Prisma offers a single pane of glass that lets you do most of what you want in one place. It's not only configurations but also knowing what you have, and your assets are doing. That's the main selling point of Prisma Cloud. It provides you with visualized reports, whether it's in the cloud, live serverless, containers, etc. 

I haven't toyed with CAB personally, but I think you can do that because you can scan images and deployments. I wouldn't say it gives you a lot of value in that regard because most of the CI/CD issues are application-level problems that Prisma Cloud or any other tool wouldn't help you with. Regarding security, you can deploy agents during the integration deployment and gain complete visibility with total memorability that you might introduce in the pipeline. Still, I think it will be a tiny part of the pipeline.

You will not see the problem if you're running an OGs application. While the developers can pinpoint the issue with the information provided, it will never relate to a piece of code and solve it. No tool can tell you exactly which part of the application is the problem, but a tool can identify which process has a vulnerability. Apart from that, many developers have issues finding the root cause of the vulnerability. When it's a library-related vulnerability, the TVD tells you to use another library or play the library. When your own code has the vulnerability, it's hard to pinpoint that.

Prisma provides a lot of information. You can see real-time alerts and forward them to JIRA or whatever tool you use with API or TVD. It also offers anomaly detection. If an administrator is logging in at weird times and doing strange functions, this tool can notify you about them. The anomaly detection is a correlation engine. You seldom get false positives. When it is a false positive, it's something you would expect. The only times I got a false positive were when the administrator forgot the password and tried logging in 50 times. At that point, they just need to contact support and change the password. 

Prisma has massively reduced our alert investigation times. It's 50 times quicker. Without this tool, we must dig up AWS logs, and the format isn't too accessible. The difference between using this tool to investigate an issue compared to a cloud-native solution is two hours versus two minutes. Digging up two logs using Ctrl-left is not the best approach, and it's the only approach cloud providers give you. 

The solution saved us because it helps us turn off idle machines. Most are machines we have turned on, and we didn't know what they do, but we didn't want to turn them off. Prisma Cloud lets you see the communication flows and the asset's actions on the communication map. If you see a device not communicating, it's easier to investigate what it's doing. Sometimes, it's a device generating reports at a particular time. You can schedule it to turn off when it's not active to save money. You also save money by spending less time solving your issues.

Doing cloud compliance without this tool would be impossible because cloud solutions are huge and highly complex. SOS compliance requires that you provide reports in under 24 hours. That's not possible without an automated tool like Prisma Cloud and the CSPN module. You would need to purchase Prisma or a competitor. It helps a lot because some customers have weird compliance requirements, and you can do it all on Prisma Cloud.

You can create custom compliance configurations according to your customer's needs and set Prisma up to provide the reports every 24 hours. In fact, you can do reports in 10-minute intervals or in real time. The client can access the dashboard and see if they're compliant. C-level executives in any company love that. 

The most valuable features are the alerts and auto-remediation because it allows us a lot of flexibility to customize and do functions the Palo Alto team never intended. We faced some challenges with certificates because we also have next-gen firewalls. We would like to equip all the traffic because there have been many cases in which the developers have made mistakes. Deploying certificates on virtual machines can be complex in a development environment, but we managed to do that with Prisma Cloud.

Prisma performs well in a fully cloud-native stack if you run several layers and Kubernetes. It's not so smooth if you migrate VMs into the cloud. Some customers try to do that with Prisma Cloud, but it's not compatible with Windows Server. However, you can deploy serverless containers without issue. You must deploy personal cloud agents into the virtual machines. The agents are called defenders. That module is excellent because you can see communications and vulnerabilities across your environment. It can also scan for malware. It tries to do many tasks at once, say the value it provides is the ability to see communications between devices.

The agent can block the traffic trying to exploit the vulnerability, but it can't fix the problem. That's on the application level. Most of the time, you give the application development team the vulnerability report, and they fix the issue, but Prisma protects you in the meantime. You can sleep well knowing that the agent is blocking the malicious traffic.

They recently added a module called Code Security that enables you to scan repositories or infrastructure as code. You can see concept errors like CSPN problems before the deployment. In tab use cases, it's excellent because you can see if there are misconfigurations in Terraform without having to deploy the instance or whatever you are deploying. That can save you money because sometimes people are deploying machines with problems that are easily fixable. It also improves security because you can fix a vulnerability before you have it with Cloud Security, but that's a rather new solution.

The IMD feature could be improved, but Palo Alto is working on that. It's a relatively new module that attempts to identify unnecessary permissions. Prisma Cloud is a platform that adds new modules whenever Palo Alto acquires a company or develops a new solution. The development team is trying to add new features. It also has Click Code Security for infrastructure security, but it doesn't add much value unless your DevOps team is really junior.

While Prisma provides a lot of visibility, it also creates a ton of work. Most customers that implement Prisma Cloud have thousands of alerts that are urgent. It creates a high workload initially. Apart from that, it solves the problems you have. Palo Alto says that 99 percent of breaches come from misconfiguration. I have seen that first hand. I think the fewest alerts a customer had was around 100 still, but they used another tool for that, so that saves a lot.

I have been working with Prisma Cloud for about 15 months.

Prisma's stability is close to 100 percent because it's just a dashboard that connects to your public cloud. It's essentially a website that never goes down, and you could also host it locally if your security requires it. Most of the customers use the Prisma Cloud platform. If it goes down for any reason, the security agents work independently of Prisma Cloud. You send logs to Prisma Cloud and update the configurations via the cloud. However, if the platform goes offline, you still have top-notch security.

As long as you purchase credits, Prisma Cloud is easy to scale.

I have never contacted Palo Alto support because our team is highly proficient in the solution and the platform is easy to use. You deploy the agents, and it just works. 

It's straightforward to deploy the solution because it's cloud-based, so you just set up an account, username, and password. If you think about it, the Prisma Cloud tool does not do much, but what it does is valuable. It does something simple on a scale that human beings could not do. 

Based on my own experience, I would I rate Prisma Cloud a ten out of ten. However, I haven't compared it with other solutions, so maybe other solutions have more features that Prisma is lacking. My advice is to implement Prisma if it has the features you want but also shop around because I'm sure other solutions are just as good as this one.

We have a very large public cloud estate. We have nearly 300 public cloud accounts, with almost a million things deployed. It's pretty much impossible to track all of the security and the compliance issues using anything that would remotely be considered homegrown—scripts, or something that isn't fully automated and supported. We don't have the time, or necessarily even the desire, to build these things ourselves. So we use it to track compliance across all of the various accounts and to manage remediation. 

We also have 393 applications in the cloud, all of which are part of various suites, which means there are at least 393 teams or groups of people who need to be held accountable for what they have deployed and what they wish to do. 

It's such a large undertaking that automating it is the only option. To bring it all together, we use it to ensure that we can measure and track and identify the remediation of all of our public cloud issues.

The solution provides risk clarity at runtime and across the entire pipeline, showing issues as they are discovered during the build phases. Our developers are able to correct them using the tools they use to code. It gives our developers a point to work towards. If the information provided by this didn't exist, then we wouldn't be able to give our developers the direction that they need to go and fix the issues. It comes back to ownership. If we can give full ownership of the issues to a team, they will go fix them. Honestly, I don't care how they fix them. I don't really mind what tools they use.

It is reducing run-time alerts. It's still in the process of working on those, but we have already seen a significant decrease, absolutely.

The entire concept is the right thing for us. It's what we need. The application is the feature, so to speak it. What it does is what we want it for: looking across the various cloud estates and providing us with information about what's going on in our cloud, where it is, when it happened. The product is the most valuable feature. It's not a do-all and end-all product. That doesn't exist. But it's a product with a very specific purpose. And we bought it for that very specific purpose.

When it comes to protecting the full cloud native stack—the pure cloud component of the stack—it is very good.

One of the main reasons we like Prisma Cloud so much is that they also provide an API. You can't expect to give someone an account on Prisma Cloud, or on any tool for that matter, and say, "Go find your things and fix them." It doesn't work like that. We've got to be able to clearly identify who owns what in our organization so that we can say, "Here's a report for your things and this is what you must go and fix." We pull down the information from the API that Prisma Cloud provides, which is multi-cloud, multi-account—hundreds and hundreds of different types of alerts graded by severity—and then we can clearly identify that these alerts belong to these people, and they're the people who must remediate them. That's our most important use case, because if you can't identify users, you can't remediate. No user is going to sit there going through over a million deployed things in the public cloud and say, "That one's mine, that one's not, that's mine, that's not." It's both the technology that Prisma Cloud provides and the ability to identify things distinctly, that comprise our use case.

It also provides the visibility and control we need, regardless of how complex or distributed our cloud environments become. It doesn't care about the complexity of our environment. It gives us the visibility we need to have confidence in our compliance. Without it, we would have no confidence at all.

It is also part of our DevOps processes and we have integrated security into our CI/CD pipeline. To be honest, those touchpoints are not as seamless as they could be because our processes do rely on multiple tools and multiple teams. But it is one of the key requirements in our DevOps life cycle for the compliance component to be monitored by this. It's a 100 percent requirement. The teams must use it all the time and be compliant before they move on to the next stage in each release. It is a bit manual for us, but that's because of our environment. It's given our SecOps teams the visibility they need to do their jobs. There's absolutely no chance that those teams would have any visibility, on a normal, day-to-day basis, simply because the SecOps teams are very small, and having to deal with hundreds of other development teams would be impossible for them on a normal basis.

Based on my experience, the customization—especially the interface and some of the product identification components—is not as customizable as it could be. But it makes up for that with the fact that we can access the API and then build our own systems to read the data and then process and parse it and hand it to our teams. At that point, we realized, "Okay, we're not never going to have it fully customizable," because no team can expect a product, off-the-shelf, to fit itself to the needs of any organization. That's just impossible.

So customization from our perspective comes through the API, and that's the best we can do because there is no other sensible way of doing it. The customization is exactly evident inside the API, because that's what you end up using.

In terms of the product having room for improvement, I don't see any product being perfect, so I'm not worried about that aspect. The RedLock team is very responsive to our requirements when we do point out issues, and when we do point out stuff that we would like to see fixed, but the product direction itself is not a big concern for us.

We've been using it since before it was called Prisma Cloud. We're getting on towards two years since we first purchased it.

The stability of Prisma Cloud is very good. I have no complaints along those lines. It seems to fit the requirements and it doesn't go down. Being a SaaS product, I would expect that. I haven't experienced any instability, and that's a good thing.

Again, as a SaaS product, I would expect it to just scale.

We regularly use Palo Alto technical support for the solution. I give it a top rating. They're very good. They have a very good customer success team. We've never had any issues. All our questions have been answered. It has been very positive.

We did not have a previous solution.

The initial setup was very straightforward. It's a SaaS product. All you have to do is configure your end, which isn't very hard. You just have to create a role for the product and, from there on, it just works, as long as the role is created correctly. Everything else you do after that is managed for you.

We have continuously been deploying it on new accounts as we spin them up. Our deployment has been going on since year one, but we've expanded. Two years ago we probably had about 40 or 50 cloud accounts. Now, we have 270 cloud accounts.

We have a team that is dedicated to managing our security tools. Something this big will always require some maintenance from our side: new accounts, and talking to internal teams. But this is as much about management of the actual alerts and issues than it is anything else. It's no longer about whether the tool is being maintained. We don't maintain it. But what we do is maintain our interaction with the tool. We have two people, security engineers, who work with the tool on a regular basis.

It's a non-functional ROI. This isn't a direct-ROI kind of tool. The return is in understanding our security postures. That's incredibly important and that's why we bought it and that's what we need from it. It doesn't create funds; it is a control. But it certainly does stop issues, and how do you quantify that?

Pricing wasn't a big consideration for us. Compared to the work that we do, and the other costs, this was one of the regular costs. We were more interested in the features than we were in the price.

If a competitor came along and said, "We'll give you half the price," that doesn't necessarily mean that's the right answer, at all. We wouldn't necessarily entertain it that way. Does it do what we need it to do? Does it work with the things that we want it to work with? That is the important part for us. Pricing wasn't the big consideration it might be in some organizations. We spend millions on public cloud. In that context, it would not make sense to worry about the small price differences that you get between the products. They all seem to pitch it at roughly the same price.

Before the implementation of Prisma Cloud, there were only two solutions in the market. The other one was Dome9. We did an evaluation and we chose this one, and they were both very new. This is a very new concept. It pretty much didn't exist until Prisma Cloud came along.

The Prisma Cloud solution was chosen because of the way it helped integrate with our operations people, and our operations people were very happy with it. That was one of the main concerns.

Both solutions are very good at what they do. They approach the same problem from different directions. It was this direction that worked for us. Having said that, certain elements of Prisma Cloud were definitely more attractive to us because they matched up with some of our requirements. I'm very loath to say one product is better than the other, because it does depend on your requirements. It does depend on how you intend to use it and what it is, exactly, that you're looking for.

You need to identify how you'll be using it and what your use cases are. If you don't have a mature enough organizational posture, you're not going to use it to actually fix the issues because you won't have the teams ready to consume its information. You need to build that and that needs to be built into the thinking around that product. There's no point having information if you're not going to act on it. So understand who is going to act on it, and how, and then you've got a much better path to understanding your use for this. There's no point in buying a product for the sake of the product. You need the processes and the workflows that go with it and you need to build those. It's not good enough to just hope that they will happen.

The solution doesn't secure the entire spectrum of compute options because there are other Palo Alto products that secure containers, for example. This is very specifically focused on the configuration of the public cloud instances. It doesn't look inside those instances. You would need something else for that. You don't want to be using other products to do this. You don't want to mistake this for something that does everything. It doesn't. It is a very specific product and it is amazingly good at what it does.

We do integrate it with our workflow as part of the process of getting an application onto the internet. It does integrate with our workflow, giving us a posture as part of the workflow. But it is not a workflow tool.

It definitely does multi-cloud. It does the three major ones plus Alibaba Cloud. It doesn't reach into hybrid cloud, in the sense that it doesn't understand anything non-cloud. We don't use it to provide security, although it is very good for that. We already have an advanced security provision posture, because we are a very large organization. We just use it to inform us of security issues that are outside our other controls.

Prisma Cloud doesn't provide us with a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources and applications in terms of security and compliance reports because we have non-cloud-related tools being folded into the reports as well. Even though it works on the cloud, and is excellent at what it does, we integrate it with our Qualys reports, for example, which is the scanning on our hosts. Those hosts are in the cloud, but this doesn't touch them. There's no such thing as a single security tool, frankly. It's basically part of our portfolio and it's part of what every organization needs, in my opinion, to be able to manage their cloud security postures. Otherwise, it would just never work.

We specialize in all Palo Alto modules, including visibility, compliance, governance, threat detection, data security, and hub security. Our comprehensive suite of services covers all aspects of these modules. We leverage the SaaS security product for advanced threat detection, and for all-encompassing monitoring, we utilize Cortex XDR from Palo Alto.

Many customers store sensitive data in on-premises data centers and require robust security measures. Prisma Access licenses can protect internal networks, but some customers prefer avoiding internet exposure. To address this, we offer gateways that create a secure environment for internet access. With the rise of remote work, we provide VPN connections, such as GlobalProtect, for secure access to both internal and external resources. Customers can deploy multiple gateways in different regions to meet their needs. Traffic flow typically involves a VPN connection to a gateway, followed by routing through internal service connections and potentially a data center firewall before reaching the desired resource. For external access, traffic is routed directly to the internet through the VPN.

Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive security across multi and hybrid cloud environments. For instance, our ADEM tool, considered industry-leading, requires installation on user machines to enable continuous monitoring of all ADEM-equipped users. This includes detecting anomalous activity outside the corporate network and tracking user online time, providing valuable insights into network usage.

Security automation and EA Ops significantly reduce manual configuration and management tasks compared to previous methods, saving valuable time. Now, we only need to configure a few minor details rather than handling everything. For instance, with service connections and gateways, we don't have to manage multiple VPN gateways; Palo Alto is managed on the backend. Our primary responsibility will be monitoring after initial tunnel creation. We've preconfigured connections to on-premises firewalls, whether third-party or Palo Alto, eliminating manual configuration. Automation is in place, and we'll only need to purchase licenses. The autonomous system further enhances automation for all processes.

Intune security automation has significantly reduced our costs, making us more financially efficient making us more financially efficient. Automation is now highly valued as it eliminates the need for engineers to configure and manage systems manually. With AI-driven automation, we can effectively monitor configurations through a dashboard, providing a complete overview. This automation simplifies tasks like creating BGP connections, which previously required complex CLI commands. Prisma Access Palo Alto's GUI interface automates tenant creation with minimal input. Integrating Prisma MDM and Palo Alto device deployment further streamlines the process, reducing manual intervention. Overall, this automation saves money and frees up engineer resources by eliminating time-consuming configuration tasks.

Palo Alto Networks is a global leader in cybersecurity, providing top-tier protection to its customer base of over 90,000. Traditionally, customers relied on on-premise hardware firewalls, but the shift towards cloud-based solutions has driven a demand for more flexible and cost-effective security options. In response, Palo Alto Networks offers cloud security solutions that leverage its existing global device infrastructure. Customers only need to purchase licenses to activate cloud security features, tailoring protection to their specific needs for internal, external, or network environments. For customers seeking complete independence, Palo Alto Networks also provides interconnect licenses that eliminate the need for a service connection.

Customers do not directly purchase Palo Alto products or deploy them into production. Our professional engineers provide a lab environment for customers to test any desired Palo Alto services, from essential Prisma Access to advanced cybersecurity solutions like SaaS security and Cortex XDR. Once customers are satisfied with the lab environment, they can deploy the chosen products into production. If they encounter any issues during deployment or operation, the support team promptly addresses them.

I have resolved numerous customer issues, closing over 400 or 500 cases globally. While many cases can be resolved within a week, some complex issues may take up to a month. Palo Alto Networks aims to provide timely support for all customer issues, regardless of severity. When a customer encounters a VPN connection problem, they can create a case with varying priority levels. Critical cases are assigned to engineers immediately, with hourly updates provided to the customer. If the issue persists, the case is escalated to senior resources. Prisma, a relatively new platform, is constantly being monitored for bugs. Any issues identified are addressed promptly and communicated to customers. Our goal is to deliver exceptional support services.

Prisma Cloud offers complete visibility across our entire environment, from end users to the data center. We'll have full control and oversight within a single unified portal, eliminating the need to juggle multiple platforms as often required by other solutions. Prisma Cloud provides dedicated applications for various functions, such as SaaS security, threat and vulnerability management, cloud identity engine, and log analysis. These applications work seamlessly together, automatically connecting through APIs once deployed and licensed. For configuration management, the Strata Cloud Manager handles Prisma Access and Prisma SD-WAN. This centralized approach allows us to efficiently manage multiple aspects of our security infrastructure within a single platform.

Prisma Cloud offers SaaS security and data loss prevention as separate features requiring additional licensing. Both can be managed through a single portal. For threat prevention, they provide Cortex XDR, a recent cybersecurity offering from Palo Alto. When combined, we have a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources and applications.

Prisma Cloud helps reduce the number of runtime alerts. Users will only receive live alerts generated when Prisma detects an issue within the environment. For instance, if Prisma Access observes an attack, it will generate a live alert visible in the startup cloud manager's dashboard.

Prisma Cloud effectively reduces the overall number of alerts by prioritizing them into categories: critical, high, medium, low, and informational. Less critical warnings are consolidated into the informational category, minimizing alert fatigue. Critical alerts persist until resolved, and recurring issues can be configured to trigger email notifications for proactive monitoring, ensuring timely attention even when engineers are unavailable.

Prisma Cloud offers significant cost savings for customers. Previously, customers managed multiple firewalls, including internal and external devices. With Prisma Access, this complex management is eliminated, as Palo Alto handles firewall management. Customers configure and purchase a license to access gateways for end-user connections. This eliminates the need to purchase expensive individual firewalls, which can cost billions. While customers retain visibility through a provided portal to monitor traffic, the primary benefit is the streamlined management and cost reduction achieved through Prisma Cloud.

Visibility and control are valuable features. Customers desire complete oversight to monitor resource access, both internal and external, and verify user activity. ADEM, a purchasable license, enhances network visibility by tracking traffic patterns and identifying potential threats through a dashboard. Our Strata Cloud Manager platform unifies Prisma access and cloud management, while also accommodating next-generation firewall administration. The dashboard provides in-depth visibility into threats and vulnerabilities.

Prisma Cloud's most valuable feature is its user identification capabilities. By integrating with Active Directory or LDAP servers, it efficiently manages user access to cloud resources. Previously, determining user access required multiple hops through internal resources, consuming significant bandwidth. Prisma Cloud's Cloud Identity Engine directly connects to identity providers, streamlining user authentication and authorization. This improves performance and security by eliminating the need to constantly query Active Directory. Additionally, Prisma Cloud offers full visibility into network threats and vulnerabilities through a unified dashboard, reducing the need for multiple tools and licenses. This centralized approach enhances threat detection, response, and overall security posture.

The speed at which Palo Alto resolves bugs should be improved to prevent customers from experiencing issues while waiting for resolutions.

Palo Alto Prisma Cloud is relatively new, with only three years of history. While the documentation continually improves, it still has limitations compared to the extensive resources available for older products like hardware firewalls, which have been around for approximately 20 years. Despite these shortcomings, Prisma Cloud's documentation is growing, and knowledge base articles can be helpful for troubleshooting issues.

I have been using Prisma Cloud for two years.

The quality of technical support varies depending on the issue a customer faces. High-priority cases demand immediate attention and daily follow-up to prevent customer frustration. I have resolved hundreds of Palo Alto cases, including critical ones. These cases require engineers to provide half-hourly updates and expedite troubleshooting. A recent critical case involved a customer migrating Panorama configuration and experiencing Prisma Access account verification issues. The initial engineer engaged with Prisma Access but encountered licensing problems. I escalated the case, collaborating with licensing and engineering teams to resolve the API-related issue and restore service. While such cases are time-consuming due to limited resources, a global team of engineers can address troubleshooting needs.

Positive

The initial deployment was smooth due to excellent support from Palo Alto's professional services engineer. They provided a clear overview of our deployment needs, considering the customer's two branches and primarily remote workforce. We determined six VPN gateway connections were required, two in the US, India, and Europe, and two branch office connections. Palo Alto created a lab environment, presented the network topology, and demonstrated traffic flow. Additionally, they introduced the split tunneling feature, allowing specific traffic like Google search to bypass Prisma Access and access the internet directly. Overall, the top-tier engineers at Palo Alto delivered exceptional customer service and ensured a seamless implementation.

I would rate Prisma Cloud nine out of ten. I am deducting a point because of the limited documentation.

We use Prisma Cloud's CSPM and container modules to secure our workloads across multiple cloud platforms, including GCP, Azure, and AWS.

Prisma Cloud provides spanning for multi-cloud environments. We are using GCP, AWS, and Azure.

Security automation is beneficial. By hosting applications and containers in the cloud, we can implement policies to automatically detect and shut down unauthorized network access attempts, simultaneously alerting us to the potential threat.

The security automation has saved us around ten percent of our time.

Prisma Cloud has significantly enhanced our cloud security posture. When deploying applications to the cloud, prioritizing robust security is essential, especially within the complex Kubernetes environment. Prisma Cloud's comprehensive toolbox enables us to design and implement robust security systems, including RBAC. This unified platform allows for proactive security measures and rapid response to attacks, eliminating the need for multiple third-party tools. Its consolidated approach to scanning, monitoring, and traffic control proved highly effective during our previous engagement.

I quickly recognized the value of Prisma Cloud after reading about the effectiveness of its CSPM module in securing enterprise environments.

The software development lifecycle was previously handled as a separate task. I was involved in the build process, where developers frequently introduced security vulnerabilities that went unnoticed until Prisma Cloud was integrated into the system. The recognition of Prisma Cloud's value in addressing container security issues on the cloud became apparent. There was no integration between the SDLC scanning, building, deploying, and running and deploying systems. However, a process was being developed to enable full end-to-end monitoring by the development and security teams, including the desktop team, to identify security issues before applications reached the cloud. Prisma Cloud continues to monitor for vulnerabilities and security breaches even after deployment to the cloud.

Prisma Cloud provides visibility and management, allowing us to understand and control our environment. When we identify potential issues, we notify our superiors, who can take further action, such as removing a container. Due to our limited privileges, our role is primarily to report anomalies. Prisma Cloud offers valuable insight into what's happening in our environment, not just in terms of visibility but also in terms of access control. It's a reliable tool that has proven helpful in our work.

Prisma Cloud reduces our costs by consolidating multiple third-party tools into a single platform, eliminating the need for separate contracts with various vendors.

Prisma Cloud significantly reduced runtime alerts.

Prisma Cloud's most valuable asset is its ability to provide detailed visibility into container activity. It offers insights into application networking, container behavior, potential issues, and immediate remediation suggestions.

The training documentation provided for the two-hour boot camps is notoriously poor and disorganized. It might be beneficial to restructure the documentation into a step-by-step format that is more straightforward for beginners to follow.

I have been using Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for one year.

Prisma Cloud is a stable solution.

Prisma Cloud is designed to be highly scalable due to its cloud-based architecture.

The technical support was good.

Neutral

Some aspects of the deployment were straightforward, while others presented challenges due to the complexity of engineering. The entire process took between one and two months to complete.

Prisma Cloud is a high-end enterprise solution, making it quite expensive. As I am based in Nigeria, I have limited knowledge of its usage here, as it appears to be more widely adopted in North America and Europe.

I would rate Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks eight out of ten. It's a complex, dynamic world with countless security challenges arising daily, and Prisma Cloud is a valuable tool for addressing many of them. While not an omnipotent solution, Prisma Cloud effectively tackles numerous security issues. However, as the threat landscape evolves, we must continually reassess and adapt our security strategies. Despite these challenges, Prisma Cloud remains an excellent tool for now.

Prisma Cloud was deployed in around 15 locations.

I suggest conducting a proof of concept in the desired deployment location for Prisma Cloud. Given that cost is a primary concern, I recommend discussing the matter with a Prisma Cloud solution architect before proceeding to the next stage.

Our enterprise customers tend to use it for compliance. 

A big drive towards Prisma Cloud came during COVID-19 when many organizations were moving away from traditional VPNs. There was a drive to facilitate people working from home, and traditional VPNs were not the right solution for large customers who had a huge amount of staff working from home. Prisma Cloud offered multiple solutions that facilitated the ability to work securely from anywhere. That was one of the big things, and that continues to be a big thing today.

Prisma Cloud provides security spanning multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. That is what its big strength is.

It is one of the most comprehensive solutions available. If you compare it with the likes of Netskope and Skyhigh, Prisma Cloud is fairly similar in terms of features and depths of features. Automation capability is built in. It has got extensive logging. Automation is there, but it is not extensive. You can combine it with other tools like XO. The integration capability is already strong. That itself makes it a good contender.

Prisma Cloud takes away a lot of manual work for our clients. It has reduced costs by not having to work with pre-COVID-19 traditional networking scenarios. It has given them the ability to have staff working securely from anywhere on the globe. I do not have the metrics for cost savings, but all customers who bought the solution from us say that it has reduced their costs. Over the last three years, we have not had a customer who has not renewed, and it is based on the reduced costs.

As long as it is set up correctly and it is integrated correctly with the SOAR and the SIEM components, it provides very good visibility. It is a very good enterprise solution. No one toolset or platform can protect every single cloud resource, but it can cover a lot of cloud resources.

They claim to secure the entire cloud-native development lifecycle, across build, deploy, and run, but I am not 100% sure. It probably can do 80% of the job.

Visibility is a key feature. Integration with other technologies across the board, whether they are Palo Alto technologies, Windows technologies, or cloud technologies, is probably the biggest thing.

They can improve the integrations into the SDLC lifecycle.

Their support is good. I would rate the Palo Alto technical team an 8 out of 10.

Positive

It is not easy, and it has to be well-planned. You need good skills to deploy any of these tools, but that is the same for many solutions. These platforms are complex, and it is important to understand exactly what outcome you want when you are deploying any tool like this. 

The deployment duration depends on the size of the environment. It can take anywhere from two weeks to four or five months depending on the size of the environment and the complexity of the environment. Some customers have a very simple setup in Azure only or in AWS only. It is very quick to deploy. Other customers have complex hardware environments where they are in the process of migrating to the cloud. Those implementations typically take much longer. It depends on how many global offices they have.

It is an expensive tool. It is not cheap technology. It is a serious investment for any customer. Customers typically buy it together with services. In my experience, customers buying Prisma Cloud are prepared to pay for the implementation and the tool itself.

Overall, I would rate Prisma Cloud an 8 out of 10.

We initially wanted something to protect our infrastructure. We acquired Prisma Cloud, so at least our containers are secure because we already installed agents in the containers. Our infrastructure is being monitored by Prisma Cloud. Then, we started with the WAF (web application firewall) service to enable API discovery and to understand what our APs are doing.

We can protect our APIs in case of a DDoS attack. We are currently working on CI/CD integration so that we can enable Slack CLI in our pipelines. Whenever there is a vulnerability, it will automatically be produced into the Prisma cloud.

The most valuable feature of Prisma Cloud is WAF. AWS also provides web application security, but it is outside the VPC. Since the agent is already installed in the container, we can protect it directly from the application side. We have a UI-based view of the request.

If I want to know how many SQL injection attacks happened in a day, I can just make a filter. Instead of typing, I can select the filter and get the details. It's much faster, and it is very easy to find out attacks and discovery from the user's perspective.

A couple of exporting functionalities should be more user-friendly because if I want to export something, I can get a lot of data visible to that particular CSV. There is no filter for what kind of data I want to export. That is something that I have missed as someone from the management side. When we see any CVE issues, proper information, including the path, should be mentioned.

For example, in the case of vulnerable packages or images, whether a base image is vulnerable or the package under the base image is vulnerable should be mentioned. That visibility is sometimes missing there, although not every time. It took me some time to figure out what kind of issue it was trying to resolve.

For example, one issue was that an image should be run with a non-route user. Only the discussion was there, but how to validate and fix that was not there.

I used Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for around one month in my previous company. I've been using it for the past four months in my current company.

Prisma Cloud is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. We have more than 20 people using Prisma Cloud in our organization.

I rate the solution's one-on-one technical support session a six out of ten. The support team usually provides only a half an hour session, which sometimes is very little for us when the issues are big. However, their support through email is good. The solution's one-on-one support session should be extended by at least half an hour. Since their one-on-one sessions are based on their availability, I don't get instant assistance when I need it.

Neutral

I have previously worked on different tools like PingSafe. PingSafe is only into cloud security posture management, but Prisma Cloud has everything enabled in it. As a cloud security posture management tool, both the tools have their own advantages and disadvantages.

I can compare only one functionality, which is the CSPM module. For the CSPM module, Prisma Cloud's finding is good because it has access inside a containerized agent. PingSafe was more into the basic CIS benchmark things where we were able to identify the issues. PingSafe was also good, but Prisma Cloud has more advantages and configurations enabled.

The solution's initial setup was pretty straightforward. It's a bit complex for a new person, and some guidance will be required. However, the documentation is quite enough to reduce those things. The initial setup is neither too hard nor too easy.

The DevOps team does the solution's deployment. I was not a part of the deployment process. When I discussed it with them, they told me they had some script or documentation. They started that, and the deployment was completed in a day or two.

We are using cloud protection, virtual protection, and the CI/CD modules of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks.

The comprehensiveness of the solution for protecting the full cloud-native stack is pretty good. We need to monitor those things. We initially did all the configuration from the container or API side. Now, our work is only to monitor periodically. It has a report functionality on a mail and download basis.

Periodically, we'll receive a mail asking us if we want to work on the weekly summary of our findings. There is a rescan functionality that I can use to rescan and confirm if someone has fixed a vulnerability so that it will not be shown in the results the next time. Prisma Cloud provides comprehensiveness that covers most of the areas.

When we didn't have this tool initially, we had to run around for different open-source tools because there was no one-stop solution. We had to go for different open-source tools for different functions. Prisma Cloud is a one-stop solution that covers multiple things like API security, container security, infrastructure security, AWS cloud security, and CI/CD security. So, it's a complete package for us to look around and figure out the issues in every area.

We did not immediately realize the solution's benefits from the time of deployment. It took an initial one month to understand the functionalities and their uses. After one and a half months, we were able to identify the benefits of using these services.

The solution provides the visibility and control we need. Initially, we did some access analysis to know what kind of permissions these particular agents are running. Then, we got to know and understand the agent's particular privileges.

The solution has reduced runtime alerts by around 15 to 20%. As soon as we use any image, we decide to run the scan and get the finding immediately. We have a time window to figure out the issue.

In case of an incident, Prisma Cloud requires some maintenance. If something happens because of the tool, we have to stop those agents, rerun them, and then check the logs. Sometimes, the services are disrupted when we enable something amid permission issues. So, that part definitely requires some maintenance.

I would recommend Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks to other users. Prisma Cloud is a one-stop solution where you get multiple tools within one tool. That is a great thing because you don't have to run around for different kinds of tools.

Overall, I rate Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks an eight out of ten.

We use Prisma Cloud primarily for clients with a multi-cloud environment who require all these posture checks to be done uniformly from a single pane of glass to ensure they are in compliance. They have regulatory policies that require integration with the SIEM to generate alerts and reports. That's the primary use case for a CSPM solution. For cloud workload protection, we need vulnerability management, runtime defense, as well as image, container,  and registry scanning.

In terms of modules, we started with Redlock, the cloud security posture management component, and followed with Twistlock for cloud workload protection. Lately, I've been using Aporeto for identity-based micro-segmentation and BridgeCrew for cloud security.

Identity-based micro-segmentation allows you to create microparameters across workloads on the cloud and on-premises. You can enforce a pure wireless model through whitelisting flows in various workloads. Cloud security is primarily for core security, including SaaS and PaaS tools for scanning container images and core infrastructure. We have Terraforms, which we need to scan if we forget to remove any passwords or if there is some consideration drift between what you've configured in the IaC and what has materialized into the cloud infrastructure. 

I don't think we have had more than four or five admins for any project. We provide read-only access to the monitoring guys and custom authentication authorization privileges to a couple of users. The number of authorized users varies from plan to plan. Lots of people don't need to have access to the solution. 

Prisma Cloud helped us with compliance. Most of my deployments have been greenfield, so I don't have a benchmark to compare how the security posture has improved. I've always used this from day zero of the configuration. However, I can say that the compliance checks for PCI, DSS, HIPAA, etc., made my life simpler. I don't need to look at each of these standards and compare the rules I have in place.

It also enabled us to adopt a preventative approach to security. It gives us an option to monitor and remediate, so I don't think there is any challenge. If we see something going wrong, the solution offers a way to implement preventative controls. 

You can incorporate Prisma into DevSecOps and put it into any of the pipelines, like Jenkins and Azure DevOps. I don't think there are any challenges. You have all the ready-made plugins on these CI/CD tools, so you don't need to do or write a custom script plugin or anything. It's already available. It takes care of your end-to-end security from build to deployment and runs.

The cloud workload protection module Twistlock has ready-made plugins. Still, I don't think there was a plunging for identity-based micro-segmentation sites in the past, so we had to build a pipeline manually, I think they released a plugin for IBMS, but I never worked on it.

Prisma provides a single pane of glass for all our cloud resources to control all these different functionalities from various menus. It also helps us assess risk at runtime and throughout the whole pipeline. I have never compared Prisma with other tools, like Qualys or Tenable, so I cannot say which gives better results regarding runtime. However, I get a lot of actionable insights and suggestions from the tool about the next steps to follow.

The solution provides excellent security coverage of multi-cloud and hybrid environments. Without it, I would need to create a manual playbook for each cloud. There is a lot to maintain for each cloud, and you can't monitor from a single pane of glass. That's an administrative nightmare because you can't pull compatible reports. If I identify some compliance issues on AWS, I don't have a similar set of parameters to compare those for Google Cloud or Microsoft Azure. I definitely need this for a multi-cloud environment. 

I can get a relatively good amount of end-to-end security within the cloud. All these pieces fit together to address all my cloud needs. Of course, I don't think any vendors target security within the microservices, analytics, or data warehouse. I'm unsure because I haven't done it, but I don't think anything is missing.

It gives developers the tools they need to correct issues so they do not have to write their own scripts. Sometimes, I need an administrator to work with these developers, so it's not fully automated. Maybe I didn't find the best way to do it. Perhaps I need to find a linter or something, but there were many instances where I needed to involve someone to work with the developer. I don't think we are doing everything from the developer's end. 

Prisma also substantially reduced alert investigation times because we previously did everything by hand. We used to scan it manually, so it depended on the periodicity of scans. Earlier, we used to run scans for a couple of customers about every 15 days, and then we did the remediation. Now, all these scans run every minute or 15 minutes, so it's faster.  

Prisma's identity-based micro-segmentation is better than all its competitors. I've already evaluated Guardicore and Illumio, but Prisma stands out for the ease of configuring rules and how seamlessly it works with your cloud workloads and container environments. I used it for Kubernetes as well as K3s. I prefer Prisma's identity-based micro-segmentation. I can't think of any competitors doing this as well as Prisma Cloud.

We integrated this solution as a part of DevSecOps, so we have a dedicated pipeline for cloud workload protection. That works brilliantly. You don't need to log in to the control unless you want to do some management or full reports. I can bake in all these functionalities within the pipeline, and I can do the same for IBMS. 

As part of application security or whatever my developers are working on, I can have them bake all the configurations they need to do, like listening and patching remediation. I think it's relatively automatic, but I would consider it to be more of a DevSecOps functionality.

Prisma is the result of multiple Palo Alto acquisitions, like CWPP, Twistlock, and Aporeto. Though they are part of a single pane of glass, there is no correlation between the solutions. I don't see vulnerability scans done for tools that have been micro-segmented. 

A better correlation between the multiple products Prisma Cloud contains would be crucial. It would reduce the time spent looking at reports and enable you to get all the actionable insights across products. I think that Palo Alto is working on it, but they need to work faster because it doesn't make sense to have all these products in a single pane of glass without any correlation between them. 

At some point, things get a bit unwieldy when working with complex environments, but I don't think that challenge is unique to Prisma Cloud. It's an issue for any solution deployed in massive and complex environments. Let's say you have an enterprise with 30,000 workloads in the cloud, so it's unwieldy to have it configured for a single instance of Prisma Cloud. In that case, it would be better to segregate it across multiple tenants.

In the future, I'd like to see Palo Alto create a single consolidated agent software for workload production and identity-based micro-segmentation. Currently, I need to install two agents for the same platform to get two different functionalities. The second is maybe ease of licensing. That would also be helpful.

I have been using Prisma Cloud for nearly three and a half years.

I never faced any challenges because of internal hardware issues or the agent. Because I've always worked on the cloud-managed version, we have never faced any problems with the functionality. We did have a couple of hangups with the user and administrator onboarding and privileges, but I don't think that affects the functionality of the overall product.

The product itself is scalable, but it can become unwieldy from the administrative side of things. I can push Prisma Cloud out for 10,000 workloads, but the reporting and management would be a bit difficult. I prefer to have it segmented across multiple tenants, but it's somewhat complicated. 

I rate Palo Alto support a nine out of ten. My company is a CPSP partner with premium support, so I can't speak to the typical support experience. Even if we don't raise a ticket, we have an internal account manager to take care of all this. 

Positive

Redlock was the original company doing CSPM, so I got into Prisma Cloud because they acquired Redlock. I previously used  Qualys and Tenable for vulnerability management. I thought putting the CSPM and cloud workload protection pieces of Prisma Cloud under one roof would simplify my life.

Also, all these are cloud-managed and take care of the end-to-end requirements for cloud workloads. Qualys and Tenable have all these vulnerability management capabilities, but they might lack some native remediation capabilities. It's not that the other products are falling short, but I need that consolidated single pane of glass for cloud security. 

Setting up Prisma Cloud is straightforward. You get an activation email and deploy a couple of scripts. I work for a consulting firm that is a CPSP partner. All I needed to do is email Palo Alto with a bill of material describing our environment and the components, and then we get the activation email. After that, I followed the self-service enrollment steps, and it's running. Depending on your environment, you need to install all these applications. It's a seamless onboarding experience.

The total deployment time varies depending on the client because some of them have restrictions. One mid-sized company with around 700 workloads took less than three weeks. However, we needed to do a step-by-step approach for some, moving from the on-premises environment to the cloud and from dev to production. Those deployments took a couple of months.

Usually, the deployment requires no more than two or three people, but it depends on the approach. One should be enough if it's a batch approach. I've been doing this alone for a lot of my clients. In some situations, if you may need some help troubleshooting an app that isn't working, or the client may need someone with specialized expertise. It also depends on the client's size. At most, you'll need a half-dozen.

It's a costly solution, so we spend a lot on the licenses. At the same time, we can perform compliance checks, external audits, etc., faster because we have all the right pieces in place. That definitely helped, but I've never calculated the total cost of ownership or return on investment.

Prisma Cloud Enterprise is a costly solution. You need a license for all the components. At the same time, you have everything under one roof, so I think it's still justified. 

I rate Prisma Cloud an eight out of ten. I deduct a couple of points because I would still like to see all the products in the platform correlated. They should also do away with the need to install multiple agents for various functionalities or burn it all down into a single agent that takes care of it.

My advice is to start early if you are moving from on-premises to a hybrid or cloud environment. Implement Prisma Cloud as soon as possible, especially for greenfield deployments. This isn't a problem with Prisma Access, but it's usually a challenge. You need time to customize your rules and tailor them to your setup. 

The second recommendation I have is for Prisma Cloud Compute, the cloud workload protection piece. It's available in self-managed and cloud versions. You should opt for the cloud-managed version because you can get two single-cloud platforms.