Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Reviews

We use it for compliance management and policy detection, especially for hybrid clouds.

If you have just one or two clouds the detection policy provided by the cloud provider is sufficient. But if you have more than two clouds, a tool like Prisma Cloud is required because you want to go to one place and do things once. The value of a solution like this is that when you have multiple cloud providers, it plays a vital role in security posture management, security detection management, and alert management.

The solution also enables us to make security alerts and security risks visible to our tenants, as we have a common dashboard. In addition, it helps us to improve knowledge of the environment by allowing people, and not just the central team, to always access the data and to see what the security posture looks like. It gives us a central location to see what the security posture is like for multiple cloud providers.

Prisma Cloud also provides the visibility and control you need, regardless of how complex or distributed your cloud environments become. It helps to simplify that complexity. Now we know what the best practices are, and if something is missing we know.

It also helps us to confidently certify compliance for a customer. The reports it provides become a basis for compliance certification. It gives us a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources and applications without having to manage and reconcile disparate security and compliance reports.

In addition, by using the Prisma Cloud 2.0 Cloud Security Posture Management features, our security teams get alerts with the context to know which situations are the most critical. That helps because we have visibility without having to log in to multiple cloud providers. It gives us one simple way to look at all the three cloud provider policies. Those alerts provide us with a good place to start. Our teams get all the data they need to pinpoint the root cause.

Prisma Cloud provides security spanning multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. That is very important when you have a multi-cloud environment because it gives you a single pane of glass for all of them.

In that single pane of glass it gives you Cloud Security Posture Management, Cloud Workload Protection, and Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management, and the vast majority of Cloud Network Security. Without this kind of tool, you would have to go through the three cloud providers and do the mappings for each one. It would be a huge amount of mapping and cross-referencing work, but that work is already done with this solution. Not just the referencing work is done, but it also does the monitoring and scheduling. And a given workload that needs to be compliant with the requirements of a certain country or with your business will be compliant, based on the regionality. Visibility and monitoring are things that are required and Prisma Cloud provides them.

It provides mapping for all compliances so that you do not have to do it. Mapping policies to different compliances can be tricky but it's also a good thing. And you can reuse it as-is. You do not have to do anything. It also provides mapping to the compliance history.

And when it comes to detection, it allows you to write policies that are not just based on compliance but also on your cloud security controls. It allows you to write customizations. It is also the sort of tool in which customization of alerts, notifications, and cloud posture management is possible.

In addition, Prisma Cloud gives you visibility over all of your policies. I know that it can do auto-collection, but I have not seen that implemented by anyone because auto-collection requires organizational maturity, but that lack of implementation is not due to tool immaturity.

And it is a perfect tool, in terms of security policy detection, when it comes to the comprehensiveness of the solution for protecting the full, cloud-native stack. It's very effective.

Another great feature of Prisma Cloud is its integration with Jira and ServiceNow. With those integrations, you do not have to manually intervene. If you do an integration, alerts can be assigned to the respective group, using Jira and ServiceNow. That definitely helps in reducing a good amount of work.

It also provides integration with Agile tools, and that is a great thing. It integrates security into the CI/CD pipeline for container workloads. (We have not used it for non-container workloads, but that's not an issue with the tool). The touchpoints in our DevOps processes are just API calls, making the integration very easy and very smooth.

Developers are able to correct issues using the tools they use to code. The way we have it set up, it's a process of reverse engineering. When an alert comes up it is used to see what was detected and how that can be converted into a preventive policy. That feedback loop is manual, but that input helps to turn the policy into a preventive one. Prisma Cloud has helped to reduce runtime alerts by about 30 percent because we are converting everything into preventive policies. And because it gives you an idea of what needs to be done, it has reduced alert investigation times by 30 to 40 percent.

There is some work to be done on preventive security policies. I would give the existing preventive approach a seven out of 10. I'm sure they will be doing something in this area.

In terms of securing cloud-native development at build time, a lot of improvement is needed. Currently, it's more a runtime solution than a build-time solution. For runtime, I would rate it at seven out of 10, but for build-time there is a lot of work to be done.

Another area for improvement is support for OPA (Open Policy Agent) rather than the proprietary language. Nowadays, people mix things, but you don't want to write a policy in different languages.

I have been using Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto for almost two years.

We haven't seen any issues with the stability of the solution in the last two years. It's good, with no problems at all.

As for the scalability, we haven't seen any issues. We are not cloud-busting, but so far, so good.

We want to extend the solution more in the container world and have more service automation. Those are scenarios we have not gotten to yet.

I am happy with Palo Alto's technical support. It has been good.

Positive

Before Palo Alto, we used the cloud providers' native tools. We switched because, while the native tools were great, managing three different cloud provider portals was not ideal. We needed some centralization and customization.

The initial deployment was a simple and automated process. It was good. It took four or five hours per cloud provider. We use it with AWS, Azure, GCP, and Oracle. There was some strategy involved in the implementation because there are differences among the cloud providers. For example, in AWS you have a Control Tower. A good strategy reduces manual intervention, but it's a SaaS solution so we did not have to do much.

We don't need any staff members to maintain the solution but we do need people to write the custom policies and to make sure that someone is there to take action when there are alerts. We have three staff members involved because writing the policies is not easy. One of the guys is responsible for policy writing, one of the guys is responsible for communication and checking the portal to make sure we communicate with people, and the other guy is helping them both with whatever tasks they need help with.

We tried a few other options but once we looked at Prisma Cloud we decided it was a better option.

The advantage of Prisma Cloud was its support for all the cloud providers and its automation. The ease of automation was one of our selection criteria. Cost was another consideration. While Prisma Cloud is not cheap, it's in the medium range. But if an organization is already using Palo Alto, they can negotiate a good price.

It makes sense for a smaller company to use the native cloud tools, but for a large organization it makes sense to have a tool like Prisma Cloud with centralized information, especially for security.

We are mainly using Prisma Cloud for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and for following the compliance standards as per the industry. Another use case is to get the runtime workload protection.

We are using the WAAS, CWP, application security, and CSPM modules. We are not using the DSPM module because it is not available for the India tenant.

All the features provided by Prisma Cloud are quite helpful for the BFSI sector and other sectors. It protects our overall infrastructure and detects any attacks or threats in real-time scenarios. It can also block any suspicious processes or things from the Internet, so it is quite helpful for the organization.

We are working for an organization with a multi-cloud environment. We have deployed Prisma Cloud in their infrastructure with AWS, Azure, and GCP. We are able to monitor all the tools and all the assets as per the compliance standards. We have deployed Defender on all the environments. We have integrated Defender with an embedded kind of application. We have been able to work with the client as per their specific requirements.

Compliance monitoring is very important for the banking sector. With Prisma Cloud, we can see the compliance status. It shows us how we are following the rules of a particular industry. It helps organizations match the industry level and ensure that their data is secure and they are following the guidelines of their particular industry.

Prisma Cloud provides security spanning multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. It is very important to create a secure infrastructure. Prisma Cloud has the ability to protect a multi-cloud environment with AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle as well as Alibaba Cloud. It plays a very crucial role in the security of an organization.

For security automation capabilities, we have some integrations. We have initialized application security before deploying the infrastructure over different environments, such as prod and pre-prod environments. Every open point should be closed. If we are creating our infrastructure through any automation code, there should be no cloud security posture management alert. We have also integrated Prisma Defender at the same time with the app-embedded format to protect our workload.

Prisma Cloud has features to detect anomalies, attack paths, and escalation privileges as well. It detects the root cause and lets us know the things in our infrastructure that can lead to the attack. We remediate them and secure our infrastructure.

Prisma Cloud saves a lot of time. It provides a consolidated dashboard for our infrastructure. We have multiple accounts, and on a single page, we can see the types of issues and the resources impacted. From there, we can directly go to the cloud, and we can take action on that. It saves time. We can close an alert in minimal time. It saves about 60% of the time which also has financial benefits. There are more than 50% cost savings.

We are more aware of things. If something suspicious is happening, we can track it and take action on that. Also, if any critical issue or vulnerability is reported that can impact our infrastructure, we can take recommended action from there. It helps us to detect the root cause. If there is any data leakage or server compromises, we can get the details and investigate things in detail. We get the API call as well. We get to know which endpoints are not set or how we can secure them. We can secure the endpoints. It helps us to reduce any attacks. We are using a lot of things from Prisma Cloud.

We could realize its benefits within one week of its implementation. Before we started with the actual implementation, we had done a PoC. It took us one week to observe and understand the flow and how it can help our organization.

Prisma Cloud covers all the stages such as build, deployment, runtime, etc. It has the capability to detect, protect, and escalate at all of these stages. At the build stage, we can initiate scanning for application security. It has the capability to scan the images at runtime. It also has features to block things in real-time scenarios. It has all the features. We have already adopted all the features of Prisma Cloud.

We trust Prisma Cloud and follow all the recommended actions. If there is any module that we have not yet adopted, we do a PoC and adopt that as well. As security engineers, we have to secure our infrastructure and assets in real time. Most of the competitors are providing CSPM, but only Prisma Cloud has the features to detect and block things in real-time scenarios. That is why we believe in Prisma Cloud.

Prisma Cloud provides a single tool to protect all of our cloud resources and applications, without having to manage and reconcile disparate security and compliance reports.

Prisma Cloud provides near to real-time alerts for our cloud infrastructure. At run time, when our Defender is running, it instantly gives the impacted process in a particular environment. So far, we have reduced more than 40% runtime alerts.

We have pre-production, production, prod, and UAT accounts. We can take action on the basis of severity and close any vulnerabilities.

The CWP module, runtime protection, and WAAS API are valuable.

For Prisma Cloud, I have already raised some requests, which are in progress. I am hoping they will be implemented soon. One of the requests is that Prisma Defender for the ECS solution is only supported for Linux. It does not support Windows.

For a runtime incident, it only has the option to archive. After validating the incident, the team members should have the option to add some comments and then archive. We should be able to add comments saying, "It is a false positive." or "This is the action we have taken." We have requested a few more improvements. The Palo Alto team is working on them.

I have been using Prisma Cloud for more than one and a half years.

It is a stable solution. We can trust it and rely on it. I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.

I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

In our organization, more than 60 users are using this solution. We have some team members working on AWS. We have some team members working on networking and we have some team members working on creating the infrastructure.

We are using the enterprise version, and we are getting the required support. If we find something suspicious, we can raise a ticket with the support team. They are working on priority, and they are following their timeline as well. They are working properly based on the severity and agreed timeline. There is no recommendation for any kind of change.

They are quite helpful, and they are aware of the things. If something is beyond their understanding, they reach out to their internal engineering team, and they are able to help us. They are very nice.

Positive

I have used multiple security vendors. Every vendor has its specific use case. Every tool has some kind of limitation. Overall, we found Prisma Cloud to be better. It has features like template scanning, runtime scanning, and runtime blocking. Endpoint blocking is also there in Prisma Cloud. 

Other products do not have all the features. Some products have only the CSPM feature. Some products have only vulnerabilities and scanning features. Some products only have API endpoint discovery features. Prisma Cloud has all the features integrated or consolidated into one platform. As a single platform, we are getting all the things. Prisma Cloud gives a consolidated report in a single platform. This is why we chose it.

Its deployment is very straightforward. The time taken for its deployment can vary depending on whether it is a migration or a new deployment. Overall, it takes a maximum of one week.

It is fairly priced. However, its price can be better so that small banks or small organizations can afford it and adopt it to secure their environment and data.

I would recommend Prisma Cloud if you are looking for security, real-time protection, and real-time API discovery. If a client needs such a solution, we recommend implementing Prisma Cloud.

Overall, I would rate Prisma Cloud a nine out of ten.

My main experience with Prisma Cloud is with AWS. We have a huge AWS environment, and we are trying to manage its security with Prisma Cloud. 

We have about 7,000 assets of different customers. We are managing the security posture. Prisma Cloud is the product that we have to manage the security posture for different companies. They are e-commerce companies that do online shopping, payment companies, banks, and even online bakeries and cloth stores. Prisma Cloud is a very good product. We have never seen a breach. I have never come across a situation where Prisma Cloud caused data leakage.

We mainly use AWS, but we also have some of our workloads in Azure. Prisma Cloud is a multi-cloud solution. So far, I have not seen any other solution capable of doing all the jobs that we do in Prisma Cloud.

With respect to the AWS cloud, we can achieve whatever we want in terms of automation most of the time. I have not come across a scenario where I am not able to automate any security-related feature for AWS with Prisma Cloud.

Prisma Cloud helps to take a preventative approach to cloud security. It is about 97% there. It is very good for cloud security posture management. It is also good in terms of prevention.

Prisma Cloud was deployed before I joined the company, but within six months, I was able to see the ability of Prisma Cloud. Compared to the old solution that I was using in my previous company, it has more capabilities and more features. It has less than 1% false positives. It is a very nice product.

As it was already implemented when I joined, I only tried to use all of its features or enhance the features wherever I could. I have never come across a breach situation, but if there is a breach, it will provide immediate remediation or at least give us the information. If you have configured it properly, it alerts you that this breach is happening, and this could be a possible cause and a possible solution. In my experience so far, it has been quite comprehensive.

Palo Alto DSPM is one of the best features because we have customers across different domains. For data classification, it is a very nice product. It also has some customization capabilities where you can define your categories and categorize the data according to that. It is one of the top-rated solutions.

Palo Alto DSPM can help discover data that exists outside of your official IT systems, but I do not have experience with that. Based on the documentation and what people discuss on different forums, it is capable.

Palo Alto DSPM provides automated discovery of new data assets as they onboard. When we onboard a new customer or their new AWS environment, it helps a lot in discovering. This automated process is very nice. We are able to discover them as soon as possible. It is quite easy to discover and classify. We are more comfortable now.

Palo Alto DSPM provides us with a prioritized list of all the data security posture issues in our environment. We can categorize and prioritize what needs to be done. We can see what kind of alerts should be prioritized and what data we can prioritize to monitor. 

Prisma Cloud has good insights. You can have graphs and very good statistics. To present the statistics, it has very good reports. The representation within the reports is very nice. It takes you to the core of the things. You can get the statistics at a very granular level.

Prisma Cloud is one of the best products. We renew annually because it seems that we cannot survive without it.

We have integrated Prisma Cloud with our SOC operations. It is a Cloud Security Posture solution that can be integrated with multiple SOC standards or SOC solutions or products.

Prisma Cloud provides the visibility and control we need, regardless of how complex or distributed our cloud environments become. Otherwise, we would not continue with the solution. Our chief security officer and others find it to be one of the best solutions.

It is not very easy to deploy, but once you learn it and deploy it properly, it provides a very granular level view of your entire security environment. You can do a lot of customization. You can monitor. You can remediate. You can automate a lot of processes.

Prisma Cloud has reduced a lot of our manual work and a lot of our time from having to go into different environments and looking into them. We do not have to use different products for different purposes. That is why Palo Alto Prisma Cloud is one of the best solutions. We can have everything within one solution. It has helped us with cloud security posture management. We mostly work with AWS. We have time savings, and we have productivity improvements. We have moved towards a rapid remediation or an automation of remediation. We have moved towards more effective alerts related to any kind of vulnerability. That has helped a lot. We can report them to our management and our teams, and we can also communicate the same to our customers. That is where Prisma Cloud has an edge.

Prisma Cloud has saved us money. Previously, we were using multiple products. We were using one product to check the encryption and multiple products to maintain a security posture and capture vulnerabilities or issues with our CI/CD pipelines. The company was using four or five products. We are now able to get all those functionalities in Prisma Cloud, so the license cost of the products we were using previously is gone. Prisma Cloud initially seemed expensive to us, but when we started utilizing it, we were able to save the cost of other products that were giving us just a slice of the pizza but not the entire pizza. Prisma Cloud has helped us reduce costs, and there is also efficiency. The cost management team knows exactly how much we have saved, but as per the 2023 report, we have had about 37% savings from not having to spend on multiple products. We were able to achieve the same things with Prisma Cloud.

Through Prisma Cloud, we can write Lambda functions, configure policies to check the security posture, and get reports. We can do a lot more. That is my main expertise, and that is one of the advantages of Prisma Cloud. For example, we have almost 7,000 AWS assets. If I want to check how many of my S3s have encryption, I can write a Lambda function in Prisma Cloud and get that report. Things like this are helpful in understanding where we lack security and where we can improve it.

Prisma Cloud is very comprehensive, but there should be better support for the customization of the reports. If Palo Alto can have more customized reports available or give an option to the users to customize the reports, that would be great.

As Palo Alto is developing Prisma Cloud, they can provide more graphical visibility. That would help organizations like ours where we have to generate multiple reports and share them not only with the technical people but also with the management of customers. The reports should be as per the requirement of non-technical people.

I have been using Palo Alto Prisma Cloud for almost four years.

We are renewing its license because we are getting a lot out of it.

It supports multi-cloud environments. It is already scalable. It has very good features such as discovery.

We are a multinational company spread across the globe. I am in the UAE. Some people are connecting from the US, and some are connecting from the UK. All of them are working within their domain. The cost optimization team is within the US. In the technical team, eight members are from the UAE. A couple of them are from India and the US as well. Our customer base is mostly in the US, UK, and some of the European regions. We have very few from the UAE.

Their support is very good. If we have anything to discuss or want to learn something that has been added, we engage the support.

I would rate them a nine out of ten because whenever there are issues, they are able to resolve them within the timelines and SLAs.

Positive

Prisma Cloud was already deployed when I got into this company.

In my previous company, we were using a Cloud Security Posture Management solution from a smaller US company. I do not know if they are still using that or not. I do not remember the name, but we were getting a lot of false positives and things like that. We even gave this feedback to them.

I was not involved in its deployment. It was already deployed when I got here.

It does not require any maintenance from our side.

Prisma Cloud is no doubt one of the best solutions in the market. Among cloud security or cloud-based posture solutions, Prisma Cloud is one of the best.

We are getting what we want, so I would rate Prisma Cloud a nine out of ten.

We had Azure, AWS, and a little bit of GCP, so we gave Prisma read access to all those accounts, subscriptions, etc., and monitored the alerts to mitigate risks based on what popped up in the dashboard.

While it's not our only tool, Prisma is managing about 80 percent. We still occasionally go into cloud-native tools to ensure certain compliance standards are being met. Sometimes, urgent issues need to be fixed that haven't been reported in Prisma because the native tools will catch them first. As a third-party solution, Prisma might take a little longer to build a report directory.

We had around 30 to 40 users who were a mix of cloud and DevOps engineers. There were also members of the security team who made decisions about what kind of security policies we had to follow. We used it extensively within the public cloud across all our Azure, AWS, and GCP subscriptions and projects. There was interest in using it on-premises with our vSphere environment as well. I don't know if that ever happened.

Prisma enabled us to get up-to-speed on enforcing TLS 1.2. It helped us look at different types of resources, like storage accounts and app services. I'm thinking particularly of Azure because that was my focus. I found all the resources from the Prisma list and remedied those issues so that they were displayed as resolved in Prisma.

It gave us visibility into and control over complex cloud environments, which helped us feel better about our security and secure the environment with the clinical data. Our security team was pleased when we showed them clean Prisma reports. It boosted their confidence and their comfort level that we were being compliant.

Prisma made it much easier to ensure that all of the security pieces are handled. It simplified our security issue resolution. It cut down our investigation time by giving us one place to look. It cleaned up our operations considerably because finding what resources needed to be resolved, mitigated, or updated was easier. It probably saved us several hours every week. It also saved us some money, but I couldn't quantify the savings because other environments also used it.

It helped us develop a preventative approach to security. Nine out of ten times, we could find issues that needed to be fixed ahead of time. We had a monthly meeting where we would review the high-severity alerts on the dashboard and assign people to remedy them. Once we got through the high severity alerts, we looked at mediums and low severity alerts. Prisma enabled us to identify resources we needed to fix, which was quite handy.

We were pleased with Prisma's custom and built-in reports. We could go into the dashboard and see all these notifications telling us which subscriptions didn't have TLS 1.2 enabled. The security controls were the most valuable features. 

Prisma's multi-cloud capabilities were essential. We wouldn't have used it without them. We would have just used the native cloud vendors' security solutions. Its protection of our full cloud-native stack is pretty comprehensive. I would rate it at least an eight out of ten. It stacks up well compared to the security alerts and notifications we got from solutions like Defender.

It sometimes took Prisma a little while to build queries, so new services or features wouldn't appear. It wouldn't get flagged in Prisma for a bit. It would be helpful if they sped up how quickly they got their default notifications, queries, and alerts.

The access controls for our bank roles were not granular enough. We needed specific people to do particular actions, and we often had to give some people way too much access for them to be able to do what they needed in Prisma. They couldn't do their jobs if they didn't have that level of access, so other people had to do that part for them. It would help to have more granular role-based access controls.

We used the solution for about three years at my previous company. 

Prisma seemed highly stable, but I wasn't managing the solution. I was more of a user.

Prisma seemed to scale pretty well. It covered several large environments and didn't seem to struggle when loading information for us. I think it did well.

I rate Palo Alto support a six out of ten. The support was adequate, but I can't say it was great. If we had an issue with a feature or a query, it could take them a little while to get back, especially if it was a feature improvement or a new alert. They were very slow to add new warnings and features.

Neutral

The company never had a public cloud solution before Prisma, but they had something for on-prem. I don't know what it was. They also used cloud-native solutions like Defender for Cloud and the native tool for AWS.

We switched to Prisma because we wanted a single pane of glass that would allow the security team to see security issues across all of the public cloud vendors that we used, so they wouldn't have to jump to each individual cloud vendor's tool.

I was involved in the POC several years ago. It was like a lab test. After we tested that for several months, we rolled out the official one. At that point, I was just helping them test as they tried out the product. I didn't actually install the software.

The setup seemed pretty straightforward. There were clear instructions on how we just needed to create service principles with specific permissions and then grant Prisma the credentials for the service. I think they only had about five people maintaining the Prisma environment, and each was responsible for bits and pieces of it.

I believe the company saw a return using Prisma.

I know that the guys who handled the pricing said Prisma was costly, but I don't know how that compares to other products.

I know the team evaluated other options, but I wasn't involved.

I rate Prisma Cloud an eight out of ten. Having one place to go for all of your security alerts and notifications makes it easier to solve issues than going to each vendor's security tool.

I have mostly used the CSPM and CWP side of things. 

For one of our clients, we used the self-hosted version that we had deployed on IBM Cloud and the SaaS version hosted by Prisma itself. For the CWP side, we used it for securing applications of our clients, doing the runtime checks, and servicing the runtime events and plug-in vulnerabilities.

For the CSPM side, the use case was more heavily for compliance on the cloud. We had Google and AWS environments.

Its main benefit was that it made it easier to monitor our clients. It just made everything more efficient. There was efficiency.

Prisma Cloud provides security spanning multi-cloud environments. I have not worked with a hybrid cloud environment.

I never did anything with the automated features other than being able to click and have it do the relearn process when it comes to the runtime events. If I see that an application is creating a bunch of false positive runtime events, I can put it in an automatic relearn state. It will relearn what that application does so it is not firing off a bunch of false positives. That is the only automation I have used other than the Helm option provided at the time of deployment. It does some automation when it comes to deployment. That is about it. I am not sure about the savings money-wise, but I know that every time we deploy by Helm, it saves us time. It is hard to judge the time savings because I never deployed it in a manual way.

Prisma Cloud is pretty good for helping us take a preventative approach to cloud security. We can have lock-in controls where a developer cannot deploy vulnerabilities that are critical. We can prevent them from doing it that way. It is excellent in that regard. I also like the preventive controls on the runtime side. If you see a runtime event, you could put options in place to prevent that specific command from running, or you can shut down the console, container pod, etc. It is hard to measure the time savings. However, it can take us an hour if we have to reach out to the proper team to get a pod shut down. It would also depend on how responsive they are. Having something in place to automatically shut something down does save a lot of time.

When we first started deploying it, our team was new. We had done some training, but it did take us a little while to fully grasp all the benefits of Prisma Cloud itself. It could have taken a couple of weeks to a month before we really got a good grasp of everything. I would not say that this is the case with everyone. None of us in the team had done the cloud before, so it took us longer to understand and realize the benefits compared to others.

Prisma Cloud is pretty comprehensive. On the CSPM side of things, the SaaS-hosted version seems to have a lot more capability than the self-hosted version. The SaaS-hosted version is more comprehensive than the self-hosted version.

The visibility and control that Prisma Cloud provides affect confidence in the security and compliance postures. A great thing about it is that we can set up whatever specific compliance needs the clients have. It has a lot of features already built into it. It is a simple toggle action to enable the compliance that they need to follow. It lays out what is failing. It gives you all the information that you need to work with clients to get everything compliant. It also offers some options if you want to make custom policies and things like that. If the compliance policies that clients follow are not available nationally, they can have their own compliance policies. They can put those in. It is great.

Prisma Cloud provides a single tool to protect all of the cloud resources and applications, and then there are other tools that you can download from the console, such as the twistcli tool. It is all in there, but there are different tools that you can use as well.

Prisma Cloud saves a lot of time and probably a lot of money too. That is because you can log in to one specific tool. The CSPM SaaS side of it even has more, so being able to log in on that one tool helps. You do not have to worry about different tools to take care of different security aspects. Everything built into one saves a lot of time.

We were able to reduce runtime alerts as we worked with our clients to get to that security posture maturity. There were some clients that were getting probably 25 or more different alerts a day, and we were able to bring that down by more than half. We were on the way to getting even fewer alerts than that. It was quite a bit of a reduction. It is a slow process of getting the runtime alerts knocked down depending on how big the environment is, but it definitely helps.

When it comes to the vulnerability side of things, it has built-in top ten features or top ten vulnerabilities. We can look at them and say that these vulnerabilities are being ranked by Prisma Cloud as our top ten. These are the ones that we should be focusing on. We can work with our clients to help them determine which things should be knocked out first and so on.

Runtime protection and the ability to set up policies and controls are valuable.

The thing that I like the most is that when it comes to runtime events, whenever we see an event, we are able to look through the logs. It is pretty easy to look back through everything that took place. I also like the Radar screen for seeing how everything is connected.

While you can find everything, sometimes, it is a bit difficult. I have always had a little bit of an issue or struggle using the Resource Query Language that we can use to look through and find different things. I wish it was a little bit easier. It might be just my failings in that regard, but it can be a little bit difficult to find everything. You can find everything, but it is difficult sometimes.

If there is a way for auto Defender upgrades, that would be great. They started to implement it, but I do not know if they have done it yet. Having auto Defender upgrades so that we do not have to upgrade Defender manually would be helpful. If there is a way to push the upgrades from the console, that would be one way to improve it. I had created a couple of other requests for improvements, but I do not remember them at this point in time. I know that was one of them.

I started using it back in 2020 although I did a little bit of training a little bit before that around the end of 2019. It was originally Twistlock. I am not sure if Palo Alto had bought it out when I first started training with it.

I would rate it an eight out of ten for stability. Sometimes, on the SaaS version, the console would not load. It was a glitch on their end that they had to fix. We had issues with the GUI at a couple of points. We had issues whenever we were downloading the vulnerability report. It did not include all the information. Once they got some bugs worked out, it was pretty stable, but there were some issues.

It is very scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.

We had a couple of Fortune 500 clients. I do not know if we had anything that was small. A lot of them were big organizations, but some of the environments were small.

We had a client that had the SaaS version that had hundreds of different endpoints, if not more. Most of our clients were on the self-hosted version. Some of them only had four or eight different endpoints or hosts. One of them had about 50 different hosts, give or take. It was a wide array depending on the client we were working with.

When we started, there were three of us working with Prisma Cloud. There were about six of us by the time I left.

They are pretty good, but sometimes, it does take them a little bit longer to move from level 1 support to a higher-up level when it is a technical issue that they have not dealt with before. Overall, it is pretty good.

Positive

We also used a product called Aqua Security. We were using Aqua Security back when we were using the self-hosted version of Prisma and not the SaaS version of Prisma. We had not worked on the SaaS version yet, so I do not know if it is a completely fair comparison, but I did feel that at that point in time, Aqua Security had more features and a better layout. I do not know how that compares today. It has been a little over a year since I last touched Aqua Security, so I am not sure what updates and changes they have made.

We had a deployment team handling the initial deployments. We worked on the upgrades after the initial deployment, which were pretty straightforward, but I am not sure about the initial deployment. It seems to be pretty straightforward, but I have never done an initial deployment.

In terms of maintenance, it is just doing the upgrades. That is really about it. It seems that they push out a patch pretty close to every month. You can upgrade to the minor versions at the very least or security patches.

I would recommend Prisma Cloud to others. It does take a good bit of work to learn it and fully understand the complexity of it and all the features. There are still features in there that I do not even know about or have not even touched, but it is great for protecting the environment. It is easy to get into and understand some of it, but it requires a lot of learning to understand the whole complexity of it.

Its learning curve depends on what you need to do with it. I had taken a week-long class with it, and then there were other training sessions. It could take weeks, if not months, if you want to try to do all the different training they offer.

With my limited use of other platforms, I would rate Prisma Cloud a ten out of ten. This is the one that I have used the most. It is the best of the ones that I have used.

I am in a services company. My company is also a partner of Palo Alto, so all the Palo Alto products have been tested, researched, and deployed at least three to four times by every engineer in my team.

It is being used for posture management. We have many users coming from many locations. All of them are having the same experience and all are secured. We used to use CASB which is a solution for authentication. This solution is in line with CASB. It helps to ensure that data protection is fine and all the data is coming properly. We can see whether there are any leakages or vulnerabilities. We can check all these aspects of security with this solution. All this is configurable. It is a web-based solution.

Our company is a vendor. If customers want, they can purchase solutions via us. We then take care of the physical box as well as the configuration. We manage the physical as well as the logical. In the case of Palo Alto, it is all logical. We can even code for a customer if the customer wants to upgrade their existing cloud setup, migrate to a cloud setup, or bring in a new setup. It is our bread and butter. We are one of the leading sellers of Palo Alto solutions.

Prisma Cloud helps reduce vulnerabilities. The number of vulnerabilities is less. If you have 1,200 vulnerabilities, after implementing Prisma Cloud, the number is drastically reduced to 500. That is one of the key advantages of using Prisma Cloud. You can see its benefits within a month.

Prisma Cloud helps to identify all the vulnerabilities in modern scenarios. For traditional scenarios, we have enough products, but a solution like Prisma Cloud helps to identify vulnerabilities in containerized environments and modern traffic scenarios. It helps with run-time security and east-west traffic.

Prisma Cloud helps secure the entire cloud-native development lifecycle, across build, deploy, and run. I would rate it an eight out of ten for this.

As an enterprise architect, I seek three capabilities from a solution. It should be preventative. It should be corrective, and it should be detective. Prisma Cloud is good in these aspects. I would rate it an eight out of ten for these capabilities.

Palo Alto DSPM's discovery and data classification processes are comprehensive. I would rate it an eight out of ten for comprehensiveness. For data security, we have a DLP solution. We have a separate solution. We never use Palo Alto for that.

Palo Alto DSPM provides us with insights into the content it has discovered. It also provides automated discovery of new data assets as they onboard and a prioritized list of all the data security posture issues in our environment.

The security provided by Prisma Cloud is important for our customers, especially for our banking and finance customers. We are a service company. We never use any of these products. I am a security architect. I am the one responsible for assessing and finding the right product and then deploying the product with the help of my engineering team.

Prisma Cloud definitely reduces complexity. We can see the issues or vulnerabilities that have been there for a while. We get good clarity on why they have been there and how to resolve them. Palo Alto is very good at this, and they make complex work quick and easy.

Prisma Cloud drastically reduces the number of vulnerabilities in the organization. There can be 60% to 70% reduction. It also depends on the industry again. For the web-based industry, where the company is providing solutions through the internet, such as share market or banking companies, it is very helpful. Production companies rarely use online solutions. 

With the reduction in vulnerabilities, the security cost automatically reduces. There is an indirect impact on an organization's cost.

It is user-friendly. It has a good look and feel and reporting structure. It provides a single pane of glass. These are the things that I like.

There should be some kind of automation, AI incorporation, and bot system. All these would add value. For example, AI should be able to detect all related viruses based on one virus. That will be a great invention. 

I have been using this solution for about five years.

It is stable. I would rate it an eight out of ten for stability.

It is scalable. I would rate it an eight out of ten for scalability.

Their support is very good. I would rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have worked with Trend Micro Deep Security, Singularity, and Lacework. There is a new vendor called Orca Security. They are phenomenal. They can even beat Palo Alto.

Prisma Cloud is better in terms of cost, GUI, and look and feel. There is a single pane of glass and very good reporting.

Its deployment is straightforward for me. It is deployed across multiple geographies and departments. We mainly work with enterprises.

We have some stringent processes for getting the system to a perfect stage and ensuring that it is running properly. It takes at least a month. We do all sorts of testing, and then based on our test outcome, we configure everything in the right way. After that, we consider the data shown in the report as official.

Prisma Cloud is one of the top solutions in the market. When customers ask for alternatives, I recommend Trend Micro Deep Security, Singularity, Lacework, and Orca to them. I provide them with a detailed comparison, and then customers make the decision. I help customers with architecture design, decision-making, vulnerability assessment, and penetration testing. I also help them compare vulnerabilities before and after implementing a solution.

There were some cases where we struggled with some customer requests such as related to zero trust. We were struggling to configure that. They thought that this product also supported zero trust. We then had to tell them to buy the Prisma Cloud CNAAP solution. In many cases, we also moved them from DSPM to CNAAP.

As a security professional, I would not suggest automated remediation. That is because we need to see that automatic remediation does not impact anything else. We have a team. We register all the vulnerabilities and threats, and then at the backend, we do the testing to ensure that remediation or automated remediation will not create any other problems. As soon as we get that assurance, only then we do the fix. This is a requirement from the customer side, especially from the banking and finance organizations. Because everything is crucial, we do not configure automatic resolution for any of the issues.

Overall, I would rate Prisma Cloud an eight out of ten.

There are five pillars of Prisma Cloud, including CWPP for workloads and security posture in the basic configuration. We have also been working with application APIs. These are the areas in which I'm working.

Most of our customers are using multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environments, and the problem they were facing was that they didn't have a one-stop shop for managing all the clouds. For example, Azure has something like that capability, but there are some problems and gaps. Every cloud provider says, "This is our territory, and we can only secure our territory." But the whole idea of Prisma Cloud is that it can take any cloud, whether public or private, bring the accounts on board, and after that, everything is managed by Prisma Cloud.

Another problem with Azure is that it has very overwhelming alerts, making it hard to manage them in native Azure. With Prisma Cloud, we have different rules and it is easier and more manageable. It is not overwhelming. We can look at its different modules. If we're talking about identity management, we can go to that module and see the identity. That makes things quite manageable with Prisma Cloud.

When it comes to investigation time, Prisma Cloud has something like 18,000 or 19,000 predefined policies and has remediations as well, so we know what to do or what not to do. It helps reduce investigation time because all those policies are already there. They are the "top" policies, and it provides remediations alongside.

Most of the customers we are tackling have different tools and solutions, like Qualys, Nessus, and vulnerability management assessment solutions. There are plugins for them, and we can integrate Prisma Cloud with them. We can enrich our telemetry with their data and use the predefined correlation rules in Prisma Cloud. That means we have that work done in seconds.

We also like the firewalls.

It also perfectly provides security across multi- and hybrid cloud environments. We use it with multi-cloud environments, and there are five cloud providers supported, including Amazon Web Services, Oracle, GCP, Azure, and Alibaba. Most of the big companies out there are using multi-cloud or hybrid environments, and they share dependencies on different types of cloud.

The basic idea of Prisma Cloud, and what I like the most, is that it is a managed cloud and everything is easy to do. So we can integrate different cloud-native services. We can use solutions like Defender for Cloud, Azure, and Amazon Inspector and enhance our telemetry using these data lakes. Prisma Cloud is the best for integrating with these cloud-native solutions.

The automation is good so far. If we look at the Kubernetes runtime environment, there is good automation for that.

Prisma Cloud is all about a preventative approach, and we can use it for compliance as well.

We can also integrate it into a CI/CD pipeline, and it can scan different images and containers, such as Kubernetes. Also, when we are loading an account, there are some agents that scan as well. There is Lambda for automation, and, in the first phase—the staging environment—we can have our work done. Pipelining is a continuous process, and the scanning takes place in the previous stage only. It runs in a sandbox environment and gives us all the remediations.

Sometimes, credentials are hardcoded. We can use the code security module and correlate with the predefined rules provided by Prisma Cloud. We get alerts, and based on these alerts, we can harden the policies for that code.

And the dashboard provided by Prisma Cloud has capabilities through which we can make alerts visible based on their severity level. We can create a separate dashboard for rules related to medium or high severity. That way, without wasting our time, we get to the medium- and high-level alerts and tackle the things that need attention the most.

The automation capabilities are growing each day, but the problem is that the updates are not that frequent. There are some services on Amazon that have come out with updates, and Azure is also getting up to date. But Prisma takes some time to follow. There's a time gap that Prisma inherits from these clouds. I understand why it takes some time, but that time should be reduced.

I have been using Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks for two years.

The stability is a 10 out of 10.

The scalability is also a 10 out of 10.

We have a team of 25 to 30 people. Our company is based in India, but we have offices in Malaysia, Singapore, and Bangladesh, and we have clients in India and outside of India. Most of them are enterprise-level.

Their technical support comes up with great solutions. Every time we call we definitely get a solution.

Positive

It is onboarding in the cloud. There are a lot of documents, but it is quite easy. I'm into training as well, and it is quite easy for me to train my interns on how to onboard accounts to Prisma Cloud. If we are only onboarding one account, it happens in minutes.

In terms of price, we have to see the value we are getting for the particular penny we are paying. In that context, Prisma Cloud is a value-back cloud-managed solution; cloud-native solutions are quite expensive. That's why a lot of our clients are shifting from cloud-native to Prisma Cloud: because of its effectiveness and because it is budget-friendly as well.

I love Prisma Cloud. It's a one-stop shop for managing cloud security. And it is very easy to use. The dashboard and all the UI are very easy.

Prisma protects our workloads and provides network security for our containers. Our infrastructure is mostly Azure-based and entirely on the cloud. We use the Prisma Compute and Prisma Network Security modules.

We have multiple security tools like Prisma, but not the same use cases. Prisma has its own unit use cases like image scanning, repository scanning, or container scanning. We have other tools as well, but they have different use cases.

We have about 15 users. Some are DevOps, infrastructure, and security engineers. There are also a few SOC analysts. I believe we'll expand usage in the coming years if everything goes well with other customers.

Before implementing Prisma Cloud, we didn't have any visibility into workspaces like Kubernetes and the underlying network of containers. Now, we have a better understanding of the resources interacting with Kubernetes and can identify vulnerabilities across the organization. In the past, we had limited information to take action on those resources, but now we can better understand the risks.

The solution has had a significant impact on our organization, especially our governance team. Once we get reports on non-compliant resources, we must take action before going live. We need to implement a risk-based approach to handle those non-compliant resources. Prisma offers a better understanding of whether the resources comply with regulations.

Prisma reduced runtime alerts by about 500 or something. We still get those because we're in the operational stage, but it's only a few. It has cut our average alert investigation times by about two days. Prisma probably saves us eight to ten hours total each week. 

I found the network queue sets useful. I also liked the Workload Protection Module, the vulnerability findings, and how the rule sets handle the vulnerabilities based on severity.

Prisma was easy to adopt in our CI/CD pipeline, but we only use it to scan the images for the last push in the CI. On the CD side, we use it for the assessment, like the pull and push. 

Prisma's notifications aren't up to industry standards. Also, Prisma is a bit harder to integrate than other tools. The deployment and onboarding are plug-and-play, but somewhat hard to handle in terms of integration with external operations tools. The product design isn't up to the current standard. I would recommend having higher standards in terms of integration with other tools, especially operationalized tools.

The product could better integrate business logs and runtime notifications from Enforcer and Network Security Module. I would recommend better visibility and integration for any violations.

I have been using Prisma for a year.

Prisma is stable.

We haven't used Prisma at scale. It hasn't grown since we deployed. We have four clusters but haven't added anything. We still keep the four clusters. We didn't add anything. In the coming months, we'll replicate this with other customers once we see that the solution is stable. 

Prisma's support was helpful. I rate them nine out of ten. 

Positive

We've never had another solution for this specific use case. This is the first. 

Some modules are straightforward to deploy, but others are a bit complex. End-to-end deployment of the modules and the whole network took approximately four months.

The Prisma team helped us in this deployment. The team helped us learn while implementing it. 

We've seen a return by reducing risks from cyberattacks and compliance issues. 

I recommend knowing the number of licenses you need for your operations and your expected workloads before signing a license agreement. There are no hidden costs as far as I know.

We looked at some solutions to improve security posture and risk management. Prisma was the product that had the capabilities we need in our price range.

I rate Prisma Cloud seven out of ten. Before you implement Prisma or any other solution, you need to ensure you have all the tools you need in place and know if it will fit into your current environment.