For any application that requires 100% uptime, 100% of data accessibility, I use these servers.
Within our organization, there are roughly 100 employees using this solution.
For any application that requires 100% uptime, 100% of data accessibility, I use these servers.
Within our organization, there are roughly 100 employees using this solution.
This solution could be more secure. Also, the CPU power could be increased.
I have been using this solution since the very beginning — about eight or nine years.
This solution is very stable. Much more so than similar products.
It's more of an availability solution than a scalable solution.
The initial setup is very easy. Installation takes no longer than one hour.
I installed this solution by myself.
We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance.
I would absolutely recommend this solution to others. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.
There is no other server equivalent to this one available on the market at the moment. Not HP, not IBM, and not Dell.
I am very pleased to say that I like Red Hat in many ways because of their innovations,working on new technology and improving day by day bringing it upto the expectations of customers with premium support available through out at all time. RHEV was launched as a web portal based access of virtual machines throughout the network which is used in organizations for different purposes with all virtualization features available today; earlier they were having problems with the product but now RHEV 3.2 is quite stable.
Very good information about how many logical and virtual CPU can be supported on different types of virtualization. However, could you please guide us where there are any significant better performances or bottlenecks when the number of CPUs are quite large.
Is there any limit on number of virtual machines on RHEV?