We have been using RHEV in both on-premises and cloud deployments for testing.
In my team, we don't have access to a paid version of Red Hat. Instead, we mostly use CentOS and Ubuntu.
For how long have you used this solution? - 1 year
Which features are most valuable? - Live migration
Can you give an example of how this solution has improved the way your organization functions? -We where able to reduce the amount of servers. This has reduced our costs significantly.
What areas of this solution have room for improvement? - The interface is sometimes not logical and previous versions where not so stable but luckily this has been mostly resolved.
Did you encounter any issues with deployment, stability or scalability? If so, please describe. - Stability and bugs in previous 2.x versions
Did you previously use a different solution and if so, why did you switch? - No this was our first virtual platform
Before choosing this solution, did you evaluate other options? If so, which ones? - The choice was clear for us; it had to be open-source with commercial support
How would you rate the level of customer service and technical support? - The support we got so far from redhat as customers was great. You would probably not get better elsewhere
Was the initial setup straightforward or complex? In what ways? - Straightforward. Yes there is a great guide online at redhat on how to install this
Did you implement it in-house or through a vendor team? If through a vendor, how would you rate their work? - We installed it in-house as we are reseller and integrator
What is your ROI on this solution? - There is no investment in this product. As a reseller we can use it to test for free we pay every year a fixed cost as partner.
What was your original setup cost for this solution and what is your day-to-day cost of using it? - Free for us
What advice would you give to others looking into this solution? - I would say give it a look if you are looking for a virutalization platform. Most of the things can be done with rhev and the cost is much lower then with other commercial solutions. Since version 3 this product is mature and since version 3.1 most glitches where removed.
Disclosure: The company I work for is partners with several vendors (including Red Hat) - http://www.open-future.be/solutions/partners
We have been using RHEV in both on-premises and cloud deployments for testing.
In my team, we don't have access to a paid version of Red Hat. Instead, we mostly use CentOS and Ubuntu.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the support portal.
Configuring the network interfaces is much better in Ubuntu and should be improved. I find this to be the biggest problem. In Ubunto they have the idea of the Netplan, which is much better than the facility in Red Hat.
I have been using RHEV for about five months.
I have seen some bugs that I fixed on my own.
We have not had to scale this solution because it is not for everyday use. Rather, we use it for testing purposes.
Technical support for RHEV is very fast and good.
We use different versions of Linux including CentOS and Ubuntu. CentOS is very comparable to Red Hat because it is almost the same, internally.
In the beginning, the initial setup was quite complex. However, once you get used to it, I would say that the setup is of normal difficulty and not a problem.
I implemented this solution with the assistance of my colleague.
We are using the free version of Red Hat.
RHEV is a good solution and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
The primary use case of this solution is for making DNS, website work, DHCP, and other security functions like ID tables and other tools.
The Administration of the Oracle database and the SAP ERP needs improvement.
In the next release. I would like to see some additional features to make it easier, such as improvements to the GUI and the maintenance. The maintenance of Red Hat is difficult.
Red Hat is the most stable system. It's better than other OS solutions.
At first, this solution was deployed on-premises, then I converted it to cloud using VMware tools to make our private cloud on our data center.
This is an open-source solution.
I have always recommended using other platforms versus Windows. I didn't like using any Windows system, Microsoft system or any system with heavy traffic like ERP and Websites.
I recommend Linux.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We are using Redhat hypervisor for large organization - 50K plus. It is best virtualization solution we have used so far.
The solution is a great all-round product. The virtualization is especially good.
The GUI interface needs improvement. Not 90%, but 50% or 60% of the work is done from the command line and so on, so the GUI needs work because people are looking for an easier way to manage the environment. Right now, if someone is not very familiar with Red Hat and actually is looking to add Red Hat to the environment, they have to take some training. It needs to be easier to use.
The solution could use network virtualization.
The stability is very good. We've had very good feedback on it.
The solution is very scalable.
The technical support is very good.
The initial setup can be a bit complex, but it depends on the deployment itself.
We are resellers of Red Hat. We deal with various deployment models, however, we generally deal with on-premises.
I would recommend the solution. Of course, it depends on what an organization is looking for in terms of virtualization.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We have been using RHEV in our production environment since 3.0 and have I to say that the product continues to evolve with each release. The current version is very stable and offers all of the features we require from a virtualisation infrastructure platform. I am especially impressed with the self provision user portal and the performance of Spice as a remote desktop protocol, although it would be nice to have better client end support (OSX, IOS etc).
One of the biggest lacking features is the ability to replicate virtual machine configurations to another RHEV environment for DR. Our development team addressed this by producing a python script which calls the REST API and replicates VM configuration allowing us to restore data into prebuilt VMs. www.quru.com/rvsr
Overall we are very happy with RHEV and have deployed a number of roll outs to our UK based clients. Looking forward to the next release.
Disclaimer: the company I work for is partners with several vendors including Red Hat
I like at RHEV the feature called Transparent Huge Pages, which allows Linux to dynamically create large memory pages for virtual machines and improve performance by reducing the number of times that memory is accessed. Another useful feature is a power user portal that allows users to provision VMs, define templates, administer and customize environments. RHEV 3.0 and the newer versions have scalability improvements. As far as I know, they support around 160 logical CPUs and 2 TB per host. You said that you are very happy with RHEV, I am also happy with it.
The Ovirt component has flexibility, and is easy to perform integration within a heterogenous data centre manager with OpenStack or ManageIQ.
It has the possibility to OEM and create a great product with Ovirt as the main component.
It needs a better administrator KB, similar to what Citrix XenDesktop has. Also, they don't know how to sell their great products and don’t really seems to be interested in taking care of their partners who trust and really know their products.
If you have a heterogenous data centre that is specially focused on Linux platforms, this is safe money, and good if you are looking for automation.
It also offers great integration with DevOps tools.
For any application that requires 100% uptime, 100% of data accessibility, I use these servers.
Within our organization, there are roughly 100 employees using this solution.
This solution could be more secure. Also, the CPU power could be increased.
I have been using this solution since the very beginning — about eight or nine years.
This solution is very stable. Much more so than similar products.
It's more of an availability solution than a scalable solution.
The initial setup is very easy. Installation takes no longer than one hour.
I installed this solution by myself.
We have to pay extra for vulnerability and fault tolerance.
I would absolutely recommend this solution to others. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.
There is no other server equivalent to this one available on the market at the moment. Not HP, not IBM, and not Dell.
Patrik, I do not think you are allowed to use NFR licenses for production.