RHEV Reviews

RHEV offers a range of pricing models, including a socket pair per-physical-machine licensing model. Many users find the solution affordable, noting it is significantly cheaper than competitors like VMware. Some view the costs, particularly for support and licensing, as reasonable and offering good value. However, there's feedback suggesting RHEV's pricing could be more competitive to attract enterprise clients, especially when compared to purely open-source alternatives. Scalable licensing options further enhance its appeal.

• "RHEV offers pricing based on a per-physical-machine licensing model."
• "It's a budget product as far as I'm concerned. It's way cheaper than any of its competitors. The only thing cheaper than Red Hat is that the people who take the Red Hat code clone it and then self-support it."
• "Price-wise, RHEV is okay, in my opinion."

RHEV is primarily utilized for hosting virtual machines, deploying operating systems, and supporting ERP systems. Businesses transition applications like SAP to a Linux environment and manage security tasks such as DNS and DHCP. Companies in sectors like petroleum and banking create privacy clouds and offer cloud solutions. RHEV supports high-volume computing, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and combines with VMware to virtualize environments and reduce physical servers.

Technical support for RHEV is frequently praised for being responsive and effective. Users in Malaysia report challenges with on-site assistance, relying on conference calls instead. Support experiences vary, ranging from excellent to average, with some describing it as slow. RHEV's subscription model ensures continuous updates. Organizations with in-house engineers seldom need assistance but appreciate the option to open tickets for specific issues. Services are customer-friendly but may involve international communication.

RHEV's initial setup varies in complexity, with some finding it straightforward, especially for basic use, while others consider it more complex, particularly when compared to VMware. Experienced users often find the deployment manageable, and proper documentation aids the process. Skilled personnel can efficiently maintain it, and the setup may take as little as an hour or extend to a week based on specific requirements and configurations.

RHEV shows strong scalability, easily handling existing loads. Organizations manage it efficiently with small teams, supporting hundreds of users. Some encounter difficulties related to specific databases or applications, while third-party add-ons enhance scalability. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization parallels competitors in planning and management, allowing for expansion through clustering. Users rate its scalability highly, facilitating growth without noticeable limitations.

RHEV is generally stable, providing reliable performance without frequent crashes or glitches. User experiences indicate high stability ratings, with some drawing favorable comparisons to other OS solutions like VMware. A few users note annoyances with the upgrade cycle or encounter occasional bugs, which they proactively address. Red Hat Virtualization's stability is praised, with some users highlighting its versatility and reliability under operation, while others mention complex recovery if issues arise. Stability ratings typically range from eight to nine out of ten.