Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Salesforce Einstein Analytics based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, and IBM Cognos.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Salesforce Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Salesforce, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Microsoft Power BI excels with easy third-party integration, cost-effectiveness, and diverse data source connectivity. In comparison, Salesforce Einstein Analytics offers advanced AI-driven analytics within the Salesforce ecosystem. Both have distinct strengths, catering to different organizational needs and preferences.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics offers robust CRM integration and advanced data visualization. In comparison, Amazon QuickSight provides cost-effective integration within the AWS ecosystem. Salesforce excels in predictive analysis, whereas QuickSight is valued for rapid visualization and connectivity with Amazon services.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics may involve higher initial setup costs compared to Amazon QuickSight, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it suitable for businesses seeking to minimize upfront investment.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics may involve higher initial setup costs compared to Amazon QuickSight, which offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it suitable for businesses seeking to minimize upfront investment.
IBM Cognos offers robust reporting and data modeling, catering to organizations needing comprehensive analytics capabilities. In comparison, Salesforce Einstein Analytics provides seamless AI-driven insights, aligning well with the Salesforce ecosystem for CRM-focused analytics, ideal for businesses prioritizing integration and cloud-based analytical solutions.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics excels in predictive analysis and ease of use, offering interactive dashboards with minimal technical skills needed. In comparison, SAP Analytics Cloud integrates AI with business intelligence for seamless analytics in SAP environments, excelling in comprehensive business planning and user-friendly visualization.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics tends to have a higher setup cost compared to SAP Analytics Cloud, which offers a more economical initial setup. The difference in pricing highlights distinct cost structures between the two analytics solutions.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics tends to have a higher setup cost compared to SAP Analytics Cloud, which offers a more economical initial setup. The difference in pricing highlights distinct cost structures between the two analytics solutions.
Oracle OBIEE offers enterprise-grade scalability and security with customizable options, while Salesforce Einstein Analytics provides customer-centric, AI-powered insights tailored for Salesforce integration. In comparison, OBIEE faces user-friendliness challenges, and Salesforce's ecosystem dependency may limit broader data source integration.
Domo excels with extensive data connectors and rapid dashboard creation for large-scale rollouts. In comparison, Salesforce Einstein Analytics offers advanced predictive analytics and AI capabilities. Domo focuses on data democratization, while Salesforce's strength lies in comprehensive CRM integration for enhanced sales insights.
Domo offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Salesforce Einstein Analytics involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment.
Domo offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Salesforce Einstein Analytics involves a more complex and potentially higher initial investment.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics emphasizes ease of use with AI integration, making it ideal for seamless integration. In comparison, Oracle Analytics Cloud focuses on comprehensive analytics with stable, large-scale data handling, attracting those seeking cost-effectiveness and powerful visualization capabilities.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics incurs a significant setup cost, while Oracle Analytics Cloud offers a lower initial expenditure, providing an affordable entry point for users.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics incurs a significant setup cost, while Oracle Analytics Cloud offers a lower initial expenditure, providing an affordable entry point for users.
Zoho Analytics provides ease of use with SQL functions and integration with other Zoho products. In comparison, Salesforce Einstein Analytics offers advanced AI-driven insights and scalability, appealing to those within the Salesforce ecosystem, despite higher costs.
Zoho Analytics offers a straightforward setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious businesses, while Salesforce Einstein Analytics has a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive enterprise-level features and capabilities.
Zoho Analytics offers a straightforward setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious businesses, while Salesforce Einstein Analytics has a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its extensive enterprise-level features and capabilities.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics appeals to CRM-focused businesses with its AI-driven insights and seamless integration. In comparison, SAP Analytics Hub attracts enterprises with its centralized access to diverse analytics tools. Cost-conscious tech buyers may prefer SAP, while those prioritizing sophisticated CRM analytics might choose Salesforce.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics incurs higher setup costs, focusing on comprehensive features, while SAP Analytics Hub offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to those seeking budget-friendly options.
Salesforce Einstein Analytics incurs higher setup costs, focusing on comprehensive features, while SAP Analytics Hub offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to those seeking budget-friendly options.
