Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SUSE Manager Logo

Top 10 SUSE Manager Alternatives

Vendor: SUSE
4.5 out of 5
Post review

Top SUSE Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SUSE Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and BigFix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SUSE Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SUSE, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SUSE Manager Logo
SUSE Manager Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in Windows integration for seamless enterprise operations, offering reliability and expert support. In comparison, SUSE Manager provides flexibility with strong Linux support and open-source resources, appealing to those prioritizing customization and multi-platform capabilities. Pricing reflects integration ease versus versatile functionality.
Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. SUSE Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager involves a higher setup cost, offering extensive system management capabilities, whereas SUSE Manager provides a more cost-effective setup, delivering efficient Linux server management.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager involves a higher setup cost, offering extensive system management capabilities, whereas SUSE Manager provides a more cost-effective setup, delivering efficient Linux server management.
SUSE Manager Logo
SUSE Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valued for its intuitive command structure and scalability. In comparison, SUSE Manager excels in lifecycle management and integration with SUSE Linux environments. Tech buyers might choose Ansible for ease of use or SUSE Manager for comprehensive lifecycle management features.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. SUSE Manager Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has higher initial setup costs, while SUSE Manager is more cost-effective in this regard. Ansible Automation Platform's price includes advanced features, whereas SUSE Manager offers essential automation at a lower setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has higher initial setup costs, while SUSE Manager is more cost-effective in this regard. Ansible Automation Platform's price includes advanced features, whereas SUSE Manager offers essential automation at a lower setup cost.
SUSE Manager Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
SUSE Manager Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in pricing and support, featuring powerful automation and extensive endpoint management. In comparison, SUSE Manager is superior in scalability and flexibility, with integrated tools for administrative efficiency. BigFix offers easier deployment with quicker setup, while SUSE Manager provides better long-term ROI.
Download BigFix vs. SUSE Manager Report
BigFix typically has a lower initial setup cost, while SUSE Manager often requires a higher investment to get started. The significant difference in setup costs between BigFix and SUSE Manager is a crucial factor to consider.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix typically has a lower initial setup cost, while SUSE Manager often requires a higher investment to get started. The significant difference in setup costs between BigFix and SUSE Manager is a crucial factor to consider.
SUSE Manager Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
SUSE Manager Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Satellite attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, efficient resource management, and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, SUSE Manager appeals with its integration capabilities and versatile features for managing both Linux and Unix systems, despite its potentially higher costs and occasional deployment complexities.

Download Red Hat Satellite vs. SUSE Manager Report
Red Hat Satellite typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to SUSE Manager, but it offers more advanced features. SUSE Manager has a lower entry price with straightforward setup, making it a cost-effective choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Satellite typically incurs a higher setup cost compared to SUSE Manager, but it offers more advanced features. SUSE Manager has a lower entry price with straightforward setup, making it a cost-effective choice.
SUSE Manager Logo
SUSE Manager Logo
AWS Systems Manager
4.0 out of 5
SUSE Manager excels in cost-effectiveness and support, with strong Linux management. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager offers advanced features and flexibility, making it superior for diverse environments. Tech buyers might choose SUSE Manager for its Linux-specific efficiency and AWS Systems Manager for extensive cross-platform capabilities and integrations.
Download AWS Systems Manager vs. SUSE Manager Report
SUSE Manager has higher setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager is more budget-friendly. AWS Systems Manager appeals to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
SUSE Manager has higher setup costs, while AWS Systems Manager is more budget-friendly. AWS Systems Manager appeals to cost-conscious users.
SUSE Manager Logo
SUSE Manager Logo
HashiCorp Terraform
4.2 out of 5
HashiCorp Terraform offers efficient provisioning and extensibility, making it ideal for automation-focused tasks. In comparison, SUSE Manager excels in lifecycle management and patching capabilities. HashiCorp Terraform's lower setup costs and quicker ROI appeal to budget-conscious buyers, whereas SUSE Manager's comprehensive feature set justifies its higher initial costs.
Download HashiCorp Terraform vs. SUSE Manager Report
HashiCorp Terraform has minimal setup costs, while SUSE Manager offers a more involved and costly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
HashiCorp Terraform has minimal setup costs, while SUSE Manager offers a more involved and costly initial setup.

Related categories

Configuration Management
Server Monitoring
Patch Management