Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Telerik Test Studio Logo

Telerik Test Studio pros and cons

4.0 out of 5
556 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution.
Performance and load testing are very good.
Helps manual testers like the reviewer transition easily into automation.
Record and play feature is easy to use.
Element identification method is efficient.

CONS

Charts need to be more detailed and customizable.
Improvement is needed in allowing multiple file types to be selected simultaneously.
There are compatibility issues with the load standpoint test.
Excel and Word validation is challenging.
Minor difficulties in fetching elements in some scenarios using C#.
 

Telerik Test Studio Pros review quotes

KD
Dec 29, 2022
Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me.
Raghvendra Jyothi - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 17, 2022
The performance and load testing are very good.
Chirag N M - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 30, 2023
The way it identifies elements is good.
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, SeleniumHQ, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CK
Jul 25, 2022
Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution.
SR
Nov 28, 2019
The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface.
 

Telerik Test Studio Cons review quotes

KD
Dec 29, 2022
I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding.
Raghvendra Jyothi - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 17, 2022
There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test.
Chirag N M - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 30, 2023
Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy.
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, SeleniumHQ, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CK
Jul 25, 2022
It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously.
SR
Nov 28, 2019
The charts need to be more detailed and customizable.