OpenText UFT One vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

OpenText and Progress Software are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Progress Software is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 9.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Progress Software’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT One

Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,393 Views
4,616 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

1,052 Views
689 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Telerik Test Studio are competing products in the automated testing tools category. Data comparisons suggest OpenText UFT One has the upper hand due to its robust integration capabilities and broader testing scope.

Features:OpenText UFT One provides advanced integration capabilities, extensive test automation for mobile, web, and enterprise applications, and supports a wide range of technologies and protocols. Telerik Test Studio is known for agile automation testing, robust debugging features, and offers coded steps for complex scenarios along with an intuitive recording mechanism.

Room for Improvement:OpenText UFT One could benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving its user interface for beginners, and enhancing performance for complex test scenarios. Telerik Test Studio would improve by expanding its testing scope, providing better integration options, and offering more advanced reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText UFT One involves a more complex setup but includes comprehensive support through extensive documentation and support channels. Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward deployment process, focusing on rapid implementation with accessible support services.

Pricing and ROI:OpenText UFT One requires a higher initial investment, justifiable by its expansive test coverage and integration benefits suitable for large enterprises. Telerik Test Studio, offers competitive pricing with faster ROI, appealing to agile teams due to its efficient setup and robust capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.8%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."

"It is easy to automate and new personnel can start learning automation using UFT One. You don't have to learn any scripting."

"The scalability of Micro Focus UFT One is good."

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."

"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."

More OpenText UFT One pros

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

Cons

"You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out."

"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."

"The solution needs better marketing, training, promotion, and visibility because it is not visible."

"One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all."

"One area for improvement is its occasional slowness."

"Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory. On this note, if you are running UFT on a virtual server I would add more RAM memory than the minimum requirements especially when using multiple add-ins. HP is pretty good about coming out with new patches to fix known issues and it pays for the user to check for new patches and updates on a regular basis."

"Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected."

"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

More OpenText UFT One cons

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"There are no additional costs involved apart from the standard license."

"The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 35% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 5% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

February 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio

January 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT One vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.