Trellix MOVE AntiVirus Reviews

We use the solution to prevent viruses and threats.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus blocks ports and applications that we need to use.

I have been using the product for ten years.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is not stable since it blocks applications.

The product is scalable. My company has 1000 users.

I haven't contacted the technical support team yet.

The tool's deployment is easy and can be completed in a few minutes. You can install it by accessing the setup file.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus' licensing costs are yearly.

I rate the solution a six out of ten. I don't recommend it.

The solution protects from threats.

The product is reliable and easy to use. It is user-friendly.

The solution must provide better pricing.

I have been using the solution for three years.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The tool is scalable. We have 15 users in our organization.

The setup is very easy. The deployment did not take a long time.

The implementation was done through a third-party vendor.

The tool is secure and reliable.

We have a yearly subscription. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

McAfee MOVE's most valuable features are DLP, hardware control, and content filtering. 

I would like to see MOVE include zero-trust functionality. 

I haven't faced any issues with McAfee's scalability. 

I rate McAfee support four out of 10. 

Neutral

Setting up McAfee is complex, and it took us seven or eight months to fully deploy it. 

We pay annually. 

I rate McAfee MOVE six out of 10. 

We are using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for protection against computer threats.

The overall features are very good, it can detect viruses even in a document when you're trying to open them. Additionally, it is very easy to use and has regular updates.

I have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for approximately 15 years.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus has been scalable.

The technical support is good.

On a personal computer system, the solution is easy to install. You go to the company's URL and buy a license for the solution, download and install it, and put in the license.

I can implement the solution myself.

There is a license needed to use this solution and the price is very good. However, the price could be less expensive.

Comparing McAfee MOVE AntiVirus to other solutions on the market, it is very good.

I rate McAfee MOVE AntiVirus a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case of this solution—we've got what they call McAfee ePO—is for a centralized system that we use to manage all the other endpoints from the central point. It's for endpoint protection, but there are some other options that you can use, such as Web Control, Firewall, etc. This solution is deployed on-premise. 

One of the most valuable features is the performance. It's very stable. 

The installation process could be improved. It's a bit difficult, but once you get it right, it's fine. 

I have been using McAfee for the past 10 years. 

This solution is very stable. We have a team of three admins for maintenance. 

This solution is scalable. There are approximately 250 users in my organization who are using McAfee. 

The installation is a bit difficult, but once you get it right, it's fine. Installation took about three to four days and we had a team of three admins. 

We implemented through an in-house team, with outside support. 

There is a yearly subscription cost for this solution. 

We also looked at ESET and Sophos, but settled on McAfee. When we visited other sites that were using McAfee, we were quite impressed. 

I rate McAfee a nine out of ten. I can definitely recommend this solution to others considering implementation. 

I use it for protection, antivirus, anti-phishing, and support.

I like real-time mobile protection. It's quite easy to use and efficient.

It's a good protection. I use it personally, so for this kind of first level of protection, it's okay. For the usage that I have. It's okay.

I would consider additional measures if I needed a higher level of protection, such as implementing more firewalls and other security measures.

But this kind of first level of protection, it's okay.

However, there is room for improvement in terms of stability. 

I have been using this product for four years.

It's stable. I would rate the stability an eight out of ten because there is always room to improve.

It is a scalable solution. I use it personally. 

I used Kaspersky, and I was not happy with the solution.

The initial setup was very easy. It was easy and quite quick.

It's a very standard installation. Nothing specific.

It's like insurance, so you don't have any benefits until the moment that you need it. This is the security.

The license fees are reasonable. It is a yearly licensing fee. 

There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees.

If somebody is not very professional in security and just wants to have a good solution to protect his environment, it's a good one.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for security purposes. 

The solution has been stable. 

It has a good UI. I don't see any great gaps in that for my use cases.

This was straightforward to set up. 

We'd like the price point to be more attractive to potential users. If I was offered a stripped-down version of it at a more reasonable price, I would be happier. 

We've used the solution for the last year. We used it for a couple of months and are now moving away from it. 

It is a very stable, very reliable solution. There are no bugs or glitches to discuss. 

I've only tried it as a POC. We did not try to scale the product. I'm not sure how it would fare in terms of scaling. 

I'm not sure how many people are using the solution in our organization. 

As an organization, we are actually looking at Sophos now.

The solution is pretty straightforward. It's easy to implement. We did not find it to be overly complex. I'd rate it a four and a half out of five in terms of ease of implementation. It offers good documentation, which simplifies things. 

The price point could be a bit better. 

We've only really used this solution in a POC capacity, and therefore I don't have much advice to instill to other potential users. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for security and protection from viruses.

How it’s improved organization:

We haven’t had any problems with McAfee yet. It’s worked smoothly.

The product is easy to implement.

It is a stable, reliable solution with good performance.

The solution is reasonably priced.

It’s great at protecting users and won’t let any external devices come through. They can’t copy anything from the server.

Right now, nothing is missing from the solution. We are happy with it.

We've been using McAfee for as long as I've been with the company. That’s over three years since we've been using McAfee for our business plan.

The stability is good. We haven’t had issues. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable.

It is a scalable product. It's on the server, and the other workstations are connected to that. The product itself will derive it from the server. It's protecting everything from the server, including all the other desktops.

We have about six users not eh solution currently. We do have plans to increase usage in the future.

We have in-house support with McAfee. That said, we haven’t had any problems. Once we installed it, then we had our typical IT department look at it. Everything is running well.

It's a straightforward setup. It's not complex.

It’s very fast to deploy. You can do it in three to five minutes. It’s very fast to set it up.

The solution is done in-house. It’s so easy. We didn’t need any outside assistance from a consultant or integrator.

We have a license directly with McAfee that we need to renew from time to time.

It isn’t overly expensive.

We use the standard version of the solution.

I’d recommend the solution to others. We’ve used it for a long time and are happy with it overall.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten.