Trellix MOVE AntiVirus Reviews

I primarily use the solution in order to protect my office. If there is any site that is unsafe, I get a message pop up to warn me.

I like that it immediately blocks unsafe sites. It also communicates that I am safe. 

It does good scanning to ensure I do not have any viruses. 

The solution is scalable.

It is stable and reliable.

The solution offers good value for money.

I'm not sure what can be better on the solution. I only use it for my office and am not missing any features. 

The solution could always be cheaper.

I've used the solution since 2014. It's been about nine years or so. I've used it for a while. 

The solution is very stable. I'd rate it nine out of ten in terms of reliability. 

The scalability is easy enough if you want to set up new employees. It's easy to download and add more licenses. I'd rate it nine out of ten in terms of ease of scaling. 

We have everyone on the solution right now. 

We do not have plans to increase usage. 

I've never used technical support. 

I have not used other antivirus solutions. 

The initial setup was done by my IT team. They did it remotely. My understanding is that it is easy and it doesn't take too long. 

I'm not sure how many technical staff are used to maintain the solution. 

The solution offers very good value for money. Of course, it would be cheaper; however, we are happy with its capabilities. 

There is a license that needs to be purchased. It's pretty inexpensive. I'm not sure how long the license extends until. It might be set up as a yearly subscription. 

I'm not sure of which version I'm using. 

I'm happy with the solution overall.

I would recommend the solution to others.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We are using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for protection against computer threats.

The overall features are very good, it can detect viruses even in a document when you're trying to open them. Additionally, it is very easy to use and has regular updates.

I have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for approximately 15 years.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus has been scalable.

The technical support is good.

On a personal computer system, the solution is easy to install. You go to the company's URL and buy a license for the solution, download and install it, and put in the license.

I can implement the solution myself.

There is a license needed to use this solution and the price is very good. However, the price could be less expensive.

Comparing McAfee MOVE AntiVirus to other solutions on the market, it is very good.

I rate McAfee MOVE AntiVirus a nine out of ten.

McAfee MOVE's most valuable features are DLP, hardware control, and content filtering. 

I would like to see MOVE include zero-trust functionality. 

I haven't faced any issues with McAfee's scalability. 

I rate McAfee support four out of 10. 

Neutral

Setting up McAfee is complex, and it took us seven or eight months to fully deploy it. 

We pay annually. 

I rate McAfee MOVE six out of 10. 

We use McAfee MOVE AntiVirus 

The most valuable feature of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is the central management console. I can control everything from one place.

SentinelOne provides a cloud solution that McAfee MOVE AntiVirus should as well. When all other vendors come out with new features they are implemented by all the other vendors within a few months. However, this is not the case with McAfee MOVE AntiVirus. They should update their features more often to be more competitive with the market.

I have used McAfee MOVE AntiVirus within the last 12 months.

I rate the stability of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus a six out of ten.

The solution is scalable.

I rate the scalability of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus an eight out of ten.

If we are stuck with something with our customers we contact the support from McAfee MOVE AntiVirus.

The setup of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is complex. The time it takes for the deployment depends on the features deployed. If it is only the antivirus it doe snot take a lot of time.

We have a team we use for the implementation of the solution.

The subscription for the solution is annually or every three years.

I rate the price of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus a six out of ten.

We use three people for the maintenance of the solution.

I rate McAfee MOVE AntiVirus a six out of ten.

We primarily use this solution to prevent virus attacks from outside of the organization.

The most valuable feature is the security, which is very effective compared to other products.

The resource utilization is very low, not consuming the same level of resources as Symantec.

The dashboard should be improved, as a more user-friendly version is required.

We have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for five years.

This is a stable solution and it is being used 24/7.

We did not face any issues when we built up our infrastructure and increased our workload, so it is scalable. We have approximately 500 servers that it is deployed on.

When you first contact technical support, they simply show you articles. It is only after it is escalated that a person joins the call.

Prior to McAfee, I had used a similar solution from Symantec. I found that it was much more resource-intensive, although it was more user-friendly.

The complexity of the setup depends on the environment. We have multiple installations and in some cases, it is simple, whereas in others it is complicated. It took us between two and three months to deploy.

We had a third-party to assist with the deployment.

We have two or three people in our company who handle maintenance.

The licensing fees are billed on an annual basis.

We trust McAfee and as such, we did not evaluate other options.

My advice to anybody who is researching this solution is that it is very good for a virtual environment. I have not found any bugs, it is scalable, and overall a very good product. My only complaint is about the user interface.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I use the solution for my personal needs. It helps me monitor threats and viruses.

Whenever I scan my device, the product detects threats and viruses.

The solution is fast. It protects my computer. I like the dashboards. It helps in monitoring systems. The solution would be helpful to any organization. It is very user-friendly.

The product must use AI to detect and block unwanted viruses automatically. Such a feature will be very useful.

I have been using the solution for one year.

The tool is stable.

The installation was quite easy and simple. The deployment can be done in-house.

I like to use endpoint security products like SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender.

I will recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

The tool offers protection from viruses for devices and endpoints. 

The tool's stability could be better. 

I have been working with the solution for two years. 

I would rate the tool's stability a six out of ten. We experience certain issues with the solution. However, the tool is manageable. 

My company has 200 users for the solution. 

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for security purposes. 

The solution has been stable. 

It has a good UI. I don't see any great gaps in that for my use cases.

This was straightforward to set up. 

We'd like the price point to be more attractive to potential users. If I was offered a stripped-down version of it at a more reasonable price, I would be happier. 

We've used the solution for the last year. We used it for a couple of months and are now moving away from it. 

It is a very stable, very reliable solution. There are no bugs or glitches to discuss. 

I've only tried it as a POC. We did not try to scale the product. I'm not sure how it would fare in terms of scaling. 

I'm not sure how many people are using the solution in our organization. 

As an organization, we are actually looking at Sophos now.

The solution is pretty straightforward. It's easy to implement. We did not find it to be overly complex. I'd rate it a four and a half out of five in terms of ease of implementation. It offers good documentation, which simplifies things. 

The price point could be a bit better. 

We've only really used this solution in a POC capacity, and therefore I don't have much advice to instill to other potential users. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.