Trellix MOVE AntiVirus Reviews

It is useful in detecting any issues on the internet, and security issues.

I like that it keeps my systems secure.

It's a good product.

It uses a lot of your bandwidth and your memory.

It makes your system slow.

I have been using this solution for approximately nine years.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

It's a scalable solution. In my previous organization, they used it with 50,000 to 100,000 users.

I have never required the support. I don't think that there is support for personal use. If you go the endpoint protection in the enterprise, they definitely require support. This is something that the IT team does.

I am sure that McAfee has a good support team.

The installation was straightforward.

It should be deployed in half an hour, depending on how long it takes to download in your network.

I completed the installation myself.

There is no monthly fee. You just purchase the tool.

I would recommend this product to other users. 

I plan to continue using this solution for my personal use.

I would rate McAfee a nine out of ten.

We use the latest version.

The solution is useful for protection of one's personal and business information. 

As a general rule, I find many of the antivirus solutions to be intrusive when running. They consume a sizable amount of memory resources while they are loading. When it comes to working on one's laptop or desktop, many of these processes, initially, run when a machine boots up - something which prevents a person from accessing his mail or quickly accessing his work. It would be very helpful if a significant reduction in overhead could be brought about. Other than this, I would rate them as fairly good from a protection standpoint. 

I have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for at least the last ten years, although I believe I have been using it for much longer. 

The solution is stable, which is why I have been using it for at least ten years, if not much longer. 

The technical support comes without charge. As a general rule, when it comes to companies, IT divisions provide support for the teams. They handle this on their own and tend to get patches from the support teams. When it comes to personal use, I feel they have fairly good updates. There are automated updates. 

The installation is fairly good and straightforward. 

Our subscription is yearly. 

I would recommend the solution to others. 

I rate McAfee MOVE Antivirus as an eight out of ten. 

I have been using this solution for six months. We use the private on-prem deployment model. Our primary use case is for clients who have big environments. For VDIs it's a nightmare to install security software to all of the VMs. It's a bottleneck for resource consumption and highers the data consumption costs. For example, let's say we have 1,000 VMs and we want to scan all of them with an agent-based solution, it eats up a lot of resources. A company offers agentless solutions, they prepare a VM and they scan the VMs without installing an agent. That VM will take care of the scan. McAfee MOVE minimizes a lot of the overhead. 

Sophos only provides signature-based scanning, a basic antivirus. It is not enough for an advanced attack or advanced threat. It's weak. McAfee can integrate with the existing fabric. I really like this aspect. It enables all of the security parts to talk to each other. McAfee synchronizes security across the security fabric. They cross communicate. This is one aspect that is a huge gap with other security products. McAfee minimizes the threats.

They could try to introduce advanced threat detection. This could be a huge improvement because some customers don't want to buy the entire McAfee product. It should product from unknown threats as well. 

I would like to ability to mitigate advanced threats. It should be a bit stronger. 

It's fairly stable. It's used a lot. 

It's pretty scalable. It has a module architecture. 

Their technical support is generally responsive and has good resolutions for issues. They respond quickly. 

I am very familiar with Sophos.

The initial setup complexity will depend on your deployment model. There is an agent-based or a non-agent based deployment with integrates with VMware NSX. 

The deployment can take around an hour and configuring it also doesn't take much time. Any agent-based solution can take some time. The non-agent based one will only take a few hours. It really varies on the environment. 

Take a look at the other McAfee products. It integrates with other products and vendors which is unique to other vendors. No vendor is perfect in security and no vendor can provide a solution to all security problems. Having this ability is revolutionary. It enables you to combine the best of each vendor. McAfee is the way to go for threat intelligence. 

I would rate McAfee MOVE an eight out of ten. 

We are partners with McAfee and I'm a senior solution architect. 

McAfee not only provides the antivirus, but they provide an EDR kind of solution which makes it possible for there to be zero attacks. That scenario certainly helps customers - everything can be combined in a single pane of glass from the endpoint and the server infrastructure security perspective. I like that the solution consumes less of what it stores on endpoints. When it's performing a full-system scan, it consumes less CPU and memory resources, so a user can continue working and not be aware the scanning is occurring. It also supports the real-time memory scan, protecting the user from the real-time product and from any kind of EXE file or monitoring activity. I think the endpoint protection is a very nice feature of this product. McAfee has a more simplified approach to providing security for endpoints.

This solution requires you to deploy multiple agents for multiple jobs which is unfortunate. There is the antivirus, there is a DLP client, there is a media client. I'd like to see all of these combined into a single agent that does everything without consuming significant resources. That would be a great innovation from the endpoint security point of view. Rather than having different tools, the DLP DR should be integrated and simplified into one single security solution. 

I've been using this solution for a couple of months. 

This is a stable solution. 

The solution is scalable. In general, it requires admin resources and user resources. 

The initial setup requires a certain skill set because anyone wanting to deploy such a tool needs to be aware of the best practices in terms of how the security should be designed, areas such as data configuration and product configuration. A simple antivirus installation should only take a couple of minutes but when it comes to the enterprise grade or installation on a server, it takes time because a lot of planning is required. The planning takes time, not the installation.

There is a one-year or three-year licensing option. 

I rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus I used for Antivirus and DLP.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus could improve by making it more secure.

I have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for approximately six years.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is stable.

I have found the McAfee MOVE AntiVirus scalable.

I did not have a problem with the support I received from McAfee MOVE AntiVirus.

I was not using any other antivirus solution prior to McAfee MOVE AntiVirus.

The initial setup of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is not a problem.

The license for McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is based on the number of users.

I rate McAfee MOVE AntiVirus an eight out of ten.

We use McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for endpoint protection.

I have found the most valuable feature of McAfee MOVE AntiVirus to be the ease of use.

I have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for approximately three years.

The performance of the solution has been good.

We have approximately 3,000 users using this solution in my organization.

The installation is simple and took approximately one day.

I am able to do the implementation of the solution. We have five people that can support the solution.

We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price of the solution could be lower.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate McAfee MOVE AntiVirus a seven out of ten.

We mainly use McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for server protection.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is easy to use.

The security of the solution could improve.

I have been using McAfee MOVE AntiVirus for approximately seven years.

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is stable.

I have found McAfee MOVE AntiVirus to be scalable.

We have approximately 10,000 people in my organization. 

McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is easy to deploy and is straightforward.

In our organization, McAfee MOVE AntiVirus is deployed by the infrastructure team, it is easy to employ.

There is a license required to use this solution and my organization has purchased the license.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate McAfee MOVE AntiVirus an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for applications and mobile. 

Overall, we've been satisfied with its performance. 

The solution has been quite stable. 

Technical support is okay.

The initial setup was a positive experience. 

The solution could always be more secure. Whatever they can do to protect their users in the future, they should do. 

I've used the solution for two years at this point. I've used it for a while. 

The solution has been very stable and the performance has been good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We have more than 1,000 people who use the solution right now in our organization.

I've contacted technical support in the past and have had a relatively good experience. I have no complaints in relation to their service. They are okay. 

While I don't have too many details about the initial setup, the experience we had during the process was excellent. 

We have ten members in our technical team that can handle deployment and maintenance. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're currently using. It's likely the latest.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very pleased with how it has worked for us so far. 

I'm not sure if I would recommend the solution to other users. It's not for me to say.